*** OFFICIAL *** COVID-19 CoronaVirus Thread. Fresh epidemic fears as child pneumonia cases surge in Europe after China outbreak. NOW in USA (16 Viewers)

[The Commish]

If you want to see my point in real time, do a distinct select on "lot number"....tell me what you get back.

 

[LawFitz]

I have no idea why my post was deleted. It was 100% factual. VAERS does NOT record lot numbers. That information is NOT readily available. It's a fable a by Johnson who doesn't know what the hell he is talking about.

The bolded is 100% false. Capitalize the word not all you want; you are still wrong.

From a couple randomly selected VAERS reports -

VAX DATE: 12-15-2020| ONSET DATE: 12-15-2020| DAYS TO ONSET: 0

NAME	DOSE #	TYPE	MANUFACTURER	LOT	ROUTE	SITE
COVID19 (COVID19 (PFIZER-BIONTECH))	1	COVID19	PFIZER\BIONTECH	EH 9899	SYR	LA

​

VAX DATE: 12-15-2020| ONSET DATE: 12-15-2020| DAYS TO ONSET: 0

NAME	DOSE #	TYPE	MANUFACTURER	LOT	ROUTE	SITE
COVID19 (COVID19 (PFIZER-BIONTECH))	1	COVID19	PFIZER\BIONTECH	EH9899	IM	LA

VAERS doesn't put this stuff in.....random people do. My statement is 100% true....I mean even VAERS system gives this rather long disclaimer. It's all dependent on the person entering. Always has been. There's a reason the first "verification" process they went through in 2020-21 was such a bust to all the arguments made then. Same reason exists today.

VAERS accepts reports of adverse events and reactions that occur following vaccination. Healthcare providers, vaccine manufacturers, and the public can submit reports to VAERS. While very important in monitoring vaccine safety, VAERS reports alone cannot be used to determine if a vaccine caused or contributed to an adverse event or illness. The reports may contain information that is incomplete, inaccurate, coincidental, or unverifiable. Most reports to VAERS are voluntary, which means they are subject to biases. This creates specific limitations on how the data can be used scientifically. Data from VAERS reports should always be interpreted with these limitations in mind.

The strengths of VAERS are that it is national in scope and can quickly provide an early warning of a safety problem with a vaccine. As part of CDC and FDA's multi-system approach to post-licensure vaccine safety monitoring, VAERS is designed to rapidly detect unusual or unexpected patterns of adverse events, also known as "safety signals." If a safety signal is found in VAERS, further studies can be done in safety systems such as the CDC's Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) or the Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment (CISA) project. These systems do not have the same limitations as VAERS, and can better assess health risks and possible connections between adverse events and a vaccine.

Key considerations and limitations of VAERS data:

• Vaccine providers are encouraged to report any clinically significant health problem following vaccination to VAERS, whether or not they believe the vaccine was the cause.
• Reports may include incomplete, inaccurate, coincidental and unverified information.
• The number of reports alone cannot be interpreted or used to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, frequency, or rates of problems associated with vaccines.
• VAERS data are limited to vaccine adverse event reports received between 1990 and the most recent date for which data are available.
• VAERS data do not represent all known safety information for a vaccine and should be interpreted in the context of other scientific information.

Some items may have more than 1 occurrence in any single event report, such as Symptoms, Vaccine Products, Manufacturers, and Event Categories. If data are grouped by any of these items, then the number in the Events Reported column may exceed the total number of unique events. If percentages are shown, then the associated percentage of total unique event reports will exceed 100% in such cases. For example, the number of Symptoms mentioned is likely to exceed the number of events reported, because many reports include more than 1 Symptom. When more than 1 Symptom occurs in a single report, then the percentage of Symptoms to unique events is more than 100%. More information.


Data contains VAERS reports processed as of 01/13/2023. The VAERS data in WONDER are updated weekly, yet the VAERS system receives continuous updates including revisions and new reports for preceding time periods. Duplicate event reports and/or reports determined to be false are removed from VAERS. More information.


About COVID19 vaccines:

• For more information on how many persons have been vaccinated in the US for COVID19 to date, see https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#vaccinations/.
• One report may state that the patient received more than one brand of COVID-19 vaccine on the same visit. This is a reporting error, but explains why the total number of reports may not equal the total number of COVID-19 vaccine doses.

Cool. Keep discounting VAERS completely. At your own peril. I'll continue to monitor it for the safety signals it was originally and always intended to provide.

And spin it all you want but the fact is your uber aggressive earlier assertions that VAERS doesn't log lot numbers was flat out FALSE. In caps for your pleasure. Have a nice weekend.

 

[fatness]

VAERS doesn't put this stuff in.....random people do.

And anyone who cares at all about accuracy knows that. Those that depend on making people misunderstand VAERS, however, are very invested in using ti to "prove" the latest crap they read on YouTube.

 

[The Commish]

VAERS doesn't put this stuff in.....random people do.

And anyone who cares at all about accuracy knows that. Those that depend on making people misunderstand VAERS, however, are very invested in using ti to "prove" the latest crap they read on YouTube.

There are hundreds of thousands of lot numbers at this point. That some are listed in VAERS means one thing....that those random people put that random piece of information into the system (It's not a required field). It's just like all the other information in the system...unverified until researched. Johnson's way out over his skis and so is anyone using the system as any sort of "proof" of anything. Until the cases are validated and verified, it's meaningless data in a database. That's what VAERS has always been...even they acknowledge it in the lengthy disclaimer they give on EVERY single query a person makes on the system. And it's already been proven real time with COVID already. I guess people forget that the first rounds of verifications/validations left us with a big nothingburger.

Sadly, we live in a world where people are going to listen to Elon Musk and his anecdotes over mounds and mounds of data and research.

 

[belljr]

We're headed back down again. I think we'll have these mini waves for a bit then it will kinda just be a "normal" sickness. We're no longer seeing the Delta and omnicron surges

 

[Doug B]

We're headed back down again. I think we'll have these mini waves for a bit then it will kinda just be a "normal" sickness. We're no longer seeing the Delta and omnicron surges

Agree for the most part. I don't think a "new Omicron" is a mathematical impossibility at this point, but I do think it's highly unlikely. Can't get past the idea (admittedly unsupported) that there are physical limits a virus runs into as compounding mutations yield increased viral-replication speeds.

Maybe not the best though experiment to draw a comparison, but:

Let's say some geneticists wanted to try a long-term breeding experiment with horses. They aim to see how fast a horse they can biologically generate -- no genetic engineering or interference from the researchers. So they breed the fastest stallions with the fastest mares, and keep on doing that over and over and over. Eventually, some hoof-speed advantageous mutations will pop up and randomly and boost the process along. However, no matter how long the horse breeding program continues and how many advantageous mutations pop up ... they will never get to a horse that runs a thousand miles an hour. That speed out of a horse is a physical impossibility.​

I think it's logical (even if unsupported) that something similar applies to viruses. Different parameters, of course. Wildly different organisms. But physical limits still must exist, and multiple 1,000+-fold leaps in replication speed make me think those limits are being approached with the SARS-CoV-2 "body plan".

 

[jobarules]

We're headed back down again. I think we'll have these mini waves for a bit then it will kinda just be a "normal" sickness. We're no longer seeing the Delta and omnicron surges

Seems like it. Hopefully becomes more seasonal

 

[belljr]

Read an article yesterday that I found interesting. Wasn't COVID related but with all the heart talk I found it fascinating as I never really paid attention. I forget which heart institute but it was something like between 2010-2016 people under 40 rose 2% each year with heart related issues. They had some factors they thought contributed more stress compared to previous generations, overweight, less exercise.

Forgive me if my numbers and years aren't exactly right, but it was a huge rise compared to previous generations, just nothing I ever actually looked into. Just happened to see it

Edit: wish I remember where I would post the link

 

[LawFitz]

There are hundreds of thousands of lot numbers at this point. That some are listed in VAERS means one thing....that those random people put that random piece of information into the system (It's not a required field). It's just like all the other information in the system...unverified until researched.

You are wrong once again. Lot numbers are listed on people's vax cards. Easy enough to track them from there when inputting a VAERS report.

Keep discounting the VAERS safety signals (completely) at your own peril, while the drumbeat slowly but steadily grows around you.

 

[Nathan R. Jessep]

The science (and business) behind COVID-19 disinformation. And what to do about it.

Rumors around COVID-19 vaccines and death, like the Died Suddenly video we highlighted earlier this week, aren’t random.

yourlocalepidemiologist.substack.com

 

[LawFitz]

The science (and business) behind COVID-19 disinformation. And what to do about it.

Rumors around COVID-19 vaccines and death, like the Died Suddenly video we highlighted earlier this week, aren’t random.

yourlocalepidemiologist.substack.com

The irony of that blog post is astounding, well beyond Covid or vaccines. She repeatedly uses disinformation to argue against disinformation!

And what's her end goal with that load?... Censorship, I can only conclude. Yikes. Let keep talking. Always. Even if we don't like what we hear or whom we hear it from.

 

[fatness]

Finally got my bivalent booster tonight, so I'll probably feel terrible tomorrow. The other 4 COVID shots I got all affected me the same way -- a following day of full body pain, a fever spike for 1-2 hours, and then gone. So far I feel fine from the bivalent shot except for being a bit lightheaded, but the real downside of it is that I left my insulated vest at the pharmacy. I swear to god if that vest isn't here by tomorrow I'm renouncing this foolish vaccination crap and going full horsepaste.

Didn't feel nearly as bad after the (Moderna) bivalent booster as I did after the previous 4 COVID shots. Some mild aches, none of which prevented me from doing what I planned to do the next day. The shot itself is an even smaller shot than the previous shots/boosters, and the needle is in and out in 2-3 seconds. Far better than a 5-day sore throat, or worse.

Maybe a year ago I was at a funeral for my sister-in-law who died of multiple health problems (none of them COVID) and got to talk with my niece's husband for much longer than we had ever talked before. He had just recently recovered from COVID, which he said "laid him out" for 10 days with fever and body aches and coughing and a horrible sore throat. It was the third time he had had it, and the first 2 times were indentical torture periods of 10 days. He said he finally got the Johnson & Johnson vaccination. I told him how sorry I was he went through those 30 days of hell, and that that was why I was keeping up with my vaccinations and boosters. And he was stunned. He didn't know anyone who had done that. He asked why I "went through all that", which was a day of feeling bad after each shot/booster. I told him I didn't want to go through what he had gone through, and that I saw getting updated boosters as equivalent to getting the oil in my car changed, that oil loses its effectiveness over time and gets changed, and that boosters lose their effectiveness over time and get updated (by me). It's routine common sense to me.

It was a good, long, friendly conversation. I haven't talked to him since. I'm glad I got my booster 2 weeks ahead of a weekend in which my wife and I will be in a couple crowded situations.

 

[Leeroy Jenkins]

FDA To Recommend One Simplified Shot Per Year (evaluated and distributed like the flu shot)

 

[The Commish]

FDA To Recommend One Simplified Shot Per Year (evaluated and distributed like the flu shot)

They need to continue with the "red tape free" research/funding for the new vaccines focusing on the portions of the virus that don't mutate much (if at all) along with the nasal vaccines. We are back to the "take 10 years" garbage we had before since "Operation Warp Speed" is officially over. Otherwise, they'll just be chasing variants. Good for pharma, of course, and bad for us. This is partly why I just sort of stopped at three shots. This current approach is unsustainable.

 

[Scoresman]

Along those lines, anything being done about upping the accuracy of home tests? I know so many people who still think testing negative early gives them the all clear.

If I had a nickel for every time I heard "It's a cold, I tested negative this morning (on a home test)"...

 

[Leeroy Jenkins]

Along those lines, anything being done about upping the accuracy of home tests? I know so many people who still think testing negative early gives them the all clear.

If I had a nickel for every time I heard "It's a cold, I tested negative this morning (on a home test)"...

People just need to know they have to test multiple times. Same thing just happened to my friend -- symptoms started last Sunday and he didn't test positive until Thursday.

 

[Doug B]

This is partly why I just sort of stopped at three shots. This current approach is unsustainable.

I want every shot I can get, figuring extra shots can (virtually) never hurt me and can only help. A factor such as sustainability of approach doesn't factor into the calculus.

 

[Scoresman]

Along those lines, anything being done about upping the accuracy of home tests? I know so many people who still think testing negative early gives them the all clear.

If I had a nickel for every time I heard "It's a cold, I tested negative this morning (on a home test)"...

People just need to know they have to test multiple times. Same thing just happened to my friend -- symptoms started last Sunday and he didn't test positive until Thursday.

This is the problem. People don't take the effort to learn this stuff. Then they're surprised when their entire household catches their "cold".

 

[Doug B]

Along those lines, anything being done about upping the accuracy of home tests?

I don't know enough to talk about whether PSR-like tests could ever be adapted for home use. But the main thing that's different about a PSR test vs. a home antigen test is that the DNA-fragment samples for a PSR test are amplified. That amplification yields a substantial increase in accuracy -- a sample needs fewer fragments to register a positive. That amplification also, right now, is out of the reach of home consumers -- I'm not sure if that's an issue of the expense of materials/devices, the lack of a sufficient "clean room" environment in most all homes, other factors, or all of the above.

 

[Doug B]

FDA To Recommend One Simplified Shot Per Year (evaluated and distributed like the flu shot)

From the link:

The agency’s independent vaccine advisers, the Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee, are scheduled to meet on Thursday to discuss the future of Covid-19 vaccine regimens, and will be asked to vote on whether they recommend parts of FDA’s plan.

Here's is a direct link (given in the CNN article) to the FDA Briefing Paper (PDF) that the advisers will be mulling over to prepare for the Thursday 1/26 meeting and vote. It's not all that long, and it's a treasure trove of current lay-of-the-land information about the state of COVID vaccines in the U.S. today.

 

[ZADO]

This is partly why I just sort of stopped at three shots. This current approach is unsustainable.

I want every shot I can get, figuring extra shots can (virtually) never hurt me and can only help. A factor such as sustainability of approach doesn't factor into the calculus.

yikes

 

[The Commish]

This is partly why I just sort of stopped at three shots. This current approach is unsustainable.

I want every shot I can get, figuring extra shots can (virtually) never hurt me and can only help. A factor such as sustainability of approach doesn't factor into the calculus.

I understand. Though, I'd suggest sustainability should always be part of the calculus, especially when finances are part of the equation. Of course, you are talking to a person who doesn't get the flu shot. I've only ever had it three times and each time was only because we were having kids during that time. I can't remember the last time I had the flu. Lifestyle and habits are just as influential IMO and I really hate medicine...even tylenol etc. I just don't like putting stuff in my body if I can avoid it.

 

[IvanKaramazov]

FDA To Recommend One Simplified Shot Per Year (evaluated and distributed like the flu shot)

This should be a priority IMO. If we want to encourage people to stay up to date on vaccination, we need to make it as easy as possible to get boosted. That probably means one common booster that's the same for everybody that comes out in the fall. (Nobody wastes mental energy worrying about which brand of flu shot to get -- the covid shot should be the same way).

 

[Leeroy Jenkins]

FDA To Recommend One Simplified Shot Per Year (evaluated and distributed like the flu shot)

This should be a priority IMO. If we want to encourage people to stay up to date on vaccination, we need to make it as easy as possible to get boosted. That probably means one common booster that's the same for everybody that comes out in the fall. (Nobody wastes mental energy worrying about which brand of flu shot to get -- the covid shot should be the same way).

I think the word booster is going away for the general population. It will just be your annual COVID shot, available with your annual Flu shot.

It sounds like there will be a 2-shot regiment for certain people (older, immune system issues, younger) just like there is a different flu shot for seniors currently.

 

[Sleestak]

This is partly why I just sort of stopped at three shots. This current approach is unsustainable.

I want every shot I can get, figuring extra shots can (virtually) never hurt me and can only help. A factor such as sustainability of approach doesn't factor into the calculus.

yikes

yikes

 

[fatness]

Here's is a direct link (given in the CNN article) to the FDA Briefing Paper (PDF) that the advisers will be mulling over to prepare for the Thursday 1/26 meeting and vote. It's not all that long, and it's a treasure trove of current lay-of-the-land information about the state of COVID vaccines in the U.S. today.

From that link:

"One approach to immunization schedule simplification relies upon the following two key
underlying assumptions:

• That two or more exposures to S protein through vaccination and/or infection provide
sufficient pre-existing immunity such that a single dose of COVID-19 vaccine induces or
restores sufficient VE for a desired duration.
• That a well-founded age- and/or risked-based approach can be defined, allowing substantial
simplification of the current immunization schedule to one dose for those presumed to have
sufficient pre-existing immunity, and two doses for those who do not. "

 

[Scoresman]

When Cordyceps hits, and you all have fungal growths coming out of every orifice, I bet y'all doubters will be running for the first vaccine available.

 

[ZADO]

When Cordyceps hits, and you all have fungal growths coming out of every orifice, I bet y'all doubters will be running for the first vaccine available.

Sounds like the premise of ''The last of us ''

 

[-fish-]

Friend of mine was over for dinner on Saturday night and then spent all day with my girlfriend. Friend tested positive today.

I've had both boosters since I'm over 50. I have no symptoms and feel fine. What's my protocol supposed to be at this point? Mask? Quarantine?

 

[Scoresman]

Friend of mine was over for dinner on Saturday night and then spent all day with my girlfriend. Friend tested positive today.

I've had both boosters since I'm over 50. I have no symptoms and feel fine. What's my protocol supposed to be at this point? Mask? Quarantine?

That was two days ago. He may not have been far enough along for the virus to have incubated enough to be contagious but it depends when his exposure was. I also don't know how long the time from exposure to contagious is nowadays with the new variants. I think it used to be two days before symptoms, but nowadays two days before symptoms is when exposure happens so I'm sure that timeframe got shrunk.

 

[Doug B]

What's my protocol supposed to be at this point? Mask? Quarantine?

You don't need to quarantine without symptoms and without a positive home antigen test. Home antigen tests are not great at detecting asymptomatic infections (not sensitive enough) ... so you're OK not to test until you at least have light symptoms. Note that it can start off super-slight -- a little 2-hour morning sore throat, or a headache, or feeling mildly run down, etc. Those kinds of just-getting-started symptoms are enough to prompt a home antigen test.

The following is very lifestyle/employment dependent, but: if you can, try to avoid close contact with people for the rest of the work week. Where I live, I can generally shop in groceries and retail outlets without running into crowds ... but if you live in a dense urban area and are beset by crowds often (e.g. on a subway or commuter train, shops are small and crowded, etc.), you should have a mask on when in among a crowd. Similar considerations for your workplace if you can't work from home -- if the office is packed, mask through this week and explain that you've been directly exposed and you're trying to be considerate. If you have a large workspace to yourself, on the other hand, and no one is really close by, no need to mask.

 

[-fish-]

What's my protocol supposed to be at this point? Mask? Quarantine?

You don't need to quarantine without symptoms and without a positive home antigen test. Home antigen tests are not great at detecting asymptomatic infections (not sensitive enough) ... so you're OK not to test until you at least have light symptoms. Note that it can start off super-slight -- a little 2-hour morning sore throat, or a headache, or feeling mildly run down, etc. Those kinds of just-getting-started symptoms are enough to prompt a home antigen test.

The following is very lifestyle/employment dependent, but: if you can, try to avoid close contact with people for the rest of the work week. Where I live, I can generally shop in groceries and retail outlets without running into crowds ... but if you live in a dense urban area and are beset by crowds often (e.g. on a subway or commuter train, shops are small and crowded, etc.), you should have a mask on when in among a crowd. Similar considerations for your workplace if you can't work from home -- if the office is packed, mask through this week and explain that you've been directly exposed and you're trying to be considerate. If you have a large workspace to yourself, on the other hand, and no one is really close by, no need to mask.

Thanks. I work from home and this week I'm spending most of my time re-organizing my garage, so I can avoid the public pretty easily. I had plans for Thursday, but not a big deal to skip it.

 

[LawFitz]

So good and true, this...

The Game Is Over and They Have Lost ⋆ Brownstone Institute

The script has worn itself out. These tropes are now tired and ineffective. The fear pushers seem unaware that the message has lost its effect, but do not have anything else to offer.

brownstone.org

 

[fatness]

The latest attempt by those promoting vaccination fears for profit is filing supposed uncontrollable "shaking" videos, where the "shaking" is supposedly due to the vaccine. Here's one woman who has been milking vaccination fear for over 2 years: https://twitter.com/AngeliaDesselle/status/1616809591928688641
Apparently the vaccine causes bad acting.

Here's an RN showing a video of a woman who "can no longer, clean, cook, drive a car, requires full-time caretaker". https://twitter.com/healthbyjames/status/1616142878723407894
Another case of the vaccine causing bad acting.
Here's the debunking: https://www.wired.co.uk/article/covid-vaccine-misinformation-facebook
https://www.politifact.com/article/2021/jan/20/shaking-covid-vaccine-side-effect-videos-and-what-/

Right after that video is one of the same supposedly helpless woman testifying in court. Watch how her "involuntary" hand movements increase when describing her plight, and revert to being under her full control when she's banging a fist on the table while making her "fear of vaccine" points. https://twitter.com/healthbyjames/status/1616142924487458830

Here are the actual medical diagnoses of these 2 women: https://health-desk.org/articles/co...s-of-a-covid-19-vaccine-specifically-modernas

"Recently, two videos on social media showed two women experiencing symptoms of shaking, convulsions and tongue spasms, which they said began after receiving the Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines, respectively. After seeking medical treatment, these women were diagnosed with potential other illnesses, unrelated to the vaccines themselves.

Both women underwent evaluations of their bodies and symptoms like MRIs, CT scans and blood tests but their symptoms could not be traced to the vaccine. Instead, both women's social media posts referenced what doctors suggested as possible causes: stress-related symptoms in one and Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome in the other."

Naturally the internet is mocking such bad acting and attempts at lying to people. https://twitter.com/bettybowers/status/1617578823427690496

 

[The Commish]

The latest attempt by those promoting vaccination fears for profit is filing supposed uncontrollable "shaking" videos, where the "shaking" is supposedly due to the vaccine. Here's one woman who has been milking vaccination fear for over 2 years: https://twitter.com/AngeliaDesselle/status/1616809591928688641
Apparently the vaccine causes bad acting.

Here's an RN showing a video of a woman who "can no longer, clean, cook, drive a car, requires full-time caretaker". https://twitter.com/healthbyjames/status/1616142878723407894
Another case of the vaccine causing bad acting.
Here's the debunking: https://www.wired.co.uk/article/covid-vaccine-misinformation-facebook
https://www.politifact.com/article/2021/jan/20/shaking-covid-vaccine-side-effect-videos-and-what-/

Right after that video is one of the same supposedly helpless woman testifying in court. Watch how her "involuntary" hand movements increase when describing her plight, and revert to being under her full control when she's banging a fist on the table while making her "fear of vaccine" points. https://twitter.com/healthbyjames/status/1616142924487458830

Here are the actual medical diagnoses of these 2 women: https://health-desk.org/articles/co...s-of-a-covid-19-vaccine-specifically-modernas

"Recently, two videos on social media showed two women experiencing symptoms of shaking, convulsions and tongue spasms, which they said began after receiving the Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines, respectively. After seeking medical treatment, these women were diagnosed with potential other illnesses, unrelated to the vaccines themselves.

Both women underwent evaluations of their bodies and symptoms like MRIs, CT scans and blood tests but their symptoms could not be traced to the vaccine. Instead, both women's social media posts referenced what doctors suggested as possible causes: stress-related symptoms in one and Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome in the other."

Naturally the internet is mocking such bad acting and attempts at lying to people. https://twitter.com/bettybowers/status/1617578823427690496

The entire world is in on the "conspiracy"!!!!!!! It's time to stop giving this garbage oxygen. At a point we started ignoring the loons saying 9/11 was an inside job. We are at that point here IMO.

 

[sho nuff]

The latest attempt by those promoting vaccination fears for profit is filing supposed uncontrollable "shaking" videos, where the "shaking" is supposedly due to the vaccine. Here's one woman who has been milking vaccination fear for over 2 years: https://twitter.com/AngeliaDesselle/status/1616809591928688641
Apparently the vaccine causes bad acting.

Here's an RN showing a video of a woman who "can no longer, clean, cook, drive a car, requires full-time caretaker". https://twitter.com/healthbyjames/status/1616142878723407894
Another case of the vaccine causing bad acting.
Here's the debunking: https://www.wired.co.uk/article/covid-vaccine-misinformation-facebook
https://www.politifact.com/article/2021/jan/20/shaking-covid-vaccine-side-effect-videos-and-what-/

Right after that video is one of the same supposedly helpless woman testifying in court. Watch how her "involuntary" hand movements increase when describing her plight, and revert to being under her full control when she's banging a fist on the table while making her "fear of vaccine" points. https://twitter.com/healthbyjames/status/1616142924487458830

Here are the actual medical diagnoses of these 2 women: https://health-desk.org/articles/co...s-of-a-covid-19-vaccine-specifically-modernas

"Recently, two videos on social media showed two women experiencing symptoms of shaking, convulsions and tongue spasms, which they said began after receiving the Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines, respectively. After seeking medical treatment, these women were diagnosed with potential other illnesses, unrelated to the vaccines themselves.

Both women underwent evaluations of their bodies and symptoms like MRIs, CT scans and blood tests but their symptoms could not be traced to the vaccine. Instead, both women's social media posts referenced what doctors suggested as possible causes: stress-related symptoms in one and Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome in the other."

Naturally the internet is mocking such bad acting and attempts at lying to people. https://twitter.com/bettybowers/status/1617578823427690496

Seinfeld - My whole life is a lie!

George runs into his childhood nemesis, Lloyd Braun, and makes a derisive nudge to Jerry. When Lloyd notices, George pretends that it is an involuntary spasm...

www.youtube.com

 

[Mitchie]

Friend of mine was over for dinner on Saturday night and then spent all day with my girlfriend. Friend tested positive today.

I've had both boosters since I'm over 50. I have no symptoms and feel fine. What's my protocol supposed to be at this point? Mask? Quarantine?

The real question is what was your friend doing with your girlfriend all day?

 

[IvanKaramazov]

No idea why you guys engage with some of the stuff that you engage with.

 

[LawFitz]

Australia sees a 17% increase in deaths from heart attacks and experts are dumbfounded suspect everything but the vaccine.

https://twitter.com/i/status/1617225724640854016

 

[Scoresman]

Australia sees a 17% increase in deaths from heart attacks and experts are dumbfounded suspect everything but the vaccine.

https://twitter.com/i/status/1617225724640854016

The first thing I would suspect is the COVID virus itself.

 

[top dog]

Australia sees a 17% increase in deaths from heart attacks and experts are dumbfounded suspect everything but the vaccine.

https://twitter.com/i/status/1617225724640854016

The first thing I would suspect is the COVID virus itself.

Nah... I just blame everything on the covid vaccine itself now. I've fully annoyed my wife with it as well.

Wife - "Lisa Marie died!" Me - "Yup. probably was the covid vaccine."
Wife - "My hip hurts today." Me - "Probably because you are vaccinated"
Wife - "They were out of salsa at the store." Me - "BECAUSE OF THE VACCINE! ITS SADS"

 

[LawFitz]

Australia sees a 17% increase in deaths from heart attacks and experts are dumbfounded suspect everything but the vaccine.

https://twitter.com/i/status/1617225724640854016

The first thing I would suspect is the COVID virus itself.

Why not suspect both? Oh yeah, because it's too scary. Carry on.

 

[Scoresman]

Australia sees a 17% increase in deaths from heart attacks and experts are dumbfounded suspect everything but the vaccine.

https://twitter.com/i/status/1617225724640854016

The first thing I would suspect is the COVID virus itself.

Why not suspect both? Oh yeah, because it's too scary. Carry on.

Because the virus is highly more likely to be the cause.

 

[LawFitz]

Pfizer's 5.3.6 Post-Marketing Survey Data from FEB 2021:

- 1223 fatal outcomes (out of 42k participants)
- 80% miscarriage rate among pregnant women who were tracked (25 of 32).

- YouTube

Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.

www.youtube.com

 

[Scoresman]

Pfizer's 5.3.6 Post-Marketing Survey Data from FEB 2021:

- 1223 fatal outcomes (out of 42k participants)
- 80% miscarriage rate among pregnant women who were tracked (25 of 32).

- YouTube

Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.

www.youtube.com

Hahaha @ the comments on that video.

My favorite:

"Keep your guns cleaned boys.... It's almost time"

 

[LawFitz]

Australia sees a 17% increase in deaths from heart attacks and experts are dumbfounded suspect everything but the vaccine.

https://twitter.com/i/status/1617225724640854016

The first thing I would suspect is the COVID virus itself.

Why not suspect both? Oh yeah, because it's too scary. Carry on.

Because the virus is highly more likely to be the cause.

Sorry, but you don't know that to be true.

 

[The Commish]

Australia sees a 17% increase in deaths from heart attacks and experts are dumbfounded suspect everything but the vaccine.

https://twitter.com/i/status/1617225724640854016

The first thing I would suspect is the COVID virus itself.

Nah... I just blame everything on the covid vaccine itself now. I've fully annoyed my wife with it as well.

Wife - "Lisa Marie died!" Me - "Yup. probably was the covid vaccine."
Wife - "My hip hurts today." Me - "Probably because you are vaccinated"
Wife - "They were out of salsa at the store." Me - "BECAUSE OF THE VACCINE! ITS SADS"

I brought my wife up to speed on the Hamlin debacle too. He's dead from the vaccine...just a body double at this point. She was asking if I'd heard any new info on his status because she hadn't so I had to break the bad news to her.

 

[Scoresman]

Australia sees a 17% increase in deaths from heart attacks and experts are dumbfounded suspect everything but the vaccine.

https://twitter.com/i/status/1617225724640854016

The first thing I would suspect is the COVID virus itself.

Why not suspect both? Oh yeah, because it's too scary. Carry on.

Because the virus is highly more likely to be the cause.

Sorry, but you don't know that to be true.

But you know it's the vaccines. Got it.

 

[LawFitz]

Pfizer's 5.3.6 Post-Marketing Survey Data from FEB 2021:

- 1223 fatal outcomes (out of 42k participants)
- 80% miscarriage rate among pregnant women who were tracked (25 of 32).

- YouTube

Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.

www.youtube.com

Hahaha @ the comments on that video.

My favorite:

"Keep your guns cleaned boys.... It's almost time"

Here's a more relevant quote:

And lets remember that these data required a court order to finally be released in march 2022 but were known to exist a year before! They knew that releasing these numbers would have a negative outcome on the sales of their new product.

 

[-fish-]

Friend of mine was over for dinner on Saturday night and then spent all day with my girlfriend. Friend tested positive today.

I've had both boosters since I'm over 50. I have no symptoms and feel fine. What's my protocol supposed to be at this point? Mask? Quarantine?

The real question is what was your friend doing with your girlfriend all day?

I'm pretty sure they went for a walk, went to coffee and went shopping while i watched football with her husband. Can't see why that matters.