JAA
Footballguy
This is badWorldometer
USA: 32,783 (+8,576) cases, 416 (+114) deaths
New York: 15,168 (+4,796) cases, 114 (+58) deaths
ETA: changed “confirmed” to “cases”
This is badWorldometer
USA: 32,783 (+8,576) cases, 416 (+114) deaths
New York: 15,168 (+4,796) cases, 114 (+58) deaths
ETA: changed “confirmed” to “cases”
Anyone who’s the listened to the Ramones knows that’s not true.haven’t you heard? we don’t have beaches in NYC.
![]()
But it is easy for the states?Would be a heckuva challenge under the Constitution, too. I assume emergency powers exist for the executive branch to invoke, but I don’t know exactly what they entail and exactly how they get executed.
OverYep, I posted yesterday that in a week or two NYC will have over 7,000 in need of hospitalization.
Yes let’s use obscure examples for 0.000001% of the population and use that as a reason to not do it.How are you going to get a drug addict to sit still for 14 days?
Yes. This is what we should worry about. Constitutionality.Would be a heckuva challenge under the Constitution, too. I assume emergency powers exist for the executive branch to invoke, but I don’t know exactly what they entail and exactly how they get executed.
Pandemics are included as a reason.Would be a heckuva challenge under the Constitution, too. I assume emergency powers exist for the executive branch to invoke, but I don’t know exactly what they entail and exactly how they get executed.
I'm giving him some slack.Stop trolling plz
Actually yes we do need to be very careful with the Constitution and what it has provided all of us. Assuming this does not go zombie apocalypse, there will be the vast majority that will survive.Yes. This is what we should worry about. Constitutionality.
Give him lots of drugs?How are you going to get a drug addict to sit still for 14 days?
Of course 2 fat #######s from Staten island would do this.they both have an underlying health condition. obesity and morbid obesity for her. god speed
You're severely underestimating the number of drug addicts.Yes let’s use obscure examples for 0.000001% of the population and use that as a reason to not do it.
followed up with f-bombs for the reporter.Of course 2 fat #######s from Staten island would do this.
Seems inconvenientArticle explains exactly what needs to be done to stop the virus, massive testing, tracing and isolating the sick - https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/22/health/coronavirus-restrictions-us.html?action=click&module=Spotlight&pgtype=Homepage
What exactly are we waiting for? What will it take to shut it all down?This *1000000000WHY DONT WE HAVE A STRICT NATIONAL LOCKDOWN?!?? For ####s sake.
Shut. It. All. Down. Now.
No flights. Only essentials running.
Complete federal lockdown. For 28 days.
Give the people a plan. A target and an exit strategy. That will help enforcement and stabilize markets and the economy.
Yay 28205...Mecklenburg County with 80 confirmed cases, that’s Charlotte, NC y’all
https://www.charlotteobserver.com/news/coronavirus/article241416386.html
So what?You're severely underestimating the number of drug addicts.
The reporter deserved it. Unless of course they are covering every church service, every line at a restaurant, or interviewing everybody at a crowded grocery store to make sure it was all essential items.followed up with f-bombs for the reporter.
I think the point is more that those that could more or less easily “sit still” for 14 days simply refuse to do it.How are you going to get a drug addict to sit still for 14 days?
When we have to start triaging patients and the elderly are left to die. Much like several areas of Italy.What exactly are we waiting for? What will it take to shut it all down?
100K confirmed? 1 million? A complete collapse of the health care system?
WTF are we waiting for?
I assumed the post I was addressing was about a federal edict. States have constitutions preserving personal liberty, of course.But it is easy for the states?
This isn’t something we’ve been through before. But after enough days go by with the economy tanking into depression and people dying, when do we finally understand it’s time to do the right thing? And at what point does the federal government have to step in and do it for us? Argument could be made we’ve now reached that point.I think the point is more that those that could more or less easily “sit still” for 14 days simply refuse to do it.
To really talk about it — in a real, honest way — required excoriating those we care about in real life and those we respect on this board. I’ll speak in generality and let everyone take their own meaning from it: there are people who are openly and shamelessly admitting to willfully not doing what needs to be done. People are looking for loopholes and outs. Looking for ways to displace blame. Looking for authority to excuse their choices.
These aren’t bad, messed-up, inferior people that have their heels dug in. They’ve just gone wayward somehow ... seeing themselves as something apart from everyone else. Not understanding why everyone needs to grab the rope and pull in the same direction. Not willing to sublimate the self even as such action is desperately needed.
Not Constitutionality. Issues of procedure due to being accustomed to adhering to the Constitution. No one may be willing to step and take the hard, draconian steps.Yes. This is what we should worry about. Constitutionality.
I disagree and think Ackman was right here. It would be an impetus for higher markets as it would provide some predictability.Because the Dow Jones would not react favorably.
Just read that in Italy, if you are over 60 you are not even considered for a ventilator.When we have to start triaging patients and the elderly are left to die. Much like several areas of Italy.
Then someone needs to pull the lever with conviction.Pandemics are included as a reason.
I have one showing up at my door. My friend's brother goes through money like lightening speed. He lives in his car and panhandling success is 0 here. So he shows up here since I'm the only person here he knows and I have helped him in the past. He's shown up twice in the past few days. Today I went to check my mail. I drove back and as I reached my door, I looked over at the stairwell close to mine and he was there! He saw I won't open my door so he was trying to hide to catch me. He was engrossed jn his phone so I got in without him noticing. He's never been violent but dire situations can change people.How are you going to get a drug addict to sit still for 14 days?
Someone to lead us?What exactly are we waiting for? What will it take to shut it all down?
100K confirmed? 1 million? A complete collapse of the health care system?
WTF are we waiting for?
For what?I'm heading to the ATM, I'm draining all the cash I can and hiding it under my mattress.
The biggest adjustment is working from home everyday but otherwise agree that shelter in place feels pretty lax. If I was 25 years old, I would think differently but at this point not really affecting my every day to a great extant.May have been mentioned, but Dallas has moved to shelter in place. Which, as I read it, is really no different than what life is today... essential businesses do include liquor stores. I guess it's a catch 22. People would go bonkers if they couldn't get their lixx, especially when forced to stay home. But we all know it's hardly 'essential'
By the definition, seems most of the places we would go to now will still be open (i.e. places offering food, so super target gonna be open, same with walmart, right? Also, think it includes home goods, so both qualify. Grocery, gas stations.
Went out just to grab dinner Friday, day before made last lixx and supply run... so three trips in the last four days, none in the last two. Will head to grocery and/or pharm in a couple days to reup on some items (basically working off a par system that gives 6 weeks supply, when it's down the 4.5-5 weeks, time to reup), and looking to play some tennis tomorrow.
Someone said that wi might take a similar shelter in place step, but it sounds like what we have already, and I still think there are probably too many people out and people not getting it.May have been mentioned, but Dallas has moved to shelter in place. Which, as I read it, is really no different than what life is today... essential businesses do include liquor stores. I guess it's a catch 22. People would go bonkers if they couldn't get their lixx, especially when forced to stay home. But we all know it's hardly 'essential'
By the definition, seems most of the places we would go to now will still be open (i.e. places offering food, so super target gonna be open, same with walmart, right? Also, think it includes home goods, so both qualify. Grocery, gas stations.
Went out just to grab dinner Friday, day before made last lixx and supply run... so three trips in the last four days, none in the last two. Will head to grocery and/or pharm in a couple days to reup on some items (basically working off a par system that gives 6 weeks supply, when it's down the 4.5-5 weeks, time to reup), and looking to play some tennis tomorrow.
For when either the stores close down and you cant buy anything or they decide that cash is too dirty and go to card only?An emergency.
No, after that come civil unrest and robbing and looting.For when either the stores close down and you cant buy anything or they decide that cash is too dirty and go to card only?
Or we talking when the dispensary closes and you have to get your weed on the streets?
While I generally don't agree with all of the stuff that Ackman says--I do think that he was right here. And it's not just him that's right about what is needed to fight the virus--the Chinese also found it the right way (albeit that they lied through their teeths to the rest of the world about the seriousness of it). This is a relentless virus that spreads like wildfire. Until a vaccine is made--the only way to defeat this thing is through extreme organization and extreme discipline. Only when those things occur--can the virus get stalled enough for the healthcare system to handle things more reasonably. If also affords them more time to get the necessary supplies they need to battle this thing. We cannot beat this worrying about salvaging our economy in the short to medium term--we're beyond that. Our short to medium term economy is already effed. If we don't do the smart thing and shut things down completely--not only will we be compromising way more human life, we're also eroding away our healthcare system, but also risking our long term economic outlook.I disagree and think Ackman was right here. It would be an impetus for higher markets as it would provide some predictability.
Imo a case like this is not so much where she has been, and more where you and your family have been exposed and can pass to her.Just wondering: my mother in law watches our kid at our house every day. She hasn’t gone anywhere except back and forth from our house to hers in the last 10 days - only on walks around her neighborhood. We have that life 360 app that’s tracks where she goes (not because of this but she tripped and fell when out with the kid a year ago and we didn’t know where she was).
Am I being paranoid or is it ok to have her still come over? I feel like I’m losing my mind sometimes.
A lot of people are already living like this. Everybody should be voluntarily. That it needs to be mandated is pathetic.Someone said that wi might take a similar shelter in place step, but it sounds like what we have already, and I still think there are probably too many people out and people not getting it.
I'd be worried about infecting her. As long as she's just going from her place to yours and not seeing anyone else, she's obviously fine.Just wondering: my mother in law watches our kid at our house every day. She hasn’t gone anywhere except back and forth from our house to hers in the last 10 days - only on walks around her neighborhood. We have that life 360 app that’s tracks where she goes (not because of this but she tripped and fell when out with the kid a year ago and we didn’t know where she was).
Am I being paranoid or is it ok to have her still come over? I feel like I’m losing my mind sometimes.