matuski
Footballguy
Yes. We are getting back to life... it is fantastic.Why was Texas shut down earlier but moving to phase 3 today? They're even allowing stadiums up to 50% capacity. Does any of this make sense to anybody?
Highly recommend.
Yes. We are getting back to life... it is fantastic.Why was Texas shut down earlier but moving to phase 3 today? They're even allowing stadiums up to 50% capacity. Does any of this make sense to anybody?
The heat benefits was a completely overblown talking point. It may stop it from living long on surfaces but there probably weren’t a lot people catching it by touching outdoor surfaces anyway.I wonder if it’s because the heat drives people inside with AC, which is more prone to spreading it around. Essentially counteracting the benefits of heat killing the virus when people are outside.
That’s one of the reasons I’m bearish on casino stocks...I wonder if it’s because the heat drives people inside with AC, which is more prone to spreading it around. Essentially counteracting the benefits of heat killing the virus when people are outside.
Oregon, which has maintained very low numbers throughout this, is also starting to show some concern.That's an odd take since the posts above yours were about peaks in hospitalizations in Texas and Arizona.
And phase I in Multnomah county (Portland) is supposed to start this Friday.Oregon, which has maintained very low numbers throughout this, is also starting to show some concern.
Over the last two days Oregon set records for the number of people testing positive. Hospitalizations have also increased 40% in the past week. Just when I thought we were close to done.
Considering the govenor has been lock step with the president through this crisis, opening up makes perfect sense.Why was Texas shut down earlier but moving to phase 3 today? They're even allowing stadiums up to 50% capacity. Does any of this make sense to anybody?
I agree. Some posters like to argue so much that they argue themselves a stalker.Wow, some of you really like to argue. I will never, ever get it. So strange.
so which one is right?Scripps Research Translational Institute published a study that found differently 5 days ago.In a study published June 3 in the Annals of Internal Medicine, researchers at the Scripps Research Translational Institute reviewed data from 16 different groups of COVID-19 patients from around the world to get a better idea of how many cases of coronavirus can likely be traced to people who spread the virus without ever knowing they were infected. Their conclusion: at minimum, 30%, and more likely 40% to 45%.
Link
Yes, who cares? 1900 hospitalizations in a state of 29 million people.At no point did any post suggest Texas was at capacity. It was posted that it posted it's highest hospitalizations to date. ~1900
114 new cases today in a state of 4 million. Shut it all down, everyone back inside forever.Oregon, which has maintained very low numbers throughout this, is also starting to show some concern.
Over the last two days Oregon set records for the number of people testing positive. Hospitalizations have also increased 40% in the past week. Just when I thought we were close to done.
Oregon did so well for so long. Only Alaska, Hawaii, and Montana have a lower case count per capita. And deaths are near the lowest too. They are lagging in their testing though, so maybe the case count is quite a bit higher.Oregon, which has maintained very low numbers throughout this, is also starting to show some concern.
Over the last two days Oregon set records for the number of people testing positive. Hospitalizations have also increased 40% in the past week. Just when I thought we were close to done.
Most of Oregon's spike can be traced to 2 somewhat isolated outbreaks -- one at a nursing home, and one at a cannery. It's concerning but it sounds like something that is containable and/or traceable.Oregon did so well for so long. Only Alaska, Hawaii, and Montana have a lower case count per capita. And deaths are near the lowest too. They are lagging in their testing though, so maybe the case count is quite a bit higher.Oregon, which has maintained very low numbers throughout this, is also starting to show some concern.
Over the last two days Oregon set records for the number of people testing positive. Hospitalizations have also increased 40% in the past week. Just when I thought we were close to done.
NY, NJ & CT locked down really hard and complied a lot better than most states. I took a long time but our efforts are starting to show in the numbers.Per Rt Live, here are the states that have stayed under .83 for the last 6 weeks: Hawaii, New York, New Jersey, Connecticut
A weird list, when you consider Hawaii has the lowest case rate, while the other 3 are the on the opposite spectrum.
My town literally sent out a notice in the paper yesterday stating that "Finally, testing will be available for all town residents, next week". This is suburb in southwestern CT, not a town in the middle of nowhere. It's just not true that everyone can get a test on demand.Yeah im calling BS here
Apparently you doYes, who cares? 1900 hospitalizations in a state of 29 million people.
I'm in southeastern CT, and just checked CT's portal link that discusses testing. Not only does the site suggest I DON'T get tested unless I fall into one of their categories, but when I click on the search to find a testing center near me, the closest one is an hours drive away, halfway across the state.My town literally sent out a notice in the paper yesterday stating that "Finally, testing will be available for all town residents, next week". This is suburb in southwestern CT, not a town in the middle of nowhere. It's just not true that everyone can get a test on demand.
As we've learned from other places, the "official date of reopening" isn't really the marker. It's the softer date of "when people actually start going out and acting like it's over". I feel like that's less likely to happen in CT than other places. I know I won't be eating in a restaurant or attending large gatherings anytime soon.Connecticut's numbers still trending in the right direction
- Hospitalizations up only once (25 May) in the past 35 days, and it was only by 5. We are sitting at 16.4% compared to our high mark on 22 April (324/1972).
- Deaths down to average of 17 per day over the last week. Before that, we were over 17 for 56 straight days and had averaged 67 deaths.
- Testing is up, and positives are down. 1352 positives in the last 7 days. The last time we were this low was when we first started testing in March. 46676 tests performed in last 7 days is nearly double the daily count over the previous 70 days (3421 vs 6668). 2.9% positive rate in last 7 days is a CT record.
20 May - started Phase 1 - The expected spike around 14 days later never happened. Our Phase 1 is still pretty restrictive compared to other states.
17 June - starting Phase 2 - Was set for 20 June, but Governor Lamont moved it up 3 days (IMO mostly due to restaurant owners complaining). Wondering if we see a spike on/about 1 July?
I can buy that. According to the numbers, we haven't hit that date yet.As we've learned from other places, the "official date of reopening" isn't really the marker. It's the softer date of "when people actually start going out and acting like it's over". I feel like that's less likely to happen in CT than other places. I know I won't be eating in a restaurant or attending large gatherings anytime soon.
So your proof that testing is not available for everyone is that your town sent out a notice that testing is now available for everyone?My town literally sent out a notice in the paper yesterday stating that "Finally, testing will be available for all town residents, next week". This is suburb in southwestern CT, not a town in the middle of nowhere. It's just not true that everyone can get a test on demand.
"Next week". As in, as of June 9, it's still NOT available for everyone. Also, I suspect I don't need to mention, we've been told "coming soon" before and had it not materialize.So your proof that testing is not available for everyone is that your town sent out a notice that testing is now available for everyone?My town literally sent out a notice in the paper yesterday stating that "Finally, testing will be available for all town residents, next week". This is suburb in southwestern CT, not a town in the middle of nowhere. It's just not true that everyone can get a test on demand.
I care about the 1900 hospitalizations.Apparently you do
Second time now you seem to have difficulty with reading comprehension?So your proof that testing is not available for everyone is that your town sent out a notice that testing is now available for everyone?
In Youngstown, Connecticut, population 2000, all residents are healthy individuals in their 20's. They all wear ankle monitors and haven't left their tiny town since birth. Every night for the last 12 months, the entire town has a giant keg party on Main Street, where no one wears masks or adheres to any social distancing rules.I don't think I've been doom and gloom in this thread but I can't seriously believe there's people still implying this is like the flu. We've already had 3x as many people die from Covid as we did from the flu last year and that is in basically 3-4 months with all of the measures we've taken. I want more than anything for things to go back to normal - especially for my kids but it's nuts that people are this obtuse. I do thing that it's a very vocal minority that feel this way - most people recognize it's much more serious but I do question how serious lots of people are taking it. Wear damn masks, keep your distance, wash your hands and ####### stay home if you don't have to be out.
In Youngstown, Connecticut, population 2000, all residents are healthy individuals in their 20's. They all wear ankle monitors and haven't left their tiny town since birth. Every night for the last 12 months, the entire town has a giant keg party on Main Street, where no one wears masks or adheres to any social distancing rules.
About a month ago, some 80 year old guy heard about the fun town and decided to crash one of the keggers. He died 2 weeks later. All 2000 residents were brought up on murder charges, and all were found innocent. The jury determined the 80 year old was a moron.
Pretty disappointing update from this. Apparently this does not include presymptomatic people. So they were distinguishing between asymptomatic and presymptomatic. Which - from a practical perspective - is meaningless. Doesn't help us at all.Coronavirus patients who don’t have any symptoms aren’t driving the spread of the virus, World Health Organization officials said Monday, casting doubt on concerns by some researchers that the virus could be difficult to contain due to asymptomatic infections.
“From the data we have, it still seems to be rare that an asymptomatic person actually transmits onward to a secondary individual,” Dr. Maria Van Kerkhove, head of WHO’s emerging diseases and zoonosis unit, said at a news briefing from the United Nations agency’s Geneva headquarters. “It’s very rare.”
Wasn't my doing and quite honestly this place has passed me by. Im sure you will all be happy when I'm gone.Might be less heat moving back to the shadyridr handle.
That's an unbelievably stupid statement from them. It should have been obvious that 99% of the people who heard about it wouldn't make the distinction and would draw the wrong conclusions.Pretty disappointing update from this. Apparently this does not include presymptomatic people. So they were distinguishing between asymptomatic and presymptomatic. Which - from a practical perspective - is meaningless. Doesn't help us at all.
Read a reuters article on this yesterday and it seems you're correct...not all that helpfulPretty disappointing update from this. Apparently this does not include presymptomatic people. So they were distinguishing between asymptomatic and presymptomatic. Which - from a practical perspective - is meaningless. Doesn't help us at all.
Agreed. Only problem is there’s absolutely no chance they are shutting down AZ. Governor won’t do it and even if he did, no one will follow it.Sorry, but it’s not working out in many places. AZ, UT, NC, FL you didn’t do it right. The curve never fully developed, you never really shut it down when you had the chance, and now you are starting the exponential upswing. Now you need to shut it down and go to extreme social distancing measures with no contact and masks ASAP, which you should have done when stimulus was going out and the country was told. Not good, and not listening didn’t help. Darn it, this is going to screw it up for everyone.
I for one don't believe the numbers that are being reported. Folks are being ruled as coronavirus death when they die from other causes regularly.I don't think I've been doom and gloom in this thread but I can't seriously believe there's people still implying this is like the flu. We've already had 3x as many people die from Covid as we did from the flu last year and that is in basically 3-4 months with all of the measures we've taken. I want more than anything for things to go back to normal - especially for my kids but it's nuts that people are this obtuse. I do thing that it's a very vocal minority that feel this way - most people recognize it's much more serious but I do question how serious lots of people are taking it. Wear damn masks, keep your distance, wash your hands and ####### stay home if you don't have to be out.
Reminder - The death numbers you're seeing are people that died WITH Covid, not necessarily FROM or DUE TO Covid.
A lot of fear is being driven off of those death numbers, although I'm sure you Nancy's would find something else to hide under your covers about if it wasn't that.
Can you guys please keep this stuff in the political version? This was discussed and already addressed thoroughly in that thread.I for one don't believe the numbers that are being reported. Folks are being ruled as coronavirus death when they die from other causes regularly.
It's not political and is still a valid discussion, imo. I'll be interested to see the numbers as they are updated. Maybe they're actually too low.Can you guys please keep this stuff in the political version? This was discussed and already addressed thoroughly in that thread.
The original narrative is 100% political and so are the variations we're seeing. They may end up a bit higher or a bit lower...in the end it won't be a huge number to have any sort of meaningful impact at all. We won't have good "death rates" on this thing for a few years. It's something we will have to continually manage going forward. As time goes on, we will get a more and more accurate picture. This other stuff is nonsense.It's not political and is still a valid discussion, imo. I'll be interested to see the numbers as they are updated. Maybe they're actually too low.
There are threads dedicated to the "undercount versus overcount" discussion in both PSF and FFA. The arguments have been laid out in both. As The Commish notes, take it up there instead of posting thoroughly debunked nonsense here.The original narrative is 100% political and so are the variations we're seeing. They may end up a bit higher or a bit lower...in the end it won't be a huge number to have any sort of meaningful impact at all. We won't have good "death rates" on this thing for a few years. It's something we will have to continually manage going forward. As time goes on, we will get a more and more accurate picture. This other stuff is nonsense.It's not political and is still a valid discussion, imo. I'll be interested to see the numbers as they are updated. Maybe they're actually too low.
I agree. The real numbers are definitely higher.I for one don't believe the numbers that are being reported.
Sending kids to camp?So, like, now what?
I rarely go to the PSF and dont know about another thread here so I'm fine with it in this thread. Opinions differ I guessThere are threads dedicated to the "undercount versus overcount" discussion in both PSF and FFA. The arguments have been laid out in both. As The Commish notes, take it up there instead of posting thoroughly debunked nonsense here.
You know, I heard you had balls big enough to come in a dump truck, but you don't look like much to me.I rarely go to the PSF and dont know about another thread here so I'm fine with it in this thread. Opinions differ I guess
jm192 did a really good job laying all the info on this topic out in that thread.....I'll see if I can find a good place to start in there so you don't have to wade through all the other crap....if you're interested of course.I rarely go to the PSF and dont know about another thread here so I'm fine with it in this thread. Opinions differ I guess
Funny on CNBC: