mcintyre1
Footballguy
Yeah, checking it out nowSorry to hear that. Being in Minnesota though, you should be in decent shape as far as unemployment goes. From what I hear, it's slick as ####, unlike a lot of other states.
Yeah, checking it out nowSorry to hear that. Being in Minnesota though, you should be in decent shape as far as unemployment goes. From what I hear, it's slick as ####, unlike a lot of other states.
I think that is only 2 million tests per week.Understand that 20 Million tests in a week are actually giving about 10 tests every second, 7 days a week, 8 hours a day.
I agree 100%. I don't know what the solution is. I wish these studies were not made public until they were subjected to a peer review process. What is the point of that Santa Clara study being released early? I see no good reason for it.Oh yea man, get that. Wasn't directed at you, more a general statement about all the different threads of information being promoted out there right now.
I read that twitter feed about the study and while I understand the basis of it I'm by no means intelligent enough to speak about it. Seems like they cut corners and made assumptions that kind of flies in the face of statistics. But that's what a proper peer review is for. What frustrates me is this makes it into the general populace, becomes cannon and now there are folks making pretty far reaching decisions based on a study that, at a minimum, appears to have some flaws with the logic used to ascertain the numbers they are presenting.
This recent idea that COVID doesn't really spread by touching objects has its root in this CDC advisement that I believe was first posted on April 2nd. The"fomites don't cause COVID" idea gets brought up in this thread from time to time (including yesterday by parasaurolophus), but the specifics are largely glossed over when we've discussed it. See excerpt below:Could you link anything that says that CV isn’t spread by surfaces/touch? I haven’t heard of that and you gave 3 examples and the first one I looked up (SARS) said that it can be spread that way.Of course they would never say stop washing your hands. That not even a point.
Do you seriously doubt that there are many viruses that dont get spread via surfaces?
And just because something "can" spread via surfaces doesnt mean it does or that it does in any kind of significant pattern. The cdc says zika can spread (via certain kinds of) sex. Between those ... there is one documented case. So in the discussion of being unlikely bringing that up is irrelevant.
So sure if somebody sneezed right on a door handle and then somebody else touched it and immediately wiped their face and inhaled while they did it.
IMHO, the advice is confusing and equivocal. The part in red can make people think fomite transmission does not happen, as opposed to fomite transmission not typically being tracked down/recorded. If the CDC means the former, they need to be clearer. And IF the CDC truly means "fomite transmission essentially doesn't happen", the part in green makes little sense -- who cares long the virus lasts on surfaces if the virus doesn't really spread that way?Cleaning and Disinfection for Households
Interim Recommendations for U.S. Households with Suspected or Confirmed Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)
Background
There is much to learn about the novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) that causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Based on what is currently known about COVID-19, spread from person-to-person of this virus happens most frequently among close contacts (within about 6 feet). This type of transmission occurs via respiratory droplets. On the other hand, transmission of novel coronavirus to persons from surfaces contaminated with the virus has not been documented. Recent studies indicate that people who are infected but do not have symptoms likely also play a role in the spread of COVID-19. Transmission of coronavirus occurs much more commonly through respiratory droplets than through fomites. Current evidence suggests that SARS-CoV-2 may remain viable for hours to days on surfaces made from a variety of materials. Cleaning of visibly dirty surfaces followed by disinfection is a best practice measure for prevention of COVID-19 and other viral respiratory illnesses in households and community settings.
So ... when people read this, they get the idea that COVID-19 is spread readily through HVAC systems (was discussing this with @JAA recently in this thread). Again, if the CDC wants to warn of HVAC-based transmission, say so. Be clearer. And if the virus is truly thought to truly spread through exhaled/spoken aerosol vapor (as opposed to large coughed/sneezed droplets), say exactly that, and clearly.It is unknown how long the air inside a room occupied by someone with confirmed COVID-19 remains potentially infectious. Facilities will need to consider factors such as the size of the room and the ventilation system design (including flowrate [air changes per hour] and location of supply and exhaust vents) when deciding how long to close off rooms or areas used by ill persons before beginning disinfection. Taking measures to improve ventilation in an area or room where someone was ill or suspected to be ill with COVID-19 will help shorten the time it takes respiratory droplets to be removed from the air.
Opps, yep it is actually 100 tests every second. Damn decimal point.I think that is only 2 million tests per week.
I can just imagine the new need for puke bags for the middle seaters. Then whining from people who book the middle seat (or buy basic fares and get put there) and then claim they are motion sick and can't sit there.glock said:With black plexiglass, maybe. No way I want to be eye ball to eye ball with some stranger...![]()
Thanks. That’s what I mean. On the one hand we’ve been told that this virus stays “alive” way longer ok surfaces than others but it’s only transmitted via air? Kind of contradictory and if true don’t be wishy washy.This recent idea that COVID doesn't really spread by touching objects has its root in this CDC advisement that I believe was first posted on April 2nd. It gets brought up in this thread from time to time (including yesterday by parasaurolophus), but the specifics are largely glossed over when we've discussed it. See excerpt below:
IMHO, the advice is confusing and equivocal. The part in red can make people think fomite transmission does not happen, as opposed to fomite transmission not typically being tracked down/recorded. If the CDC means the former, they need to be clearer. And IF the CDC truly means "fomite transmission essentially doesn't happen", the part in green makes little sense -- who cares long the virus lasts on surfaces if the virus doesn't really spread that way?
The next paragraph gets into room ventilation -- keep in mind that this is advice for households caring for a COVID-19 patient:
So ... when people read this, they get the idea that COVID-19 is spread readily through HVAC systems (was discussing this with @JAA recently in this thread). Again, if the CDC wants to warn of HVAC-based transmission, say so. Be clearer. And if the virus is truly thought to truly spread through exhaled/spoken aerosol vapor (as opposed to large coughed/sneezed droplets), say exactly that, and clearly.
...
I've been seriously doubting the ideas that a) fomites don't matter and that b) mere breath or speaking (from normal distances) spreads coronavirus. However, better and more compelling evidence has come out in recent weeks, can the CDC please show its work?
You have to say there are some things that New Yorkers are just better at than everyone else. Proof positive, here.Statorama said:Also: Bill DeBlasio creates tip line for people to rat on their neighbors and hilarity ensues
None of this makes sense. What are you saying here exactly?But the process of ensuring the formula is produce consistently throughout the "batch" is the problem. To get large amounts quickly, the batches tend to get less homogeneous. This is a pretty specialized area in startup of mass production, whether is metals, liquids, or compounds.
Heartbreaking. Can't imagine not being there for my wife. What are their ages?My friend who just lost his wife to covid posted an update on facebook. It is very long so I won't post it. He wanted to thank all the people that have shown his family support and love through the ordeal. Some of it was heart-wrenching... They were in the same hospital, but unable to see each other. Initially I thought for some reason they were in different hospitals. He was there for 5 days. Sitting in his room, heart broken, knowing his wife was on a vent in ICU his daughter called him and told him to look out the window. In the parking lot were a group of family and friends. All socially distanced holding signs of support and waving to him. It was something he really needed to lift his spirits.
When he was being discharged he asked to see her. They of course couldn't let him do that because he had tested positive and would have to pass through areas of the hospital that were sterile between where he was and ICU. It tore him up inside to not be able to hold her hand and comfort her. They did video chats through an app the hospital uses, but she was heavily sedated and non-responsive. His nurse came in the room in full PPE to comfort him when the doctor gave him the news that she was going on the ventilator.
He said he is now 5 days removed from the hospital, quarantined at home. Alone. Grieving his wife's passing. He wants to be with his kids to comfort them. But can't. Then family, friends, neighbors all started showing up at his house. They dropped off flowers outside. Talked to him through the window... All day long... All practicing social distancing but showing him love and support. He said he must have had 50 people show up throughout the day. It really helped lift his spirits.
At the end he said, "I guess what I'm trying to tell you is to take this virus seriously. It can happen to anyone. Thank you to the residents of __________ we have some outstanding folks here and I have an amazing group of family and friends. Thank you all."
Also if he was positive with Covid why couldnt he see his wife?Heartbreaking. Can't imagine not being there for my wife. What are their ages?
I believe he said that they didn't want him traveling through the hospital, possibly infecting others, on his way to see his wife.Also if he was positive with Covid why couldnt he see his wife?
"They of course couldn't let him do that because he had tested positive and would have to pass through areas of the hospital that were sterile between where he was and ICU."Also if he was positive with Covid why couldnt he see his wife?
I didn't read too closely. Thanks"They of course couldn't let him do that because he had tested positive and would have to pass through areas of the hospital that were sterile between where he was and ICU."
![]()
Agreed. The latest on my brother is that once the swelling receded, they found a new tumor on his brain. He is scheduled for surgery Thursday or Friday depending on availability.Heartbreaking. Can't imagine not being there for my wife.
That's tough man. I feel for you. I lived away from both of my parents when they passed (years ago, not because of this). It sucks not being there but sometimes you just can't get there. Stay strong, pray if you're so inclined, send positive thoughts.Agreed. The latest on my brother is that once the swelling receded, they found a new tumor on his brain. He is scheduled for surgery Thursday or Friday depending on availability.
Due to Covid, even his wife is not allowed to visit. (He has tested negative, she has not been tested.)
I'm 850 miles away. Someone asked me if I was going to visit and my answer was "Why?".
She was 53. He is 56.Heartbreaking. Can't imagine not being there for my wife. What are their ages?
It’s too bad you weren’t around to tell folks that it was impossible to build the bomb or put a man on the moon.Opps, yep it is actually 100 tests every second. Damn decimal point.
Heart wrenching. And also inspirational.My friend who just lost his wife to covid posted an update on facebook. It is very long so I won't post it. He wanted to thank all the people that have shown his family support and love through the ordeal. Some of it was heart-wrenching... They were in the same hospital, but unable to see each other. Initially I thought for some reason they were in different hospitals. He was there for 5 days. Sitting in his room, heart broken, knowing his wife was on a vent in ICU his daughter called him and told him to look out the window. In the parking lot were a group of family and friends. All socially distanced holding signs of support and waving to him. It was something he really needed to lift his spirits.
When he was being discharged he asked to see her. They of course couldn't let him do that because he had tested positive and would have to pass through areas of the hospital that were sterile between where he was and ICU. It tore him up inside to not be able to hold her hand and comfort her. They did video chats through an app the hospital uses, but she was heavily sedated and non-responsive. His nurse came in the room in full PPE to comfort him when the doctor gave him the news that she was going on the ventilator.
He said he is now 5 days removed from the hospital, quarantined at home. Alone. Grieving his wife's passing. He wants to be with his kids to comfort them. But can't. Then family, friends, neighbors all started showing up at his house. They dropped off flowers outside. Talked to him through the window... All day long... All practicing social distancing but showing him love and support. He said he must have had 50 people show up throughout the day. It really helped lift his spirits.
At the end he said, "I guess what I'm trying to tell you is to take this virus seriously. It can happen to anyone. Thank you to the residents of __________ we have some outstanding folks here and I have an amazing group of family and friends. Thank you all."
Cuomo stated today that the maximum amount of tests that can be done in NY State, with everything working at capacity, 24/7 would be 40,000 a week.
Thanks for your response to a similar situationIt’s too bad you weren’t around to tell folks that it was impossible to build the bomb or put a man on the moon.
I agree with you. We should still try. Doesn't seem like we are trying very hard.Thanks for your response to a similar situation. How long did it take to get either of those items to fruition? And neither is mass produced and circulated. That is my point, not that we cannot get to the point of the testing materials being produced, but it is a massive effort and takes some time to make and distribute this number of testing kits daily.
Yikes.Cuomo stated today that the maximum amount of tests that can be done in NY State, with everything working at capacity, 24/7 would be 40,000 a week.
We have video of those results in detail - Mulder and Scully did a bang up job.Imagine the brightest minds in the world doing an autopsy on an alien - that's where we are right now.
We'd be there had this effort and focus started late Jan, early Feb.Thanks for your response to a similar situation. How long did it take to get either of those items to fruition? And neither is mass produced and circulated. That is my point, not that we cannot get to the point of the testing materials being produced, but it is a massive effort and takes some time to make and distribute this number of testing kits daily.
Sorry if this was discussed already, just jumped back into the last couple of pages, and had seen this as well this morning. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/22/us/coronavirus-first-united-states-death.htmlEarliest Covid death was Feb 6th in Santa Clara https://twitter.com/joshtpm/status/1252826712963866625?s=21
I have a feeling we'll be saying the same thing in October (i.e. "too late now, if ONLY we had started in _____")We'd be there had this effort and focus started late Jan, early Feb.![]()
And stating the obvious, this wouldn't be such a monumental task today had we begun months ago. It's only a big issue now because it wasn't addressed early. It isn't a big issue now because it's difficult.
Well of course...until meaningful action is taken and an organized, national approach is in place, this is the new normal.I have a feeling we'll be saying the same thing in October (i.e. "too late now, if ONLY we had started in _____")
Scale up issues are a real thing.It's a formula....that formula doesn't change if you make an ounce of reagent or 10 gallons.
To quote a header from the story, "Fast action saves lives."Scale up issues are a real thing.
-----
I haven't seen this posted, so thought I'd drop this one in here. Austria reports a 90% drop in cases by requiring face masks.
Part of me scoffs at the idea of one item being so influential in transmissibility. The other part of me thinks that we should just do this and get back to living. If this is accurate this is the magic bullet we're looking for. And, frankly, I don't see a lot of downsides. There isn't a big negative effect here of requiring us to wear these in public. Why the CDC hasn't weighed the probabilities here I don't know.
Well if that is all we can realistically do we need to figure out how to make that work. We can't just close NYC for good.Cuomo stated today that the maximum amount of tests that can be done in NY State, with everything working at capacity, 24/7 would be 40,000 a week.
The CDC did post the following on April 3rd. We discussed it a bit in this thread. Since this came out, scattered communities across the U.S. have attempted to put this into practice, including NYC (though I don't know if it's just recommendations, or if it has the force of law, or what):I haven't seen this posted, so thought I'd drop this one in here. Austria reports a 90% drop in cases by requiring face masks.
Part of me scoffs at the idea of one item being so influential in transmissibility. The other part of me thinks that we should just do this and get back to living. If this is accurate this is the magic bullet we're looking for. And, frankly, I don't see a lot of downsides. There isn't a big negative effect here of requiring us to wear (masks) in public. Why the CDC hasn't weighed the probabilities here I don't know.
Recommendation Regarding the Use of Cloth Face Coverings, Especially in Areas of Significant Community-Based Transmission
CDC continues to study the spread and effects of the novel coronavirus across the United States. We now know from recent studies that a significant portion of individuals with coronavirus lack symptoms (“asymptomatic”) and that even those who eventually develop symptoms (“pre-symptomatic”) can transmit the virus to others before showing symptoms. This means that the virus can spread between people interacting in close proximity—for example, speaking, coughing, or sneezing—even if those people are not exhibiting symptoms. In light of this new evidence, CDC recommends wearing cloth face coverings in public settings where other social distancing measures are difficult to maintain (e.g., grocery stores and pharmacies) especially in areas of significant community-based transmission.
It is critical to emphasize that maintaining 6-feet social distancing remains important to slowing the spread of the virus. CDC is additionally advising the use of simple cloth face coverings to slow the spread of the virus and help people who may have the virus and do not know it from transmitting it to others. Cloth face coverings fashioned from household items or made at home from common materials at low cost can be used as an additional, voluntary public health measure.
The cloth face coverings recommended are not surgical masks or N-95 respirators. Those are critical supplies that must continue to be reserved for healthcare workers and other medical first responders, as recommended by current CDC guidance.
sure....they aren't prohibitive by any stretch as has been suggested. Again, we are in this position primarily because of a lack of early action, not because it's so hard to do it's taken this long to get it done. There's been very little, meaningful action behind getting testing ramped up. Again, the processing of the test is the last phase here. The first two STILL haven't been addressed, so reagent creation hasn't needed to be scaled up...there is plenty for the current situation and approx another 40-50% increase from where we're at today. The logical thing is to get test kit availability up to current thresholds WHILE working on getting the steps later down the road up to an even higher capacity moving forward. This really isn't all that complicated if one is willing to mandate the work to get thereScale up issues are a real thing.It's a formula....that formula doesn't change if you make an ounce of reagent or 10 gallons.
Why the need for hyperbole?Well if that is all we can realistically do we need to figure out how to make that work. We can just close NYC for good.
It's been rolled out here in the Bay Area counties the past few days, hit my county effective today. News stories indicating fines vary from $50-$1000, depending on the county.The CDC did post the following on April 3rd. We discussed it a bit in this thread. Since this came out, scattered communities across the U.S. have attempted to put this into practice, including NYC (though I don't know if it's just recommendations, or if it has the force of law, or what):
sorry typo, meant to say we can'tWhy the need for hyperbole?
Exactly. Every day we wait to take this seriously is a failure. We've failed every day since late January on this topic. We should all be demanding this of our representatives. Constantly.We'd be there had this effort and focus started late Jan, early Feb.![]()
And stating the obvious, this wouldn't be such a monumental task today had we begun months ago. It's only a big issue now because it wasn't addressed early. It isn't a big issue now because it's difficult.
Thanks for sharing. This is what we need. Appreciate the link.Scale up issues are a real thing.
-----
I haven't seen this posted, so thought I'd drop this one in here. Austria reports a 90% drop in cases by requiring face masks.
Part of me scoffs at the idea of one item being so influential in transmissibility. The other part of me thinks that we should just do this and get back to living. If this is accurate this is the magic bullet we're looking for. And, frankly, I don't see a lot of downsides. There isn't a big negative effect here of requiring us to wear these in public. Why the CDC hasn't weighed the probabilities here I don't know.
Just treat it as lung training, GB.It's been rolled out here in the Bay Area counties the past few days, hit my county effective today. News stories indicating fines vary from $50-$1000, depending on the county.
https://www.marincounty.org/main/county-press-releases/press-releases/2020/hhs-covid-facecoveringorder-041720
That's almost a million tests a day if you roll out the per capita there across the US. I'd sign up for that in a heartbeat.![]()
That isn't going to cut it
Kind of makes the CDC and WHO’s early guidance saying not to wear masks look really really bad.Scale up issues are a real thing.
-----
I haven't seen this posted, so thought I'd drop this one in here. Austria reports a 90% drop in cases by requiring face masks.
Part of me scoffs at the idea of one item being so influential in transmissibility. The other part of me thinks that we should just do this and get back to living. If this is accurate this is the magic bullet we're looking for. And, frankly, I don't see a lot of downsides. There isn't a big negative effect here of requiring us to wear these in public. Why the CDC hasn't weighed the probabilities here I don't know.
This is mostly why I have formed my opinion about this. They are wishy washy right now, but in reading tons of their other bulletins about other diseases that is pretty much how they are. "can't" isnt what we need to look for. I mean they list pre chewed food as a risk for transmitting HIV based on an analysis in 2009 of three cases from 1993-2004. I wasnt joking earlier when i made those comments about zika. It is on their site.Thanks. That’s what I mean. On the one hand we’ve been told that this virus stays “alive” way longer ok surfaces than others but it’s only transmitted via air? Kind of contradictory and if true don’t be wishy washy.