What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

*** OFFICIAL *** COVID-19 CoronaVirus Thread. Fresh epidemic fears as child pneumonia cases surge in Europe after China outbreak. NOW in USA (14 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Not sure why this concept is so difficult for otherwise thoughtful, intelligent people. Rather than accusing others of misinformation, pedantry or hysterical fear, it may be helpful to reread @Doug B’s post:

Nine months ago our numbers were much, much better. We had vaccines then. Monoclonal antibodies too. We also had mask mandates and other restrictions.

Realizing many of you have made the proclamation repeatedly, maybe even in June 2021, If it wasn’t “over” then, why now?

Sure, a lot more people have been infected and/or vaccinated, but do you believe we’ve reached herd immunity? Has the virus lost it’s ability to mutate?

It’s really great the numbers are trending in the right direction and we’re one step closer to normalcy. We can certainly agree in hoping those trends continue. But dismissing an active pandemic within a gestation’s throw of not one, but two major variants emerging seems a bit short-sighted.

Covid-19 remains a public health emergency (at least until April, officially), killing more people daily than any other diagnosis. The ease of vaccination to mitigate that risk doesn’t lessen its importance. A substantial drop in caseload and deaths still need to occur.

What’s the magic number? Nobody knows. But it’s not zero. Personally, I’d be content with flu-like numbers, though even that mark discounts the ginormous worldwide viral reservoir (read: mutation potential), inadequate global access to vaccines/therapeutics, and long term sequelae of covid-19.
Thank you.

That's all I'm saying. Over and over people want to claim it's over and move on because of their feelings and not the facts. Covid 19 does not care about feelings.

I want to move on too. I want to go to restaurants, concerts, etc. We can get there if people would not turn into the Atlanta Falcons and let New England steal the game because they decide it's over with alot of time left on the clock.

 
Calling it just a bad cold is pretty freaking disrespectful to the million-ish Americans who have died and the families left to mourn them and the countless sufferers of chronic illness left in it's wake.

I wasn't questioning your specific sacrifices but speaking in general about cavalier attitudes.
A million vaccinated Americans have not died from covid.

You know how anti-vax people like to talk about how the vaccines don't prevent you from getting covid?  That statement is technically 100% true.  They don't prevent infection.  But you understand perfectly well why such a statement is still misinformation.  While the vaccines don't completely block infection, they do reduce the likelihood of infection, and that's great.  When somebody says "The vaccines don't prevent spread," you understand that they're spreading misinformation by being intentionally misleading.

I am at the point where I am done giving people the benefit of the doubt with this "But look at all the people who died!" talking point.  Yes, it is true that a million Americans have died from covid.  That datapoint is highly misleading when it comes to policymaking in 2022 because the overwhelming majority of those deaths were unvaccinated people.  In 2020, we didn't have to make this distinction because everyone was unvaccinated.  That is not true any more.  You will never convince me that you don't know that.  

This is the neurotic zero-covid equivalent of the "but the vaccines don't prevent spread" line.  It takes a superficially true statement, yanks it completely out of context, and uses it to argue for a non-sensical policy that doesn't follow from the underlying data.  It's possible that a dim-witted person might make this mistake once or twice, but after a while it becomes apparent that it isn't about being dim-witted and it isn't a mistake.  It's an intentional unwillingness to deal with the world as it actually is.

 
Estimated actual case counts are magnitudes higher than confirmed cases. Even there your numbers look low.

https://covid19.healthdata.org/united-states-of-america?view=infections-testing&tab=trend&test=infections
Right. I feel like nobody tests now and if people are positive via at-home test, they aren’t bothering to go get a pcr unless required for work or travel. All of the stats have that caveat that the numbers do NOT include at-home tests, even if those results were reported to their local health department. 

 
A million vaccinated Americans have not died from covid.

You know how anti-vax people like to talk about how the vaccines don't prevent you from getting covid?  That statement is technically 100% true.  They don't prevent infection.  But you understand perfectly well why such a statement is still misinformation.  While the vaccines don't completely block infection, they do reduce the likelihood of infection, and that's great.  When somebody says "The vaccines don't prevent spread," you understand that they're spreading misinformation by being intentionally misleading.

I am at the point where I am done giving people the benefit of the doubt with this "But look at all the people who died!" talking point.  Yes, it is true that a million Americans have died from covid.  That datapoint is highly misleading when it comes to policymaking in 2022 because the overwhelming majority of those deaths were unvaccinated people.  In 2020, we didn't have to make this distinction because everyone was unvaccinated.  That is not true any more.  You will never convince me that you don't know that.  

This is the neurotic zero-covid equivalent of the "but the vaccines don't prevent spread" line.  It takes a superficially true statement, yanks it completely out of context, and uses it to argue for a non-sensical policy that doesn't follow from the underlying data.  It's possible that a dim-witted person might make this mistake once or twice, but after a while it becomes apparent that it isn't about being dim-witted and it isn't a mistake.  It's an intentional unwillingness to deal with the world as it actually is.
Kind of like calling it a cold for the vaccinated, when a #### ton more vaccinated people have died from covid than from a cold.

Sure, the vast majority of vaccinated folks will be fine when they catch it, but it's still an incorrect, tone-deaf thing to say (over and over).

 
Kind of like calling it a cold for the vaccinated, when a #### ton more vaccinated people have died from covid than from a cold.

Sure, the vast majority of vaccinated folks will be fine when they catch it, but it's still an incorrect, tone-deaf thing to say (over and over).
And it’s completely discounting that unvaccinated people exist and are still at risk. As do immunocompromised people, the elderly and those with high risk health conditions. I might not be any of those things, but I sure do know people who are and if they get COVID and die or have serious health complications, that’s still going to be hard to handle.

There was a recent post on here saying they thought some people just wanted COVID to go on forever and that those people were disappointed that the unvaccinated were ‘getting away with it’ and not getting punished. But then we got this crowd that someone dying of COVID doesn’t really matter if they’re unvaccinated.

It’s strange, I worked throughout the entire lockdown and every wave we’ve been through and I’ve never really been concerned about my own risk if I got COVID. I’ve been concerned about bringing it home to family, spreading it my co-workers and their families and all the at-risk patients I see on a regular basis. And when I do consider my own risk, it’s always in the context of how my illness would affect my loved ones.  Maybe that’s why I have such a hard time accepting the DGAF attitude of so many. Some ONLY care about their own risk.

 
Proof of vaccine requirements ended here today.  End of indoor mask mandate moved up from March 21 to March 12
Right.  And this is what most people mean when they say it's finally over.  Zero mandates and we can go back to living life as normal without forced restrictions.  If we choose to.  

Doing that doesn't mean disregard for or not caring about people that will continue to die from covid.  That is a false talking point.  

 
Maybe that’s why I have such a hard time accepting the DGAF attitude of so many. Some ONLY care about their own risk.
There are people like that but I think there are also a lot of people that believe there are enough precautions in place for people that have a higher risk (vaccine, mask up, social distance, etc) that at some point those people do have to take responsibility for their well being without making other people go out of their way. 

The flu has been around for a long time.  It is very deadly.  People that are at higher risk of catching the flu have been living with that risk and taking whatever precautions they deem necessary to be safe for them.   I think many people believe this should carry over to Covid to some degree.  

 
Right.  And this is what most people mean when they say it's finally over.  Zero mandates and we can go back to living life as normal without forced restrictions.  If we choose to.  

Doing that doesn't mean disregard for or not caring about people that will continue to die from covid.  That is a false talking point.  
So people who "choose" to live life "as normal" don't have an increased likelihood of being vectors to keep the virus circulating more widely? 
 

To be clear, I'm all for removing any mask mandates in places it makes sense, and I've never been in favor of vaccine mandates. Hell I'm down in Central America bouncing around in public wind only wearing a mask when required... but cases are rare in areas I'm at and environmental factors are low risk, 
 

However the impact of people behaving recklessly in areas of high transmission are NOT contained to themselves. Their recklessness puts everyone around them at increased risk, 

Failure to understand this nuance is beginning to feel like a modern day proxy for an IQ test (not directing that specifically at you, speaking in generalities here) 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
So people who "choose" to live life "as normal" don't have an increased likelihood of being vectors to keep the virus circulating more widely? 
 

To be clear, I'm all for removing any mask mandates in places it makes sense, and I've never been in favor of vaccine mandates. However the impact of people behaving recklessly in areas of high transmission are NOT contained to themselves. Their recklessness puts everyone around them at increased risk, 

Failure to understand this nuance is beginning to feel like a modern day proxy for an IQ test (not directing that specifically at you, speaking in generalities here) 
No worries mate.  The CDC has a color coded system and my county is green.  It also appears our governor is being a little extra cautious and is behind the CDC by a couple weeks.  We should be all good.  Dare I say, it's over?

 
Right.  And this is what most people mean when they say it's finally over.  Zero mandates and we can go back to living life as normal without forced restrictions.  If we choose to.  

Doing that doesn't mean disregard for or not caring about people that will continue to die from covid.  That is a false talking point.  
it's "over" in certain areas until the next variant that requires additional institutional safeguards.

 
No worries mate.  The CDC has a color coded system and my county is green.  It also appears our governor is being a little extra cautious and is behind the CDC by a couple weeks.  We should be all good.  Dare I say, it's over?
Over.... for NOW, for your area?
Sounds like it could be.
Hopefully it stays that way. 👍🏼
 

Congrats and enjoy it! 

 
it's "over" in certain areas until the next variant that requires additional institutional safeguards.
Cheers mate and cheers to hoping that type of variant doesn't prop up.  I'm just glad people are coming around to the idea that it may be over, the pitchforks were coming out there for a minute.  

 
I think the disconnect I have with some of you is you must live in draconian areas because mandates have been few and far between here in AZ. Also voluntary masking has been pitiful. It's been "over" for most people here for like a year which annoys the crap out of me while I do what I can do mask, distance, vaccinate, and otherwise be respectful towards a selfish society.

 
Cheers mate and cheers to hoping that type of variant doesn't prop up.  I'm just glad people are coming around to the idea that it may be over, the pitchforks were coming out there for a minute.  
Like everything with this... it's not black or white. It "may" be "over" for now, in some areas.

I'm ready for it to be "over" but if we were having two 9/11s a week, I don't think anyone would be saying "it's over because there's not one per day" 

Then again, judging by the posts from some folks, maybe they would be. 

Eithef way stay safe folks... heading down to Tuani's at the pier in San Juan Del Sur for some Mardis Gras festivities. Cheers to those in areas where they can safely kick off Lent 🍻 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Cheers mate and cheers to hoping that type of variant doesn't prop up.  I'm just glad people are coming around to the idea that it may be over, the pitchforks were coming out there for a minute.  
There’s a huge difference between ‘may be over’ and ‘it’s over’ followed by defending that position with downplaying deaths because it’s mainly unvaccinated people.

I don’t think anyone is saying not to remove mask mandates and other restrictions now. The concern is what happens if the cases rise putting counties into the ‘red’. Do you think team ‘it’s over’ will be supportive of reinstating indoor masking when justified? That is the problem.
 

I just want people to remain flexible so that if there’s another wave we can manage it better using reasonable restrictions at the right times. But I don’t see that happening. I see more people getting further jaded and  unwilling to consider any restrictions.

 
There’s a huge difference between ‘may be over’ and ‘it’s over’ followed by defending that position with downplaying deaths because it’s mainly unvaccinated people.

I don’t think anyone is saying not to remove mask mandates and other restrictions now. The concern is what happens if the cases rise putting counties into the ‘red’. Do you think team ‘it’s over’ will be supportive of reinstating indoor masking when justified? That is the problem.
 

I just want people to remain flexible so that if there’s another wave we can manage it better using reasonable restrictions at the right times. But I don’t see that happening. I see more people getting further jaded and  unwilling to consider any restrictions.
Good point, you're exactly right.  Especially all the changes the CDC has made since the peak of Omicron.   I don't think there is any way they walk all that back, no putting that genie back in the bottle.  That's the real reason this is over.  

 
I think the disconnect I have with some of you is you must live in draconian areas because mandates have been few and far between here in AZ. Also voluntary masking has been pitiful. It's been "over" for most people here for like a year which annoys the crap out of me while I do what I can do mask, distance, vaccinate, and otherwise be respectful towards a selfish society.
We still have mask mandates for at least one more week. And we're in the green according to the CDC now.  

And why are we lifting vaccine mandates now that makes no sense to me.  So that basically just rewarded all the people that cried and complained about getting one

 
We still have mask mandates for at least one more week. And we're in the green according to the CDC now.  

And why are we lifting vaccine mandates now that makes no sense to me.  So that basically just rewarded all the people that cried and complained about getting one
Vaccine mandates have lost their benefits with Omicron. With breakthrough infections much more common, they no longer significantly slow the spread. Yes I want everyone to get vaccinated but I think we’re past the point we can compel anyone to get vaccinated. I was a supporter of the mandates but Omicron has changed that. If future boosters prove more effective in decreasing transmission, then vaccine mandates will make sense again.

 
Biff84 said:
Vaccine mandates have lost their benefits with Omicron. With breakthrough infections much more common, they no longer significantly slow the spread. Yes I want everyone to get vaccinated but I think we’re past the point we can compel anyone to get vaccinated. I was a supporter of the mandates but Omicron has changed that. If future boosters prove more effective in decreasing transmission, then vaccine mandates will make sense again.
That's kind of where I'm headed as well. Will Leitch had a column in last week's NYMag that summed up my feelings pretty well: At this point, imposing a vaccine mandate on someone like Kyrie is really only about punishing him for being a jagoff, and while that's certainly an understandable motivation, it's not really the basis for sound public policy.

 
That's kind of where I'm headed as well. Will Leitch had a column in last week's NYMag that summed up my feelings pretty well: At this point, imposing a vaccine mandate on someone like Kyrie is really only about punishing him for being a jagoff, and while that's certainly an understandable motivation, it's not really the basis for sound public policy.


The policy should always have included visiting players and staff.  I don't understand at all why it did not.  Makes no sense.

 
Looks like the anti-vaxx crazies have a new study to misinterpret. Curious what guys like @Terminalxylem think of this. In Vivo not in vitro. Naturally they're trying to take a victory lap on the "alters your DNA" conspiracy   :lol:  
 

https://www.mdpi.com/1467-3045/44/3/73/htm
I read it.

Basically they showed liver cells in culture converted some of the vaccine-derived mRNA to DNA. That’s a far cry from altering our genes, and there’s no biologic plausibility for that to happen. I’ll try to explain in greater detail in the PSF thread about the released Pfizer docs, where I first heard about it.

Time for bed now though.

 
I read it.

Basically they showed liver cells in culture converted some of the vaccine-derived mRNA to DNA. That’s a far cry from altering our genes, and there’s no biologic plausibility for that to happen. I’ll try to explain in greater detail in the PSF thread about the released Pfizer docs, where I first heard about it.

Time for bed now though.
whenever that happens someone copy and paste in here plz? :D  

 
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2789793
 

The COVID Heart—One Year After SARS-CoV-2 Infection, Patients Have an Array of Increased Cardiovascular Risks

JAMA. Published online March 2, 2022. doi:10.1001/jama.2022.2411

NOTE: less than 1% of survey participants were vaccinated.

Patients with COVID-19 were at increased risk of a broad range of cardiovascular disorders including cerebrovascular disorders, dysrhythmias, ischemic and non–ischemic heart disease, pericarditis, myocarditis, heart failure, and thromboembolic disease.

At the 12-month mark, compared with the contemporary control group, for every 1000 people, COVID-19 was associated with an extra:

45.29 incidents of any prespecified cardiovascular outcome

23.48 incidents of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), including myocardial infarction, stroke, and all-cause mortality

19.86 incidents of dysrhythmias, including 10.74 incidents of atrial fibrillation

12.72 incidents of other cardiovascular disorders including 11.61 incidents of heart failure and 3.56 incidents of nonischemic cardiomyopathy

9.88 incidents of thromboembolic disorders, including 5.47 incidents of pulmonary embolism and 4.18 incidents of deep vein thrombosis

7.28 incidents of ischemic heart disease including 5.35 incidents of acute coronary disease, 2.91 incidents of myocardial infarction, and 2.5 incidents of angina

5.48 incidents of cerebrovascular disorders, including 4.03 incidents of stroke

1.23 incidents of inflammatory disease of the heart or pericardium, including 0.98 incidents of pericarditis and 0.31 incidents of myocarditis

Patients with more severe disease—determined by whether they recuperated at home, were hospitalized, or were admitted to the intensive care unit—had higher risks. But the risks were evident even among those who were not hospitalized with COVID-19.

Other subgroup analysis found increased risks regardless of age, race, sex, obesity, smoking, hypertension, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, hyperlipidemia, and preexisting cardiovascular disease.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Wow - been on the road most of the past two days and doesn't look like I missed much of anything on this topic.   I dunno if that's a good thing or not?

 
Wow - been on the road most of the past two days and doesn't look like I missed much of anything on this topic.   I dunno if that's a good thing or not?
I think everyone is focused on Ukraine. Looks like cases are falling quickly. That's a very good thing. We aren't at last summer's low yet though. Just have to hope another variant worst than the last doesn't pop up.

 
cap'n grunge said:
I think everyone is focused on Ukraine. Looks like cases are falling quickly. That's a very good thing. We aren't at last summer's low yet though. Just have to hope another variant worst than the last doesn't pop up.
My link

Don't remember this thread making it to page 2 until now.

 
nirad3 said:
Wow - been on the road most of the past two days and doesn't look like I missed much of anything on this topic.   I dunno if that's a good thing or not?
It’s a good thing until it’s not. One thing to keep an eye on is the funding from Congress. Apparently the funds used to make the vaccine free and purchase therapeutics are running low and they need to ask for more. Hopefully it’s not an issue and just gets approved without a fight. No matter how ‘over’ you think it is, it’s still better to have this at our disposal rather than deal with shortages when we need them.

 
Right.  And this is what most people mean when they say it's finally over.  Zero mandates and we can go back to living life as normal without forced restrictions.  If we choose to.  

Doing that doesn't mean disregard for or not caring about people that will continue to die from covid.  That is a false talking point.  
It's Over™️
 

May 2021

October 2021  

February 2022

 
All mask mandates are over here.  Our schools are mask optional and our kids decided to keep wearing them through spring break since we are going to visit my parents, and both of them check almost every pre-existing condition other than overweight.  At the stores it is around 50/50 but the one thing I have noticed is the people who wear them not covering their nose stick out even more.  I always figured the ones doing it a year ago were the "see I have a mask on" types, but now if you are wearing a mask I assume it is because you believe they work and want that added protection.  If that is the case, why wear it wrong?  Makes no sense.

 
It’s a good thing until it’s not. One thing to keep an eye on is the funding from Congress. Apparently the funds used to make the vaccine free and purchase therapeutics are running low and they need to ask for more. Hopefully it’s not an issue and just gets approved without a fight. No matter how ‘over’ you think it is, it’s still better to have this at our disposal rather than deal with shortages when we need them.
I read a blurb a few days ago suggesting the administration was looking for something like $20B that has not yet been passed? It is important we don't get caught out when the next variant arises like we were for testing of Omicron.

 
At the stores it is around 50/50 but the one thing I have noticed is the people who wear them not covering their nose stick out even more.  I always figured the ones doing it a year ago were the "see I have a mask on" types, but now if you are wearing a mask I assume it is because you believe they work and want that added protection.  If that is the case, why wear it wrong?  Makes no sense.
It's probably the same people that wear them alone in the car or walking outside by themselves.  

 
UOFI_316 said:
All mask mandates are over here.  Our schools are mask optional and our kids decided to keep wearing them through spring break since we are going to visit my parents, and both of them check almost every pre-existing condition other than overweight.  At the stores it is around 50/50 but the one thing I have noticed is the people who wear them not covering their nose stick out even more.  I always figured the ones doing it a year ago were the "see I have a mask on" types, but now if you are wearing a mask I assume it is because you believe they work and want that added protection.  If that is the case, why wear it wrong?  Makes no sense.
I've noticed this too, and to be honest have become one of those people, at least when masks are required.  I've been spending a lot of times in airports / on planes and I am kinda just over the whole mask thing.  

They're not required in stores, etc., around here so I'm definitely no-mask in those places.  

 
I've noticed this too, and to be honest have become one of those people, at least when masks are required.  I've been spending a lot of times in airports / on planes and I am kinda just over the whole mask thing.  

They're not required in stores, etc., around here so I'm definitely no-mask in those places.  
You chin diaper where masks are not mandated? I get being over it where they are not mandated (I'm there too). But, what was described by the OP (practices in places where they are not required) almost sounds like a protest-wearing just to protest-wear. They just can't quit being provocative.

 
You chin diaper where masks are not mandated? I get being over it where they are not mandated (I'm there too). But, what was described by the OP (practices in places where they are not required) almost sounds like a protest-wearing just to protest-wear. They just can't quit being provocative.


I likely misread the post I was replying to.  I poke my nose out so I can breathe better when it IS mandated.  Like at an airport.  If someone tells me to wear it "right", then I apologize and say I didn't realize it had fallen down a bit.  :shrug:  

No one's told me to yet, though.  And I took 3 business trips in the past 3 weeks, so plenty of airport / airplane time.

 
I likely misread the post I was replying to.  I poke my nose out so I can breathe better when it IS mandated.  Like at an airport.  If someone tells me to wear it "right", then I apologize and say I didn't realize it had fallen down a bit.  :shrug:  

No one's told me to yet, though.  And I took 3 business trips in the past 3 weeks, so plenty of airport / airplane time.
Unsurprising that you've not been challenged. Most people are uncomfortable having to police what other people are doing.

 
Unsurprising that you've not been challenged. Most people are uncomfortable having to police what other people are doing.


A guy I know who's been anti-mask since the start has been asked many times to don his mask.  

I think the whole thing is "loosening".

I'm not gonna go so far as to say it's "over", like some here, but things definitely seemed to have turned a corner.

 
A guy I know who's been anti-mask since the start has been asked many times to don his mask.  

I think the whole thing is "loosening".

I'm not gonna go so far as to say it's "over", like some here, but things definitely seemed to have turned a corner.
That's awesome. I just follow guidelines and mandates, and haven't put society in the position of policing me or ever once thought I was going to suffocate.

 
That's awesome. I just follow guidelines and mandates, and haven't put society in the position of policing me or ever once thought I was going to suffocate.


I have been, too, minus the whole "right way to wear a mask" thing as of a couple weeks ago.  Fully vaxxed/boosted, kids vaxxed and I stay home when I don't feel good.  I think that's how everyone should carry on at this point.

 
UOFI_316 said:
All mask mandates are over here.  Our schools are mask optional and our kids decided to keep wearing them through spring break since we are going to visit my parents, and both of them check almost every pre-existing condition other than overweight.  At the stores it is around 50/50 but the one thing I have noticed is the people who wear them not covering their nose stick out even more.  I always figured the ones doing it a year ago were the "see I have a mask on" types, but now if you are wearing a mask I assume it is because you believe they work and want that added protection.  If that is the case, why wear it wrong?  Makes no sense.
I decided at some point in late 2020 that I was just going to stop getting mad at other people's mask choices. But I gotta say, there's something about "d##k-nose" that really bothers me. I think you nailed it: If you're going to make the effort to wear a mask, at least cover up the most important body part.

Best was the guy I saw wearing a "mustache mask". It covered his upper lip, but not his mouth nor his nose.  :shrug:

 
Florida says healthy kids shouldn’t get COVID vaccine, contradicting CDC

Not the thread to discuss the politics of this move, but the question for our purposes is whether this is likely to have any impact on public health. On the one hand, we know that, vaxxed or not, children are unlikely to get seriously ill from Covid. On the other, I believe this is the first time any state government has taken an explicitly anti-vaccine stance (as opposed to simply defending people's right not to get vaccinated). Will that have any ripple effect on adult vaccination rates?

 
I likely misread the post I was replying to.  I poke my nose out so I can breathe better when it IS mandated.  Like at an airport.  If someone tells me to wear it "right", then I apologize and say I didn't realize it had fallen down a bit.  :shrug:  

No one's told me to yet, though.  And I took 3 business trips in the past 3 weeks, so plenty of airport / airplane time.
Yeah, I was referring to places where the mask is not mandated.  You want to wear it because you or someone you have close contact with has underlying health issues and are being super careful, go for it.  You don't want to wear it because you got all your shots or you don't believe the masks do anything, cool.   But at this point in a non mandated area, there is 0 reason to wear it wrong.

 
Florida says healthy kids shouldn’t get COVID vaccine, contradicting CDC

Not the thread to discuss the politics of this move, but the question for our purposes is whether this is likely to have any impact on public health. On the one hand, we know that, vaxxed or not, children are unlikely to get seriously ill from Covid. On the other, I believe this is the first time any state government has taken an explicitly anti-vaccine stance (as opposed to simply defending people's right not to get vaccinated). Will that have any ripple effect on adult vaccination rates?
If it's really just a recommendation (and not a prohibition, like the one the FDA is currently enforcing on kids under 5), this seems pretty reasonable.  I haven't looked at any data beyond just what's been reported in the news, but it sounds like the benefit to vaccinating children, especially young children, is pretty sketchy.  Considering that this is an age group that isn't really affected by covid anyway, it's probably best not to make this one a big sticking point.

My personal two cents is that the best way to build confidence in the vaccines is to be open and honest about what the data show.  The data show a clear, dramatic difference in infection and outcomes between vaccinated adults and unvaccinated adults.  As you look at younger and younger populations, it's harder to find any measurable differences in part because covid is so rare in those age groups and also because the vaccines just don't seem to do a whole lot with little kids.  To me, a position like "This vaccine is a no-brainer for adults but may or not be worth it for children" is a more credible and trust-building message than any alternative. 

 
It's important to keep in mind here that the FDA is literally banning kids under 5 from being vaccinated.  They're not simply recommending against it -- it is illegal to vaccinate your 4 year-old because the FDA says so.  The reason why the FDA has made it illegal to vaccinate very young children is because they can't find a reason to allow it.  

Granted, the FDA is a broken agency that is paralyzed by excessive risk aversion.  It should be abolished, its building should be burned to the ground, and we should start over from scratch with a brand new de-Ba'athified agency.  But covid vaccination for children isn't the slam dunk decision that it is for adults.  This isn't just Florida being Florida.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top