This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
I know things have been bad for black people. Maybe..just maybe Trump will at least try to improve things. This is a start finally with different players. Better than bringing Jackson and Sharpton in like the old stale regimes that never changed anything.
No. The IT staff gave him a different link to use. The response was terribly worded, but he was instructed to go to the legitimate google address, change his password, and turn on two-factor identification. The follow-up email then stated that the link to the Google address (as opposed to the original, Ukranian link), was "real" and asked a member of the IT staff to walk Podesta through changing his password and turning on two-factor identification. Which is probably what the response should have been in the first place.
How are they supposed to run a blind trust without visibility into policy decisions?
If he meant "Illegitimate" he would have said "DO. NOT. CLICK. THAT. LINK." and probably would have instructed him to destroy the email. I don't know if it matters whether it's the IT guy's fault or the aide's (and neither Latham nor Fisher were "IT") but IMO it was a clear screwup from IT even if they did think it was 'illegitimate' (which on the face of things seems absurd, and it's actually worse if that were the case).
What examples from Trump's campaign suggest race relations will be a priority in the Trump administration, and that Trump is equipped to take the lead on improving them?
Well anything Trump does will be an improvement over Obama. By every matrix black people are worse off now than they were 8 years ago and it isn't even an arguement.
You see if he implements all his policy decisions before inauguration and then puts everything into a blind trust...WA LA problem solved.
The last 8 years have not been good for race relations. Just hoping for some change and hopefully some progress with new and different players. I really thought Obama would be that person but it did not seem like a priority for him.
No wonder they don't want any vote ID laws
Is it fair to say you think Obama made race relations worse and that Obama did not create jobs during his presidency?
This is ridiculous. You obviously have no ####### clue about our history in central and south America.
My question was what specifically from Trump's campaign makes you think it will be better under Trump. Is there anything specific other than the triumph of hope over experience?
This is why the popular vote is BS and one reason why the Electoral College is essential: massive voter fraud in the Blue States, especially in their major cities.
You know Stein isn't a Democrat, right?
Thing's are looking up for Kayne, Jim Brown, and Floyd Meriweather, and those are the only black people that matter...DUH
Well, actually this seems to be the problem:
Voter IDs and laws for them would have little effect if the machines are crap.
Yeah, I don't think voter IDs are the problem either. I think we have them in NO and I bet an audit would find something similar.
...and I would not rule out user "error"...
Let's play this out:
"They" who?No wonder they don't want any vote ID laws
-) - FBGs)
seems reasonable....
oh wait, nevermind.
They can't seem to get out of their own way. They're the mush of politics.
Interesting. So, is he now admitting that he purposely takes meetings to positively or negatively affect a stock price?
Some older voting machines are like vending machines in that you feed the ballot into it like you would a dollar bill. You take your smooth, uncreased dollar into it and it's supposed to take it. How often did you get it right on the first try? In my experience, it always felt like something like a crapshoot. It spits the dollar out and you have to re-try it a few times before it accepts it. Sounds like it could be the same thing here.
You should change your user name to avoiding intellectual curiosity as it took you less than 5 minutes to put the below on display, yet again. Bravo.
"They" who?
Your response here is pretty typical of the election back and forth:
1) News reported (eg. Michigan voting problems - Detroit News)
2) Reported again and selectively edited (eg. Detroit Voter Fraud! - Fox News)
3) Posted on another web (eg. Dems voter fraud in Detroit!
4) The pot get stirred (thread here)
It's not the hot topic of "fake news" but it is a distortion of it. You get to feel, apparently, deeply satisfied as it confirmed your sweeping assumptions about "they", whoever "they" are. You're either too lazy (3 clicks is a click too far!), incurious (what happened?), or just don't care ("they" are who I think they are!).
Stop it, already.
I don't know, it depends on the machine.
I'm not sure about that, but he is admitting that a) he has no clue how the stock market actually works and b) that the success of his presidency is tied to it going up. Neither are good. Thank god someone like Cohn is actually in the room.
You're right, it IS a problem. I don't trust these voting machines.
