Yo Mama
Footballguy
And that’s against regular NBA teams, not (most of) our stacked teams.9 teams won 50 or more games last year. Talk about a low bar. GeezChat GPT says: If this were a real NBA team, it could win 50+ games with
And that’s against regular NBA teams, not (most of) our stacked teams.9 teams won 50 or more games last year. Talk about a low bar. GeezChat GPT says: If this were a real NBA team, it could win 50+ games with
My chat GPT summary:My thoughts on team Jayrod:
Starters:
PG - Derrick White; SG - Lu Dort; SF - Jimmy Butler; PF - Giannis; C - Porzingis
This group was built primarily with the idea of surrounding Giannis with complementary players. Defense and shooting were prioritized and while Jimmy doesn't shoot the 3 well, he does everything else very well and will be the glue guy on this squad (even though White is a great glue guy himself). Speaking of White, I don't love him at PG but he has done it before and as for bringing the ball up and initiating the offense, both Butler and Giannis can and will do it effectively. Defensively they are awesome. I really wanted a rim protector that can shoot the 3 and overpaid for KP but he had to fit that exact mold. Lu Dort was the last domino and is the poster child for 3 & D wings. It is a bunch of guys who win and don't have to chuck up 25 shots/game to be effective.
Bench:
Guards - Quickley, Sexton, Grayson Allen & Tre Jones
Wings - Cam Johnson, Duncan Robinson & Champagnie
Bigs - Randle, Ayton & Edey
Randle will be the 6th man and drive the second unit when Giannis is out or go to PF if we want to play smaller/quicker with KP out. The guards & wings can all shoot the 3 well and I've got a couple of options in the post to match up against the bigger/stronger post players in the league (or when KP doesn't play). Defensively not a ton of studs here (Tre Jones is the best defender of the bunch) but my starters are all plus defenders and I'm not subbing 5 at a time so the defensive form will hold with a couple of starters still in the game. It was mostly about shooting to keep the floor spread for the offense and some size to throw at the likes of Jokic, Wemby & Chet.
| Category | Grade | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Offense | A | Great balance of spacing and playmaking. |
| Defense | A | Top 3-5 in the league; elite help defense. |
| Depth | A- | 10-man rotation with multiple looks. |
| Fit | A | Roles are clear and synergistic. |
| Championship Potential | True contender. Could realistically win 60+ games. |
Top 9!9 teams won 50 or more games last year. Talk about a low bar. GeezChat GPT says: If this were a real NBA team, it could win 50+ games with
"If this were a real NBA team" makes me think you would be playing against other real NBA teams. Sounds like a play in team in this leagueAnd that’s against regular NBA teams, not (most of) our stacked teams.9 teams won 50 or more games last year. Talk about a low bar. GeezChat GPT says: If this were a real NBA team, it could win 50+ games with
| Category | Projected Rank | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Offensive Rating | 2nd | Curry–Fox–JJJ spacing + cutting |
| Defensive Rating | 1st | Claxton + Anunoby + Caruso core |
| Net Rating | +9.5 | Championship-level |
| 3P% | 3rd | Curry/OG/JJJ spacing |
| Pace | Top 5 | Fox + DJJ + Gordon transitions |
| Turnover % | Top 10 | McConnell + Caruso ball security |
| Opponent FG% | Lowest | Elite switchable defense |
That team that lost the NBA finals.Will do my write up tomorrow., but just so you know ChatGPT says I would challenge the Warriors 73 wins.
GAME-BY-GAME SIMULATIONi’m lazy:
Let’s break down why a team built around Zach LaVine, Cade Cunningham, Scottie Barnes, Karl-Anthony Towns, and Donovan Clingan could realistically contend for (and possibly win) an NBA title — assuming they have decent coaching and role players around them.
⸻
1. Perfect Modern Balance of Skills
This lineup checks nearly every modern NBA box:
• Shot creation – LaVine and Cunningham can both create their own looks and run pick-and-rolls.
• Playmaking – Cunningham and Barnes both average high assist numbers for their positions, giving you multiple play initiators.
• Spacing – Towns is one of the best 3-point shooting bigs in NBA history, and LaVine’s a career ~38% shooter from deep.
• Defense – Barnes’ length and Clingan’s rim protection form a solid defensive backbone.
You’d have no glaring weak link on either end if they buy in.
⸻
2. Offensive Versatility
You could attack in several ways:
• Pick-and-pop with Cunningham + Towns → unguardable spacing.
• Drive-and-kick with Barnes → creates open corner threes for LaVine or Towns.
• Post play and high-low action with Towns and Clingan → punishes smaller lineups.
• Transition → Barnes and LaVine both thrive in open court situations.
They could toggle between a fast-paced, perimeter-oriented game or slow it down and use Towns’ size advantage.
⸻
3. Defensive Synergy
While LaVine and Towns aren’t elite defenders, pairing them with:
• Barnes (switchable 1–4)
• Clingan (elite rim protector / drop coverage anchor)
• Cunningham (strong positional defender at guard)
…creates a solid scheme foundation. Barnes can clean up perimeter breakdowns, and Clingan can erase mistakes at the rim.
⸻
4. Age and Growth Curve
• Cunningham (23), Barnes (23), Clingan (21) → all on an upward trajectory.
• Towns (29) → entering his prime years.
• LaVine (30) → still in his athletic window.
You’d get a blend of youth, experience, and prime talent, meaning this core could compete for multiple years, not just one.
⸻
5. Championship Blueprint Comparison
This group mirrors successful title builds:
• Playmaking wings + elite shooting big (like Jokic + Murray + MPJ)
• Versatile defense anchored by a rim protector (like Boston’s core with Horford + Porzingis + Tatum + White)
• Multiple shot creators (like Golden State’s Curry + Thompson + Durant era)
They’d fit the mold of the modern multi-creator, high-spacing, switchable-defense contender.
⸻
6. X-Factor: Donovan Clingan
If Clingan’s defense and rebounding translate as projected — think a young Brook Lopez or prime Gobert with better touch — he unlocks the lineup’s ceiling. Towns can stretch the floor while Clingan protects the rim, giving you the rare offense-defense combo that’s hard to counter.
⸻
In short:
This team could win an NBA title because it has:
• Multiple elite creators (Cade + LaVine)
• A versatile defensive engine (Barnes + Clingan)
• A floor-spacing big who keeps defenses honest (Towns)
• Balance, versatility, and scalability — the three pillars of a championship team.
One thing I noticed when playing around with chat GPT is that it doesn't seem to take current player status/health/team into account. It wanted to include last season's Jayson Tatum in its analysis and had KP and Holiday as Celtics. It also seems wayyyy too high on Joel Embiid.
Built in knowledge from the basic Chat GPT is as of June 2024. If you specifically ask it to research current information, it will do a little better.One thing I noticed when playing around with chat GPT is that it doesn't seem to take current player status/health/team into account. It wanted to include last season's Jayson Tatum in its analysis and had KP and Holiday as Celtics. It also seems wayyyy too high on Joel Embiid.
That team that lost the NBA finals.Will do my write up tomorrow., but just so you know ChatGPT says I would challenge the Warriors 73 wins.
One thing I noticed when playing around with chat GPT is that it doesn't seem to take current player status/health/team into account. It wanted to include last season's Jayson Tatum in its analysis and had KP and Holiday as Celtics. It also seems wayyyy too high on Joel Embiid.
Paul George likes this post
Take that @EephusI'd rather do what if sports than Chat GPT any day