It was him or Feller, can't go wrong either way....nice one.I need an arm (particularly a lefty) and am going with Whitey Ford.
God, I seem like a Yankees homer.![]()
I guess you never saw that Mets/Marlins game where they tore off like 13 SBs against him.That guy is a liability behind the plate. It would pain me very much to call him an average defensive catcher.Piazza consistently grades out as a B+ fielder with A+ range. Bench grades out as a A-/B+ fielder with B+ range. I'd take Piazza every time.:rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao:Mike Piazza? Better with the glove.I'm taking Johnny Bench, greatest catcher ever, not up for debate.![]()
Pitching run?![]()
against speed teams Piazza becomes a big liability on defense. Against other teams, he becomes slightly above average .I guess you never saw that Mets/Marlins game where they tore off like 13 SBs against him.That guy is a liability behind the plate. It would pain me very much to call him an average defensive catcher.Piazza consistently grades out as a B+ fielder with A+ range. Bench grades out as a A-/B+ fielder with B+ range. I'd take Piazza every time.:rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao:Mike Piazza? Better with the glove.I'm taking Johnny Bench, greatest catcher ever, not up for debate.![]()
If Harrier picked piazza over Bench, he clearly is going for the sim crown. Piazza has gaudy salary numbers over there. Bench stinks over there (in his third year). I see no problem with going for the sim. Piazza and Bonds will be unbeatable on the sim....I guess you never saw that Mets/Marlins game where they tore off like 13 SBs against him.That guy is a liability behind the plate. It would pain me very much to call him an average defensive catcher.Piazza consistently grades out as a B+ fielder with A+ range. Bench grades out as a A-/B+ fielder with B+ range. I'd take Piazza every time.:rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao:Mike Piazza? Better with the glove.I'm taking Johnny Bench, greatest catcher ever, not up for debate.![]()
Awwwww @#@#!!!Nice pick Pickles....damn nice.I need an arm (particularly a lefty) and am going with Whitey Ford.
God, I seem like a Yankees homer.![]()
The sim is just killing this thing. It's bad enough that those who follow the guidelines and ignore it will have to spend two months managing a team that will get clobbered.But now its even killing the discussion, because you can't even talk up players without someone throwing out assinine grades from a system that rates Mike Piazza as a better defensive catcher than Johnny Bench.grades out how? on some sim league or in the realities of baseball? what are your grades. if they are the grades from what if sports, while meaningful in the sim, that is certainly no bible on reality in and of itself. Bench was better and I am a BIG Piazza fan, as a Mets fan.Yeah, but you get Piazza at first base, not at catcher.Piazza consistently grades out as a B+ fielder with A+ range. Bench grades out as a A-/B+ fielder with B+ range. I'd take Piazza every time.:rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao:Mike Piazza? Better with the glove.I'm taking Johnny Bench, greatest catcher ever, not up for debate.![]()
I think it'll all work out in the end. People who pick based on that sim are gonna be suprised when salary does not necessarily=production based on everything I've heard. I think we'll be alright. Any negatives are gonna be outweighed by the positives of getting to see it play out over the course of a season imo.The sim is just killing this thing. It's bad enough that those who follow the guidelines and ignore it will have to spend two months managing a team that will get clobbered.But now its even killing the discussion, because you can't even talk up players without someone throwing out assinine grades from a system that rates Mike Piazza as a better defensive catcher than Johnny Bench.grades out how? on some sim league or in the realities of baseball? what are your grades. if they are the grades from what if sports, while meaningful in the sim, that is certainly no bible on reality in and of itself. Bench was better and I am a BIG Piazza fan, as a Mets fan.Yeah, but you get Piazza at first base, not at catcher.Piazza consistently grades out as a B+ fielder with A+ range. Bench grades out as a A-/B+ fielder with B+ range. I'd take Piazza every time.:rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao:Mike Piazza? Better with the glove.I'm taking Johnny Bench, greatest catcher ever, not up for debate.![]()
No one said to ignore the sim, they just said not to draft for it. I picked Mordecai Brown, and he's not very highly rated by the sim, especially with regard to the other pitchers that were on the board at the time. But if you don't like your own lot, pick differently. Otherwise, save theThe sim is just killing this thing. It's bad enough that those who follow the guidelines and ignore it will have to spend two months managing a team that will get clobbered.But now its even killing the discussion, because you can't even talk up players without someone throwing out assinine grades from a system that rates Mike Piazza as a better defensive catcher than Johnny Bench.grades out how? on some sim league or in the realities of baseball? what are your grades. if they are the grades from what if sports, while meaningful in the sim, that is certainly no bible on reality in and of itself. Bench was better and I am a BIG Piazza fan, as a Mets fan.Yeah, but you get Piazza at first base, not at catcher.Piazza consistently grades out as a B+ fielder with A+ range. Bench grades out as a A-/B+ fielder with B+ range. I'd take Piazza every time.:rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao:Mike Piazza? Better with the glove.I'm taking Johnny Bench, greatest catcher ever, not up for debate.![]()
for your mother.It's interesting that you find their defensive grades asinine. Would you like to provide grades of your own, if you are qualified to do so? Assuming you aren't, would you like to provide the grades of ELIAS or Stats Inc. or some other reputable source? Please feel free.People are just biased against modern players, that's all. I'm sure when you were a kid, Johnny Bench was the ####, but Mike Piazza is the best catcher that ever played, and there's no two ways about that.The sim is just killing this thing. It's bad enough that those who follow the guidelines and ignore it will have to spend two months managing a team that will get clobbered.But now its even killing the discussion, because you can't even talk up players without someone throwing out assinine grades from a system that rates Mike Piazza as a better defensive catcher than Johnny Bench.grades out how? on some sim league or in the realities of baseball? what are your grades. if they are the grades from what if sports, while meaningful in the sim, that is certainly no bible on reality in and of itself. Bench was better and I am a BIG Piazza fan, as a Mets fan.Yeah, but you get Piazza at first base, not at catcher.Piazza consistently grades out as a B+ fielder with A+ range. Bench grades out as a A-/B+ fielder with B+ range. I'd take Piazza every time.:rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao:Mike Piazza? Better with the glove.I'm taking Johnny Bench, greatest catcher ever, not up for debate.![]()
salary does not necessarily=production based on everything I've heard

I am more suprised that Tim Raines went before Gwynn. Maybe HE had a great third season.Gwynn is an interesting pick... perhaps he has a great third salary year (but I kid! sorta.). Did not know where he would fall. What an amazing stroke though.I really like the Simmons choice - a player I should know more about. How consitent was he aside from that awesome peak?
All about the steals.I am more suprised that Tim Raines went before Gwynn. Maybe HE had a great third season.Gwynn is an interesting pick... perhaps he has a great third salary year (but I kid! sorta.). Did not know where he would fall. What an amazing stroke though.I really like the Simmons choice - a player I should know more about. How consitent was he aside from that awesome peak?
Mike Piazza? Better with the bat. Better with the glove.Oh, he is a homo, though, or at very least a metro, and catchers are supposed to be TOUGH MEN. Guess I was wrong.I'm taking Johnny Bench, greatest catcher ever, not up for debate.
Here is a great breakdown of how defensively good Bench was and how bad Piazza was.You've pretty much shown me with that statement that you don't know @#$%. I find you amusing.It's interesting that you find their defensive grades asinine. Would you like to provide grades of your own, if you are qualified to do so? Assuming you aren't, would you like to provide the grades of ELIAS or Stats Inc. or some other reputable source? Please feel free.People are just biased against modern players, that's all. I'm sure when you were a kid, Johnny Bench was the ####, but Mike Piazza is the best catcher that ever played, and there's no two ways about that.The sim is just killing this thing. It's bad enough that those who follow the guidelines and ignore it will have to spend two months managing a team that will get clobbered.But now its even killing the discussion, because you can't even talk up players without someone throwing out assinine grades from a system that rates Mike Piazza as a better defensive catcher than Johnny Bench.grades out how? on some sim league or in the realities of baseball? what are your grades. if they are the grades from what if sports, while meaningful in the sim, that is certainly no bible on reality in and of itself. Bench was better and I am a BIG Piazza fan, as a Mets fan.Yeah, but you get Piazza at first base, not at catcher.Piazza consistently grades out as a B+ fielder with A+ range. Bench grades out as a A-/B+ fielder with B+ range. I'd take Piazza every time.:rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao:Mike Piazza? Better with the glove.I'm taking Johnny Bench, greatest catcher ever, not up for debate.![]()
That only has information about catching guys stealing. As many people have pointed out, it's not that hard to run on Piazza. He has a pansy arm. That's only one element of a catcher's defense, though. Athleticism in blocking balls, controlling the plate, range in getting to pop-ups... all of those things are included as well in a catcher's total defensive rating. It's one thing to say that Bench was a lot harder to run on. That's tru.e But if you don't have a lot of speed on your team, I think you'd rather see Bench behind the plate than Piazza.Mike Piazza? Better with the bat. Better with the glove.Oh, he is a homo, though, or at very least a metro, and catchers are supposed to be TOUGH MEN. Guess I was wrong.I'm taking Johnny Bench, greatest catcher ever, not up for debate.Here is a great breakdown of how defensively good Bench was and how bad Piazza was.
LINK
If you don't understand that statement, you pretty much don't know ####. I find that amusing. Also find it amusing that I'm kicking ### in the draft right now. Sorry, suckers.Edit to add: I don't see anywhere that I said Piazza had a better arm than Bench. Go ahead and find me that if you can. I said he had a better glove, and he did.You've pretty much shown me with that statement that you don't know @#$%. I find you amusing.It's interesting that you find their defensive grades asinine. Would you like to provide grades of your own, if you are qualified to do so? Assuming you aren't, would you like to provide the grades of ELIAS or Stats Inc. or some other reputable source? Please feel free.People are just biased against modern players, that's all. I'm sure when you were a kid, Johnny Bench was the ####, but Mike Piazza is the best catcher that ever played, and there's no two ways about that.The sim is just killing this thing. It's bad enough that those who follow the guidelines and ignore it will have to spend two months managing a team that will get clobbered.But now its even killing the discussion, because you can't even talk up players without someone throwing out assinine grades from a system that rates Mike Piazza as a better defensive catcher than Johnny Bench.grades out how? on some sim league or in the realities of baseball? what are your grades. if they are the grades from what if sports, while meaningful in the sim, that is certainly no bible on reality in and of itself. Bench was better and I am a BIG Piazza fan, as a Mets fan.Yeah, but you get Piazza at first base, not at catcher.Piazza consistently grades out as a B+ fielder with A+ range. Bench grades out as a A-/B+ fielder with B+ range. I'd take Piazza every time.:rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao:Mike Piazza? Better with the glove.I'm taking Johnny Bench, greatest catcher ever, not up for debate.![]()
i think a lot of teams will play station to station. The teams that don't might really expose Piazza.That only has information about catching guys stealing. As many people have pointed out, it's not that hard to run on Piazza. He has a pansy arm. That's only one element of a catcher's defense, though. Athleticism in blocking balls, controlling the plate, range in getting to pop-ups... all of those things are included as well in a catcher's total defensive rating. It's one thing to say that Bench was a lot harder to run on. That's tru.e But if you don't have a lot of speed on your team, I think you'd rather see Bench behind the plate than Piazza.Mike Piazza? Better with the bat. Better with the glove.Oh, he is a homo, though, or at very least a metro, and catchers are supposed to be TOUGH MEN. Guess I was wrong.I'm taking Johnny Bench, greatest catcher ever, not up for debate.Here is a great breakdown of how defensively good Bench was and how bad Piazza was.
LINK
But will he kiss back..Capella has the best team so far.......
Sure has lots of "name" players, yes. They should be very recognizable.Capella has the best team so far.......
But if you don't have a lot of speed on your team, I think you'd rather see Bench behind the plate than Piazza.
Good luck with that in this league.BWAAAAHHHHHAAAAAA! And you guys laughed at me for passing on him?!?!?!?!?Also, Babe Ruth's third best season is as a pitcher (FYI), better draft accordingly.
No, his best pitching season is like his 5th or 6th best game salary.I was gonna use that one but it doesn't fly.Also, Babe Ruth's third best season is as a pitcher (FYI), better draft accordingly.
Then what does salary equal if not production? Just a random number?salary does not necessarily=production based on everything I've heard![]()
uh, no it isn't. Get your facts right before posting garbage.Why are you flaming nipsey for asking a legit question? Greenberg has to play in the OF? That kind of kills the spirit of the draft. It seems like guys should get to play their natural position. If they have more than one, more power to you. Also, Babe Ruth's third best season is as a pitcher (FYI), better draft accordingly.
I explained it before using a basketball analogy....what do you think they make you pay more for points or rebounds? Same thing in here...they put more stock in some things than others when assigning dollar value. It isn't meant to equal best all-around player....and certainly doesn't equal all around best player for your team. It's funny cuz the sim'll proboably work out just fine if you draft good players. I think that's a pretty safe assumption.Then what does salary equal if not production? Just a random number?salary does not necessarily=production based on everything I've heard![]()
Does that mean Ruth is still available as a pitcher because he is two players?!?!!?If not, does that mean you add his salary as a pitcher and salary as a hitter together in years he did both because he is one player???UConn, you really have to get off your high horse. The debate isn't what's driving people away, it's your ####-### attitude to people who don't see things in the ultra-simplistic way you do.Relax. And if you can't answer a question with anything other than (paraphrasing here) "#### you", then don't answer it. TIA.uh, no it isn't. Get your facts right before posting garbage.Why are you flaming nipsey for asking a legit question? Greenberg has to play in the OF? That kind of kills the spirit of the draft. It seems like guys should get to play their natural position. If they have more than one, more power to you. Also, Babe Ruth's third best season is as a pitcher (FYI), better draft accordingly.
Uh Oh!!!!!whatisfports allows me to add Ruth as a pitcher in 1917 and Ruth as an outfielder in 1920 to the same team!Does that mean Ruth is still available as a pitcher because he is two players?!?!!?If not, does that mean you add his salary as a pitcher and salary as a hitter together in years he did both because he is one player???

Why type a bold face lie and then cry when somebody calls you out on it? You express your opinion plenty Nipsey. I'll express mine as well.UConn, you really have to get off your high horse. The debate isn't what's driving people away, it's your ####-### attitude to people who don't see things in the ultra-simplistic way you do.Relax. And if you can't answer a question with anything other than (paraphrasing here) "#### you", then don't answer it. TIA.uh, no it isn't. Get your facts right before posting garbage.Why are you flaming nipsey for asking a legit question? Greenberg has to play in the OF? That kind of kills the spirit of the draft. It seems like guys should get to play their natural position. If they have more than one, more power to you. Also, Babe Ruth's third best season is as a pitcher (FYI), better draft accordingly.
Personally, I don't think that's a safe assumption. I don't think you can assume just because you think a player is good, that you can ignore the salary component. Otherwise, why have the salaries at all? Why not just use a guys statistics and be done with it. To assume the salaries are not a vital component to the sim, is not being realistic, IMO.I explained it before using a basketball analogy....what do you think they make you pay more for points or rebounds? Same thing in here...they put more stock in some things than others when assigning dollar value. It isn't meant to equal best all-around player....and certainly doesn't equal all around best player for your team. It's funny cuz the sim'll proboably work out just fine if you draft good players. I think that's a pretty safe assumption.Then what does salary equal if not production? Just a random number?salary does not necessarily=production based on everything I've heard![]()
That isn't unique to a pitching-hitting split.You could also take Babe Ruth '26, Babe Ruth '27 and Babe Ruth '28 and put them all in the same outfield.Uh Oh!!!!!whatisfports allows me to add Ruth as a pitcher in 1917 and Ruth as an outfielder in 1920 to the same team!Does that mean Ruth is still available as a pitcher because he is two players?!?!!?If not, does that mean you add his salary as a pitcher and salary as a hitter together in years he did both because he is one player???
What did I say that was a lie? I just asked a reasonable ####### question!Why type a bold face lie and then cry when somebody calls you out on it? You express your opinion plenty Nipsey. I'll express mine as well.UConn, you really have to get off your high horse. The debate isn't what's driving people away, it's your ####-### attitude to people who don't see things in the ultra-simplistic way you do.Relax. And if you can't answer a question with anything other than (paraphrasing here) "#### you", then don't answer it. TIA.uh, no it isn't. Get your facts right before posting garbage.Why are you flaming nipsey for asking a legit question? Greenberg has to play in the OF? That kind of kills the spirit of the draft. It seems like guys should get to play their natural position. If they have more than one, more power to you. Also, Babe Ruth's third best season is as a pitcher (FYI), better draft accordingly.
Babe Ruth's 3rd best salary=Babe Ruth the pitcheryou didn't type it but the guy who did typed bad info. to stir up controversy (something a select few people have consistantly done in both drafts...)What did I say that was a lie? I just asked a reasonable ####### question!Why type a bold face lie and then cry when somebody calls you out on it? You express your opinion plenty Nipsey. I'll express mine as well.UConn, you really have to get off your high horse. The debate isn't what's driving people away, it's your ####-### attitude to people who don't see things in the ultra-simplistic way you do.Relax. And if you can't answer a question with anything other than (paraphrasing here) "#### you", then don't answer it. TIA.uh, no it isn't. Get your facts right before posting garbage.Why are you flaming nipsey for asking a legit question? Greenberg has to play in the OF? That kind of kills the spirit of the draft. It seems like guys should get to play their natural position. If they have more than one, more power to you. Also, Babe Ruth's third best season is as a pitcher (FYI), better draft accordingly.
Who slowed up anything? We've waiting for you on more than one occasion in this thing. Don't even try to say that asking for a clarification of the rules is holding anything up. Guys not being on the site is what holds it up, not discussion about the league itself.Again, thanks for the condescending attitude for not sharing your simplistic views...and there wouldn't be a debate if people'd just draft good players and move....really isn't a reason for it. All it does is SLOW the draft down and force people like Capella, me, ect. to explain things that have little relevance other than nitpicking and slowing down a very fun draft and simple idea. The rules thread was completed a week ago. Lets pick players now. If you didn't get in and get things clarified in there it's your problem. PM's work fine as well. I think most people can see who wants to bend rules and drag stuff out and who wants to have fun. I'm in the lets pick 'em up and play 'em up crowd so don't give me some made up "attitude" red herring.
That would be great for the rest of us....I'm thinking about pm'ing Cappy a top 400 or however many I need to finish and having him just pick mine out.