anborn
Footballguy
easily the worst video game ever...34.18

easily the worst video game ever...34.18

a
b
i
e
s are g
r
e
a
tWe're picking up on it.The irony of stating your preference for the white slugger (Babe) over the two black guys (Hank and Barry), followed by taking That N*gger's Crazy - not lost on anyone.Ah, what do most of you know from funny. I'm killing here and I feel like Michael Richards in a Harlem bar.
I kinda need a new sig.UH - you're right, senior moment there...42-43 Dizzy and Yardbird were creating (unrecorded!! because of the strike) the new sound that lost the whiteys. The 'Cool Jazz Break' is overexaggerated, though - most of the guys came from bebop.![]()
OK, done boiling baby bottles, one last Hipple® for the road...
This kind of free flowing discussion - arguing which album had more influence, sharing concert or exhibit experiences, back story info, talking about how a pick impact your life in a personal way - that is the best part of the draft.
'twas a lot of that, especially early, in the Greatest American Draft. That's why most of us liked that one best.
There was a lot more self-pimping in the Worlds Greatest. The two biggest debbie downers were religion and Sun Tzu 1.01, but whipping it out to see who's bigger gets old quick.
IN BOTH DRAFTS, the judging sucked. Some were better than others. But IMO, there just wasn't much added value - and it caused a lot of dissension. Too much nashing of teeth for something that should be fun. Ditto for the playoffs, which were a jok:e:
This draft? Actually...I'm not sure, I haven't really paid attention (as I have demonstrated with my :honda: picks). I know everyone is weary of arguments about wrestlemania and soap.
That's why I have had an epiphany this week that krista4 is right. Judging, rankings, its OK if that is what the majority wants, but seriously, the enrichment factor is from the discussion, not who wins.
![]()

My wife is a Sondheim nut. I was tempted by a few other Sondheim's, especially those where he also wrote the music, but this is typically considered the best musical, so I went with Gypsy. I just liked this quote, I can't get in a lot of detail because of spotlighting a couple of his other plays, but I think it shows that unlike many (most?) musicals, a typical Sondheim will challenge you and have complex, interesting characters and plots.Gypsy has been referred to as the greatest American musical by numerous critics and writers, among them Ben Brantley and Frank Rich; Rich even goes so far as to call it the American musical theatre's answer to King Lear. Theater critic Clive Barnes wrote that "Gypsy is one of the best of musicals...." He described the character of Rose as "one of the few truly complex characters in the American musical...."
Sondheim took a dim view of today's musicals. What works now, he said, are musicals that are easy to take; audiences don't want to be challenged.
Stevie needs some more love here:34.20 Innervisions - Stevie Wonder (Album)Probably the album I listen to more than any other. Perfection from beginning to end.
Stevie needs some more love here:
34.20 Innervisions - Stevie Wonder (Album)
Probably the album I listen to more than any other. Perfection from beginning to end.
I love that part, though at the same time it also creeps me out a little.OK, I went back and forth between this and one other pick, so this is my official request that no one steal my other pick. TIA.Stevie needs some more love here:
34.20 Innervisions - Stevie Wonder (Album)
Probably the album I listen to more than any other. Perfection from beginning to end.Todo tambien chevre.
Chev-re.
I love Ethel Merman's voice in that show- one of the great distinctive voices in American theatre:
I had a DREAM!!! A DREAM about YOU BABE!!!
YOU'LL...
BE...
SWELL!!! You'll be great! You will have the whole world on a PLATE!!!
She belts it out.
Stevie needs some more love here:34.20 Innervisions - Stevie Wonder (Album)Probably the album I listen to more than any other. Perfection from beginning to end.
You both are spotlighting!I love Ethel Merman's voice in that show- one of the great distinctive voices in American theatre:
I had a DREAM!!! A DREAM about YOU BABE!!!
YOU'LL...
BE...
SWELL!!! You'll be great! You will have the whole world on a PLATE!!!
She belts it out.
Here's a little backstory on Gypsy.http://www.steynonline.com/content/view/2073/106/krista4 said:For Fennis:
35.01 Gypsy: A Musical Fable Music Jule Styne Lyrics Stephen Sondheim Book Arthur Laurents
My wife is a Sondheim nut. I was tempted by a few other Sondheim's, especially those where he also wrote the music, but this is typically considered the best musical, so I went with Gypsy. I just liked this quote, I can't get in a lot of detail because of spotlighting a couple of his other plays, but I think it shows that unlike many (most?) musicals, a typical Sondheim will challenge you and have complex, interesting characters and plots.Gypsy has been referred to as the greatest American musical by numerous critics and writers, among them Ben Brantley and Frank Rich; Rich even goes so far as to call it the American musical theatre's answer to King Lear. Theater critic Clive Barnes wrote that "Gypsy is one of the best of musicals...." He described the character of Rose as "one of the few truly complex characters in the American musical...."
Sondheim took a dim view of today's musicals. What works now, he said, are musicals that are easy to take; audiences don't want to be challenged.
Your sister is a very smart woman.35.02 - Rear Window - Alfred Hitchcock - Movie
I gotta give props to my sister for this pick. She recommended it to me. She's much more in tune with the critically acclaimed classics than I am.
Rear Window (1954) is a suspense film directed by Alfred Hitchcock, and written by John Michael Hayes, based on Cornell Woolrich's 1942 short story "It Had to Be Murder", and starring James Stewart, Grace Kelly, Thelma Ritter, Wendell Corey and Raymond Burr. The film is considered by many film-goers, critics, and scholars to be one of Hitchcock's best and most thrilling pictures.
Rear Window, which received four Academy Award nominations, was added to the United States National Film Registry in 1997. It was ranked #48 on AFI's 100 Years... 100 Movies (10th Anniversary Edition). Also, it ranks #17 on the IMDB top 250.
IMDB
Wiki

This was the 2nd of 3 movies that I was debating taking with my last spot (took Apocalypse Now).35.02 - Rear Window - Alfred Hitchcock - Movie
I gotta give props to my sister for this pick. She recommended it to me. She's much more in tune with the critically acclaimed classics than I am.
Rear Window (1954) is a suspense film directed by Alfred Hitchcock, and written by John Michael Hayes, based on Cornell Woolrich's 1942 short story "It Had to Be Murder", and starring James Stewart, Grace Kelly, Thelma Ritter, Wendell Corey and Raymond Burr. The film is considered by many film-goers, critics, and scholars to be one of Hitchcock's best and most thrilling pictures.
Rear Window, which received four Academy Award nominations, was added to the United States National Film Registry in 1997. It was ranked #48 on AFI's 100 Years... 100 Movies (10th Anniversary Edition). Also, it ranks #17 on the IMDB top 250.
IMDB
Wiki
IMO North By Northwest is his best.I go back and forth between Vertigo and Rear Window as to which one is the best Hitchcock film. IMO, these two rise above the others. It's interesting to note that they both feature voyeurism as a theme, which was something old Alfred was obsessed with. In both movies, James Stewart spends much of his time simply watching other people. Great pick.
IMO North By Northwest is his best.I go back and forth between Vertigo and Rear Window as to which one is the best Hitchcock film. IMO, these two rise above the others. It's interesting to note that they both feature voyeurism as a theme, which was something old Alfred was obsessed with. In both movies, James Stewart spends much of his time simply watching other people. Great pick.
Here's what is great about Hitchcock - you can get three to six different people arguing for their favorite, and they all have a legitimate claim.IMO North By Northwest is his best.I go back and forth between Vertigo and Rear Window as to which one is the best Hitchcock film. IMO, these two rise above the others. It's interesting to note that they both feature voyeurism as a theme, which was something old Alfred was obsessed with. In both movies, James Stewart spends much of his time simply watching other people. Great pick.Here's what is great about Hitchcock - you can get three to six different people arguing for their favorite, and they all have a legitimate claim.
Who else can you say that about within their genre? Beethoven...Miles...not too many.
Critics don't even come anywhere near agreement on this.
ARRRRRRRRRRRRRRGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH! Thought about this a while ago but thought I could wait.35.04 Dead Souls by Nikolai Gogol (Novel)
Another bizarre and wonderful Russian novel. If you read it, you won't forget it. It's plot is typically absurd: it's been years since the Census, and several upper class are still paying taxes on their dead serfs (slaves.) This unscrupulous merchant (Chichikov) schemes to "buy" these "dead souls" off the wealthy so that he can claim to have hundreds of slaves, winning him prestige- so who cares if they're all dead? A host of interesting and ridiculous characters are encountered along the way.
There's one passage I distinctly remember, but I can't find it to quote, unfortunately. There's this nobleman with nothing to do all day, who determines he's going to write a book that will illuminate all of the grand problems of humanity- he will answer all moral and social questions. The book gets larger and larger in his mind, (it will be several thousand pages) but after the first paragraph, he suffers from "writers block". Soon he is reduced to drawing pictures on the rest of the blank page, and after that he falls asleep.
Highly recommended.
tim, I'm starting to hate you as much as I hate Abrantes.
Gotta throw Shakespeare in that group as well.IMO North By Northwest is his best.I go back and forth between Vertigo and Rear Window as to which one is the best Hitchcock film. IMO, these two rise above the others. It's interesting to note that they both feature voyeurism as a theme, which was something old Alfred was obsessed with. In both movies, James Stewart spends much of his time simply watching other people. Great pick.Here's what is great about Hitchcock - you can get three to six different people arguing for their favorite, and they all have a legitimate claim.
Who else can you say that about within their genre? Beethoven...Miles...not too many.
Beatles.Gotta throw Shakespeare in that group as well.IMO North By Northwest is his best.I go back and forth between Vertigo and Rear Window as to which one is the best Hitchcock film. IMO, these two rise above the others. It's interesting to note that they both feature voyeurism as a theme, which was something old Alfred was obsessed with. In both movies, James Stewart spends much of his time simply watching other people. Great pick.Here's what is great about Hitchcock - you can get three to six different people arguing for their favorite, and they all have a legitimate claim.
Who else can you say that about within their genre? Beethoven...Miles...not too many.
:embarrassed: :redface: :shame:Yeah, he didn't suck either.Gotta throw Shakespeare in that group as well.IMO North By Northwest is his best.I go back and forth between Vertigo and Rear Window as to which one is the best Hitchcock film. IMO, these two rise above the others. It's interesting to note that they both feature voyeurism as a theme, which was something old Alfred was obsessed with. In both movies, James Stewart spends much of his time simply watching other people. Great pick.Here's what is great about Hitchcock - you can get three to six different people arguing for their favorite, and they all have a legitimate claim.
Who else can you say that about within their genre? Beethoven...Miles...not too many.
No worries, Krista. We can take this work and perhaps one of your selections and merge them together to make a new piece of art. The name could be "Dead Donkeys".ARRRRRRRRRRRRRRGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH! Thought about this a while ago but thought I could wait.35.04 Dead Souls by Nikolai Gogol (Novel)
Another bizarre and wonderful Russian novel. If you read it, you won't forget it. It's plot is typically absurd: it's been years since the Census, and several upper class are still paying taxes on their dead serfs (slaves.) This unscrupulous merchant (Chichikov) schemes to "buy" these "dead souls" off the wealthy so that he can claim to have hundreds of slaves, winning him prestige- so who cares if they're all dead? A host of interesting and ridiculous characters are encountered along the way.
There's one passage I distinctly remember, but I can't find it to quote, unfortunately. There's this nobleman with nothing to do all day, who determines he's going to write a book that will illuminate all of the grand problems of humanity- he will answer all moral and social questions. The book gets larger and larger in his mind, (it will be several thousand pages) but after the first paragraph, he suffers from "writers block". Soon he is reduced to drawing pictures on the rest of the blank page, and after that he falls asleep.
Highly recommended.tim, I'm starting to hate you as much as I hate Abrantes.
![]()
Why do I get the feeling you aren't going to give critics' 19th-best movie of all time a fair shake?No worries, Krista. We can take this work and perhaps one of your selections and merge them together to make a new piece of art. The name could be "Dead Donkeys".ARRRRRRRRRRRRRRGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH! Thought about this a while ago but thought I could wait.35.04 Dead Souls by Nikolai Gogol (Novel)
Another bizarre and wonderful Russian novel. If you read it, you won't forget it. It's plot is typically absurd: it's been years since the Census, and several upper class are still paying taxes on their dead serfs (slaves.) This unscrupulous merchant (Chichikov) schemes to "buy" these "dead souls" off the wealthy so that he can claim to have hundreds of slaves, winning him prestige- so who cares if they're all dead? A host of interesting and ridiculous characters are encountered along the way.
There's one passage I distinctly remember, but I can't find it to quote, unfortunately. There's this nobleman with nothing to do all day, who determines he's going to write a book that will illuminate all of the grand problems of humanity- he will answer all moral and social questions. The book gets larger and larger in his mind, (it will be several thousand pages) but after the first paragraph, he suffers from "writers block". Soon he is reduced to drawing pictures on the rest of the blank page, and after that he falls asleep.
Highly recommended.tim, I'm starting to hate you as much as I hate Abrantes.
![]()
, I have to give a shout-out to the dude that's probably my favorite mathematician ever (due to the stories surrounding him as well as his staggering accomplishments). It combines a comprehensive review of past mathematical developments (beyond the scope of any past work) with entirely new findings of his own and ample proof to support it. One of the greatest pure math books in history (a category bound to be underrepresented).The cultural historian Theodore Merz called it "that great book with seven seals," the mathematician Leopold Kronecker, "the book of all books" : already one century after their publication, C.F. Gauss's Disquisitiones Arithmeticae (1801) had acquired an almost mythical reputation. It had served throughout the XIX th century and beyond as an ideal of exposition in matters of notation, problems and methods; as a model of organisation and theory building; and of course as a source of mathematical inspiration. Various readings of the Disquisitiones Arithmeticae have left their mark on developments as different as Galois's theory of algebraic equations, Lucas's primality tests, and Dedekind's theory of ideals.
Before the Disquisitiones was published, number theory consisted of a collection of isolated theorems and conjectures. Gauss brought the work of his predecessors together with his own original work into a systematic framework, filled in gaps, corrected unsound proofs, and extended the subject in numerous ways.
The logical structure of the Disquisitiones (theorem statement followed by proof, followed by corollaries) set a standard for later texts. While recognising the primary importance of logical proof, Gauss also illustrates many theorems with numerical examples.
The Disquisitiones was the starting point for the work of other nineteenth century European mathematicians including Kummer, Dirichlet and Dedekind. Many of the annotations given by Gauss are in effect announcements of further research of his own, some of which remained unpublished. They must have appeared particularly cryptic to his contemporaries; we can now read them as containing the germs of the theories of L-functions and complex multiplication, in particular.
Gauss' Disquisitiones continued to exert influence in the 20th century. For example, in section V, article 303, Gauss summarized his calculations of class numbers of imaginary quadratic number fields, and conjectured that he had found all imaginary quadratic number fields of class numbers 1, 2, and 3. Sometimes referred to as the Class number problem, this was eventually confirmed in 1986.[1] In section V, article 358, Gauss proved what can be interpreted as the first non-trivial case of the Riemann Hypothesis for curves over finite fields (the Hasse-Weil theorem).[2]
Wow, you have a favorite mathematician. I'd be more likely to make fun of you for that if I hadn't once described a movie as being by "my third-favorite Iranian director".Make-up pick:
34.15 Johann Gauss' Disquisitiones Arithmeticae (Nonfiction)
I'm trying to cover a wide range of fields in my nonfiction picks, so as a math, I have to give a shout-out to the dude that's probably my favorite mathematician ever (due to the stories surrounding him as well as his staggering accomplishments). It combines a comprehensive review of past mathematical developments (beyond the scope of any past work) with entirely new findings of his own and ample proof to support it. One of the greatest pure math books in history (a category bound to be underrepresented).

I'm actually going to let this ogre friend of mine review that film. He promises to be impartial.Why do I get the feeling you aren't going to give critics' 19th-best movie of all time a fair shake?
Full speed ahead, GB. Let 'er rip.ETA: You're last is now 35.05.:deepbreath:
Assuming I'm not yet kicked out, now's the time to get caught up.
OK. Up to what round do I owe? My last pick was Robin Crusoe in 22nd round ... I see we're in the end of the 34th round? That would mean I owe 12 picks, the last being 34.16.
I will make them quickly and without writeups (initially). Also, I will not be able to check the OP the first time around (for speed's sake). If I pick something already taken, please let me know and I will repick.
Am I a go, or have I already been thrown out? If the latter, I understand perfectly.
:deepbreath:
Assuming I'm not yet kicked out, now's the time to get caught up.
OK. Up to what round do I owe? My last pick was Robin Crusoe in 22nd round ... I see we're in the end of the 34th round? That would mean I owe 12 picks, the last being 34.16.
I will make them quickly and without writeups (initially). Also, I will not be able to check the OP the first time around (for speed's sake). If I pick something already taken, please let me know and I will repick.
Am I a go, or have I already been thrown out? If the latter, I understand perfectly.

Wow, you have a favorite mathematician. I'd be more likely to make fun of you for that if I hadn't once described a movie as being by "my third-favorite Iranian director".Make-up pick:
34.15 Johann Gauss' Disquisitiones Arithmeticae (Nonfiction)
I'm trying to cover a wide range of fields in my nonfiction picks, so as a math, I have to give a shout-out to the dude that's probably my favorite mathematician ever (due to the stories surrounding him as well as his staggering accomplishments). It combines a comprehensive review of past mathematical developments (beyond the scope of any past work) with entirely new findings of his own and ample proof to support it. One of the greatest pure math books in history (a category bound to be underrepresented).
![]()
