What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Official Great Works Draft (7 Viewers)

If this is the way this draft is going, with The Immaculate Reception and "Get The Knack", then I'm afraid I will have to quit. It's too much time and effort for it to turn into this kind of joke. Perhaps people are pissed off at my rulings and deciding to have some fun with it; I don't know and I don't care. Let me know if you want to take this thing seriously. If you don't, that's fine, but let someone else run it.
Take a deep breath my friend. This is supposed to be fun. I think people should be able to pick whatever they want.
I think I have a pretty good sense of humor. It's not fun for me when picks like the one Misfit Blondes made are selected and then argued as if we should seriously consider them. It's not something I want to do. If others want to go that route, then this is not something I want to be part of.
So will you quit if he wins his appeal?
 
MisfitBlondes said:
MisfitBlondes said:
Misfit Blondes, your pick is vetoed. You have four options:

1. You can select "The Immaculate Reception" as a wildcard.

2. You can make another selection.

3. You can appeal my ruling to Krista and Doug B.

4. You can quit the draft.
Until you explain why you are vetoing this pick without any discussion, the selection will remain as is. It fits in the category as well as anything else and should not be vetoed on your whim.
No, I am not going to explain any further. I treat your answer as an appeal. Krista and Doug may now decide if they want to uphold your appeal.
You are acting moderator for this draft, you are supposed to explain why you feel it doesn't merit selection and then an appeal is made. I have posted why I feel it is worthy of selection and you came in with a "no" and that doesn't help anyone at all. I made this choice in good faith and I would expect you to treat the selection in the same way. If it doesn't stand after discussion on both sides, I can live with that but to just veto it doesn't gel with what this draft is all about.
:no: It was a selection designed to pick a fight, which I don't understand. You're continuing to pursue it beyond the point of any entertainment value, which I further fail to understand.

 
If this is the way this draft is going, with The Immaculate Reception and "Get The Knack", then I'm afraid I will have to quit. It's too much time and effort for it to turn into this kind of joke. Perhaps people are pissed off at my rulings and deciding to have some fun with it; I don't know and I don't care. Let me know if you want to take this thing seriously. If you don't, that's fine, but let someone else run it.
Take a deep breath my friend. This is supposed to be fun. I think people should be able to pick whatever they want.
19.13 The Hairball Gacked Up By Scott Norwood's Cat on Thanksgiving, 1998 (Scientific Discovery)
:no: how did you even know about that?!?!?!
Yes Scott, it's true.I, Uncle Humuna, am none other than your Great Aunt Harriet.Tuck in your shirt sweetie.xoxGAH
 
If this is the way this draft is going, with The Immaculate Reception and "Get The Knack", then I'm afraid I will have to quit. It's too much time and effort for it to turn into this kind of joke. Perhaps people are pissed off at my rulings and deciding to have some fun with it; I don't know and I don't care. Let me know if you want to take this thing seriously. If you don't, that's fine, but let someone else run it.
Take a deep breath my friend. This is supposed to be fun. I think people should be able to pick whatever they want.
I think I have a pretty good sense of humor. It's not fun for me when picks like the one Misfit Blondes made are selected and then argued as if we should seriously consider them. It's not something I want to do. If others want to go that route, then this is not something I want to be part of.
So will you quit if he wins his appeal?
That won't happen. If it did, yes, I would immediately resign.
 
MisfitBlondes said:
MisfitBlondes said:
Misfit Blondes, your pick is vetoed. You have four options:

1. You can select "The Immaculate Reception" as a wildcard.

2. You can make another selection.

3. You can appeal my ruling to Krista and Doug B.

4. You can quit the draft.
Until you explain why you are vetoing this pick without any discussion, the selection will remain as is. It fits in the category as well as anything else and should not be vetoed on your whim.
No, I am not going to explain any further. I treat your answer as an appeal. Krista and Doug may now decide if they want to uphold your appeal.
You are acting moderator for this draft, you are supposed to explain why you feel it doesn't merit selection and then an appeal is made. I have posted why I feel it is worthy of selection and you came in with a "no" and that doesn't help anyone at all. I made this choice in good faith and I would expect you to treat the selection in the same way. If it doesn't stand after discussion on both sides, I can live with that but to just veto it doesn't gel with what this draft is all about.
:no: It was a selection designed to pick a fight, which I don't understand. You're continuing to pursue it beyond the point of any entertainment value, which I further fail to understand.
new here?
 
If this is the way this draft is going, with The Immaculate Reception and "Get The Knack", then I'm afraid I will have to quit. It's too much time and effort for it to turn into this kind of joke. Perhaps people are pissed off at my rulings and deciding to have some fun with it; I don't know and I don't care. Let me know if you want to take this thing seriously. If you don't, that's fine, but let someone else run it.
Take a deep breath my friend. This is supposed to be fun. I think people should be able to pick whatever they want.
19.13 The Hairball Gacked Up By Scott Norwood's Cat on Thanksgiving, 1998 (Scientific Discovery)
:no: how did you even know about that?!?!?!
Yes Scott, it's true.I, Uncle Humuna, am none other than your Great Aunt Harriet.Tuck in your shirt sweetie.xoxGAH
Whooooooaaaaa, duuuuude (tte).
 
MisfitBlondes said:
Misfit Blondes, your pick is vetoed. You have four options:1. You can select "The Immaculate Reception" as a wildcard.2. You can make another selection.3. You can appeal my ruling to Krista and Doug B.4. You can quit the draft.
Until you explain why you are vetoing this pick without any discussion, the selection will remain as is. It fits in the category as well as anything else and should not be vetoed on your whim.
No, I am not going to explain any further. I treat your answer as an appeal. Krista and Doug may now decide if they want to uphold your appeal.
Krista is leaving on a jetplane, and don't know when she'll be back again.
:no:
 
skipped picks

17.19 Tirnan

18.02 Tirnan

18.07 Misfitblondes - ready for repick???

18.09 Mister CIA - auto skip remainder of draft

18.10 El Floppo - autoskip (this turn only)

18.11 Thatguy - OTC until 2:46 p.m. EDT

18.12 Wikkidpissah - On Deck

18.13 Tides of War - In The Hole

18.14 BobbyLayne

18.15 Abrantes

18.16 Doug B

18.17 Timschochet

18.18 Postradamus

18.19 Rodg

18.20 krista4

19.01 Fennis

19.02 Rodg

19.03 Postradamus

19.04 Timschochet

19.05 Doug B

19.06 Abrantes

19.07 BobbyLayne

19.08 Tides of War

19.09 Wikkidpissah

19.10 Thatguy

19.11 El Floppo

19.12 Team CIA

19.13 Uncle Humana

19.14 Misfit Blondes

19.15 Bob Lee Swagger

19.16 Scott Norwood

19.17 DC Thunder

19.18 Genedoc

19.19 Tirnan

19.20 Yankee23Fan

20.01 Yankee23Fan

20.02 Tirnan

20.03 Genedoc

20.04 DC Thunder

20.05 ScottNorwood

 
Last edited by a moderator:



the original spaceship to God. it can only be truly appreciated by first seeing it pierce the sky from its promontory interrupting the plains outside Paris. as one approaches, one can feel nothing but overwhelmed that this structure is reaching heavenward. i normally prefer quiet halls of worship but, from its friezes to its filagree to its glass, every molecule of Chartres SCREAMS "glory to God!".

a few points:

- Change Gonna Come will score very highly with me. i would normally hold the fact that it wasn't a big hit against it, but there was no way radio was putting this song in heavy rotation in '64. And, tho the rendition matters little in the judging, i prefer the original. the late, great Chuck Leonard - who introduced white America to Otis & Wikkid Pikkitt & all the great non-Motown soul as late night DJ @ WABC - often played Cooke's version to close his show, saying that while Otis's was a warning, Sam's was a prayer & he preferred it that way.

- when the TV cat was initiated, my plan was to have SNL, Civil War & Lonesome Dove as my three (forgot how TV savvy y'all was). never even considered Civil War as a documentary. a documentary is telling a real human story in 2 hrs, CW is a history program using the documentary style. not even close

- MB'S "fun with synonyms" makes Larry_Boy look like Einstein. cut the #### & HONOR THE VISION!!!!

 
Last edited by a moderator:
If this is the way this draft is going, with The Immaculate Reception and "Get The Knack", then I'm afraid I will have to quit. It's too much time and effort for it to turn into this kind of joke. Perhaps people are pissed off at my rulings and deciding to have some fun with it; I don't know and I don't care. Let me know if you want to take this thing seriously. If you don't, that's fine, but let someone else run it.
Take a deep breath my friend. This is supposed to be fun. I think people should be able to pick whatever they want.
I think I have a pretty good sense of humor. It's not fun for me when picks like the one Misfit Blondes made are selected and then argued as if we should seriously consider them. It's not something I want to do. If others want to go that route, then this is not something I want to be part of.
So will you quit if he wins his appeal?
That won't happen. If it did, yes, I would immediately resign.
You put the dic in dictator, bub.
 
MisfitBlondes said:
I'm pointing out why I believe it qualifies. All I see, so far, is people saying it doesn't belong but no one is actually stating why. The selection was made to be different than the rest of the plays selected but it was in no way meant to pick a fight.
The play category was designed for stage plays. It's not that hard to see that. A football "play" is not the same thing, nor should it be considered in the same category. If you want, you could argue that it could go in the sport record category and the play most consistently ranked the best all time in NFL history - whcih it is. It also might be the most well known and most replayed. Check Guiness. But it's not a "play" Just because it is a quasi-scripted act in front of an audience doesn't make it equal to actual plays on stage. If that's the case then John Quincy Adams' oral argument before the United States Supreme Court would fit into the category, and it doesn't.
 
skipped picks

17.19 Tirnan

18.02 Tirnan

18.07 Misfitblondes - ready for repick???

18.09 Mister CIA - auto skip remainder of draft

18.10 El Floppo - autoskip (this turn only)

18.11 Thatguy

18.13 Tides of War on the clock until 3:57

18.14 BobbyLayne

18.15 Abrantes

18.16 Doug B

18.17 Timschochet

18.18 Postradamus

18.19 Rodg

18.20 krista4

19.01 Fennis

19.02 Rodg

19.03 Postradamus

19.04 Timschochet

19.05 Doug B

19.06 Abrantes

19.07 BobbyLayne

19.08 Tides of War

19.09 Wikkidpissah

19.10 Thatguy

19.11 El Floppo

19.12 Team CIA

19.13 Uncle Humana

19.14 Misfit Blondes

19.15 Bob Lee Swagger

19.16 Scott Norwood

19.17 DC Thunder

19.18 Genedoc

19.19 Tirnan

19.20 Yankee23Fan

20.01 Yankee23Fan

20.02 Tirnan

20.03 Genedoc

20.04 DC Thunder

20.05 ScottNorwood

 
Last edited by a moderator:
If this is the way this draft is going, with The Immaculate Reception and "Get The Knack", then I'm afraid I will have to quit. It's too much time and effort for it to turn into this kind of joke. Perhaps people are pissed off at my rulings and deciding to have some fun with it; I don't know and I don't care. Let me know if you want to take this thing seriously. If you don't, that's fine, but let someone else run it.
Take a deep breath my friend. This is supposed to be fun. I think people should be able to pick whatever they want.
19.13 The Hairball Gacked Up By Scott Norwood's Cat on Thanksgiving, 1998 (Scientific Discovery)
SOD
 
Kant's Critique is a long overdue pick and deserves an extremely high ranking, IMO. Being a libertarian and still pretty much of an Ayn Rand fan, I'm not fond of Mr. Kant, but one can't deny his incredible importance to modern thought.

Brave New World is an incredible novel and highly influential. It's major theme is the question of whether progress and technology is uniformly good. It presents a "softer" totalitarian society than does 1984. I find it eerily predictive of our modern society with so many of us on some kind of medication to alter behavior.

Two excellent picks!

 
MisfitBlondes said:
- MB'S "fun with synonyms" makes Larry_Boy look like Einstein. cut the #### & HONOR THE VISION!!!!
How is it a synonym? Plays are scripted, rehearsed and acted out...football meets that requirement. I happened to choose one of the most famous and memorable football plays of all time. I don't see how following in line benefits anyone when someone sees things differently from others.
That play wasn't scripted or rehearsed, nor was Franco Harris an actor pretending to be someone else.
 
MisfitBlondes said:
MisfitBlondes said:
I'm pointing out why I believe it qualifies. All I see, so far, is people saying it doesn't belong but no one is actually stating why. The selection was made to be different than the rest of the plays selected but it was in no way meant to pick a fight.
The play category was designed for stage plays. It's not that hard to see that. A football "play" is not the same thing, nor should it be considered in the same category. If you want, you could argue that it could go in the sport record category and the play most consistently ranked the best all time in NFL history - whcih it is. It also might be the most well known and most replayed. Check Guiness. But it's not a "play" Just because it is a quasi-scripted act in front of an audience doesn't make it equal to actual plays on stage. If that's the case then John Quincy Adams' oral argument before the United States Supreme Court would fit into the category, and it doesn't.
I understand that almost everyone looked at the category in that manner but I didn't. Football plays are about rehearsal and execution just like stage plays. I fully admit that there was a lot of Improv in my selection but I do not believe that disqualifies it from being chosen.
dude...CMON!Plays have dialogue. Football doesn't. Make it a WC...I'm sure it would do better in that category anyway.
 
MisfitBlondes said:
MisfitBlondes said:
I'm pointing out why I believe it qualifies. All I see, so far, is people saying it doesn't belong but no one is actually stating why. The selection was made to be different than the rest of the plays selected but it was in no way meant to pick a fight.
The play category was designed for stage plays. It's not that hard to see that. A football "play" is not the same thing, nor should it be considered in the same category. If you want, you could argue that it could go in the sport record category and the play most consistently ranked the best all time in NFL history - whcih it is. It also might be the most well known and most replayed. Check Guiness. But it's not a "play" Just because it is a quasi-scripted act in front of an audience doesn't make it equal to actual plays on stage. If that's the case then John Quincy Adams' oral argument before the United States Supreme Court would fit into the category, and it doesn't.
I understand that almost everyone looked at the category in that manner but I didn't. Football plays are about rehearsal and execution just like stage plays. I fully admit that there was a lot of Improv in my selection but I do not believe that disqualifies it from being chosen.
It's not about opinion though. The category was designed for the medium that entertained for centuries before TV and movies. Most of human history was controlled by and entranced by the play. If you looked at the category in such a way that allowed a sports play to be selected in the category, then you looked at Jupiter and said Pluto is bigger.
 
MisfitBlondes said:
MisfitBlondes said:
- MB'S "fun with synonyms" makes Larry_Boy look like Einstein. cut the #### & HONOR THE VISION!!!!
How is it a synonym? Plays are scripted, rehearsed and acted out...football meets that requirement. I happened to choose one of the most famous and memorable football plays of all time. I don't see how following in line benefits anyone when someone sees things differently from others.
That play wasn't scripted or rehearsed, nor was Franco Harris an actor pretending to be someone else.
When football coordinators design plays, they don't have the actual players in mind...so Franco Harris being involved is a moot point.
Well, your first part is categorically wrong.
 
MisfitBlondes said:
MisfitBlondes said:
- MB'S "fun with synonyms" makes Larry_Boy look like Einstein. cut the #### & HONOR THE VISION!!!!
How is it a synonym? Plays are scripted, rehearsed and acted out...football meets that requirement. I happened to choose one of the most famous and memorable football plays of all time. I don't see how following in line benefits anyone when someone sees things differently from others.
That play wasn't scripted or rehearsed, nor was Franco Harris an actor pretending to be someone else.
When football coordinators design plays, they don't have the actual players in mind

...so Franco Harris being involved is a moot point.
:thumbup: Come on now.

 
skipped picks

17.19 Tirnan

18.02 Tirnan

18.07 Misfitblondes - ready for repick???

18.09 Mister CIA - auto skip remainder of draft

18.10 El Floppo - autoskip (this turn only)

18.11 Thatguy

18.13 Tides of War

18.14 BobbyLayne on the clock until 3:57

18.15 Abrantes

18.16 Doug B

18.17 Timschochet

18.18 Postradamus

18.19 Rodg

18.20 krista4

19.01 Fennis

19.02 Rodg

19.03 Postradamus

19.04 Timschochet

19.05 Doug B

19.06 Abrantes

19.07 BobbyLayne

19.08 Tides of War

19.09 Wikkidpissah

19.10 Thatguy

19.11 El Floppo

19.12 Team CIA

19.13 Uncle Humana

19.14 Misfit Blondes

19.15 Bob Lee Swagger

19.16 Scott Norwood

19.17 DC Thunder

19.18 Genedoc

19.19 Tirnan

19.20 Yankee23Fan

20.01 Yankee23Fan

20.02 Tirnan

20.03 Genedoc

20.04 DC Thunder

20.05 ScottNorwood

 
You put the dic in dictator, bub.
Nice.
Which part do you disagree with?You're ruining what was otherwise an awesome thread with your, "I don't have to explain myself, just do what I say or I'm taking my ball and going home" attitude.
If you really believe that I should have to "explain myself" over this particular question then your conception of what makes an "awesome thread" and mine are very much opposed.
 
If this is the way this draft is going, with The Immaculate Reception and "Get The Knack", then I'm afraid I will have to quit. It's too much time and effort for it to turn into this kind of joke. Perhaps people are pissed off at my rulings and deciding to have some fun with it; I don't know and I don't care. Let me know if you want to take this thing seriously. If you don't, that's fine, but let someone else run it.
Take a deep breath my friend. This is supposed to be fun. I think people should be able to pick whatever they want.
19.13 The Hairball Gacked Up By Scott Norwood's Cat on Thanksgiving, 1998 (Scientific Discovery)
:thumbup: how did you even know about that?!?!?!
Yes Scott, it's true.I, Uncle Humuna, am none other than your Great Aunt Harriet.Tuck in your shirt sweetie.xoxGAH
:crazy: :cool: :eek:
 
MisfitBlondes said:
MisfitBlondes said:
MisfitBlondes said:
I'm pointing out why I believe it qualifies. All I see, so far, is people saying it doesn't belong but no one is actually stating why. The selection was made to be different than the rest of the plays selected but it was in no way meant to pick a fight.
The play category was designed for stage plays. It's not that hard to see that. A football "play" is not the same thing, nor should it be considered in the same category. If you want, you could argue that it could go in the sport record category and the play most consistently ranked the best all time in NFL history - whcih it is. It also might be the most well known and most replayed. Check Guiness. But it's not a "play" Just because it is a quasi-scripted act in front of an audience doesn't make it equal to actual plays on stage. If that's the case then John Quincy Adams' oral argument before the United States Supreme Court would fit into the category, and it doesn't.
I understand that almost everyone looked at the category in that manner but I didn't. Football plays are about rehearsal and execution just like stage plays. I fully admit that there was a lot of Improv in my selection but I do not believe that disqualifies it from being chosen.
It's not about opinion though. The category was designed for the medium that entertained for centuries before TV and movies. Most of human history was controlled by and entranced by the play. If you looked at the category in such a way that allowed a sports play to be selected in the category, then you looked at Jupiter and said Pluto is bigger.
Everything being selected is about opinion. I fail to see otherwise on that matter. If the category was designed for people to just select from the same medium, then what is the point of having an opinion at all? If you looked at the category and only thought of Shakespeare, you'd be considered narrow minded...I happened to look elsewhere and I'm not being taken seriously.
No, you looked for apples in a potato farm and are arguing with people telling you it's a potato.The category was specifically designed for the same medium, allowing for different genres. A football play does not fit into any genre, nor is it a play in that sense. I looked at the category and thought of alot more then Shakespeare, but the the thought never went to Dikembe Mutumbo. But I'm enjoying the discussion, so keep going.

 
MisfitBlondes said:
What I'm referring to is that the coordinators are looking at the players according to the position they play, not their actual names.
What I am referring to is that you are categorically wrong.
 
I'm not on a jet plane yet (have another hour or so before taxi comes).

I've read the arguments and, though I think it's a creative and fun argument on MB's part, I'm not going to overrule tim's ruling on the "play". MB, you're better off repicking anyway, since tim is the plays judge.

 
Misfit Blondes, your appeal has now been overruled. You may:

1.Select this choice as a wildcard.

2. Make another selection.

3. Quit the draft.

 
MisfitBlondes said:
I'm not on a jet plane yet (have another hour or so before taxi comes).I've read the arguments and, though I think it's a creative and fun argument on MB's part, I'm not going to overrule tim's ruling on the "play". MB, you're better off repicking anyway, since tim is the plays judge.
I'm standing by my selection until Tim actually offers an opinion as to why it shouldn't be allowed. I've already stated I'm fine with it be ruled out but I don't think Tim should be allowed to act smug and not offer anything beyond a "no."
You're free to "stand by your selection." It will not be accepted. If you want to leave that slot blank, that's up to you.
 
MisfitBlondes said:
I'm not on a jet plane yet (have another hour or so before taxi comes).I've read the arguments and, though I think it's a creative and fun argument on MB's part, I'm not going to overrule tim's ruling on the "play". MB, you're better off repicking anyway, since tim is the plays judge.
I'm standing by my selection until Tim actually offers an opinion as to why it shouldn't be allowed. I've already stated I'm fine with it be ruled out but I don't think Tim should be allowed to act smug and not offer anything beyond a "no."
You're free to "stand by your selection." It will not be accepted. If you want to leave that slot blank, that's up to you.
Why can't you just be a normal person and at least offer him your opinion instead of acting like this.I think you're jealous of his draft and are trying to derail him.
 
skipped picks

17.19 Tirnan

18.02 Tirnan

18.07 Misfitblondes - needs a repick

18.09 Mister CIA - auto skip remainder of draft

18.10 El Floppo - autoskip (this turn only)

18.11 Thatguy

18.13 Tides of War

18.14 BobbyLayne on the clock until 3:57

18.15 Abrantes

18.16 Doug B

18.17 Timschochet

18.18 Postradamus

18.19 Rodg

18.20 krista4

19.01 Fennis

19.02 Rodg

19.03 Postradamus

19.04 Timschochet

19.05 Doug B

19.06 Abrantes

19.07 BobbyLayne

19.08 Tides of War

19.09 Wikkidpissah

19.10 Thatguy

19.11 El Floppo

19.12 Team CIA

19.13 Uncle Humana

19.14 Misfit Blondes

19.15 Bob Lee Swagger

19.16 Scott Norwood

19.17 DC Thunder

19.18 Genedoc

19.19 Tirnan

19.20 Yankee23Fan

20.01 Yankee23Fan

20.02 Tirnan

20.03 Genedoc

20.04 DC Thunder

20.05 ScottNorwood

 
MisfitBlondes said:
MisfitBlondes said:
I'm not on a jet plane yet (have another hour or so before taxi comes).I've read the arguments and, though I think it's a creative and fun argument on MB's part, I'm not going to overrule tim's ruling on the "play". MB, you're better off repicking anyway, since tim is the plays judge.
I'm standing by my selection until Tim actually offers an opinion as to why it shouldn't be allowed. I've already stated I'm fine with it be ruled out but I don't think Tim should be allowed to act smug and not offer anything beyond a "no."
You're free to "stand by your selection." It will not be accepted. If you want to leave that slot blank, that's up to you.
Instead of acting like a child who dropped his ice cream, how about you act like the moderator and actually offer your opinions as to why you disagree with it?
I think this is a fair analogy - but you are the other kid who knocked over his ice cream. Neither is making this thread enjoyable right now.
 
MisfitBlondes said:
MisfitBlondes said:
I'm not on a jet plane yet (have another hour or so before taxi comes).I've read the arguments and, though I think it's a creative and fun argument on MB's part, I'm not going to overrule tim's ruling on the "play". MB, you're better off repicking anyway, since tim is the plays judge.
I'm standing by my selection until Tim actually offers an opinion as to why it shouldn't be allowed. I've already stated I'm fine with it be ruled out but I don't think Tim should be allowed to act smug and not offer anything beyond a "no."
You're free to "stand by your selection." It will not be accepted. If you want to leave that slot blank, that's up to you.
Instead of acting like a child who dropped his ice cream, how about you act like the moderator and actually offer your opinions as to why you disagree with it?
I think this is a fair analogy - but you are the other kid who knocked over his ice cream. Neither is making this thread enjoyable right now.
:goodposting: Both of you, please just stop and move on. TIA.signed, the other 18+ drafters
 
MisfitBlondes said:
I've offered my opinions as to why it should be allowed...Tim is just saying "no" and I'm not sure Tim fully believes the selection shouldn't be allowed. I think Tim is afraid that the category won't fall in line with how he believes things should run and allowing my pick will open up the category to different visions.
Or, you know, you could be wrong. :goodposting: Just throwing that out there.
 
OK then, since you asked for it so many times, here is my reasoning:

When the "Immaculate Reception" was first selected as a "play" I figured it was a one line joke, not particularly funny but a smart little jibe at the rules, and I figured you weren't serious. When it turned out that you were serious I decided you were trying to derail the draft. There is no rational way to compare a sports "play" to theatre, and even to attempt to criticize such a comparison makes me look even more foolish than the one making the comparison in the first place. That's why I didn't respond. What annoys me so much about the whole thing, Misfit Blondes, is that I KNOW you're mocking the draft by this pick. How do I know it? Because I've come to respect your other selections, and you're commentary, and I know you're not a stupid guy. Only a stupid person could expect the rest of us to take such an argument as you have been making seriously, and therefore I ruled that out as a possibility. And while I fully expect you to respond to this post by protesting that you have been genuine all along, I believe that is also part of the mockery.

I don't know why you have chosen to attempt to derail the draft at this time. As I wrote, your other picks have been fine. Perhaps you will continue to persist in this attempt with other picks of a similar nature. I hope this is not the case.

That is my reasoning: to sum up, I do not consider a sports play to be what was meant; we were asking for theatre plays. Your choice is vetoed; please choose again or quit.

 
MisfitBlondes said:
MisfitBlondes said:
I've offered my opinions as to why it should be allowed...Tim is just saying "no" and I'm not sure Tim fully believes the selection shouldn't be allowed. I think Tim is afraid that the category won't fall in line with how he believes things should run and allowing my pick will open up the category to different visions.
Or, you know, you could be wrong. :goodposting: Just throwing that out there.
Tim is outspoken and has an opinion on everything...he hasn't said anything in regards to supporting his opinion for vetoing my selection. It meets the criteria and therefore should stand.
It doesn't come close to meeting the criteria.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top