What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Official Hillary Clinton 2016 thread (7 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.
SaintsInDome2006 said:
This is a good summary of the Fox report last night.

- You can not believe but fwiw the reporting is from Catherine Herridge who was pretty much right on almost every report last spring and winter just a week to a month ahead of WaPo & NYT in most instances.

- I think the report that at least 5 foreign intelligence services hacked/accessed Hillary's server is important, new and almost certainly true.
Hey GB, if you're curious here's a tweetstorm from a mediamatters guy destroying Baier and the report much better than I did.

 
Melania is about to make a speech in the Philly suburbs. I predict: 

I say this to you, about is our opposition. When they goes low, we are getting high! 

 
I never knew there was such a thing as a tweetstorm.

I wish there was a Rosetta Stone for speaking Twitter. I'm sure that guy made good points. No way to tell though.

 
So if Podesta told Hillary not to use personal email for classified communication how can she plead ignorance? 

She was told before she took office, told during and then when confronted after she lies lies and lies some more. This is way more than careless. How does this not establish intent?

 
Hey GB, if you're curious here's a tweetstorm from a mediamatters guy destroying Baier and the report much better than I did.
You think you can just tread on squisiton's domain like that?  Linking Media Matters tweetstorms?  Did you at least notify him first?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Did we get to the Anonymous dump yet? Promising graphic video and photo evidence?

https://twitter.com/BigStick2013/status/794133558482726912 
I believe I covered this already:

That's the great thing about targeting low-information voters. All you have to do is say "I'm releasing a tape of Clinton stabbing a puppy in two weeks", and idiots will see it, assume that this tape must exist, and then never follow up to see if it actually comes out.

 
Melania is about to make a speech in the Philly suburbs. I predict: 

I say this to you, about is our opposition. When they goes low, we are getting high! 
She could just say random words and I'd listen. Unlike the dem candidate she doesn't sound like a chalkboard or a face that looks like a catcher's mitt. 

 
Hey GB, if you're curious here's a tweetstorm from a mediamatters guy destroying Baier and the report much better than I did.
Thanks. I will say hearken back to the original pushback on the NYT report last summer with regard to their use of the term 'criminal inquiry.' That is what ultimately happened. 

I'm willing to keep an open mind. However it seems to me it was just a few days ago you and I were in agreement in the press having contacts with the Clinton campaign as being appropriate. A little bit further up I point out there is nothing wrong with journalists confabbing with campaign officials at dinner or being chummy in emails. I've defended reporters using anonymous sources in other contexts.

Anyway thanks for the link again I will keep an open mind.

 
So if Podesta told Hillary not to use personal email for classified communication how can she plead ignorance? 

She was told before she took office, told during and then when confronted after she lies lies and lies some more. This is way more than careless. How does this not establish intent?
She probably forgot what Podesta told her.  People's memory tends to decline when they get old.

 
Basically, an app called NeverTrump connects people who want to vote for Clinton and live in states where that doesn't matter with people who want to vote third party but don't want Trump to get elected, and those people can agree to swap votes on the app.  Welcome to the insane future.

 
JFC.  I never thought this was possible, that Trump really could win this thing.  Sanders, Biden, or any average Democrat would be crushing him right now, but no, you just had to have Hillary "most qualified ever" "she didn't do anything wrong" Clinton.  Thanks a lot.
Bump.
Tim a month ago:

Back in February I wrote that the candidate with the best shot of beating Hillary was Rubio, but that even then it would be a tight race. She'd beat anybody else. I stand by that. Hillary is not a weak candidate.  
https://forums.footballguys.com/forum/topic/721079-official-hillary-clinton-2016-thread/?page=1272#comment-19462740

 
It would be realistic if NV wasn't almost over for him based on the early vote.  He has a better shot of flipping CO, MI, WI, or PA at this point.  Even with NH, he still needs to flip one of those.
It looks good but I'm not counting any chickens yet:

Democrats hold a 30,500 raw-vote lead statewide over GOP voters with three days of early voting remaining. That translates to a percentage margin of 43-37, which is the same margin seen on the prior day and matches the early-vote partisan margin for 2012.

 
I can't believe any Bernie voter would vote for her.  Trump is about as progressive as your going to get for a Republican.  He was holding up a rainbow flag in stage the other day.  10 years ago that is political suicide for a Republican.

 
So if Podesta told Hillary not to use personal email for classified communication how can she plead ignorance? 

She was told before she took office, told during and then when confronted after she lies lies and lies some more. This is way more than careless. How does this not establish intent?
"Well actually if you read what I said..."

"If you look at my statement you'll see..."

Her patented lead-ins to explain a lie. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I can't believe any Bernie voter would vote for her.  Trump is about as progressive as your going to get for a Republican.  He was holding up a rainbow flag in stage the other day.  10 years ago that is political suicide for a Republican.
Holding a rainbow flag vs wanting to nominate a replica of Scalia is not in the best interest of any LGBT person. Nice try though.

 
I can't believe any Bernie voter would vote for her.  Trump is about as progressive as your going to get for a Republican.  He was holding up a rainbow flag in stage the other day.  10 years ago that is political suicide for a Republican.
Is his policy of deporting Hispanics and building a wall that is progressive?  Maybe banning Muslims from entering the country?  Wanting to punish women who seek abortions?

 
Is his policy of deporting Hispanics and building a wall that is progressive?  Maybe banning Muslims from entering the country?  Wanting to punish women who seek abortions?
You forgot a few important details about the Muslims & illegal alien positions.  CRIMINAL & UNVETTED REFUGEES

 
Is his policy of deporting Hispanics and building a wall that is progressive?  Maybe banning Muslims from entering the country?  Wanting to punish women who seek abortions?
You forgot a few important details about the Muslims & illegal alien positions.  CRIMINAL & UNVETTED REFUGEES
In an interview that aired in September 2015 on CBS’ 60 Minutes, Scott Pelley pressed Trump about what he would do with the population.

Pelley: "Eleven, 12 million illegal immigrants --"

Trump: "Or whatever the number is."

Pelley: "Still in the country, what do you do?"

Trump: "If they've done well, they're going out and they're coming back in legally. Because you said it--"

Pelley: "You're rounding them all up?"

Trump: "We're rounding 'em up in a very humane way, in a very nice way. And they're going to be happy because they want to be legalized. And, by the way, I know it doesn't sound nice. But not everything is nice."

 
I also think that women will come out even stronger for Hilldog than they're currently polling.  I mean if you were a self respecting woman, how could you possibly vote for Trump?  I'd take the political criminal over the sexist pig any day of the week.  


And this is why we get the gov't we deserve and Wall St keeps us spinning their hamster wheel.

 
Is his policy of deporting Hispanics and building a wall that is progressive?  Maybe banning Muslims from entering the country?  Wanting to punish women who seek abortions?
You forgot a few important details about the Muslims & illegal alien positions.  CRIMINAL & UNVETTED REFUGEES
In an interview that aired in September 2015 on CBS’ 60 Minutes, Scott Pelley pressed Trump about what he would do with the population.

Pelley: "Eleven, 12 million illegal immigrants --"

Trump: "Or whatever the number is."

Pelley: "Still in the country, what do you do?"

Trump: "If they've done well, they're going out and they're coming back in legally. Because you said it--"

Pelley: "You're rounding them all up?"

Trump: "We're rounding 'em up in a very humane way, in a very nice way. And they're going to be happy because they want to be legalized. And, by the way, I know it doesn't sound nice. But not everything is nice."
During an interview this weekend with NBC's "Meet the Press," host Chuck Todd asked Trump whether his comment should be interpreted as a "slight rollback."

"I don't think so. I actually don't think it's a rollback. In fact, you could say it's an expansion," Trump said. "I'm looking now at territory. People were so upset when I used the word 'Muslim': 'Oh, you can't use the word "Muslim."' Remember this. And I'm okay with that, because I'm talking territory instead of Muslim."

Trump first proposed banning nearly all Muslims overseas from the country in early December, soon after a terrorist attack in San Bernardino, Calif. Trump's original statement — which calls for "a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States" — is still on his campaign website. This position continues to be one of Trump's most controversial and a key reason that some fellow Republicans do not want to help him with his campaign.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top