What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Official Hillary Clinton 2016 thread (2 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.
timschochet said:
I find this all pretty sad. I like Debbie; I don't think she did anything wrong. If Hillary wins in November, and if the Dems take back the Senate, it will be due in part to DWS' tremendous organizational and fundraising skills. 

Shes s good person too. I suppose they had to do this to get the story out of the way (which it will) but IMO it's shameful. 
Click to expand...
She's not bad for a 1%er

 
Leeroy Jenkins said:
To that i say, so what?  Obama was able to overcome it because at the end of the day, he and his campaign was better. 

I think it is crazy that Bernie all of a sudden is this amazing political figure. He's been in politics since the 70s. He's a good voice for the far left, but he would have been a terrible President. 

And if you dont think there are people who did not run out of respect for the Clintons, you're dead wrong. 
Click to expand...
You've mentioned this numerous times but I have yet to see any actual reasoning behind it. You don't like him or agree with him? Fine. Cool. Nobody appeals to everyone and respectful disagreements are an incredibly value thing in politics. But you've repeatedly stated he had no business in that position, was unqualified, and would have been terrible.

I strongly suggest you have no idea what in the hell you're talking about.

 
NorvilleBarnes said:
He has no one to blame but himself. He should have stayed on message - and if that didn't line up with Hillary then so be it. But if you're going to campaign against political corruption and Wall Street influence all this time, and then endorse Hillary, I have absolutely no sympathy for him.
Click to expand...
I feel for the guy. If it were a typical Republican candidate I could get behind this thinking. Facing the possibility of Trump winning...that has to cause everyone to seriously reassess everything. He had no good option. 

 
Bloomberg suggested in June that this same hacker collective breached the Clinton Foundation emails too.  Anyone get the feeling that the DNC leak was just a single to get everyone's attention?  I am guessing the Clinton Foundation emails (if leaked) will show the true corruption since that is where the dirty money gets laundered into.  

 
timschochet said:
I find this all pretty sad. I like Debbie; I don't think she did anything wrong. If Hillary wins in November, and if the Dems take back the Senate, it will be due in part to DWS' tremendous organizational and fundraising skills. 

Shes s good person too. I suppose they had to do this to get the story out of the way (which it will) but IMO it's shameful. 
Click to expand...
Who do you think the they is?

 
bigmarc27 said:
It always amazes me how out of touch politicians are, then in turn how citizens never seems to care because it's their "side".
Click to expand...
Hillary doesn't think rules apply to her and she can do whatever she wants, If this is true it just reinforces that. It's a big middle finger to everyone.

 
AnonymousBob said:
You've mentioned this numerous times but I have yet to see any actual reasoning behind it. You don't like him or agree with him? Fine. Cool. Nobody appeals to everyone and respectful disagreements are an incredibly value thing in politics. But you've repeatedly stated he had no business in that position, was unqualified, and would have been terrible.

I strongly suggest you have no idea what in the hell you're talking about.
Click to expand...
I like Bernie Sanders. Generally, i like the rationale behind his positions. I do not agree with the extreme nature of his socialist ideas and their policy executions. I do not think any extreme element of either party has any place in the oval office.  

I think we need him to keep certain elements in check, but I do not think he should lead the free world, as everything cannot just be free. 

 
Leeroy Jenkins said:
I like Bernie Sanders. Generally, i like the rationale behind his positions. I do not agree with the extreme nature of his socialist ideas and their policy executions. I do not think any extreme element of either party has any place in the oval office.  

I think we need him to keep certain elements in check, but I do not think he should lead the free world, as everything cannot just be free. 
Click to expand...
if its free its for .....bernieeeeee

 
Leeroy Jenkins said:
I like Bernie Sanders. Generally, i like the rationale behind his positions. I do not agree with the extreme nature of his socialist ideas and their policy executions. I do not think any extreme element of either party has any place in the oval office.  

I think we need him to keep certain elements in check, but I do not think he should lead the free world, as everything cannot just be free. 
Click to expand...
I think the definition of extreme can be interpreted many different ways. Bernie may be extreme to some but he worked with both sides and had the respect of many from both parties. He had opponents readily acknowledge he is a man who knows when to compromise. That seems pretty reasonable.

The everything free argument rings hollow to me. We have plenty of 'free' stuff already. But I think I understand your argument. We need money to pay for things. Good thing numerous economists came out in favor of his plans. So everything isn't just free.

 
The General said:
Yes there was. If you guys took like 5 seconds to actually look into it. The guy who posted that video also had other gems like the chick from Ghostbusters is actually a gorilla. 
Click to expand...
I stand by my assertion.  Anyone who watches that video would have the same questions.  Anyone except HRC supporters, I guess.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
MaxThreshold said:
I stand by my assertion.  Anyone who watches that video would have the same questions.  Anyone except HRC supporters, I guess.
Click to expand...
Yeah, not really. This is bat#### stuff. 

Search this on youtube and the here's a list of the people who posted it from the first page: Patriot Populist, Elite NWO Agenda, The Vigilant Christian, Occult Investigations. If you google "Hillary Clinton Seizure" it doesn't even really show up, which is kind of hard to do. A few sites have it like "conservativeoutfitters" and "teaparty.org". 

 
She didn't exactly hire her. DWS will serve as "honorary chair" of Hillary's campaign to get OTHER DEMOCRATS elected- 

i doubt "honorary chair" is a paid position...

 
timschochet said:
She didn't exactly hire her. DWS will serve as "honorary chair" of Hillary's campaign to get OTHER DEMOCRATS elected- 

i doubt "honorary chair" is a paid position...
Click to expand...
If there is one thing Hillary knows it's how to get people paid or rewarded. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hillary doesn't like walls or fences...unless it is one to keep protesters against the democrats away and it needs to be 4 miles out to keep them out of site and out of mind and most importantly outside the networks cameras. 

 
timschochet said:
Well all we can hope for is that either those numbers change before November or that she finds a way to win anyhow. Sinn Fein is dead wrong; the Commish is dead wrong. Anybody who believes that either Hillary and Trump are equally bad (or that Hillary is worse) is dead wrong. Anybody who doesn't realize the existential threat of a Trump presidency is dead wrong. 

This week I'm going to send money to Hillary's campaign and I'm going to continue to send as much as I can until the election is over. That's all I can do. 
Click to expand...
What exactly am I "dead wrong" about? :oldunsure:  

 
So Donna Brazile was named interim head, and then WikiLeaks tweets they have the goods on her, so they dropped Brazile and now its Marcia Fudge as DNC head. Holy crap, I didn't think they could out-do the RNC trainwreck

 
bigmarc27 said:
I was just waiting for his justification.  It's going to take some creativity I would think. 
Click to expand...
Hardly. I brought it up because a few guys around here are so freaked out Hillary "hired" her. I dont believe being an "honorary chairman" is a "hired" position; I think it's a meaningless title designed to help give DWS some face. But personally I don't give a #### if she hired her or not. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
timschochet said:
Hardly. I brought it up because a few guys around here are so freaked out Hillary "hired" her. I dont believe being an "honorary chairman" is a "hired" position; I think it's a meaningless title designed to help give DWS some face. But personally I don't give a #### if she hired her or not. 
Click to expand...
Oh tim.  Why do this to yourself?

 
IvanKaramazov said:
Oh tim.  Why do this to yourself?
Click to expand...
Lol. What did I do this time Ivan? 

By the way, has anyone explained yet what DWS did wrong exactly? Why is stating her preference on an email nobody is supposed to read such a crime? Or is there tangible evidence she actually did something corrupt to seal Hillary's victory? 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

mr. furley
Long Island serial killer suspect in custody
Replies
34
Views
2K
Dezbelief
Dezbelief
krista4
In this thread I rank my favorite Beatles songs: 204-1.
138 139 140
Replies
7K
Views
252K
rockaction
rockaction
HellToupee
***Official*** Joe Biden 2016 Presidential Thread
Replies
35
Views
2K
That one guy
T

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top