What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Official Hillary Clinton 2016 thread (7 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.
SaintsInDome2006 said:
Two things have really been possible to derail Hillary: Biden and the FBI/DOJ. That's it.
Sure there is always the "possibility", but "really been possible" has always been "wishful" thinking.

Still think you should be able to get better :tinfoilhat: stuff from the Mena story.

 
SaintsInDome2006 said:
Two things have really been possible to derail Hillary: Biden and the FBI/DOJ. That's it.
Sure there is always the "possibility", but "really been possible" has always been "wishful" thinking.

Still think you should be able to get better :tinfoilhat: stuff from the Mena story.
Ha, pfft, yeah, the FBI will never investigate Hillary, what'm I thinkin'?
That this substantive!
Verb much?

 
SaintsInDome2006 said:
Two things have really been possible to derail Hillary: Biden and the FBI/DOJ. That's it.
Sure there is always the "possibility", but "really been possible" has always been "wishful" thinking.

Still think you should be able to get better :tinfoilhat: stuff from the Mena story.
Ha, pfft, yeah, the FBI will never investigate Hillary, what'm I thinkin'?
That this substantive!
Verb much?
You asked what you were thinkin'...

 
Astonishing interview on Maddow. Hillary defends her husband's actions on DOMA, Don't Ask, Don't Tell, and the crime bill as defensive measures to prevent things from being worse-DOMA, for example, prevented a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage according to her. She says that the role of a responsible leader is sometimes to have to choose between two bad choices- which could be an implied dig at an idealist like Bernie Sanders.

 
Astonishing interview on Maddow. Hillary defends her husband's actions on DOMA, Don't Ask, Don't Tell, and the crime bill as defensive measures to prevent things from being worse-DOMA, for example, prevented a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage according to her. She says that the role of a responsible leader is sometimes to have to choose between two bad choices- which could be an implied dig at an idealist like Bernie Sanders.
Well if there is one thing Hillary is good at identifying with, it's bad choices.

 
It shows you how awful the GOP is now, when Clinton was proven yesterday to be an outright liar, yet she came off as the winner because the GOP bungled it so badly. When she ends up the president, the GOP will have no one to blame but themselves.

 
One post. As all are well aware I am no Hillary fan. But she completely destroyed that stupid political witch hunt of a hearing. I agree with Erickson she is way too smart for them. They're idiots and the GOP should have to refund every dime they wasted on this travesty.

Bye

 
One post. As all are well aware I am no Hillary fan. But she completely destroyed that stupid political witch hunt of a hearing. I agree with Erickson she is way too smart for them. They're idiots and the GOP should have to refund every dime they wasted on this travesty.

Bye
Everyone on that committee should have to pay back every dime out of their own pockets....GOP and Dems alike. The American people should be embarrassed that they elected these people to office.

 
One post. As all are well aware I am no Hillary

fan. But she completely destroyed that stupid political witch hunt of a hearing. I agree with Erickson she is way too smart for them. They're idiots and the GOP should have to refund every

dime they wasted on this travesty.

Bye
Everyone on that committee should have to pay back every dime out of their own pockets....GOP and Dems alike. The American people should be embarrassed that they elected these people to office.
The American people are the real idiots for constantly allowing, through ignorance and apathy, these morons to get there and then stay there at an alarming rate. I believe Congress has an approval rating in the high teens or low twenties but my guess is incumbents will win reelection next Fall at a very high rate.

 
Astonishing interview on Maddow. Hillary defends her husband's actions on DOMA, Don't Ask, Don't Tell, and the crime bill as defensive measures to prevent things from being worse-DOMA, for example, prevented a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage according to her. She says that the role of a responsible leader is sometimes to have to choose between two bad choices- which could be an implied dig at an idealist like Bernie Sanders.
You could be doing the same when you vote next year.

 
Astonishing interview on Maddow. Hillary defends her husband's actions on DOMA, Don't Ask, Don't Tell, and the crime bill as defensive measures to prevent things from being worse-DOMA, for example, prevented a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage according to her. She says that the role of a responsible leader is sometimes to have to choose between two bad choices- which could be an implied dig at an idealist like Bernie Sanders.
Yeah can't let this slide. I dare her to show they had the votes for a constitutional amendmwnt I don't think they did. What did the crime bill prevent that was worse? How about Glass/Stegall what did destroying those rules prevent? What did her passionate speech against gay marriage prevent? How about her vote on Iraq? What a load.And here you are lapping it up.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Astonishing interview on Maddow. Hillary defends her husband's actions on DOMA, Don't Ask, Don't Tell, and the crime bill as defensive measures to prevent things from being worse-DOMA, for example, prevented a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage according to her. She says that the role of a responsible leader is sometimes to have to choose between two bad choices- which could be an implied dig at an idealist like Bernie Sanders.
Yeah can't let this slide. I dare her to show they had the votes for a constitutional amendmwnt I don't think they did. What did the crime bill prevent that was worse? How about Glass/Stegall what did destroying those rules prevent? What did her passionate speech against gay marriage prevent? How about her vote on Iraq? What a load.And here you are lapping it up.
I read tim's post as being disappointed that Hillary took that angle, but maybe I'm misreading him.

 
Astonishing interview on Maddow. Hillary defends her husband's actions on DOMA, Don't Ask, Don't Tell, and the crime bill as defensive measures to prevent things from being worse-DOMA, for example, prevented a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage according to her. She says that the role of a responsible leader is sometimes to have to choose between two bad choices- which could be an implied dig at an idealist like Bernie Sanders.
This is a glimpse into the person you're all in on Tim :shrug:

 
Astonishing interview on Maddow. Hillary defends her husband's actions on DOMA, Don't Ask, Don't Tell, and the crime bill as defensive measures to prevent things from being worse-DOMA, for example, prevented a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage according to her. She says that the role of a responsible leader is sometimes to have to choose between two bad choices- which could be an implied dig at an idealist like Bernie Sanders.
Yeah can't let this slide. I dare her to show they had the votes for a constitutional amendmwnt I don't think they did. What did the crime bill prevent that was worse? How about Glass/Stegall what did destroying those rules prevent? What did her passionate speech against gay marriage prevent? How about her vote on Iraq? What a load.And here you are lapping it up.
I read tim's post as being disappointed that Hillary took that angle, but maybe I'm misreading him.
If I misread I apologize. But he has been so over the top in accepting her excuses and double talk I think it's understandable.

 
Good morning. I neither lapped up the interview or was necessarily disappointed- I was astonished, which is what I wrote. It's an argument- or an excuse- that I haven't encountered before. I have been highly critical of Hillary for her "evolving" stance on several issues, especially gay marriage. But in that she's little different from most politicians (not Bernie, I get it.) I'm voting for her nonetheless for a variety of reasons which have all been stated.

 
One post. As all are well aware I am no Hillary fan. But she completely destroyed that stupid political witch hunt of a hearing. I agree with Erickson she is way too smart for them. They're idiots and the GOP should have to refund every dime they wasted on this travesty.

Bye
Everyone on that committee should have to pay back every dime out of their own pockets....GOP and Dems alike. The American people should be embarrassed that they elected these people to office.
I don't understand why the Democrats should be paying anything here. They tried to shut down the committee. During the Hillary hearing they were the only ones who showed a shred of sanity IMO. Why do we always have to go through this charade of "both sides are equally guilty"? In this case they're not. The Republicans are squarely to blame for this debacle.

 
I heard from people who would know that Hillary definitely suffered brain damage as result of her fall,and that she now has trouble processing complex information. If she released all her medical records, they would show that, but of course she won't release those because she doesn't want the truth to come out.
Imagine how much better she would done at the hearing if she wasn't brain damaged and could actually process complex informaton. :hophead:

 
Astonishing interview on Maddow. Hillary defends her husband's actions on DOMA, Don't Ask, Don't Tell, and the crime bill as defensive measures to prevent things from being worse-DOMA, for example, prevented a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage according to her. She says that the role of a responsible leader is sometimes to have to choose between two bad choices- which could be an implied dig at an idealist like Bernie Sanders.
This is a glimpse into the person you're all in on Tim :shrug:
The adult in the room?

 
Astonishing interview on Maddow. Hillary defends her husband's actions on DOMA, Don't Ask, Don't Tell, and the crime bill as defensive measures to prevent things from being worse-DOMA, for example, prevented a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage according to her. She says that the role of a responsible leader is sometimes to have to choose between two bad choices- which could be an implied dig at an idealist like Bernie Sanders.
While most of this is historical revisionism the general concept is true. But aren't you the guy that in morality threads of the past that has rejected the concept of "necessary evil"? That there is always a "good" choice? Or is politics an amoral realm where such things don't apply?

 
Astonishing interview on Maddow. Hillary defends her husband's actions on DOMA, Don't Ask, Don't Tell, and the crime bill as defensive measures to prevent things from being worse-DOMA, for example, prevented a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage according to her. She says that the role of a responsible leader is sometimes to have to choose between two bad choices- which could be an implied dig at an idealist like Bernie Sanders.
While most of this is historical revisionism the general concept is true. But aren't you the guy that in morality threads of the past that has rejected the concept of "necessary evil"? That there is always a "good" choice? Or is politics an amoral realm where such things don't apply?
I think you may have me confused with somebody else. I don't recall making that argument; it doesn't sound like me. I've always pointed out that we had to work with Stalin to beat the Nazis; that's the ultimate example of necessary evil.
 
Astonishing interview on Maddow. Hillary defends her husband's actions on DOMA, Don't Ask, Don't Tell, and the crime bill as defensive measures to prevent things from being worse-DOMA, for example, prevented a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage according to her. She says that the role of a responsible leader is sometimes to have to choose between two bad choices- which could be an implied dig at an idealist like Bernie Sanders.
While most of this is historical revisionism the general concept is true. But aren't you the guy that in morality threads of the past that has rejected the concept of "necessary evil"? That there is always a "good" choice? Or is politics an amoral realm where such things don't apply?
I think you may have me confused with somebody else. I don't recall making that argument; it doesn't sound like me. I've always pointed out that we had to work with Stalin to beat the Nazis; that's the ultimate example of necessary evil.
Maybe. The FFA only seems to be indexed back to November 2012, in this case to the Promise Ring thread. Talk about evil!

 
Hillary should pay, she's the whole reason - the entire reason - this second round occurred.
:bs:
Hillary should pay, she's the whole reason - the entire reason - this second round occurred.
:lol:
The Republicans have obviously driven and held the hearings but they were over in January 2013. As in Ov-ah. There isn't a legislative or legal hearing in the world that wouldn't be reconvened upon hearing that a witness had withheld all her documents. And there are very few witnesses in the world who wouldn't be punished or penalized in some way for having done so.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hillary should pay, she's the whole reason - the entire reason - this second round occurred.
:bs:
Hillary should pay, she's the whole reason - the entire reason - this second round occurred.
:lol:
The Republicans have obviously driven and held the hearings but they were over in January 2013. As in Ov-ah. There isn't a legislative or legal hearing in the world that wouldn't be reconvened upon hearing that a witness had withheld all her documents. And there are very few witnesses in the world who wouldn't be punished or penalized in some way for having done so.
:lmao:

 
The Republicans have obviously driven and held the hearings but they were over in January 2013. As in Ov-ah. There isn't a legislative or legal hearing in the world that wouldn't be reconvened upon hearing that a witness had withheld all her documents. And there are very few witnesses in the world who wouldn't be punished or penalized in some way for having done so.
It is 100% Hillary's fault that the hearings continued after January 2013. And, is she sorry now!

http://www.cnn.com/2015/10/23/opinions/gergen-gop-helping-hand-for-hillary/index.html

GOP's helping hand for Hillary Clinton

By David Gergen,

(CNN)For Hillary Clinton, Republicans have become the gift that keeps on giving. Mrs. Clinton owes much of her extraordinary comeback to her own abilities, but surely she must be grateful to the GOP as well. Never in modern times has a political party done so much to rehabilitate the leading presidential candidate in the other party.
David Sirota ‏@davidsirota ·

GOP may have done the seemingly impossible: turning death of State Dept officials into a political gift for Clinton http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/trey-gowdy-just-elected-hillary-clinton-president-20151023?page=3
 
The Republicans have obviously driven and held the hearings but they were over in January 2013. As in Ov-ah. There isn't a legislative or legal hearing in the world that wouldn't be reconvened upon hearing that a witness had withheld all her documents. And there are very few witnesses in the world who wouldn't be punished or penalized in some way for having done so.
It is 100% Hillary's fault that the hearings continued after January 2013. And, is she sorry now!

http://www.cnn.com/2015/10/23/opinions/gergen-gop-helping-hand-for-hillary/index.html

GOP's helping hand for Hillary Clinton

By David Gergen,

(CNN)For Hillary Clinton, Republicans have become the gift that keeps on giving. Mrs. Clinton owes much of her extraordinary comeback to her own abilities, but surely she must be grateful to the GOP as well. Never in modern times has a political party done so much to rehabilitate the leading presidential candidate in the other party.
David Sirota ‏@davidsirota ·

GOP may have done the seemingly impossible: turning death of State Dept officials into a political gift for Clinton http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/trey-gowdy-just-elected-hillary-clinton-president-20151023?page=3
good thing CNN and RollingStone are on the case! I can't think of two more unbiased sites than them.

 
The Republicans have obviously driven and held the hearings but they were over in January 2013. As in Ov-ah. There isn't a legislative or legal hearing in the world that wouldn't be reconvened upon hearing that a witness had withheld all her documents. And there are very few witnesses in the world who wouldn't be punished or penalized in some way for having done so.
It is 100% Hillary's fault that the hearings continued after January 2013. And, is she sorry now!

http://www.cnn.com/2015/10/23/opinions/gergen-gop-helping-hand-for-hillary/index.html

GOP's helping hand for Hillary Clinton

By David Gergen,

(CNN)For Hillary Clinton, Republicans have become the gift that keeps on giving. Mrs. Clinton owes much of her extraordinary comeback to her own abilities, but surely she must be grateful to the GOP as well. Never in modern times has a political party done so much to rehabilitate the leading presidential candidate in the other party.
David Sirota ‏@davidsirota ·

GOP may have done the seemingly impossible: turning death of State Dept officials into a political gift for Clinton http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/trey-gowdy-just-elected-hillary-clinton-president-20151023?page=3
True, that's a whole other question. It was a shtshow. I'm glad they dragged the documentation out of her but the hearings weren't conducted in an evidentiary manner. The GOP have had this idea in their head they would force her to implode in some manner, which is insane. She did have the 'what difference did it make' line in the first hearing, which I think reflected poorly on her. But the only 'bad' moment I could even possibly suggest she had in the second hearing was the bizarre moment when she said Stevens hunting for barricades and leftover security materials from evacuated embassies was somehow demonstrative of his 'sense of humor' and 'entrepreneurial spirit.' I thought that was sad and strange, but by far she did better than last time, talked policy like a pro and (and we already knew this) guys like Trump and Carson should be nowhere near a foreign policy situation.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
One post. As all are well aware I am no Hillary fan. But she completely destroyed that stupid political witch hunt of a hearing. I agree with Erickson she is way too smart for them. They're idiots and the GOP should have to refund every dime they wasted on this travesty.

Bye
Everyone on that committee should have to pay back every dime out of their own pockets....GOP and Dems alike. The American people should be embarrassed that they elected these people to office.
Typical false equivalency. Like the Democrats had anything to do with creating or sustaining this ongoing farce.

 
Funny how you're on these boards day in an day out ripping conservatives, laughing them off, calling the liars but when one happens agrees with you then suddenly they are the most respected source in the world.

 
One post. As all are well aware I am no Hillary fan. But she completely destroyed that stupid political witch hunt of a hearing. I agree with Erickson she is way too smart for them. They're idiots and the GOP should have to refund every dime they wasted on this travesty.

Bye
Everyone on that committee should have to pay back every dime out of their own pockets....GOP and Dems alike. The American people should be embarrassed that they elected these people to office.
I don't understand why the Democrats should be paying anything here. They tried to shut down the committee. During the Hillary hearing they were the only ones who showed a shred of sanity IMO.Why do we always have to go through this charade of "both sides are equally guilty"? In this case they're not. The Republicans are squarely to blame for this debacle.
They were willful participants. They didn't have to be part of it if they didn't want to be and no amount of mental gymnastics can change that. Not all that complicated really :shrug:

 
One post. As all are well aware I am no Hillary fan. But she completely destroyed that stupid political witch hunt of a hearing. I agree with Erickson she is way too smart for them. They're idiots and the GOP should have to refund every dime they wasted on this travesty.

Bye
Everyone on that committee should have to pay back every dime out of their own pockets....GOP and Dems alike. The American people should be embarrassed that they elected these people to office.
Typical false equivalency. Like the Democrats had anything to do with creating or sustaining this ongoing farce.
Yeah...bull####. No one was holding a gun to their heads to be part of this goat rodeo :shrug:

 
One post. As all are well aware I am no Hillary fan. But she completely destroyed that stupid political witch hunt of a hearing. I agree with Erickson she is way too smart for them. They're idiots and the GOP should have to refund every dime they wasted on this travesty.

Bye
Everyone on that committee should have to pay back every dime out of their own pockets....GOP and Dems alike. The American people should be embarrassed that they elected these people to office.
I don't understand why the Democrats should be paying anything here. They tried to shut down the committee. During the Hillary hearing they were the only ones who showed a shred of sanity IMO.Why do we always have to go through this charade of "both sides are equally guilty"? In this case they're not. The Republicans are squarely to blame for this debacle.
They were willful participants. They didn't have to be part of it if they didn't want to be and no amount of mental gymnastics can change that. Not all that complicated really :shrug:
No offense but that's really bad logic.
 
I missed the hearings. I'm guessing Hillary must have had brilliant answers for the alleged incompetence leading up to the attack and the blatant dishonesty immediately after the attack. Everyone in the media has been talking about how great she was and how embarrassing the R's were but I haven't seen anyone providing any actual content.

Were these issues even addressed, and if so how did Hillary turn them from her looking like a dishonest fool to looking like a stunning and brave hero?

 
Just let her take the oath already.
One hand on the Bible and the other giving the middle finger to Trey Gowdy?
It will be a sad day if that crook becomes President. She and Bill have gained great wealth off of peddling influence to corporations and wealthy people. Extremely unethical. I could live with almost the same policies from a Biden simply because he is not even close to the crook level of Hillary, who has taken the art of unethical conduct to new levels.

 
One post. As all are well aware I am no Hillary fan. But she completely destroyed that stupid political witch hunt of a hearing. I agree with Erickson she is way too smart for them. They're idiots and the GOP should have to refund every dime they wasted on this travesty.

Bye
Everyone on that committee should have to pay back every dime out of their own pockets....GOP and Dems alike. The American people should be embarrassed that they elected these people to office.
I don't understand why the Democrats should be paying anything here. They tried to shut down the committee. During the Hillary hearing they were the only ones who showed a shred of sanity IMO.Why do we always have to go through this charade of "both sides are equally guilty"? In this case they're not. The Republicans are squarely to blame for this debacle.
They were willful participants. They didn't have to be part of it if they didn't want to be and no amount of mental gymnastics can change that. Not all that complicated really :shrug:
No offense but that's really bad logic.
It's a statement of facts unless you are disputing the "willful" part. There's no logic in the statement :shrug:

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top