My point is that everything you guys are saying is a crime. At least as I understand it (again, please set me straight if not). So in the absence of an indictment of Clinton, you have to believe:
a) Clinton didn't commit a crime
b) Clinton did everything the fever swamp is accusing her of, but the FBI/DOJ failed to prosecute any of it despite holding 'written' evidence and the involvement of dozens of agents.
You already see people lining up for option B. "The FIX IS IN". It's stupid.
Maybe she did commit crimes. Based on the last 20 years of overblown nothing, I strongly doubt it -- we have seen this movie over and over again after all. But maybe she did. If she's charged I'll accept that I'm wrong.
But to believe that there's SUPER OBVIOUS evidence she committed crimes, the FBI has that evidence, and she doesn't get charged is the same mouth-breathing goofballery we've heard in an unbroken thread from Vince Foster to Benghazi.