Official Hillary Clinton 2016 thread (12 Viewers)

[Sand]

No, I was aware of that.  I was referring to Tim's post referenced by Saints.

Sorry - skipping between this thread and one of our runners chasing an Olympic berth in the running thread.

 

[timschochet]

Is this your way of invoking Godwin's Law - making fun of America's greatest massacre?

I'm not making fun of it at all. I'm making fun of Mr. Ham's ridiculous "scourge" comments. 

 

[Bottomfeeder Sports]

BFS, I'm relaxing in Palm Springs for the weekend with the family and just got a chance to read that Bllomsberg piece with Obama.  Great stuff - thank you for sharing. 

We're really going to miss Obama. He's a once in a generation leader, by far the best POTUS of my lifetime. Can't wait to see what he does next.  

You're welcome.   

 

[cobalt_27]

I'm a Nixon fan DESPITE Watergate. He deserved to go over that one. But allow me to paraphrase Lloyd Bentson. 

I knew Watergate. I worked with Watergate. Watergate was a friend of mine. The Hillary Clinton email scandal is no Watergate. 

You might be right.  I have no idea how this will unfold.  60/40 no indictment odds for me.  But, I clearly wouldn't be shocked to see her get clipped.

 

[SaintsInDome2006]

Which neither you, Mr. Ham or any of the other Hillary bashers paid any attention to, or if you did, it didn't hinder your daily multiple postings and Hillary hate-fest.

It was discussed extensively.

 

[SaintsInDome2006]

Notice he conveniently left out Watergate.  The big Nixon fan is still a denier of that, too.

The list is actually really short: Nixon and Hillary, Tim just threw in a bunch of red herrings.

 

[SaintsInDome2006]

I'm a Nixon fan DESPITE Watergate.

Besides that, how was the play, Mrs. Lincoln?

 

[squistion]

It was discussed extensively.

It if was you obviously didn't take it seriously, or wouldn't have posted your usual daily nonsense about the emails.

 

[SaintsInDome2006]

It if was you obviously didn't take it seriously, or wouldn't have posted your usual daily nonsense about the emails.

I did. I also posted a similar article from WaPo in January IIRC.

 

[dparker713]

Especially when they've broken the law.

We regularly execute innocent people, despite the extra precautions taken in capital cases.  So there's no especially about it.  Everyone should have counsel when they talk to law enforcement, regardless of your level of culpability.  

 

[squistion]

I did. I also posted a similar article from WaPo in January IIRC.

But you obviously didn't believe it to be true or you wouldn't have wasted hours posting countless articles about Hillary's impending doom.

 

[cobalt_27]

We regularly execute innocent people, despite the extra precautions taken in capital cases.  So there's no especially about it.  Everyone should have counsel when they talk to law enforcement, regardless of your level of culpability.  

Agreed.  With all the downplaying this as a security review, not a criminal investigation, it just looks discordant.

 

[SaintsInDome2006]

@squistion - there have probably been three articles at least discussing why prior precedent and sources say Hillary won't be indicted. If you want to discuss it I will be glad to repost them, though pretty busy this weekend. CNN, Politico and WaPo. They've all been discussed here. Let me know.

 

[dparker713]

Not surprised but sick.  At no time have the facts done anything but corroborate that Hillary conspired to hide her communications, even those that belong to the American people.  Some of the dirtiest dealings in American history have taken place around it.  She jeopardized American security and set a precedent that insults all of the many thousands of brave Americans who risk life and limb to protect this nation and safeguard its classified intelligence.

If she is not charged, it is a scourge on this nation and a clear indication of its decline.  

You do realize that there are no criminal penalties attached to FOIA, right?

 

[bueno]

You do realize that there are no criminal penalties attached to FOIA, right?

You do realize that this isn't about just violating the FOIA, right?

 

[dparker713]

Besides that, how was the play, Mrs. Lincoln?

It's not like Nixon was without his successes as President.

 

[squistion]

@squistion - there have probably been three articles at least discussing why prior precedent and sources say Hillary won't be indicted. If you want to discuss it I will be glad to repost them, though pretty busy this weekend. CNN, Politico and WaPo. They've all been discussed here. Let me know.

Evan Perez is quoted to talking to sources as to their current findings. What CNN said a month ago is not relevant to what has been happening in the last few days. And please don't post this month old nonsense again which was simply speculation.

 

[SaintsInDome2006]

Evan Perez is quoted to talking to sources as to their current findings. What CNN said a month ago is not relevant to what has been happening in the last few days. And please don't post this month old nonsense again which was simply speculation.

Sure ok it was pro-Hillary. But nm.

 

[dparker713]

You do realize that this isn't about just violating the FOIA, right?

He's responding to a post about the likelihood of no indictment.  Then he claims to be sick because it's been proven that she tried to hide her communications, which is only really relevant to FOIA requests.  It's not like State felt they were missing important correspondence when she left.  

 

[Smack Tripper]

You guys still have those meddling kids at wiki leaks who were promising something 

 

[Guest]

You guys still have those meddling kids at wiki leaks who were promising something 

I think that's bull####.  

 

[tommyGunZ]

Ham, probably time for a username change.  How about Stuffed Wolf?  

 

[MaxThreshold]

You do realize that this isn't about just violating the FOIA, right?

Actually, they think it's all part of the normal "security review" the FBI does on everyone.

 

[Bottomfeeder Sports]

16 months & 2 weeks, that's all.

Don't worry.  There will soon be another silly controversy that you can utilize to get the "likes".

 

[timschochet]

Meanwhile Judge Andrew Napolitano is on Fox assuring his audience that there WILL be an indictment, his sources are positive. Reminds me of **** Morris and the 2012 election. Doesn't FOX get tired of hiring these guys? And why do their viewers keep buying into this nonsense no matter how many times they're lied to? 

 

[squistion]

Meanwhile Judge Andrew Napolitano's on Fox assures his audience that there WILL be an indictment, his sources are positive. Reminds me of **** Morris and the 2012 election. Doesn't FOX get tired of hiring these guys? And why do their viewers keep buying into this nonsense no matter how many times they're lied to? 

Of course not, because they tell the audience exactly what they believe and what they want to hear.

 

[badmojo1006]

Meanwhile Judge Andrew Napolitano's on Fox assures his audience that there WILL be an indictment, his sources are positive. Reminds me of **** Morris and the 2012 election. Doesn't FOX get tired of hiring these guys? And why do their viewers keep buying into this nonsense no matter how many times they're lied to? 

Course not! They provide the red meat to keep the audience at bay

 

[cobalt_27]

CNN and MSNBC reporting sources indicate no charges will be filed against HRC.

 

[cstu]

CNN and MSNBC reporting sources indicate no charges will be filed against HRC.

You don't say. 

 

[Max Power]

CNN and MSNBC reporting sources indicate no charges will be filed against HRC.

Just wait for the second order effects. The govt is slapping the face of the intelligence community.

 

[Baloney Sandwich]

I read several articles today that stated that Kevin Durant was blown away by the Clipper's presentation when they met and now the Clipper's just signed their coaches son for 36M effectively taking them out of the running for Durant.  Not everything reported ends up being true.

 

[MaxThreshold]

CNN and MSNBC reporting sources indicate no charges will be filed against HRC.

Of course they are.

 

[Max Power]

The Inintelligence agency and whistleblower act.  its all Hilary needs to think about.  The FOIA will solve everything.

 

[SaintsInDome2006]

Meanwhile Judge Andrew Napolitano is on Fox assuring his audience that there WILL be an indictment, his sources are positive. Reminds me of **** Morris and the 2012 election. Doesn't FOX get tired of hiring these guys? And why do their viewers keep buying into this nonsense no matter how many times they're lied to? 

CNN just hired Corey Lewandowski, that's a real shame.

 

[cobalt_27]

I read several articles today that stated that Kevin Durant was blown away by the Clipper's presentation when they met and now the Clipper's just signed their coaches son for 36M effectively taking them out of the running for Durant.  Not everything reported ends up being true.

True.  But, it does fit with a narrative that most felt this would fall below criminal charges threshold.  As I have said many times, I trust Comey, and if he doesn't think any charges should be filed, I accept that.  I trust Lynch as well and don't buy that there has been influence on this investigation.  I happen to think it's all typical rotten Clinton stink, but if they don't have charges to bring, then it is what it is.  

 

[timschochet]

The timing on this could not be better. Hillary is bound to get some negative press on this for a few more weeks but by early August the email scandal should be behind her. 

 

[Apple Jack]

The timing on this could not be better. Hillary is bound to get some negative press on this for a few more weeks but by early August the email scandal should be behind her. 

as if they're not going to come up with another scandal.

 

[dparker713]

Just wait for the second order effects. The govt is slapping the face of the intelligence community.

So, the intelligence community is sure that Hillary committed a crime that the FBI is just going to sweep under the rug, even though they've never seen the pertinent emails.  Well, unless they've illegally hacked Hillary or the FBI.

 

[SaintsInDome2006]

The timing on this could not be better. Hillary is bound to get some negative press on this for a few more weeks but by early August the email scandal should be behind her. 

Actual quote from April 2015.

 

[SaintsInDome2006]

I read several articles today that stated that Kevin Durant was blown away by the Clipper's presentation when they met and now the Clipper's just signed their coaches son for 36M effectively taking them out of the running for Durant.  Not everything reported ends up being true.

36 mill for Rivers - now that's a national scandal.

 

[timschochet]

as if they're not going to come up with another scandal.

Oh they will. They already have- the latest claim is that she helped son-in-law Mezvinsky when he invested in Greece (he lost money BTW). But this was the big one- there won't be another FBI investigation. 

 

[timschochet]

Actual quote from April 2015.

If the FBI concludes its investigation, it's over. Even you gotta admit that Saints. 

 

[SaintsInDome2006]

If the FBI concludes its investigation, it's over. Even you gotta admit that Saints. 

Investigating what?

 

[squistion]

Environmental damage, failed bank, fired lifetime staffers, missing files, accessing confidential files, banged an intern, workplace harassment, mishandled classified data, barged into the US AG's plane while under investigation.... shame how they keep getting run over in the middle of the highway. 

 

 

[SaintsInDome2006]

 

 

[NorvilleBarnes]

Especially when they've broken the law.

What the? . . . You're back?!

And . . . you're on . . . my side?

:LooksInTheMirror:

oursTallDrink:

this can't be good

 

[timschochet]

Investigating what?

The security review. 

 

[cobalt_27]

The security review. 

You keep using that phrase.  I do not think it means what you think it means.

Any FBI/DOJ folks using that phrase, by the way?  Or is it just camp Hillary?

 

[BeaverCleaver]

The security review. 

Stop trolling

 

[Smack Tripper]

You keep using that phrase.  I do not think it means what you think it means.

Any FBI/DOJ folks using that phrase, by the way?  Or is it just camp Hillary?

Hillary could get audited by the IRS and say that they were just being helpful double checking her math