What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Official Hillary Clinton 2016 thread (6 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.
 i am owned... can you tell me more about how her lesbian is impacts her presentation, let me sit under that learning tree
:yes:  Completely.

Still waiting for even one video clip showing Maddow acting hysterically over anything.

You can't do it, can you? If not, prove me wrong with one single clip.

 
I do every week day. 

Please provide link to back up Snacks claim he has been hysterical in his coverage of the Comey news or any link that he has ever been hysterical in any of his coverage or a drama queen. TIA
No. I didn't say he was hysterical about Comey I said he was a drama queen and MSNBC is hack central. He is often overwrought and over the top. And MSNBC is the suck. The fact that you watch it is unsurprising.

 
Please link where I said they were hysterical. 
They are losing their minds, but that is not being hysterical. I stand corrected. :lol:

They're running breathlessly hot with it tonight on the Maddow show.... it just reeks of a "change the story" narrative.... Maddow and Hayes look like they're losing their mind with these last 72 hours... but it may be a bit of boy who cried wolf.  Lots of ways to attack Trump, I don't see this flimsy attempt really resonnating. 

Lest we forget this party mocked Romney out of the room for talking about Russia but now they're to sell to independents that these are areas of concern?
 
:yes:  Completely.

Still waiting for even one video clip showing Maddow acting hysterically over anything.

You can't do it, can you? If not, prove me wrong with one single clip.
Wow, Squishy seriously OWNS this place!

Gaze upon him in AWE and challenge him at your own risk !  

:tebow:

 
:yes:  Completely.

Still waiting for even one video clip showing Maddow acting hysterically over anything.

You can't do it, can you? If not, prove me wrong with one single clip.
I said they were losing their minds not hysterical. 

A rabbit hole narrative of trump and Russians for 2/3's of her show for a story we all know is going nowhere is a nonsensical choice.   If it bears out that the FBI indicates such a link, I will admit I was wrong. The NY Times is aleady reporting this is unlikely. 

That is losing your mind over a story 

 
No. I didn't say he was hysterical about Comey I said he was a drama queen and MSNBC is hack central. He is often overwrought and over the top. And MSNBC is the suck. The fact that you watch it is unsurprising.
Life is much better when you avoid reality TV masquerading as news.

 
In this extract from his new book When Google Met Wikileaks, WikiLeaks' publisher Julian Assange describes the special relationship between Google, Hillary Clinton and the State Department -- and what that means for the future of the internet. WikiLeaks readers can obtain a 20 percent discount on the cover price when ordering from the OR Books website by using the coupon code "WIKILEAKS".

So he is just trying to sell books these days?

 
In this extract from his new book When Google Met Wikileaks, WikiLeaks' publisher Julian Assange describes the special relationship between Google, Hillary Clinton and the State Department -- and what that means for the future of the internet. WikiLeaks readers can obtain a 20 percent discount on the cover price when ordering from the OR Books website by using the coupon code "WIKILEAKS".

So he is just trying to sell books these days?




 




 
WikiLeaks is not on the HRC payroll so they probably could use the cash.  But the link I gave you is completely free to read.  Only if you wanted the backstory, would you need to buy the book.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Probably already posted but can't be highlighted enough how big of scumbags these Clinton people are-

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign manager wanted to leak an announcement  presumably officially announcing her presidential candidacy — as a “decoy” after the New York Times first reported her email scandal in March 2015.

“I think we should get a credible leak out that we’re announcing on the 20th. As a decoy,” campaign manager Robby Mook told Clinton adviser John Podesta in a March 12, 2015, email 10 days after the New York Times story broke. The email was made public Monday by Wikileaks.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
HRC going all in on the Russia connection:

https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton/status/793234169576947712

The hackers have already countered on multiple levels.  

I ask again, Why is HRC so ready to put the US at war with Russia?
The FBI just announced an investigation into Paul Manafort. Over his ties to Russia. It well known Trump can no longer borrow money in the US. Banks won't have it. Seem like the Russians will still float him. He could owe them 100s of millions. Further it's now out there that Comey agreed with the idea that the Russians were behind the hack and were trying to influence the election. That pretty likely means a crap ton of pressure to get the FBI looking into all these Trump connections with Russia given the election thing. This is politics 101.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
In this extract from his new book When Google Met Wikileaks, WikiLeaks' publisher Julian Assange describes the special relationship between Google, Hillary Clinton and the State Department -- and what that means for the future of the internet. WikiLeaks readers can obtain a 20 percent discount on the cover price when ordering from the OR Books website by using the coupon code "WIKILEAKS".

So he is just trying to sell books these days?
Google staff visits the White House more than once a week.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3554953/Google-staffers-meetings-White-House-staggering-427-times-course-Obama-presidency-averaging-week.html

 
All conjecture aside, how sickening is it that a supposedly democratic leader talked about rigging the 2006 Palestinian election:

https://soundcloud.com/user-30899546/hrc-determine-who-win-1
Well she was right. That vote should have never been called. It had disaster written all over it. But it went forward and here we are. Further we should have made sure there was a candidate that wasn't a terrorist organization pledged to destroy Israel out there. Got to agree with Hillary on this one though it pains me.

 
Probably already posted but can't be highlighted enough how big of scumbags these Clinton people are-
If it was, no was paid attention and it was treated the same as what you posted. since you didn't provide a link outside of to the original Times article.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm watching Maddow right now; didn't get a chance to before. She's not hysterical at all, but I really disagree with her assessment of Andrew Johnson. Sure, Johnson was a racist, who didn't want to give blacks any rights. But he also wanted to impose Lincoln's idea of a gentle Reconstruction, and resisted the efforts of Radical Republicans to take advantage of the beaten South and turn it into a wasteland.

 
I'm watching Maddow right now; didn't get a chance to before. She's not hysterical at all, but I really disagree with her assessment of Andrew Johnson. Sure, Johnson was a racist, who didn't want to give blacks any rights. But he also wanted to impose Lincoln's idea of a gentle Reconstruction, and resisted the efforts of Radical Republicans to take advantage of the beaten South and turn it into a wasteland.
Andrew Johnson was more qualified than Hillary.

 
The chance of the FBI finding no classified emails is less than zilch.
People keep conflating how many emails there are with how many are likely linked even tangentially to Hillary. Some estimates, advanced by alleged FBI sources. put the number at less than 10.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hillary supporters, why is this happening?

Podesta DOJ Pal Peter Kadzik Is Heading Hillary Criminal Probe

- Marc Rich's former attorney

- Podesta's former attorney

Does this not point to Lorretta Lynch being super corrupt?

 
The chance of the FBI finding no classified emails is less than zilch.
So? That in itself is not evidence of a crime committed by Hillary.

In order for this to rise to the level of a criminal situation, you'll need all of the following things to be true:

1. laptop must contain classified material.

2. material must have been classified prior to being sent.

3. classified material must have been sent by Hillary.

And on top of that, you would most likely need to prove that there was intent (or at least knowledge) on Hillary's part that she was transferring classified material in an unsecured and/or unapproved and/or disallowed manner. And the previous FBI investigation has already established the precedent that Hillary's reckless handling of the previous 3 pieces of classified material did not rise to the level of an arrestable offense.

And none of that is happening by Tuesday, by the way.

 
I'm watching Maddow right now; didn't get a chance to before. She's not hysterical at all, but I really disagree with her assessment of Andrew Johnson. Sure, Johnson was a racist, who didn't want to give blacks any rights. But he also wanted to impose Lincoln's idea of a gentle Reconstruction, and resisted the efforts of Radical Republicans to take advantage of the beaten South and turn it into a wasteland.
She has never been hysterical or rather acting like she has "lost her mind" contrary to Mr. Snacks posts.

 
To be crucified?
Well that too!

Hey being from North Carolina, do you agree with my notion that history needs to reassess Andrew Johnson? Without his resistance, the South would have been plundered much more than it was, and its recovery would have been much slower, to the nation's detriment.

 
Of course Hillary was more qualified than Donald Trump. HRCs team paid off the media to elect the Pied Paper opposition.  This election has been handpicked by HRC's team.  They conspired against Bernie Sanders and then spent 1.5 Billion on an Eric Schmidt project to ensure one of these three came out of the GOP (Trump, Cruz, Carson).  This was all be design   These were the only 3 GOP that HRC's team felt she could win against.  

 
Of course Hillary was more qualified than Donald Trump. HRCs team paid off the media to elect the Pied Paper opposition.  This election has been handpicked by HRC's team.  They conspired against Bernie Sanders and then spent 1.5 Billion on an Eric Schmidt project to ensure one of these three came out of the GOP (Trump, Cruz, Carson).  This was all be design   These were the only 3 GOP that HRC's team felt she could win against.  
Eric Schmidt? WTF?

I have no idea what you're going on about, but I'm impressed that Hillary is good enough to manipulate the Republican primaries. Damn she's smart.

 
Found a commercial for anyone who wants to get a job defending Hillary and the Democratic Party (which includes the MSM).

Join Now

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top