He should. why are they saying he shouldnt?NPR news is here reporting. And the board of elections official is debating on whether the Hillary for prison dude is allowed to be near the parameter
Delaware AND Ohio?! Voter fraud! Lock her up!Standing in line for early voting in Delaware Ohio ... Over an hour wait ?
Because "Hillary for prison" is a political statement, and electioneering at a polling place is illegal.He should. why are they saying he shouldnt?
Because the official said "it's not a campaign slogan." ?He should. why are they saying he shouldnt?
Thank you for voting. They may make you change your shirt because you're not supposed to wear campaign slogans at a polling place.Or Steelers ?
Just saw some overweight white dude wearing a Hillary for Prison tee shirt. And, although not planned and pure coincidence, I'm wearing my HRC Love Not Hate shirt ?
It's a personal opinion.Because "Hillary for prison" is a political statement, and electioneering at a polling place is illegal.
So is "you should vote for Trump" but you can't wear a shirt that says that, either.It's a personal opinion.
I have a hoodie that I can easily put over my tee shirt. But this isn't a campaign shirt ... I purchased last summer. I'll let you know if it gets questioned ...Thank you for voting. They may make you change your shirt because you're not supposed to wear campaign slogans at a polling place.
Are they gonna send you home?Because the official said "it's not a campaign slogan." ?
They usually just make people turn their shirts inside out or wear a jacket over them.quickhands said:Are they gonna send you home?
No. I heard the official say they ask people to wear their shirt inside outquickhands said:Are they gonna send you home?
I thought they where gonna come back for tues?PA voters: spread the word. The strike is affecting the ability to reach polling places, but Uber and Lyft are offering free rides to polling places all day in Election Day. Promo Code: VOTEPA
http://billypenn.com/2016/11/05/free-uber-and-lyft-rides-to-philly-polls-on-election-day-thanks-to-a-clinton-pac/
If either of those things happened they'd be pretty bad. Since I don't take my news analysis from RT or Breitbart though, I'm confident they didn't.I'm not a trump supporter, although I do think he'd be a departure from the neocon globalism we've had for the past 16 years.
What planet are you from where payforplay, election rigging and Citigroup handselecting Obama's cabinet are not bad things?
What makes you think this? He was in favor of the Iraq war and the Lybian intervention. He's promised to "kick the ####" out of ISIS. He says the problem with Iraq is that we didn't occupy the country even longer and take the oil while we were there. I have no idea where this image of Trump the pacifist comes from.I'm not a trump supporter, although I do think he'd be a departure from the neocon globalism we've had for the past 16 years.
easy there tough guyDare this B to come speak in Fayetteville, NC. 5th largest voter turnout in a swing state. Talk to us...
Just venting on a drunken afternoon. Shes a hack.easy there tough guy
Sure, John Podesta is the one wallowing in breast milk semen and menstral blood, but the right are the crazy ones...Oh dude, totally. I can tell you're dialed in. Have you read this yet:
Something Very Strange Is Going On - If The Watchmen Are Right, We Are Closing In Upon 'America's Worst Nightmare' Come True  - 'Silence And Darkness Is The Only Sure Outcome'
Yeah we're the ones that want to lock up our political opponents for nothing.Sure, John Podesta is the one wallowing in breast milk semen and menstral blood, but the right are the crazy ones...
Don't hold your breath on that.Comey told Chafffetz they aren't changing their July conclusions...whole bunch of crow to eat on the right.
I just saw that on his Twitter account. Wow. So all the questioning and maybe even investigation Comey and others will go through was for nothing? That has to sting.Comey told Chafffetz they aren't changing their July conclusions...whole bunch of crow to eat on the right.
First!Finished. Total time was around 1 hour, 10 min.
Uneventful, and no issue with my HRC shirt. What I did find interesting is I had to sign up for an absentee vote. Ohio only opens one polling location per county, which is 30 minutes from my house. And, my vote will be reflected first as soon as the polls close on Tuesday.
They haven't even received a subpoena to look at them yet.Don't hold your breath on that.
Chaffetz Tweet:
Jason Chaffetz @jasoninthehouse 16m16 minutes ago
FBI Dir just informed us "Based on our review,
we have not changed our conclusions that we expressed in July with respect to Sec Clinton"
Who hasn't?They haven't even received a subpoena to look at them yet.
I thought it was reported over the weekend that they had gotten a search warrant.They haven't even received a subpoena to look at them yet.
They got the warrant last weekend, I believe. It was in the news last Sunday.They haven't even received a subpoena to look at them yet.
The Justice department hadn't as of a few days ago. They FBI was reviewing the metadata. That could have changed, but I haven't heard it reported.Who hasn't?
SELL MORTIMER SELL!!!Comey told Chafffetz they aren't changing their July conclusions...whole bunch of crow to eat on the right.
Sure, John Podesta is the one wallowing in breast milk semen and menstral blood, but the right are the crazy ones...
you guys are the gift that keeps on giving.Like that ever stopped anyoneBecause "Hillary for prison" is a political statement, and electioneering at a polling place is illegal.
Understood...that's where you draw your lineat "not Trump". For a lot of other people that isn't where they draw their line. They go beyond "Trump sucks so I'll vote for the other person".I'm not a MSM hater, but I do not take what they say at face value either. In fact, I've had personal experience of having first hand knowledge of a story (non political) and media of all sorts had reported so many inaccuracies that it made no sense. Media is so sensationalized and a rush to ratings, that investigative reporting and factual information is not the norm anymore. With that being said, I'm trying my best to sift through the information that I do have, to make the best choice. Fortunately, Donald is such an ####### openly that that's all the information I ever needed.Initially you asked if they were falling for it, which is an entirely different question. I'd imagine many people are still following it to see what's uncovered. Why wouldn't they?
After all the tinfoil, criminal accusations, scumbaggery; this: Foreign Policy, or more accurately, military policy, makes me close to a single issue guy. The candidates are so full of other issues it's hard to stay focused on this one, but I try. It's where the oval office can do the most damage and usually does. Along with being Californian, it's the reason I won't vote for either candidate. No reason for something I oppose to have my meaningless endorsement. I despise the past 16 years of fumbling neoconservatism and Obamadroning. I see Hillary every bit as hawkish a neocon as W, and more dangerous because she doesn't require a team of likemindeds to persuade her. She gets it. She is in. So without the drama that used to dominate my posts on the topic, I hate her. It has nothing to do with security failures and foundation corruption. On the other had there's the Donald in your quote, and his comments about nukes, and his ridiculous reactions to slights, the unpredictable narcissism, his obvious puppethood, and utterly disqualifying ignorance. So preferring Clinton isn't about the lesser of two evils. I'm not 100% which is the lesser. Rather I prefer the evil I know, to the absurdly mysterious evil I don't.What makes you think this? He was in favor of the Iraq war and the Lybian intervention. He's promised to "kick the ####" out of ISIS. He says the problem with Iraq is that we didn't occupy the country even longer and take the oil while we were there. I have no idea where this image of Trump the pacifist comes from.
Based on our review, we have not changed our conclusions that we expressed in July with respect to Secretary Clinton.