Official Hillary Clinton 2016 thread (3 Viewers)

[MaxThreshold]

You know we all see that as a nervous laugh, right?

 

[Apple Jack]

I know Trump is incredibly dishonest. I think the last time I saw a stat was that he lies like 75% of the time.

But is it true that both of them are incredibly dishonest? I thought Hillary was at like 25%. That seems sort of run of the mill politician liar. Not anything especially egregious. Is it great? Of course not. But she seems just sort of par for the course. 

There's some strategery that can be employed here along with some fuzzy math where by if a derp repeats that she's a liar over and over and over again on the internet for a few years it initiates a multiplying agent where by the 25% becomes 37.5% and that becomes 56.25% and next thing you know it's crossing lines in the sand and all bets are off because samesees!

 

[cstu]

It is true you can just as surely drown in water an inch over your head (Clinton) as 100 feet over your head (Trump), but given my druthers, I'd opt for the former and take my chances that way. The false equalization squad implicitly is rolling with the candidate that asked twice at a security briefing why we can't use nukes since we have them, who wants to be "unpredictable" with nukes and stands for nuclear proliferation by Japan, South Korea and even Saudi Arabia. The candidate who is undermining and eroding Democracy with dangerous "rigged" rhetoric, and seditiously enlisting the aid of illegal Gestapo-like poll monitor goon squads. Puts the press in harms way by calling them disgusting and pointing them out in rallies if they don't write about him in terms of fawning adoration. A hothead that openly courted violence and talked about wanting to punch opposing politicians and protesters. With such poor impulse control, personal discipline and prioritization sense that HIS OWN STAFF don't trust him with his Twitter feed and wrestled it away from him during crunch time in case he did something "impetuous" or "rash" (such a child). Wannabe dictator.

* Why is it the most vocal anti-false equivalency proponents that claim to be impartial as both candidates are equally bad ONLY berate Clinton supporters. Never Trump supporters.       

 

[squistion]

Squis not sure if you're aware but you out yourself with some of the tweets you post. Be aware and if that gets you to stop posting tweets here, great.

 

[MaxThreshold]

There's some strategery that can be employed here along with some fuzzy math where by if a derp repeats that she's a liar over and over and over again on the internet for a few years it initiates a multiplying agent where by the 25% becomes 37.5% and that becomes 56.25% and next thing you know it's crossing lines in the sand and all bets are off because samesees!

And, of course, there is the actual fact that she is an immense liar and POS.  

Those who like to make excuses because "SHE'S MY LIAR" only become more pathetic with each passing day.

 

[Willie Neslon]

Not sure if you're embarrassed or doubting what I wrote.

 

[squistion]

Not sure if you're embarrassed or doubting what I wrote.

 

[Willie Neslon]

I was trying to help you.

 

[Ramblin Wreck]

I'm kind of feeling like nearly every conservative I know either here or in my personal life is going to repeat something similar to this over the next few days and weeks...

I'm not a conservative.  I supported Sanders.  I've never supported either of these two.  I never intended to vote for either so I wasn't going to be happy regardless of who wins but I'm not going to make myself miserable over it either.  I accepted months ago the collective US voters screwed this election up.

 

[Chaos Commish]

I am disgusted Hillary is our next president.

By the same token, I'm relieved.

We're gladly dodging a bullet in order to be stabbed in the back. 

 

[BeaverCleaver]

I was trying to help you.

Well...why try and help him now?

 

[Henry Ford]

And, of course, there is the actual fact that she is an immense liar and POS.  

Those who like to make excuses because "SHE'S MY LIAR" only become more pathetic with each passing day.

Okay.

 

[MaxThreshold]

Okay.

  We're good.

 

[squistion]

I was trying to help you.

Yeah, I would really have a problem if people might have some negative opinions about me on an anonymous forum.

Maybe you can go over to the cage where you express your views with Fantasy Curse and DDT who have similar views (who are about the same age).

Have a good evening.

 

[Henry Ford]

Yeah, I would really have problem with living if people have some negative opinions about me on an anonymous forum.

Maybe you can go over to the cage where you express your opinions with Fantasy Curse and DTD who have similar views.

Have a good evening.

He's telling you you're making it less anonymous, I believe.  Maybe I'm misinterpreting.

 

[Willie Neslon]

Well...why try and help him now?

I don't think anyone wants their personal info out there.

 

[BeaverCleaver]

Yeah, I would really have a problem if people have some negative opinions about me on an anonymous forum.

Maybe you can go over to the cage where you express your opinions with Fantasy Curse and DTD who have similar views.

Have a good evening.

Most people don't like you here as well. 

 

[Willie Neslon]

Yeah, I would really have a problem if people might have some negative opinions about me on an anonymous forum.

Maybe you can go over to the cage where you express your opinions with Fantasy Curse and DTD who have similar views.

Have a good evening.

I guess I don't get it.

 

[BeaverCleaver]

I don't think anyone wants their personal info out there.

No...but why would you post what you did and then have Squissy dump all over it?

 

[Willie Neslon]

He's telling you you're making it less anonymous, I believe.  Maybe I'm misinterpreting.

Correct.

 

[Willie Neslon]

No...but why would you post what you did and then have Squissy dump all over it?

what do you mean?

 

[shader]

I know Trump is incredibly dishonest. I think the last time I saw a stat was that he lies like 75% of the time.

But is it true that both of them are incredibly dishonest? I thought Hillary was at like 25%. That seems sort of run of the mill politician liar. Not anything especially egregious. Is it great? Of course not. But she seems just sort of par for the course. 

So she has a more honest speech writer?

 

[SaintsInDome2006]

I didn't follow the 1st round in detail but didn't they drag that out forever due to the number of emails?

She was going to win regardless so I guess at least we don't have a President under FBI investigation making our country look like an even bigger joke.  

For a change I haven't kept up. However not all 650K related to Hillary. Some smaller number did. Secondly unlike the first time there is a repository of documents to compare against. Software can examine the whole set to identify what is duplicate and what is new. What is new is relatively small. I don't know that the investigation is actually over. It's funny the constant 180 degree reverses we hear from the talking points from both sides. 

Comey issues his letter. GOP yells 'investigation reopened!'. Dems respond that oh no the investigation was never really closed. Oh ok. Now it's closed. Trump goes from 'rigged!' To Comey is a man of integrity bravely battling the DOJ back to Rigged! again. Dems do the flip of that, and now we're back to trusting Comey again. The FBI is supposed to be independent which was GREAT in July, then not in October, now is again in November, and then when Hillary cans Comey on January why that will just be 'just deserts'. I think Hillary - like the Dems said just a couple weeks ago - is still under investigation in a couple directions as is Trump, and if this country is a joke it's for putting our selves in this ridiculous position in the first place. Yeah our country has taken a hit from all of this. 

 

[ren hoek]

What makes you think this? He was in favor of the Iraq war and the Lybian intervention. He's promised to "kick the ####" out of ISIS. He says the problem with Iraq is that we didn't occupy the country even longer and take the oil while we were there. I have no idea where this image of Trump the pacifist comes from.

Never said he is a pacifist, just not a globalist.  Trump is bad.  But he's not WW3 bad. 

 

[SaintsInDome2006]

You keep using that word, "rigged". I do not think it means what you think it means.

Irony Missed Here.

 

[SaintsInDome2006]

Just heard that the 15,000 of the 33,000 deleted emails that were found on Weiner's laptop were mostly duplicates with some personal emails. Unless something changes on that reporting, it seems to back up Hillary's explanation. 

We're back to trusting anonymous sources again. Good. 

 

[squistion]

Correct.

I am touched by your concern after you repeatedly (like in 20 posts) accused ToneLoc1 and I of being the same account. I asked you for proof and you said two moderators on The Test Forum verified it. I asked for proof of that (links, copy and paste of posts, etc) and all I got was crickets. Bottom line, you make up stuff and there is no actual proof of any of your claims.

 

[Arsenal of Doom]

So apparently more Hispanic voters have voted early in FL than voted in TOTAL in 2012.

AA vote now also ahead of 2012 early voting totals.

I guess running an overtly racist campaign has some drawbacks. 

 

[Trey]

The line to vote in Cincinnati today was 3 hours long at one point due to all the cuts made to early voting. 

Democracy at its finest!

 

[Dinsy Ejotuz]

So apparently more Hispanic voters have voted early in FL than voted in TOTAL in 2012.

That seems kind of hard to believe.  Where'd you see that?

 

[Chaos Commish]

For a change I haven't kept up. However not all 650K related to Hillary. Some smaller number did. Secondly unlike the first time there is a repository of documents to compare against. Software can examine the whole set to identify what is duplicate and what is new. What is new is relatively small. I don't know that the investigation is actually over. It's funny the constant 180 degree reverses we hear from the talking points from both sides. 

Comey issues his letter. GOP yells 'investigation reopened!'. Dems respond that oh no the investigation was never really closed. Oh ok. Now it's closed. Trump goes from 'rigged!' To Comey is a man of integrity bravely battling the DOJ back to Rigged! again. Dems do the flip of that, and now we're back to trusting Comey again. The FBI is supposed to be independent which was GREAT in July, then not in October, now is again in November, and then when Hillary cans Comey on January why that will just be 'just deserts'. I think Hillary - like the Dems said just a couple weeks ago - is still under investigation in a couple directions as is Trump, and if this country is a joke it's for putting our selves in this ridiculous position in the first place. Yeah our country has taken a hit from all of this. 

This narrative fits the breaking news but it doesn't fit with the Dems I've known and followed for over a decade. I'm talking about writers at Salon, Crooks and Liars, the like. Call them historically informed highly activated Dems. They hated the appointment of Comey, much astoundment, gnashing of teeth and Obama bashing over that. They hated the July announcement, wrote seething criticisms of his flagrant attack on Hillary. Of course they were stunned to hysterics over the October letter, and while some may be thankful he cleared things up before Tuesday, he is and always has been despised. 

 

[timschochet]

The line to vote in Cincinnati today was 3 hours long at one point due to all the cuts made to early voting. 

Democracy at its finest!

What's your feeling about Ohio? Most pundits assume Trump but the last 3 polls has him up by 1, down by 1, and tied. Hillary was there today with LeBron.

 

[Willie Neslon]

I am touched by your concern after you repeatedly (like in 20 posts) accused ToneLoc1 and I of being the same account. I asked you for proof and you said two moderators on The Test Forum verified it. I asked for proof of that (links, copy and paste of posts, etc) and all I got was crickets. Bottom line, you make up stuff and there is no actual proof of any of your claims.

What don't you believe? And when did I say anything about test forum verifying anything? 

Dude, you out yourself on some of your linked tweets. i can see you twitter account, i.e. your real name.  The 5th letter of your twitter account is an h. Is that good enough? Trying to help you out here.

 

[Arsenal of Doom]

That seems kind of hard to believe.  Where'd you see that?

@ElectProject:

Likely when the data come out tomorrow, more Hispanics will have voted early in FL than all Hispanics voted in 2012

 

[timschochet]

Interesting point made in this Michael Tomasky piece:

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/11/06/hillary-clinton-s-closing-argument-is-right-and-is-probably-enough.html

Here’s another truth that is little discussed in the media, because I think most political journalists don’t have much grasp of this reality. In these last days, message matters a lot less than mechanics. That is: When Clinton goes to a city to give a speech, Orlando or Charlotte or Detroit or Las Vegas or wherever, the content of the speech she gives is what the media focus on. But it’s hardly the most important thing that happens when she hits town. 
What happens is that she sees people. She sees, yes, fundraisers, the local money bags. But she sees local party activists and local black preachers and United Federation of Teachers phone-bankers and who knows who else. They get invited to come backstage and meet her. 


Also, local Democrats and union leaders and others organize caravans to the event, and in those caravans they sign people up to make calls or knock on doors. You may have seen situations in the past where a candidate, Democrat or Republican, showed up in a place and in the next poll gained two points in that place, and you may have wondered why; just because of a speech? But it’s not because of a speech. It’s because the appearance of the candidate activated and engaged hundreds of people, who then reached out to thousands, who amounted to two points.
Is the same thing happening on the Trump side? This is the thing about this election. We don’t know. He has no roots in any local GOP operation. Not even Manhattan’s! Some of them love him, sure. But some of them don’t. And the rich Republicans around the country are very divided on Trump. Some wouldn’t go to a Trump fundraiser if you held a gun to their head. So I would tend to doubt that a Trump appearance in Columbus has the same knock-on effect that a Clinton appearance there does.

 

[Trey]

What's your feeling about Ohio? Most pundits assume Trump but the last 3 polls has him up by 1, down by 1, and tied. Hillary was there today with LeBron.

I think it could be the Florida of 2012. Everyone thought Romney had it and Obama took it by a sliver.

Obviously team Clinton sees it neck and neck to devote resources to it in the stretch run. 

 

[SaintsInDome2006]

This narrative fits the breaking news but it doesn't fit with the Dems I've known and followed for over a decade. I'm talking about writers at Salon, Crooks and Liars, the like. Call them historically informed highly activated Dems. They hated the appointment of Comey, much astoundment, gnashing of teeth and Obama bashing over that. They hated the July announcement, wrote seething criticisms of his flagrant attack on Hillary. Of course they were stunned to hysterics over the October letter, and while some may be thankful he cleared things up before Tuesday, he is and always has been despised. 

I think the 'breaking news', talking points narrative is what we mostly see here and hear on tv so that's what I'm speaking to. 

I'm old enough to remember Comey being praised for his bedside stand against Ashcroft during his appointment. Seems like Norse myth now.

As for die hard Dems who never trusted Comey, ok at least that's consistent. However the same people did not trust the SD or IC IG's. At some point people are so partisan they are paranoid of any idea or process which threatens them.

 

[timschochet]

I think it could be the Florida of 2012. Everyone thought Romney had it and Obama took it by a sliver.

Obviously team Clinton sees it neck and neck to devote resources to it in the stretch run. 

If the GOP loses Ohio and Florida again...

They're running out of battleground states. The path to victory for a Republican candidate just gets slimmer ever 4 years.

 

[Chaos Commish]

I think the 'breaking news', talking points narrative is what we mostly see here and hear on tv so that's what I'm speaking to. 

I'm old enough to remember Comey being praised for his bedside stand against Ashcroft during his appointment. Seems like Norse myth now.

As for die hard Dems who never trusted Comey, ok at least that's consistent. However the same people did not trust the SD or IC IG's. At some point people are so partisan they are paranoid of any idea or process which threatens them.

Yup, just sayin'.

Also the more I looked at it, the more I sympathized with Comey's letter. It very well could be he ran a little interference that aided Hillary more than we can know. The laptop was in NYC hands and somewhere I read they were going to town with it. Comey may have said, "Whoa, I promised Congress to apprise them of any new developments, so slow your roll and let's be transparent." 

Also also, the bedside stand against Ashcroft wasn't ever reported thoroughly. Sure he stopped the surveillance order, but not because he was protecting citizens privacy. The fine print was legally screwed up. He fixed it so that the secret domestic spying would go on for years and signed it that month.

 

[Ramblin Wreck]

If the GOP loses Ohio and Florida again...

They're running out of battleground states. The path to victory for a Republican candidate just gets slimmer ever 4 years when they nominate an ######

Fixed

 

[Bob Magaw]

So apparently more Hispanic voters have voted early in FL than voted in TOTAL in 2012.

AA vote now also ahead of 2012 early voting totals.

I guess running an overtly racist campaign has some drawbacks. 

Ya think?

 

[Rohn Jambo]

If the GOP loses Ohio and Florida again...

They're running out of battleground states. The path to victory for a Republican candidate just gets slimmer ever 4 years.

If democracy is working, it should depend on whether the new POTUS does a good job or not.

 

[Leeroy Jenkins]

I thought comey was in a tight spot and did his job.  

 

[Sand]

What's your feeling about Ohio? Most pundits assume Trump but the last 3 polls has him up by 1, down by 1, and tied. Hillary was there today with LeBron.

HRC campaign has pretty much pulled out of OH.  That says a lot. On the other hand she's trying real hard to lock down PA.  That also says a lot (I do think she gets PA).

 

[Sand]

If the GOP loses Ohio and Florida again...

They're running out of battleground states. The path to victory for a Republican candidate just gets slimmer ever 4 years.

If Rubio was the candidate this statement wouldn't hold water.  In fact, if he had won the primary I think we'd have a huge runaway.

Republicans could not have picked a worse candidate for, honestly, the easiest general in modern history.

 

[Koya]

If Rubio was the candidate this statement wouldn't hold water.  In fact, if he had won the primary I think we'd have a huge runaway.

Republicans could not have picked a worse candidate for, honestly, the easiest general in modern history.

But, considering who the Republicans did pick, you could say the same about the Dems and Hillary.

 

[Chaos Commish]

Ya think?

In 94 CA Republican governor Pete Wilson wrote the outline for 16 Trump. He sent the national guard to help border patrol. He promised to save the state billions by denying services to illegals. An anti-illegal immigrant proposition passed at nearly 60%, and Wilson rolled to another term. The problem is he woke up a giant sleeping burrito. CA used to be very red. It supported every single Republican nominee for president from Truman to Clinton, even providing Nixon and Reagan. It is deep blue for as far as the eyes can see now. I've been wondering if the massive political shift that happened in CA isn't coming to several of the red states Trump will win. If those burritos come to life the GOP is in deep guacamole. Arizona? Texas? Hmmm.

 

[Bob Magaw]

In 94 CA Republican governor Pete Wilson wrote the outline for 16 Trump. He sent the national guard to help border patrol. He promised to save the state billions by denying services to illegals. A anti-illegal immigrant proposition passed at nearly 60%, and Wilson rolled to another term. The problem he woke up a giant sleeping burrito. CA used to be very red. It supported every single Republican nominee for president from Truman to Clinton, even providing Nixon and Reagan. It is deep blue for as far as the eyes can see now. I've been wondering if the massive political shift that happened in CA isn't coming to severa of the red states Trump will win. If those burritos come to life the GOP is deep guacamole. Arizona? Texas? Hmmm.

But I thought the Trump Tower Grill served the best taco bowls, and Trump loves Mexicans?

I thought for sure that would work. He should have done a watermelon eating tweet on MLK day. His racially targeted messaging is so nuanced and sophisticated I still can't wrap my mind around how he is losing.   

 

[SoBeDad]

In 94 CA Republican governor Pete Wilson wrote the outline for 16 Trump. He sent the national guard to help border patrol. He promised to save the state billions by denying services to illegals. An anti-illegal immigrant proposition passed at nearly 60%, and Wilson rolled to another term. The problem is he woke up a giant sleeping burrito. CA used to be very red. It supported every single Republican nominee for president from Truman to Clinton, even providing Nixon and Reagan. It is deep blue for as far as the eyes can see now. I've been wondering if the massive political shift that happened in CA isn't coming to several of the red states Trump will win. If those burritos come to life the GOP is deep guacamole. Arizona? Texas? Hmmm.

A Republican with a path to citizenship could turn the tide. Especially if he said "si se puede". Marco Rubio, perhaps. 

 

[Koya]

A Republican with a path to citizenship could turn the tide. Especially if he said "si se puede". Marco Rubio, perhaps. 

Could have. 

Could they now?  Is the party too poisoned? And will the current faux populist nee nationalist white uneducated male dominated base be in any position to nominate a Rubio ... especially considering how many Latinos who could have come to voting age / status as Republicans if Rubio were the guy now are likely lost to the Dems, possibly forever or at least a good number of cycles?

not only will these folks feel alienated from the Republican Party and likely not vote for them, but their voice in the primaries will also be lost, further isolating what was mainstream conservatism with Trumpism

Rubio against Hill could have brought on a lot of new, young Latinos into the republican camp. Instead they hung a huge "no bad hombres wanted" sign and sent them running in record numbers to the other Party.

a well thought out long range place for sure.