What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

**OFFICIAL** Packers vs Saints (1 Viewer)

The punt return for a TD makes the new kickoff rule look even more absurd.
Not seeing the connection.
It's probably got something to do with his fantasy team. 100% of Kenny Powers posts are related to his fantasy teams in some manner.
Really? I probably post more in the FFA than here so I must be forgetting a lot of team pimping. Oh thats right, when I took Pete Rock in the hip hop group draft the other day, I mentioned that I took AD with the #1 pick. It was a tough decision.
 
The punt return for a TD makes the new kickoff rule look even more absurd.
Not seeing the connection.
It's probably got something to do with his fantasy team. 100% of Kenny Powers posts are related to his fantasy teams in some manner.
Really? I probably post more in the FFA than here so I must be forgetting a lot of team pimping. Oh thats right, when I took Pete Rock in the hip hop group draft the other day, I mentioned that I took AD with the #1 pick. It was a tough decision.
Dont' act like a baby about this.
 
The punt return for a TD makes the new kickoff rule look even more absurd.
Not seeing the connection.
It's probably got something to do with his fantasy team. 100% of Kenny Powers posts are related to his fantasy teams in some manner.
Really? I probably post more in the FFA than here so I must be forgetting a lot of team pimping. Oh thats right, when I took Pete Rock in the hip hop group draft the other day, I mentioned that I took AD with the #1 pick. It was a tough decision.
Dont' act like a baby about this.
Are you my pool boy? I honestly dont know who the #### you are, but follow me on teh twitter if you want to see more of my excellence.
 
The punt return for a TD makes the new kickoff rule look even more absurd.
Not seeing the connection.
It's probably got something to do with his fantasy team. 100% of Kenny Powers posts are related to his fantasy teams in some manner.
Really? I probably post more in the FFA than here so I must be forgetting a lot of team pimping. Oh thats right, when I took Pete Rock in the hip hop group draft the other day, I mentioned that I took AD with the #1 pick. It was a tough decision.
Dont' act like a baby about this.
Are you my pool boy? I honestly dont know who the #### you are, but follow me on teh twitter if you want to see more of my excellence.
Why bother? This forum is your blog.
 
eh, both Grant and Starks look great, as does the entire Pack O.

so it's either they are going to score 50 every week, or Saints D not that good...

 
The difference between this thread and the other is that half the posts are not "bump" or "let's beat the other thread".At least there is some reasonable commentary in this one.
I was wondering how they were both equal like 45-60 minutes ago, and then had like 2 more pages 20 minutes later :lol:
 
Starks has come a long way. He's just getting better & better. Considering he's their short yardage & 3rd down back, it won't be long before he's their feature back, IMO.

I haven't kept track, but it seems like Starks has been in for more plays than Grant in the 1st half. I expect this trend to keep favoring Starks as the season wears on. This kid could have a very big season.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hey AE, mine's bigger.
Mrs. Roboto would beg to differ. :lol:
The difference between this thread and the other is that half the posts are not "bump" or "let's beat the other thread".At least there is some reasonable commentary in this one.
Like the Kenny Powers deep-hitting analysis?
You ####### know it! :bowtie: Only free until Selena Gomez is legal
Gross. :X
 
Grant is going to be a distant memory by midseason.
Halftime
Don't over react. Starks got some good blocking up front against a defense on it's heels looking for the pass.Horrible tackle attempt by Malcolm Jenkins. He threw himself at Starks's ankles.
My jokes don't go over too well round these parts. Grant had a 5.2 ypc and Starks 3.2 until that last carry. They are gonna split time much to the chagrin of both owners.
 
'dharmapunk said:
'nysportsfan said:
Grant not out there after the time out. PRetty telling that these guys will split, no?
It may have been the gameplan, but as most of the hawks knew already, Grant is a much better back than a guy who ran under 4 yards a carry with the best passing game keeping defenses honest. Starks is overrated. Grant is the real deal. He'll be getting 80% of the carries by week 2 or 3. :moneybag:
Starks looked pretty good on that TD rumble. It looks like RBBC to me. Same thing with NO: PT, Ingram, and Sproles--they are all good, and all have their role. I wouldn't want to count on any of them in FF though. Ditto for the Packer's HBs. I want Rodgers and maybe Jennings.
 
Aside from one decent run by PT, the Saints rushing attack is not great. THen again, they haven't been on the field all that much comparatively speaking.

 
'gandalas said:
Nice catch by meachem. Looking like a shootout so far. Hope you took the over :)
Meachem is the guy who produces when Moore isn't there. He can produce big plays. Colston is not looking so hot this year--can't get any separation.
 
'duaneok66 said:
I am happy for Cobb (Cobb owner) - but no way can you start him until Driver retires . . .
No way you trade or drop him either though. He has already shown me enough to think he will be a star. That little juke of his shoulder to let him get the angle to the endzone? That's what the great one's can do. You have to get open and catch the ball, but RAC is golden. This guy looks deadly. He won't produce consistently this year but next year, look out?
 
'duaneok66 said:
I am happy for Cobb (Cobb owner) - but no way can you start him until Driver retires . . .
No way you trade or drop him either though. He has already shown me enough to think he will be a star. That little juke of his shoulder to let him get the angle to the endzone? That's what the great one's can do. You have to get open and catch the ball, but RAC is golden. This guy looks deadly. He won't produce consistently this year but next year, look out?
i agree . . . anyone that drafted him is banking on him producing in 2012 and beyond . . .
 
'gandalas said:
Nice catch by meachem. Looking like a shootout so far. Hope you took the over :)
Meachem is the guy who produces when Moore isn't there. He can produce big plays. Colston is not looking so hot this year--can't get any separation.
Looks like a good chance that Lance Moore will be the best Saints Wr if he can ever get healthy.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top