What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

***Official SEAHAWKS Playoff Thread*** (1 Viewer)

December 31, 1983

AFC: Seattle Seahawks 27, Miami Dolphins 20

1 2 3 4 Total Seahawks 0 7 7 13 27 Dolphins 0 13 0 7 20 at Miami Orange Bowl, Miami, Florida

Game time: 12:30 p.m. EST

TV announcers (NBC): Marv Albert and Bob Trumpy

The Seahawks converted three turnovers in the second half into 13 points, while running back Curt Warner rushed for 113 yards and 2 touchdowns. Dolphins quarterback Dan Marino threw two touchdown passes in the second quarter: A 19-yard pass to Johnson and a 32-yard pass to wide receiver Mark Duper. Seattle's only score in the first half was quarterback Dave Krieg's 6-yard touchdown pass to running back Cullen Bryant. In the third quarter, a fumble led to Warner's 1-yard touchdown. A fourth quarter interception from Marino then led to Norm Johnson's 27-yard field goal to give Seattle a 17-13 lead. After the Dolphins regained the lead off of running back Woody Bennett's 3-yard touchdown, Seattle responded with Warner's 2-yard touchdown. On the ensuing kickoff, Miami returner Fulton Walker fumbled, setting up Norm Johnson's 37-yard field goal.

Scoring

MIA - Johnson 19 pass from Marino (kick failed)

SEA - Bryant 6 pass from Krieg (Johnson kick)

MIA - Duper 32 pass from Marino (von Schamann kick)

SEA - Warner 1 run (Johnson kick)

SEA - FG Johnson 27

MIA - Bennett 3 run (von Schamann kick)

SEA - Warner 2 run (Johnson kick)

SEA - FG Johnson 37
Flashback to the only road win in Seahawks franchise history. Seattle was 9-7 that year, the heavily favored Dolphins were 12-4 and they watched as the Hawks controlled the ground game as the original Curt Warner ran wild. Seahawks are 1-4 all-time in playoff road games but all those games came in the 1980s. This is 2007!

GO......SEAHAWKS!
I thought their run last year was special, but I'll still remember those 83-84 teams as the best Seahawk teams in history. Easley was a beast. Warner was special. Krieg turned us into believers. The Seahawks created a fan base during those two years. They were a novelty before 83.Ahhhhhh memories...

 
Seattle just can't make any mistakes today and they need Chicago to make a few. I think Branch scores and if Alexander gets over 85, they will win this game. Stevens will play a roll but I see him being used as a decoy today. On defense they need to play the run and let Rex Grossman beat them. Forcing an early mistake would be huge for a number of reasons. Hasselbeck will need to play a near perfect game and Holmgren is going to have to have a great gameplan. I think they can win but they need the ball to bounce their way a few times and get great coaching and QB play.

 
Good showing in the playoffs. Nothing to be ashamed of considering the injuries and the fact they lost because of the secondary. So close....

 
Damn

Last four years in the playoffs have not been kind.

This year losing 27-24 in OT having the chance to win it with just 15 more yards.

Last year that Super Bowl, nuff said

2005 Losing 27-20 to a terrible Rams team at home

2004 Losing in OT to the Packers like that.

Doesn't really seem fair although I suppose fans of other franchises would be glad to have been in those positions. Damn.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Wish we had a 1st round pick so we could draft a competant secondary, blitzing six on that 3rd down was brutal, left thier speedy receivers in single coverage.

 
Lots of people will pick Seattle to fall apart in the off season. I'm sure the 49ers, Cardinals, and Rams will all be trendy picks to win the NFC West next year, but the reality is that this is still the team to beat. DT Marcus Tubbs will make a huge difference. I'm confident Seattle will take care of their offensive line issues and defensive secondary issues. No first round pick, but I don't think it's really necessary. Biggest obstacle for this team is just to get healthy.

 
Just another example of missed oportunities for the Seahawks. Too many dropped passes and other small mistakes ( bumbled snap at a crucial point ) continue to plague this team. They had a decent year considering all the injuries but I was hoping for more. The good news is my stress level should go back to normal and my wife will be able to get the remote control fixed... for now.

 
Wish we had a 1st round pick so we could draft a competent secondary, blitzing six on that 3rd down was brutal, left thier speedy receivers in single coverage.
Well you can't blame them for today really given that we had a safety starting on one side and a seldom played rookie on the other. I think they would have won that game with Trufant. Jennings will likely be the starter on the other side of Trufant next year and I think he's gonna be pretty good. Outside of getting burned by Berrien on that long pass, he played well today. The Strong Safety position needs to be addressed for sure. I ####### hate Boulware, what a ####bag. They also will get Tubbs back next year and if they can add another run stuffer, this defense is actually going to be very good. The linebacking core is one of the league's best and Trufant and Hamiln are both above average if not pro bowl caliber players. On offense I just don't know what to say. They were off kilter all year and that's the best way I can describe it. About 200 days until we hear how the 49ers or Cardinals will win the division next year. I honestly think this team will be much better in 2007 but the schedule will be brutal with the AFC North and the NFC South plus Philadelphia, Chicago, and Chicago. Looks like the toughest games are at home anyway. Home: Arizona, San Francisco, St. Louis, New Orleans, Tampa Bay, Baltimore, Cincinnati, Chicago Away: Arizona, San Francisco, St. Louis, Atlanta, Carolina, Cleveland, Pittsburgh, Philadelphia
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Wish we had a 1st round pick so we could draft a competant secondary, blitzing six on that 3rd down was brutal, left thier speedy receivers in single coverage.
We did go out and get Mike Brown or Green or whatever from the former Bears safety but he spent the whole season on IR. I even forgot he was signed until just recently. And I am among those that think Jackson will be trade bait thiw off season. Another costly 2 drops today on 3rd down. Even though they were tough catches, when you have a history of drops the microscope is on you.
 
Lots of people will pick Seattle to fall apart in the off season. I'm sure the 49ers, Cardinals, and Rams will all be trendy picks to win the NFC West next year, but the reality is that this is still the team to beat. DT Marcus Tubbs will make a huge difference. I'm confident Seattle will take care of their offensive line issues and defensive secondary issues. No first round pick, but I don't think it's really necessary. Biggest obstacle for this team is just to get healthy.
They seem to bounce back hard after bad finishes. After losing to the Rams thrice they head to the SB next year on a record season. With renewed health and another good offseason of moves from the FO (Hutch loss notwithstanding) I think the team is just fine and should be frontrunners for the NFCW again. The division should be better, amking that accomplishment worth a little more.And I think if Tubbs was in the game today, we win. He's huge in the middle.
 
Wish we had a 1st round pick so we could draft a competant secondary, blitzing six on that 3rd down was brutal, left thier speedy receivers in single coverage.
We did go out and get Mike Brown or Green or whatever from the former Bears safety but he spent the whole season on IR. I even forgot he was signed until just recently. And I am among those that think Jackson will be trade bait thiw off season. Another costly 2 drops today on 3rd down. Even though they were tough catches, when you have a history of drops the microscope is on you.
:goodposting: DJAX is gone. Too much of a contract headache for a guy that is often hurt, and that drops a lot of passes (didn't drop them last year but has every other year). Someone will take him for a draft pick and give him the money he wants.
 
Wish we had a 1st round pick so we could draft a competant secondary, blitzing six on that 3rd down was brutal, left thier speedy receivers in single coverage.
We did go out and get Mike Brown or Green or whatever from the former Bears safety but he spent the whole season on IR. I even forgot he was signed until just recently. And I am among those that think Jackson will be trade bait thiw off season. Another costly 2 drops today on 3rd down. Even though they were tough catches, when you have a history of drops the microscope is on you.
:goodposting: DJAX is gone. Too much of a contract headache for a guy that is often hurt, and that drops a lot of passes (didn't drop them last year but has every other year). Someone will take him for a draft pick and give him the money he wants.
I thought someone had posted that his contract isn't really that big and is pretty damn cap friendly for the next few years.
 
Wish we had a 1st round pick so we could draft a competant secondary, blitzing six on that 3rd down was brutal, left thier speedy receivers in single coverage.
We did go out and get Mike Brown or Green or whatever from the former Bears safety but he spent the whole season on IR. I even forgot he was signed until just recently. And I am among those that think Jackson will be trade bait thiw off season. Another costly 2 drops today on 3rd down. Even though they were tough catches, when you have a history of drops the microscope is on you.
:goodposting: DJAX is gone. Too much of a contract headache for a guy that is often hurt, and that drops a lot of passes (didn't drop them last year but has every other year). Someone will take him for a draft pick and give him the money he wants.
I thought someone had posted that his contract isn't really that big and is pretty damn cap friendly for the next few years.
He has three years left on the deal but I'm not sure how much is left on the deal $$$ wise(6 year 25 million dollar deal with an 8 million dollar signing bonus). I think they can probably trade him for a nice draft pick but the team getting him will have to renegotiate. I think this may have been their thought process all along when they got Branch. Regardless if it's cap friendly, you don't want him around if he's gonna be #####ing and complaining about his contract and holding out. that is a guarantee before next season. then he'll be out of shape and even more likely to get hurt. Maybe the Lions will take him for their second rounder. :)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
What? No refs for Holmgren to blame this year? Guess he'll have to find another excuse. Injuries? All the playoff teams had them; Seattle wasn't exempt.

You know, for a team that went 9-7, largely because their kicker won a few games with some long field goals at the end, it's kind of ironic that they were ousted in like fashion.

 
Gosh, struck a nerve with Doctor Detroit-----the title of a bad Dan Aykroyd film and the site of Seattle's loss in last year's SuperBowl.

So, if someone says something that you don't like, no matter if it's valid, you resort to name-calling?

The point was that Seattle lost in the manner they had won a few games this season, and not everyone is sad about that.

If you don't like a position contrary to yours, you don't have to be nasty. It might be cooler to dismiss it if that comeback is the best you got.

 
Gosh, struck a nerve with Doctor Detroit-----the title of a bad Dan Aykroyd film and the site of Seattle's loss in last year's SuperBowl.So, if someone says something that you don't like, no matter if it's valid, you resort to name-calling?The point was that Seattle lost in the manner they had won a few games this season, and not everyone is sad about that.If you don't like a position contrary to yours, you don't have to be nasty. It might be cooler to dismiss it if that comeback is the best you got.
Sorry for calling you Capella. That was a low blow. :)
 
Gosh, struck a nerve with Doctor Detroit-----the title of a bad Dan Aykroyd film and the site of Seattle's loss in last year's SuperBowl.So, if someone says something that you don't like, no matter if it's valid, you resort to name-calling?The point was that Seattle lost in the manner they had won a few games this season, and not everyone is sad about that.If you don't like a position contrary to yours, you don't have to be nasty. It might be cooler to dismiss it if that comeback is the best you got.
Sorry for calling you Capella. That was a low blow. :tumbleweed:
Just change your name to "DrChicago" and you're an instant bears fan. :confused:"Grew up a big Neal Anderson fan, been a Bears fan since I was a kid, loved the shoes...you can ask my Aunt Doris"
 
What happened to Strong? He must have gotten hurt? I had too many kids running around and must have missed it, and the announcers never recapped anything either.

There were at least 3 crucial short yardage plays in the second half that he was not in on.

Sorry, I don't have time to sift through the 22 page game thread.

 
What happened to Strong? He must have gotten hurt? I had too many kids running around and must have missed it, and the announcers never recapped anything either.There were at least 3 crucial short yardage plays in the second half that he was not in on.Sorry, I don't have time to sift through the 22 page game thread.
According to Sando's blog at the TNT Strong suffered two stingers in the game. There was talk of him contemplating retirement and whether or not his heart was still in the game. Probably the wrong time to be considering these sorts of questions.
 
Gosh, struck a nerve with Doctor Detroit-----the title of a bad Dan Aykroyd film and the site of Seattle's loss in last year's SuperBowl.So, if someone says something that you don't like, no matter if it's valid, you resort to name-calling?The point was that Seattle lost in the manner they had won a few games this season, and not everyone is sad about that.If you don't like a position contrary to yours, you don't have to be nasty. It might be cooler to dismiss it if that comeback is the best you got.
Sorry for calling you Capella. That was a low blow. :hey:
Just change your name to "DrChicago" and you're an instant bears fan. :jawdrop:"Grew up a big Neal Anderson fan, been a Bears fan since I was a kid, loved the shoes...you can ask my Aunt Doris"
Neal Anderson had his own line of shoes? Wow.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
monessen said:
What? No refs for Holmgren to blame this year? Guess he'll have to find another excuse. Injuries? All the playoff teams had them; Seattle wasn't exempt.You know, for a team that went 9-7, largely because their kicker won a few games with some long field goals at the end, it's kind of ironic that they were ousted in like fashion.
Who is giving excuses?
 
monessen said:
What? No refs for Holmgren to blame this year? Guess he'll have to find another excuse. Injuries? All the playoff teams had them; Seattle wasn't exempt.You know, for a team that went 9-7, largely because their kicker won a few games with some long field goals at the end, it's kind of ironic that they were ousted in like fashion.
Who is giving excuses?
Nobody is, but he can't feel superior unless he gets to call you out for not being as much of a man as he perceives himself to be. Not only does he have to live his life vicariously through the successes of sports teams, he has to point out the flaws of others, even if the flaws weren't there. Go figure.
 
Shick, I honestly cannot tell if you are referencing me or Holmgren. The use of "He" in your message isn't clear. So, here are 2 replies. One is operable, once "He" is clarified.

1. If "He" is Holmgren--------um, yes, right. Couldn't agree more. Carry on, sir! Enjoy your work. Big fan!

2. If "He" is monessen-------I feel superior to no one, am not trying to rain on your parade (Seattle gets plenty of rain as is), merely believe Holmgren to be pompous and handles defeat poorly for a supposedly-mature middle-aged coach, and had no idea your Board Admin status carried with it a psychology degree, and probably should have noticed the Bellingham affiliation in your profile. Golly gee, people. It says Shark Pool, not Thin-skin Anonymous. Expect an occasional harpoon. I never actually said Holmgren was making excuses . . . yet. But he may go hunting for one to account for their loss and to save face.

 
The loss hurt only after watching the Bears/Saints game. I thought all along the Hawks would have beat the Saints and I believe that to be true today. 13 yards away. :lmao: Hopefully the mantra next year when everyone is picking the 49ers to win the division.

 
The loss hurt only after watching the Bears/Saints game. I thought all along the Hawks would have beat the Saints and I believe that to be true today. 13 yards away. :banned: Hopefully the mantra next year when everyone is picking the 49ers to win the division.
Niners? I'm more worried about the Cards. With a solid coaching staff in place they have the talent (with some good offseason moves and draft) to be pretty dangerous. The NFCWorst could become a very competitive division next season. It will make the 4th time the sweetest.
 
I'm more worried about the Cards. With a solid coaching staff in place they have the talent (with some good offseason moves and draft) to be pretty dangerous.
I will respectfully disagree. The Cardinals have WR talent, but other than that I think they're pedestrian at best. Most importantly they suck in the trenches where seasons are won and lost.
 
I'm more worried about the Cards. With a solid coaching staff in place they have the talent (with some good offseason moves and draft) to be pretty dangerous.
I will respectfully disagree. The Cardinals have WR talent, but other than that I think they're pedestrian at best. Most importantly they suck in the trenches where seasons are won and lost.
That would be where their off season moves would have to come in.
 
I'm more worried about the Cards. With a solid coaching staff in place they have the talent (with some good offseason moves and draft) to be pretty dangerous.
I will respectfully disagree. The Cardinals have WR talent, but other than that I think they're pedestrian at best. Most importantly they suck in the trenches where seasons are won and lost.
That would be where their off season moves would have to come in.
That's possible, but they've had chances in the past to spend their money on impact players and opted for the high profile skill positions. Warner and James? Until proven otherwise I'll continue to believe that the biggest problem in Arizona is the front office.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top