Maybe I'm in the minority here, but I don't really see much of a difference between Rossi and a number of other cross-country soccer players. It goes both ways....some of the players that really helped put the US back on the map internationally - David Regis, Tab Ramos, etc. - were foreign-born. Now that the US is becoming much stronger, it's only natural that players are going to be coveted by other nations, whether they are traditionally better than the US or not.If you're not going to ##### about a guy like Stuart Holden playing for the US after moving to the US at age 10, you shouldn't ##### about Rossi playing for Italy when he moved to Italy at 13.Personally, I don't get all the frustration and hate. Yeah, it's kinda stupid for Rossi to make that move, especially seeing as how he didn't even make the squad. And yes, I wish he were playing for the US. But it's all part of the game - players come and go...you win some, you lose some. In the last 20 years, the US was more of a "step down", so they managed to bring in a lot of foreign guys to make a big difference. I'd imagine that in the future, as US soccer continues to get better, you're going to see a ton more guys make the move to other countries.I guess I don't see how the step-up/step-down thing really matters. He's an American, born and bred, and he has chosen to play for another nation internationally.I know it's not a popular opinion, and I'm as much of a die-hard as the rest of you guys, but it's just part of the game. If you're not upset with Stuart Holden playing for the US, you shouldn't be upset about Rossi playing for Italy, IMO. Trust me, I wish Rossi was heading to SA partnered with Jozy up front as much as you guys do. But