What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

***Official Soccer Discussion Thread*** (2 Viewers)

FWIW, that didn't look like a dive to me.  Excessive reaction, maybe, but legs certainly got tangled and he was going down.  Neither a penalty nor a yellow for diving should have been given, IMO.

 
FWIW, that didn't look like a dive to me.  Excessive reaction, maybe, but legs certainly got tangled and he was going down.  Neither a penalty nor a yellow for diving should have been given, IMO.
:lol:

Looked like Vardy launched himself - if he had just gone to ground on contact, it might have been different. 

 
Looked to me that there was definite contact from behind and definite embellishment.

Stupid move by Vardy. Don't understand why he didn't just shoot and draw the foul that way.

 
The guy weighs like a buck 20 fully wet and before a monster poop.  Legs got tangled and he went into the air.  Diving is going to ground without any contact.  Whether he made more of it or not, he was going down no matter what when their legs caught got together.  Factor in that he's sitting on a yellow already and is the leading goal scorer on the top team in a title race, that's an awful call by the ref in that situation. 

That call could completely impact the final table standings on what should have just been a goal kick.  Silly on Vardy but just awful by the ref who had an abysmal day.

 
Lot's of focus on the Vardy and not enough on the shitty ref. 

Awards the 'Ammers a pk on a foul in the box, then does NOTHING when Huth is put into a choke hold and dragged to the ground. 

 
All shtick aside, legs did not get tangled.  West Ham player was tugging at Vardy's shoulder.  Then, watch Vardy's lower body - he moves into the defender - not the shoulder which was being tugged.  As he moves into the defender - he then kicks out, launching himself to the ground.  Classic dive.

https://streamable.com/0jer

As an aside - that stream also shows the "improper conduct" - pointing at Moss and allegedly calling him a ####### #### - but that seems rather tame to be charged...

 
Lot's of focus on the Vardy and not enough on the shitty ref. 

Awards the 'Ammers a pk on a foul in the box, then does NOTHING when Huth is put into a choke hold and dragged to the ground. 
I think the ref largely got the calls right.  They could have gone the other way, but I would not call any of the key decisions egregious.

Prior to the West Ham penalty he pulled Huth and Morgan out for a chat - and essentially told them he was watching for the pulling/tugging - and Morgan did pull and tug on the corner.  Certainly those don't get called all the time - but given the advanced warning I don't think it was a "wrong" call.

Vardy's first yellows was for an accumulation of fouls - that happens.

Vardy's second yellow was pretty clearly a dive.  I think the fact that the FA have charged Vardy with improper conduct following the dismissal shows they are backing Moss here.  I think if it was a questionable call, they would have let Vardy go on the improper conduct charge.

Carroll's penalty - again that gets called sometimes, and not called sometimes.  If the game were already 2-2 it probably would not have been called - but it was a foul, that would easily be called in the middle of the field.

 
I don't think that there's any question that Vardy initiated the contact with his legs.  The question is whether that's simulation (and a second yellow card) or just a no call.  I normally think of a dive as simulating contact, not initiating contact.  It's not a PK in any case.

Of course, Vardy's first yellow was also super soft.  He was punished because LC were piling up the fouls, but he was carded on a challenge that he actually pulled out of. 

 
Carroll's foul and the one on Vardy were similar, minus the extra kick out from the Leicester player. 

Contact = no dive for me. Vardy tried to cut in front and went down on contact, happens all the time and is never a yellow when there's contact. West Ham had the ball back and most refs would waive at the player and tell him to get up. 

The extra game for Vardy is not for the dive but for his reaction and that's not backing Moss on his dive call. It's backing the ref for abuse, which is fine. 

Did Vardy embellish? Yes.

Is that a yellow, especially a second yellow? No

 
I don't think that there's any question that Vardy initiated the contact with his legs.  The question is whether that's simulation (and a second yellow card) or just a no call.  I normally think of a dive as simulating contact, not initiating contact.  It's not a PK in any case.

Of course, Vardy's first yellow was also super soft.  He was punished because LC were piling up the fouls, but he was carded on a challenge that he actually pulled out of. 
I think the simulation came when he launched himself after the contact.

If he had just gone down, I suspect it would have been a non-call all the way around.  But, when he launched - it had the appearance of trying to draw a foul that was not there - particularly from Moss' view behind the play.

 
I'm just glad the ref got the check from White Hart Lane!

That second yellow seemed weak.  I don't think Vardy really has a reputation as a 'diver' does he?  If a notorious 'diver' made the same play I can see the card being shown, but probably only a first yellow (which is also not fair because all cards should be awarded on their own merits).

 
I'm just glad the ref got the check from White Hart Lane!

That second yellow seemed weak.  I don't think Vardy really has a reputation as a 'diver' does he?  If a notorious 'diver' made the same play I can see the card being shown, but probably only a first yellow (which is also not fair because all cards should be awarded on their own merits).
Leicester have received 11 penalties this season, Man City is 2nd with 6.  I think they might go down a little easy in the box...

 
Leicester have received 11 penalties this season, Man City is 2nd with 6.  I think they might go down a little easy in the box...
Makes sense, I mean Vardy is such a wee lad of course he's getting tossed about the pitch.  

As for that last phrase, we are still talking football...  right?

 
You know its possible the FA is just now realizing that when they make the movie of Leicester's dream season, the opening scene is going to be in a Thai brothel, with some questionable language....

 
FA should keep Vardy suspended for Swansea and let him play after that. Any punishment heavier than that is a travesty.

 
I don't think that there's any question that Vardy initiated the contact with his legs.  The question is whether that's simulation (and a second yellow card) or just a no call.  I normally think of a dive as simulating contact, not initiating contact.  It's not a PK in any case.

Of course, Vardy's first yellow was also super soft.  He was punished because LC were piling up the fouls, but he was carded on a challenge that he actually pulled out of. 
this is spot on. Vardy got punished because LC were fouling repeatedly just prior... nothing in that particular challenge to warrant a yellow, IMO, and it wasn't Vardy himself persistently fouling or getting warned for it. there were lots of worse challenges in that game that didn't get booked. 

that call was far worse than the dive- and I do think it was a dive/simulation. he changed his own direction to initiate contact instead of just continuing his run directly to the ball. yes, there was contact, but it wasn't the defender creating it. and then his swan dive after- terrible. but that should've been his first yellow. that ref was an inconsistent mess, IMO- let a lot of #### go and then brought out the yellows almost haphazardly. not saying some of those yellows didn't deserve the card, but given the laissez-faire manner in which he handled things some times... just seemed inconsistent, which is the worse thing a ref can be, IMO.

 
FA should keep Vardy suspended for Swansea and let him play after that. Any punishment heavier than that is a travesty.
Swansea is an automatic for the Red card.

A second game for misconduct seems inevitable once he is charged - he really has no defense.

 
this is spot on. Vardy got punished because LC were fouling repeatedly just prior... nothing in that particular challenge to warrant a yellow, IMO, and it wasn't Vardy himself persistently fouling or getting warned for it. there were lots of worse challenges in that game that didn't get booked. 

that call was far worse than the dive- and I do think it was a dive/simulation. he changed his own direction to initiate contact instead of just continuing his run directly to the ball. yes, there was contact, but it wasn't the defender creating it. and then his swan dive after- terrible. but that should've been his first yellow. that ref was an inconsistent mess, IMO- let a lot of #### go and then brought out the yellows almost haphazardly. not saying some of those yellows didn't deserve the card, but given the laissez-faire manner in which he handled things some times... just seemed inconsistent, which is the worse thing a ref can be, IMO.


Vardy did commit 4 fouls in the game - most of any player in the game.

 
and btw- I mentioned this last week or before, about how LC always seem to be defending for their lives, which puts them apparently on the back foot. that linked article or articles talking about how they're built to absorb the crosses in... I guess I understood it. but it still leaves me with a taste of- anybody can beat them if they can get the right cross in or have the right moment of skill to beat the guy on the inside. IMO, they're just as likely to lose all of these games as get 9 points.... with or without Vardy.

 
He was the victim of his own early fouls, and then a run of 4 Leicester City fouls from 21' to 28', including Ozaki less than a minute before Vardy's.

 
Swansea is an automatic for the Red card.

A second game for misconduct seems inevitable once he is charged - he really has no defense.
The FA could overturn the red meaning no ban, then give a game for the misconduct charge leaving him out the 1 game..... and avail for the matchup with United.  

 
All shtick aside, legs did not get tangled.  West Ham player was tugging at Vardy's shoulder.  Then, watch Vardy's lower body - he moves into the defender - not the shoulder which was being tugged.  As he moves into the defender - he then kicks out, launching himself to the ground.  Classic dive.

https://streamable.com/0jer

As an aside - that stream also shows the "improper conduct" - pointing at Moss and allegedly calling him a ####### #### - but that seems rather tame to be charged...

"This is from a poster who has a history of doing this, so it should be a surprise to absolutely nobody. And when you look at it, if you are a human being, you will realize that that is not acceptable. And it’s not acceptable in 2016. Quite honestly, it’s never been acceptable."

 
"This is from a poster who has a history of doing this, so it should be a surprise to absolutely nobody. And when you look at it, if you are a human being, you will realize that that is not acceptable. And it’s not acceptable in 2016. Quite honestly, it’s never been acceptable."
:lmao: :lmao:

 
MLS is typically stricter with suspensions than other leagues.

De Jong got only 3 games for trying to end Nagbe's career (De Jong some how did not get a red on that play).  

It puts a 2 game suspension for Vardy in perspective.

A second game seems a real stretch to me and I am someone who abhors diving.

 
MLS is typically stricter with suspensions than other leagues.

De Jong got only 3 games for trying to end Nagbe's career (De Jong some how did not get a red on that play).  

It puts a 2 game suspension for Vardy in perspective.

A second game seems a real stretch to me and I am someone who abhors diving.
wtf

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top