roadkill1292
Footballguy
I'd really like to slam MLS for page after page but I'm a little intimidated by Andy's overall historical knowledge to do so.
I get it. But last year, Real Madrid beat Malmo 10-0 over two legs. You can't tell me Tottenham, Sevilla or Borussia Dortmund wouldn't have put up a bigger fight AND those games would have had much higher ratings.see- I LOVE watching the minnows get to play the barcas, bm and rms in their tiny and strange home stadiums, regardless of the outcome. but sometimes results are gotten and history made, even if the top teams still always rise to the top. it's also what makes the WC so great- I don't love that because I get to see Germany, Italy, Brazil, etc beat people... I love it because of the rest of the teams. seeing the huge variety of payrolls, qualities and styles is completely compelling to me and part of what's great about the CL as well.
The only reason I'm discussing it is because it's been in the news and there have been articles about it. I'm not saying that they need to change it, but it appears that they are looking to make changes, so I figured a message board was a pretty good place to discuss scenarios. Apparently not.I'm not exactly sure what andy's referring to, re: epl... but the "this needs to be fixed" schtick is an immediate hot-button red flag for those of us who have been fans/players of the sport for a long time. its' the equivalent of US non-soccer sports fans watching a couple of games in the WC and then telling us how to fix soccer; typically misinformed, ignorant and with malicious intent. not saying that's what you're up to at all- but just looking for an explanation of why a lot of your posts come across wrong
sounds like you and RHE should get a room with nothing but the big teams on your PPV porn station.I get it. But last year, Real Madrid beat Malmo 10-0 over two legs. You can't tell me Tottenham, Sevilla or Borussia Dortmund wouldn't have put up a bigger fight AND those games would have had much higher ratings.
Yeah, I get that the minnows playing the big teams has a certain appeal to it. I personally don't share that appeal, but I can understand it.
For me the difference is intent. Shader is not trying to troll anyone. He's talking about making changes to CL - which, by the way, so are the people involved with CL. So, whether we like it or not, I think changes are coming. No harm in tossing out a few ideas.I'm not exactly sure what andy's referring to, re: epl... but the "this needs to be fixed" schtick is an immediate hot-button red flag for those of us who have been fans/players of the sport for a long time. its' the equivalent of US non-soccer sports fans watching a couple of games in the WC and then telling us how to fix soccer; typically misinformed, ignorant and with malicious intent. not saying that's what you're up to at all- but just looking for an explanation of why a lot of your posts come across wrong
Finishing in the "top" is subjective. Once you've opened pandora's box and begun rewarding teams for finishing 4th place in their league, what's the big deal about moving that to 6 or 7?sounds like you and RHE should get a room with nothing but the big teams on your PPV porn station.
IMO, if teams like Tott can't finish in the top teams of their league, they have no business being in a "champions" league.
Total number of games. It's already somewhat of an issue.Finishing in the "top" is subjective. Once you've opened pandora's box and begun rewarding teams for finishing 4th place in their league, what's the big deal about moving that to 6 or 7?
I'm all for ideas and discussion. and I absolutely get shader isn't trying to troll.For me the difference is intent. Shader is not trying to troll anyone. He's talking about making changes to CL - which, by the way, so are the people involved with CL. So, whether we like it or not, I think changes are coming. No harm in tossing out a few ideas.
not the point I was making.Finishing in the "top" is subjective. Once you've opened pandora's box and begun rewarding teams for finishing 4th place in their league, what's the big deal about moving that to 6 or 7?
In fairness, my idea the other day about the CL was way too far out of the box. I kind of see why it would be annoying. But I don't see why raising the caliber of competition in the existing CL group stages is that big of a deal.For me the difference is intent. Shader is not trying to troll anyone. He's talking about making changes to CL - which, by the way, so are the people involved with CL. So, whether we like it or not, I think changes are coming. No harm in tossing out a few ideas.
This is the unwinnable argument - same as the NCAA - do you reward the top 10 teams in the big conferences, or do you throw the little guys a bone.Finishing in the "top" is subjective. Once you've opened pandora's box and begun rewarding teams for finishing 4th place in their league, what's the big deal about moving that to 6 or 7?
I got briefly flustered. I'm fine now.I'm all for ideas and discussion. and I absolutely get shader isn't trying to troll.
I'm too lazy to go back and find the posts- but the way they were worded felt less about discussion and more about a kind of lhucksian, uninformed "this is broke so here's how it should be fixed"... which is why I brought up the comparison to non-soccer people. IMO, the posts deserve the responses they've gotten- which is mostly eye-rolling. still not sure about andy's intent or why shader should get his panties so bunched about getting called out after jumping head first into uncharted waters.
I got briefly flustered. I'm fine now.
Seriously, slam away. If I post something stupid, or insulting to other fans (not in a joking way), feel free to slam. It should be expected.I'd really like to slam MLS for page after page but I'm a little intimidated by Andy's overall historical knowledge to do so.
You're not insulting and you don't post too much. I have a philosophical difference, that's all, and I recognize my limitations.Seriously, slam away. If I post something stupid, or insulting to other fans (not in a joking way), feel free to slam. It should be expected.
But I hear what you are saying and I will try hard to not post so much in this thread any more as I guess I do post too much.
Dude, you are fine posting, that was jerky of me. My apologies on that one. I'm trying to get into the MLS. Atlanta is within 4 hours of me and I read yesterday that my hometown of Nashville is going to put in a bid for an MLS franchise. No idea if it's a long shot, but Nashville is a booming town, so I think it'd be a great fit for both parties.Seriously, slam away. If I post something stupid, or insulting to other fans (not in a joking way), feel free to slam. It should be expected.
But I hear what you are saying and I will try hard to not post so much in this thread any more as I guess I do post too much.
I think so - thought i saw her doing some Olympic soccer stuff. One of the idiots with her said something to the effect of good to have her back, looking good as ever, or some such thingOnly a few days until the football starts back up. Did Rebecca have her kid yet?
My premier league vs the world tournament idea didn't go over to well.What the #### are you guys doing in here?
she must have- I've seen her covering the olympics.Only a few days until the football starts back up. Did Rebecca have her kid yet?
Yes!!! She's done some Olympic coverage. And if Floppo continues on his anti-Rebecca crusade that will be 10x as unconscionable as anything shader is posting.Only a few days until the football starts back up. Did Rebecca have her kid yet?
I think so - thought i saw her doing some Olympic soccer stuff. One of the idiots with her said something to the effect of good to have her back, looking good as ever, or some such thing![]()
she must have- I've seen her covering the olympics.
and she looks fantastic.
well... still looks like a dog, but a fantastic one.
Shader, I think the general consensus here is that contrary to conventional wisdom, you will, in fact, walk alone...
#####ingscouser
she must have- I've seen her covering the olympics.
and she looks fantastic.
well... still looks like a dog, but a fantastic one.
No idea if he's ahead or behind Holding. Think Arsenal pretty much have to sign a CB, but who knows with Aresene. He always says that you can't get deals early in the window, and then we get an injury crisis and suddenly a guy like Mustafi's price goes up 15 million pounds. Shrewd!RHE, is Chambers gonna start for Arsenal for awhile? He's 4.5 on the fantasy website and looks quite juicy considering their injury problems.
I will ******* cut you.she must have- I've seen her covering the olympics.
and she looks fantastic.
well... still looks like a dog, but a fantastic one.
hey- I've got no problem with dogs and horses. always been a big fan.I will ******* cut you.
That's disturbing, coming from you. Yikes!I will ******* cut you.
Long, short story: Roma makes it. Agreed?Often, we have these arguments without defining our terms. So what do we want out of the Champions League?
Parity? Because on one hand, we have that. We've never had a repeat champ. On the other hand, has there been a "minnow" winner since Porto (who is more of a medium sized fish)? Is a system where 5 or 6 teams realistically have a shot really a display of parity? That's, of course, more than just about any domestic league. Of course, a team like Leicester couldn't win the BPL until they did, but I still think it's valuable to look at rules that seem designed to give us parity and candidly ask whether they meet that goal. Until last season, I think it would been hard to argue that the English league system, complete with pro/rel, provided anything close to parity.
Broad representation? It's a noble goal, but you can see why big clubs might get pissed that they have to fly to Kazakhstan in midweek to play a team that everyone knows can't win the CL. In my opinion, my views on what is optimal to see as a fan are never going to prevail in the long run over the owners' views of what is most profitable for them.
The highest proportion of big games/big players? This would be my personal preference, but I'm perfectly happy supporting what we've got. But I do think that this is the goal that clubs will eventually drift to, because its what I'd probably do as an owner. But the pull of tradition is strong, so the change is likely to be gradual.
**ALERT****ALERT***
jack wilshere is injured.
Hypothetically, I think Roma would leapfrog a Bologna or something. Not sure they'd pull the tradition card to take Roma over Napoli or Fiorentina.Long, short story: Roma makes it. Agreed?
Good to see him putting aside his hobby of being a professional footballer to focus on his career as a rehab patient.**ALERT***
jack wilshere is injured.
How dare you patronize, squadra quatro!Hypothetically, I think Roma would leapfrog a Bologna or something. Not sure they'd pull the tradition card to take Roma over Napoli or Fiorentina.
I think the EPL would work similarly. If Everton makes finishes fourth, I imagine they'd probably get the invitation. If it were Wolves? I think Liverpool or Man U would likely get to leapfrog them.
I haven't seen them, but SK put up a lot of goals in those first two games. this one should be an interesting test.Big Olympic match on now - Mexico v. South Korea.
South Korea needs a draw to advance, and keep their dream alive of avoiding mandatory military service...
Plus, #### Mexico...
Germany taking on the mighty Fiji, and up 2-0 after 14 minutes
i. e.: tobacco connoisseur...let's leave us rehab patients out of thisGood to see him putting aside his hobby of being a professional footballer to focus on his career as a rehab patient.
Leave Andy Carroll out of this.hey- I've got no problem with dogs and horses. always been a big fan.
Them's fightin' words... (After RHE cuts you to slow you down a bit...)she must have- I've seen her covering the olympics.
and she looks fantastic.
well... still looks like a dog, but a fantastic one.