What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

***OFFICIAL*** Washington Redskins 2011 Season Thread (1 Viewer)

Like I predicted, Panthers won the game. And Skins fans, if you haven't watched the Panthers all year, they have been in EVERY game, ignore their record. Cam is the real deal. So I'm not upset or shocked that we couldn't slow down their offense. Look what they scored against the Packers, Bears, Saints, and Cardinals. This team averages about 24 points a week. Skins are averaging under 20. And we haven't scored more than 20 since week 2. Our team is better but still average at best. Average is a lot better than craptacular though, which is exactly what we've been for years. I was encouraged by Beck, and hope one day we can draft a WR that is worth a chit.

 
What I don't like is the defense regressing each week. I take Eastwood at his word about the Panthers' ability because watching the game yesterday you could see they were better than the Skins on both sides of the ball.

After getting thumped by the 2-4 Panthers, the Redskins now face Buffalo and San Francisco who are considerably better, and the Redskin defense is fading. This could get really ugly, and end up with a semi-desperate game against Miami trying to get to 4-5.

I like what John Beck did in his press conference --- take blame for the INT on which Hankerson clearly made the wrong read. He said to put it all on the QB, Hankerson's going to be a valuable part of the team, all the things you want to hear a class player say. And then he asked the reporters "how's that sound?". ;)

 
Last edited by a moderator:
John Keim

Say what you want about Carlos Rogers, but he was good in the slot last season. The Redskins miss that because Kevin Barnes has struggled in this area. He gets beat easily off the line and in key situations; two fourth down plays last week (one of which was incomplete) and on the touchdown throw Sunday. It’s a tough spot to play. The question is, can Phillip Buchanon play it well? He hasn’t done it in a while (one note: Rogers hadn’t done it before last season). ...The tough part for Washington is that it plays another team with a strong offense in Buffalo. The Redskins absolutely need their defense to play well and give them more short fields. Of course, this happened vs. Philly to no avail. The Redskins are on the verge of going south with all their issues. They need to respond.
 
Fatness I agree the D has been way to up and down, and mostly down this year. And its frustrating, because you see glimpses of a great plays, and then crap. Its time to see what Stinkerson can do though. He can't be worse than what we've got now. :bag:

 
Fatness I agree the D has been way to up and down, and mostly down this year. And its frustrating, because you see glimpses of a great plays, and then crap. Its time to see what Stinkerson can do though. He can't be worse than what we've got now. :bag:
"Stinkerson" <-- lol
 
I don't know what to say. At the beginning of the season, we all thought this team was a 7-9 or 8-8 club. That still looks like kind of a possibility, I guess. That's the most positive thing I can say about it. Even with a bad defensive performance on Sunday, I still think the defense has been upgraded and as long as we stay with the 3-4 next year (hoping that Snyder doesn't can Shanahan if we fail to make the playoffs), we'll continue to improve on that side of the ball. We really have to look at this as we have been saying all along, that it is a multi-year rebuilding project. If you were expecting the Redskins to make the playoffs this year on the strength of the 3-1 start, though, it's Armegedon for sure.Re: the offense -- another lackluster offensive performance. Beck looked OK...he didn't totally suck...and that is definitely a positive, but it also doesn't look like he's going to take this team to the playoffs. His final stat line looks serviceable, but when the team got behind and we needed to keep pace with the Panthers, we just couldn't flick the switch and do it. Once again, in the first half, when we had chances to score TDs we scored field goals. In other words, he seems like a fine guy if you are leading and playing in a close game, but compare him to Newton, who is playing in his first year...Newton is a playmaker in a way that Beck just is not and likely will not be. Beck or Grossman are serviceable if the rest of the team is just clicking on all cylinders and we just don't have the horses for that just yet.Re: the defense -- I'm actually more upset over the defensive performance than the office for this game, only because I do think the defense has the potential to be a good unit, moreso than the offense. And they laid an egg. They gave up a ton of yardage on the ground and also let Newton have his way through the air when he needed it. Bad day for the defense. But, I think they will regroup and come back.Future -- as the tag line of this thread says, "they are who we thought they are." Significantly improved on defense, marginally improved on offense, but massively lacking at Quarterback and also in dire need of more offensive lineman (little depth). This offseason they have to get a QB. I still don't fault them for not drafting a QB this year...I mean...is Gabbert lighting the world on fire? (though Christian Ponder certainly looks like a legitimate QB). In their estimation, there just wasn't anyone worth it this year, and meanwhile Kerrigan certainly looks worth a first round pick. But next year, with a deep QB class...they have to go QB. The big concern for me is that they give Shanahan another year or two to get a new QB and see if they can get some traction with them. And I don't say this because I am a huge Mike/Kyle Shanahan fan. I am saying this because I fear that if they can Shanahan, the new guy comes in and starts all over again and then we are back to square one -- not only with offense but also with defense. Hell, if you must fire Shanahan then install Haslett as head coach, just to at least keep continuity on that side of the ball.I am not so down on the team because I know they are a multi year project but I do think Shanahan has basically lost two years messing around with McNabb, Rex and possibly Beck (we'll see how he does...maybe he'll shock all of us and go on a tear). This is hindsight and hindsight is 20-20 but in hindsight it does seem to be a wasted two years. Either Mike can't evaluate QBs as well as we thought or Kyle is being given too much authority; in either case, it lands on Mike as the head coach.Here's hoping that Beck continues to play solid and we fine a way to go 8-8. I fear if we dip down much further Snyder may not be as patient.
One key item: the Redskins are still dreadfully weak at wide receiver despite keeping eight of them on the roster. Gaffney dropped a long pass from Beck early, then caught a pass on the next play and fumbled it. Hankerson was in for one play and ran the wrong route, causing an intercepton. Paul, Austin, and Stallworth get a couple of receptions a game combined. With Moss' injury, we need someone to step up at WR.
I think they are just one playmaker away from having a decent WR crew.
 
I don't know what to say. At the beginning of the season, we all thought this team was a 7-9 or 8-8 club. That still looks like kind of a possibility, I guess. That's the most positive thing I can say about it. Even with a bad defensive performance on Sunday, I still think the defense has been upgraded and as long as we stay with the 3-4 next year (hoping that Snyder doesn't can Shanahan if we fail to make the playoffs), we'll continue to improve on that side of the ball. We really have to look at this as we have been saying all along, that it is a multi-year rebuilding project. If you were expecting the Redskins to make the playoffs this year on the strength of the 3-1 start, though, it's Armegedon for sure.Re: the offense -- another lackluster offensive performance. Beck looked OK...he didn't totally suck...and that is definitely a positive, but it also doesn't look like he's going to take this team to the playoffs. His final stat line looks serviceable, but when the team got behind and we needed to keep pace with the Panthers, we just couldn't flick the switch and do it. Once again, in the first half, when we had chances to score TDs we scored field goals. In other words, he seems like a fine guy if you are leading and playing in a close game, but compare him to Newton, who is playing in his first year...Newton is a playmaker in a way that Beck just is not and likely will not be. Beck or Grossman are serviceable if the rest of the team is just clicking on all cylinders and we just don't have the horses for that just yet.Re: the defense -- I'm actually more upset over the defensive performance than the office for this game, only because I do think the defense has the potential to be a good unit, moreso than the offense. And they laid an egg. They gave up a ton of yardage on the ground and also let Newton have his way through the air when he needed it. Bad day for the defense. But, I think they will regroup and come back.Future -- as the tag line of this thread says, "they are who we thought they are." Significantly improved on defense, marginally improved on offense, but massively lacking at Quarterback and also in dire need of more offensive lineman (little depth). This offseason they have to get a QB. I still don't fault them for not drafting a QB this year...I mean...is Gabbert lighting the world on fire? (though Christian Ponder certainly looks like a legitimate QB). In their estimation, there just wasn't anyone worth it this year, and meanwhile Kerrigan certainly looks worth a first round pick. But next year, with a deep QB class...they have to go QB. The big concern for me is that they give Shanahan another year or two to get a new QB and see if they can get some traction with them. And I don't say this because I am a huge Mike/Kyle Shanahan fan. I am saying this because I fear that if they can Shanahan, the new guy comes in and starts all over again and then we are back to square one -- not only with offense but also with defense. Hell, if you must fire Shanahan then install Haslett as head coach, just to at least keep continuity on that side of the ball.I am not so down on the team because I know they are a multi year project but I do think Shanahan has basically lost two years messing around with McNabb, Rex and possibly Beck (we'll see how he does...maybe he'll shock all of us and go on a tear). This is hindsight and hindsight is 20-20 but in hindsight it does seem to be a wasted two years. Either Mike can't evaluate QBs as well as we thought or Kyle is being given too much authority; in either case, it lands on Mike as the head coach.Here's hoping that Beck continues to play solid and we fine a way to go 8-8. I fear if we dip down much further Snyder may not be as patient.
One key item: the Redskins are still dreadfully weak at wide receiver despite keeping eight of them on the roster. Gaffney dropped a long pass from Beck early, then caught a pass on the next play and fumbled it. Hankerson was in for one play and ran the wrong route, causing an intercepton. Paul, Austin, and Stallworth get a couple of receptions a game combined. With Moss' injury, we need someone to step up at WR.
I think they are just one playmaker away from having a decent WR crew.
They have a lot of really young WRs and WRs take time to develop. Hankerson and Paul are rookies. Austin is a first year player. Armstrong and Banks are both 2nd year players. That is 5 developmental WRs. On the other side, Moss, Gaffney, and Stallworth are all older WRs and appear to on the downside of their careers. Maybe a playmaker or two will develop from the current group.
 
I don't know what to say. At the beginning of the season, we all thought this team was a 7-9 or 8-8 club. That still looks like kind of a possibility, I guess. That's the most positive thing I can say about it. Even with a bad defensive performance on Sunday, I still think the defense has been upgraded and as long as we stay with the 3-4 next year (hoping that Snyder doesn't can Shanahan if we fail to make the playoffs), we'll continue to improve on that side of the ball. We really have to look at this as we have been saying all along, that it is a multi-year rebuilding project. If you were expecting the Redskins to make the playoffs this year on the strength of the 3-1 start, though, it's Armegedon for sure.Re: the offense -- another lackluster offensive performance. Beck looked OK...he didn't totally suck...and that is definitely a positive, but it also doesn't look like he's going to take this team to the playoffs. His final stat line looks serviceable, but when the team got behind and we needed to keep pace with the Panthers, we just couldn't flick the switch and do it. Once again, in the first half, when we had chances to score TDs we scored field goals. In other words, he seems like a fine guy if you are leading and playing in a close game, but compare him to Newton, who is playing in his first year...Newton is a playmaker in a way that Beck just is not and likely will not be. Beck or Grossman are serviceable if the rest of the team is just clicking on all cylinders and we just don't have the horses for that just yet.Re: the defense -- I'm actually more upset over the defensive performance than the office for this game, only because I do think the defense has the potential to be a good unit, moreso than the offense. And they laid an egg. They gave up a ton of yardage on the ground and also let Newton have his way through the air when he needed it. Bad day for the defense. But, I think they will regroup and come back.Future -- as the tag line of this thread says, "they are who we thought they are." Significantly improved on defense, marginally improved on offense, but massively lacking at Quarterback and also in dire need of more offensive lineman (little depth). This offseason they have to get a QB. I still don't fault them for not drafting a QB this year...I mean...is Gabbert lighting the world on fire? (though Christian Ponder certainly looks like a legitimate QB). In their estimation, there just wasn't anyone worth it this year, and meanwhile Kerrigan certainly looks worth a first round pick. But next year, with a deep QB class...they have to go QB. The big concern for me is that they give Shanahan another year or two to get a new QB and see if they can get some traction with them. And I don't say this because I am a huge Mike/Kyle Shanahan fan. I am saying this because I fear that if they can Shanahan, the new guy comes in and starts all over again and then we are back to square one -- not only with offense but also with defense. Hell, if you must fire Shanahan then install Haslett as head coach, just to at least keep continuity on that side of the ball.I am not so down on the team because I know they are a multi year project but I do think Shanahan has basically lost two years messing around with McNabb, Rex and possibly Beck (we'll see how he does...maybe he'll shock all of us and go on a tear). This is hindsight and hindsight is 20-20 but in hindsight it does seem to be a wasted two years. Either Mike can't evaluate QBs as well as we thought or Kyle is being given too much authority; in either case, it lands on Mike as the head coach.Here's hoping that Beck continues to play solid and we fine a way to go 8-8. I fear if we dip down much further Snyder may not be as patient.
One key item: the Redskins are still dreadfully weak at wide receiver despite keeping eight of them on the roster. Gaffney dropped a long pass from Beck early, then caught a pass on the next play and fumbled it. Hankerson was in for one play and ran the wrong route, causing an intercepton. Paul, Austin, and Stallworth get a couple of receptions a game combined. With Moss' injury, we need someone to step up at WR.
I think they are just one playmaker away from having a decent WR crew.
They have a lot of really young WRs and WRs take time to develop. Hankerson and Paul are rookies. Austin is a first year player. Armstrong and Banks are both 2nd year players. That is 5 developmental WRs. On the other side, Moss, Gaffney, and Stallworth are all older WRs and appear to on the downside of their careers. Maybe a playmaker or two will develop from the current group.
If there is ever a silver lining, it's that you'll find a diamond in the rough from your young guys. Over the past few years, we've actually done that. Torrain stepped up when Portis faded, and Anthony Armstrong turned out to be a steal from where he was aquired. So this is a real chance to evaluate primarily three guys:Austin -- has shown great flashes. Play him and give him a chance to do it with live bullets.Paul -- coaches and players raved about this guy in camp, said QBs LOVED him. Throw him out there and see what happens.Hankerson -- had lots of preseason hype and now it's time to grow into it. As opposed to Austin and Paul, who seemed to have performed well with little expectations, Hankerson has not met his expectations yet. We need to see if we have another WR bust situation on our hand (we're famous for those unfortunately)...you might as well learn now.In this respect, as the rebuilding project goes, having to play these three guys is not the worst thing in the world. You have to see what you have in these guys so when you do get a QB next year then you know if you have WRs on the squad who can perform.
 
Shanahan said Armstrong or Paul will replace Moss as a starter. I hope it's Paul because I really don't think Armstrong is that good. I think he benefited last year from being an unknown and having a good deep-ball QB in McNabb. Paul has looked good in preseason and his limited regular season action.

 
Should Moss be kept on the 53 man roster and made inactive each week, or should he be IR'd? There's only 10 weeks left, does him coming back for the last 3-4 games really mean much? Same with Cooley, depending on how long he's supposed to be out.

 
Cooley and Hightower are now on the IR.

And the coaching criticism begins:

Injuries don’t explain how the defense could allow three straight touchdown drives by the Panthers on their first possessions after halftime. Who delivered that pep talk, and made those strategic adjustments? “We should have had better balance, a better game plan in the second half,” Brian Orakpo observed.

Injuries don’t explain why the Redskins made an iffy decision to go for it at midfield on fourth and two, and then set Beck up for a sack with an ill-considered pass play. “We gave him a bad call,” Shanahan said.
link
 
Cooley and Hightower are now on the IR.

And the coaching criticism begins:

Injuries don’t explain how the defense could allow three straight touchdown drives by the Panthers on their first possessions after halftime. Who delivered that pep talk, and made those strategic adjustments? “We should have had better balance, a better game plan in the second half,” Brian Orakpo observed.

Injuries don’t explain why the Redskins made an iffy decision to go for it at midfield on fourth and two, and then set Beck up for a sack with an ill-considered pass play. “We gave him a bad call,” Shanahan said.
link
The defense has come out pretty sharp in the 2nd half all year long. That was the most worrisome thing for me this week.
 
GAME BALLS

QB JOHN BECK: Beck was better than I initially thought. He threw in rhythm, on time and accurately for most of the second half. He threw 25 of his 37 passes after halftime when the Redskins ran play-action off their first-half rushing success and, eventually, had to throw to make up a large deficit. He wasn’t nearly as dangerous as his Carolina counterpart Cam Newton, but he gave the Redskins a chance to win.

Beck had 22 completions and 15 incompletions. Of those 15, four were dropped; two were batted down at the line; one was intentional grounding; and one was the interception on which rookie WR Leonard Hankerson ran a different route than Beck expected. Who knows how many of those eight throws might have been completed, but his numbers could have been even better than those that produced an 80.8 passer rating.
FB DARREL YOUNG:Young’s quality lead blocks were a big reason why the Redskins averaged 4.6 yards on 18 first-half rushes. He knows his assignments and is violent executing his blocks at full speed.
Davis made some quality run blocks in the first half, too. He helped RB Tim Hightower gain 17 yards with a combo block on which he ended up driving Anderson onto the sideline. Davis dropped an easy completion in the second half, but he was one of the Redskins‘ only offensive playmakers in a game in which their shortage of them was exposed.
Campbell's review of the offense which includes poor performances on the offensive line.
 
Shanahan apparently said Cooley should have been put on the PUP this year. This is the second year in a row they've said that about someone, last year being Malcolm Kelly. I guess the lockout could be to blame this year, but it's kind of disturbing that they haven't been able to properly diagnose problems.

Anyway, some good news: Fletcher and Atogwe have had limited practice, so hopefully they both can go Sunday. I had heard some pessimistic reports about Fletcher earlier this week, which would have really been a shame since he has such a great game streak going.

 
Shanahan apparently said Cooley should have been put on the PUP this year. This is the second year in a row they've said that about someone, last year being Malcolm Kelly. I guess the lockout could be to blame this year, but it's kind of disturbing that they haven't been able to properly diagnose problems.Anyway, some good news: Fletcher and Atogwe have had limited practice, so hopefully they both can go Sunday. I had heard some pessimistic reports about Fletcher earlier this week, which would have really been a shame since he has such a great game streak going.
I read this week he Fletcher is the only player left from the 1999 Rams team still playing.ETA: I'm also concerned with the PUP issues the past two years. This year I would blame on the lockout and I'm not sure how I feel about Kelly, I'm sure it could have been possible they were trying to push him to see if he could stay push through and contribute.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
What do folks think our chances are this weekend? Most of what I've seen doesn't give the Skins much chance - Buffalo beat the Pats, has lost a couple of close games to good teams, has a real stud in Fred Jackson this year, playing at home...

But this game sets up well for Washington, potentially. They play better with low expectations. Buffalo's run defense is pretty bad (over 5 YPC by opponents). Toronto is not exactly a daunting road locale (Buffalo is winless there, I believe). Washington run D has been slipping, but it is still a relative strength of the team, especially if Fletcher can play.

If they don't fall behind big early, I could really see a prototypical Skins win - i.e. sloppy, ugly, comes down to a late 4th quarter kick by one team or the other.

Skins, 23-21?

 
What do folks think our chances are this weekend? Most of what I've seen doesn't give the Skins much chance - Buffalo beat the Pats, has lost a couple of close games to good teams, has a real stud in Fred Jackson this year, playing at home...But this game sets up well for Washington, potentially. They play better with low expectations. Buffalo's run defense is pretty bad (over 5 YPC by opponents). Toronto is not exactly a daunting road locale (Buffalo is winless there, I believe). Washington run D has been slipping, but it is still a relative strength of the team, especially if Fletcher can play.If they don't fall behind big early, I could really see a prototypical Skins win - i.e. sloppy, ugly, comes down to a late 4th quarter kick by one team or the other. Skins, 23-21?
Yes, the Redskins have a recent history of playing close games vs. better opponents and blowing the game against "easier" competition. Think about games vs. GB and NO the years each team won the SB. However, that said, I think what concerns me about this game is the fact that the offense just can't score enough points to "keep up" with the Bills. When the played the Eagles, the defense actually kept them in the game after giving up points early. But the offense just couldn't come back. I can see the defense playing heroically again but the offense just failing to keep pace, therefore losing like 24-20 or something. The wild card to me is turnovers and special teams. If the defense can snag a few turnovers and give them a short field, or if Banks can get on track and run one back, who knows they can steal one. But I think they need a big play like that to have a chance.Even though I think they will go down, of course I will watch the game and root for them like crazy. I'm stupid like that and will never stop watching.
 
The skins need to work the clock from the start. Take as much time of with ground and pound, keep it a low scoring game. The defense can make plays and keep the offense in it, but any team that can score more than 20 points on Washington will beat them. The offense can't keep up, especially with the injuries and QB situation.

 
Buffalo's run defense is pretty bad (over 5 YPC by opponents).
They started off well last week. Hightower was having success early, but the passing game failed to produce much in the first half. Drives stalled and they could only get FGs. After leaning heavily on the run, Kyle went with play action to start the 2nd half. They had a nice opening drive going when they hit a 3rd and 2 in Carolina territory. They threw, despite facing a horrible run D, and it was incomplete. Then, on 4th down, they go for it with pass and are sacked. If they were going to go for it, they should have just run on 3rd. They could have easily picked up two yards on two run against that D. Instead, they turn it over downs and Carolina scores a TD. The Gaffney fumble and that failed conversion really swung that game.They have to stick with the run, especially when they need to move the chains. Yes, they need to trust Beck enough to make some plays, but they have to prey on Buffalo's weakness and use their own strength. Oh, and they REALLY need to keep the ball out of Buffalo's hands. The Redskin lose big-time if this is a shootout.
 
With a banged up offensive line and secondary, and with Moss out, I see a game of frustration for the Skins. They'll "fight their guts out" but with the injuries I just don't think they have the horses to win.

 
The Redskins’ 21 sacks are tied for most in the NFL; the Bills’ seven sacks allowed are the fewest in the league. Something has to give.

The statistical match-up is a wash but where the Redskins can and should take advantage is against Buffalo’s patchwork left side of the line. Kyle Levitre is the third starting left tackle (moving from left guard) and former Redskins draft pick flameout Chad Rinehart starts at left guard.

“[Fitzpatrick] gets the ball out of his hands fast,” Redskins defensive coordinator Jim Haslett said. “I know he’s really smart and he knows where he’s going to throw it. The protection, they throw quickly.”
Maybe this is when Rinehart will finally come through for the Skins.
 
Also from that article.

Jabar Gaffney and Anthony Armstrong are likely to be the top two in the pecking order, but the chatter around Redskin Park this week is that Niles Paul and Terrence Austin will get more playing time. Somebody needs to rise up and help the Redskins stretch the field vertically.
The Redskins, as much as they won’t admit it, eased quarterback John Beck into the game last week, which became a luxury when Hightower had such a strong start. Against a Buffalo team averaging 31.3 points per game, a few of the chains need to come off today. Don’t be surprised if the Redskins look more diversified offensively, allowing Beck to do what he does best – play action roll outs.
 
Here is hoping the Skins go winless from here on out and get a nice QB and WR in the first 2 rounds of next year's draft :bag:

 
So is Beck worth a play today? Solid numbers last week (inflated due to the rushing TD though)?
I think he'll be passing a good bit out of necessity today. I don't think the Skins will stop Buffalo from scoring a lot. What happens after Beck passes -- who knows? But he did not look bad in the second half last week, controlled drives mainly through passing. He's worth a shot if your starter is out.
 
'fatness said:
'Eastwood said:
Here is hoping the Skins go winless from here on out and get a nice QB and WR in the first 2 rounds of next year's draft :bag:
I'll never be able to bring myself to wish for that.
:goodposting:I've known since the offseason that we would have a high draft pick. I can't root for a loss and I've been pleasantly surprised with the advances they have made this year.
 
I am seriously becoming a bigger Panther fan than Redskin fan. I've cheered for the Skins my entire life, and cheered for the Panthers since my home state was awarded the franchise. The Panthers haven't won a lot of games, but at least they are fun to watch. After 30 years of watching this franchise, I think I'm just tired of the suck. I can only pray next year they have a top 3 pick and get a franchise QB to do what Newton has done for the Panthers this year.

 
I blame the playcalling. Straight dropback every time, slow developing bunch formations. No screens, no creativity. You've gotta help out your quarterback when he's getting assaulted like that.

 
I am seriously becoming a bigger Panther fan than Redskin fan. I've cheered for the Skins my entire life, and cheered for the Panthers since my home state was awarded the franchise. The Panthers haven't won a lot of games, but at least they are fun to watch. After 30 years of watching this franchise, I think I'm just tired of the suck. I can only pray next year they have a top 3 pick and get a franchise QB to do what Newton has done for the Panthers this year.
:bye:
 
I blame the playcalling. Straight dropback every time, slow developing bunch formations. No screens, no creativity. You've gotta help out your quarterback when he's getting assaulted like that.
I don't know. They called several bootlegs to give him more time. Beck just doesn't seem to make quick decisions. Not all of those sacks were the OL's fault. The first, Beck just failed to notice the DB. I'm not sure how he missed him come up, but he didn't notice him. Had he noticed, he may have quickly dumped it to Helu who had tons of space and might have scored.
 
Facts our, the line sucks, the WRs suck, the RBs suck, the QB sucks, and the D sucks. I think that pretty much covers it. :wall:

 
Facts our, the line sucks, the WRs suck, the RBs suck, the QB sucks, and the D sucks. I think that pretty much covers it. :wall:
The D has made progress from last year. Kerrigan is looking awesome and they can keep the team in games. Neither the WRs or RBs "suck" they need one more playmaker and more help on the O-Line. This shouldn't come as a surprise.And yeah the QBs blow.
 
Facts our, the line sucks, the WRs suck, the RBs suck, the QB sucks, and the D sucks. I think that pretty much covers it. :wall:
The D has made progress from last year. Kerrigan is looking awesome and they can keep the team in games. Neither the WRs or RBs "suck" they need one more playmaker and more help on the O-Line. This shouldn't come as a surprise.And yeah the QBs blow.
The OL was terrible today. Pass blocking was bad. Run blocking was bad. And this was against a weak defense.We knew OL depth was an issue coming into the season. And it shows with two starters out. At WR, they need a youngster to step up. Hankerson got a catch today. Autsin had a couple. Niles Paul and Anthony Armstrong had none. I was surprised the Redskins did not call more pass plays where Beck could get rid of it really fast. Like WR screens and slants. Is Moss the only WR that can run these routes?
 
Facts our, the line sucks, the WRs suck, the RBs suck, the QB sucks, and the D sucks. I think that pretty much covers it. :wall:
The D has made progress from last year. Kerrigan is looking awesome and they can keep the team in games. Neither the WRs or RBs "suck" they need one more playmaker and more help on the O-Line. This shouldn't come as a surprise.And yeah the QBs blow.
The OL was terrible today. Pass blocking was bad. Run blocking was bad. And this was against a weak defense.We knew OL depth was an issue coming into the season. And it shows with two starters out. At WR, they need a youngster to step up. Hankerson got a catch today. Autsin had a couple. Niles Paul and Anthony Armstrong had none.

I was surprised the Redskins did not call more pass plays where Beck could get rid of it really fast. Like WR screens and slants. Is Moss the only WR that can run these routes?
It should. It was known that the depth on the Oline is practice squad material for pretty much every other team in the NFL.Also I'm a beliver in Armstrong, Paul, Austin and Hankerson. I feel like one or two guys can step up and round out a solid group of WRs. Provided they draft or sign a reall playmaker at WR. They are all at best WR2/3 material.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
On a different note has anyone seen Bizkiteer or Buster C around? I haven't seen them post this year at all.
They probably found more enjoyable things to do then watch and comment on Skins games, like getting root canals or cleaning toilets at rest stops. ;)
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top