What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

**Official YANKEES 2009 Thread** (3 Viewers)

Liquid Tension said:
cobalt_27 said:
[

Do you know that Jeter has the same OPS in the post-season as he has in the regular season? Do you also know that A-Rod has a playoff OPS that's -123 points lower than his regular season OPS?

To say that they are the same in the playoffs ignores this glaring discrepancy in your interpretation.
OK, so you are penalizing ARod because he is so good normally? How is it possible for someone to suck in the postseason and have the same OPS as a guy you say is clutch in the postseason?
Compared to his normal routine, he does suck. A-Roid has immense skills and talents in routine situations, particularly when aided by steroids. When he gets into the playoffs, when the stadiums are filled, and millions are watching on television, the glare of the spotlight causes his production to decrease dramatically away from the norm.While Jeter is not the natural (or unnatural) talent that A-Roid is, he remains consistent. What you see is what you get.

With the Fraud, what you see is not what you get overall in the playoffs. Hence, over the last 3 seasons in the playoffs, he's had 44 ABs and 4 hits. It's become psychological warfare for the guy, and he's losing big-time in recent years. In short, he's a choker.

End of story.
End of story for someone who has no understanding of expected statistical deviations and someone who makes up incorrect stats. ARod has 7 hits (not 4) in his last 44 AB's, with a double a homer and 8 walks.So you conveniently exclude the 72 AB's prior to these 44 where ARod had 25 hits, 7 doubles, 5 homers, 9 walks and was hit twice? This is a .347 BA, .433 OBP and a .653 slug (OPS of 1.087)!!! How is it possible he wasn't choking under the pressure of the playoffs and all the lights for these 72 AB's???

So tell me why Tino Martinez isn't a huge choker and why he is thought of as a clutch player? I can tell you why, it is because the Yankees won and people overlook bad performances when a team wins. It is also because people have unrealistic expectations for great players. Tino had a career OPS of .672 in 356 AB's in the postseason. But Tino had some good performances as well...which happens when you understand statistical deviations.

Mr. clutch Girardi had exactly ONE RBI and a .463 OPS in 114 postseason AB's. How did Girardi manage a HUGE triple when he was clearly so unclutch?

Do you remember how many people were on another great player in Barry Bonds about him choking so badly in the playoffs after having 3 bad series' (and one pretty good one .868 OPS)? Then, all of a sudden the guy had a 74 plate appearance stretch that was the best ever (something around an OPS of 1.550)...Yeah, I know it was all roids...

How about a fellow Yankee like Bernie Williams? Do you remember the first 3 series' he had in the postseason and he was labeled as clutch performer? Sure was great, an OPS of about 1.40 in 55 AB's. Then, he went through a stretch of 52 AB's where his OPS was about .420??? How can this be? He is so clutch?

...and finally let me rest my case for anyone being objective. Your entire weak argument is based on the ARod's most recent 44 AB's (it is really only the 29 AB's but I will extend it for you). Let's compare some under pressure spots in critical moments of Mr consistent D. Jeter. Jeter actually had a similar 44 AB stretch, in fact, it was critical in that the WS that was as close as they come was part of this stretch.

ARod 44 AB's - 7 hits, 1 double and 1 homer with 8 walks = OPS .538

Jeter 44 AB's - 6 hits, 0 double and 1 homer with 2 walks = OPS .371

How is this possible? On ARod's worst small stretch he is .167 OPS points higher than Jeter's??? Perhaps if ARod's postseason career would have ended after a 4 game sweep of Boston, people would have wrongly assumed that he was one of the most clutch players to play the game? :shrug:

The point is that when people start getting closer to a full season of postseason AB's or even half of that, you can see that they revert closer to their norm. Jeter has a full year of postseason stats and his stats are about the same in both areas. Bernie had a .858 OPS in the regular season and a .851 OPS in the postseason in almost a full year of postseason AB's.

If clutch ability were a real thing wouldn't you see a more consistent trend from players to almost always be clutch or unclutch? They wouldn;t swing back and forth. One good series like he has already had a few times and ARod is not a choker? I would also expect someone who was a choker to perform much worse than normal, maybe like Tino and Girardi, but if you have the same OPS in the postseason as Jeter, i have a hard time calling that type of performance a choker, even if it is less than his normal stellar self.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I called it months ago. It's all coming together. :thumbup:
Good call. Only weakness this team has is 3, 4, & 5 starters. I think Chamberlain will be inconsistent like any young pitcher but should be decent enough. I think the Yanks will trade for another starter (like Washburn). Pettitte stinks IMO. I was actually fairly impressed with Mitre, 92-93mph sinker with movement and threw strikes.
 
21-5 in their last 26 games. Wow. I know some bad teams were mixed in and they still have to beat the Sox and Angels but this is a good team.

 
In summary, I'd mount A-Rod, if I had the chance.
Spin the argument however you want. Bottom line, A-Fraud is a choker and a duuchebag. Easily among my least-favorite Yankee players in history.
Pretty lame to create a quote from me that was not mine. Outside of that move, you sum up the difference in our thought patters, I am looking at this objectively and you are blinded by your dislike of him. I am sure on the other side you overlook how poorly your favorite players do things.
 
cobalt Id love to see your thoughts on the Santana for Hughes, Cabrera, & Kennedy non-trade now.
No different than before. Utterly ridiculous that we didn't make that deal because we didn't want to get rid of Kennedy. Did something change all of a sudden that I'm not aware of? Hughes has been absolute $ of late, though. Great role for him so far.
 
In summary, I'd mount A-Rod, if I had the chance.
Spin the argument however you want. Bottom line, A-Fraud is a choker and a duuchebag. Easily among my least-favorite Yankee players in history.
Pretty lame to create a quote from me that was not mine. Outside of that move, you sum up the difference in our thought patters, I am looking at this objectively and you are blinded by your dislike of him. I am sure on the other side you overlook how poorly your favorite players do things.
You've got it backwards. My dislike of A-Roid is informed by the fact that he is a choker and a prolonged steroid user. You're blinded by your homerism, which makes it impossible for you to be objective when considering the obvious that everyone else knows about the guy.
 
cobalt Id love to see your thoughts on the Santana for Hughes, Cabrera, & Kennedy non-trade now.
No different than before. Utterly ridiculous that we didn't make that deal because we didn't want to get rid of Kennedy. Did something change all of a sudden that I'm not aware of? Hughes has been absolute $ of late, though. Great role for him so far.
Hughes has been dominant, Santana seems to be on the decline. And if they signed Santana they wouldnt have signed one of CC or Teixeira.
 
In summary, I'd mount A-Rod, if I had the chance.
Spin the argument however you want. Bottom line, A-Fraud is a choker and a duuchebag. Easily among my least-favorite Yankee players in history.
Pretty lame to create a quote from me that was not mine. Outside of that move, you sum up the difference in our thought patters, I am looking at this objectively and you are blinded by your dislike of him. I am sure on the other side you overlook how poorly your favorite players do things.
You've got it backwards. My dislike of A-Roid is informed by the fact that he is a choker and a prolonged steroid user. You're blinded by your homerism, which makes it impossible for you to be objective when considering the obvious that everyone else knows about the guy.
You really should tattoo this on your ####### forehead
 
In summary, I'd mount A-Rod, if I had the chance.
Spin the argument however you want. Bottom line, A-Fraud is a choker and a duuchebag. Easily among my least-favorite Yankee players in history.
Pretty lame to create a quote from me that was not mine. Outside of that move, you sum up the difference in our thought patters, I am looking at this objectively and you are blinded by your dislike of him. I am sure on the other side you overlook how poorly your favorite players do things.
You've got it backwards. My dislike of A-Roid is informed by the fact that he is a choker and a prolonged steroid user. You're blinded by your homerism, which makes it impossible for you to be objective when considering the obvious that everyone else knows about the guy.
Yeah, OK champ, homerism has always been my criticism :lmao: I am human and probably show some bias, but I try to be as objective as possible. Jeter is one of my favorite players and I probably criticize him more than anyone?

 
Friday:

So what do we think of Joba now? Just like a few bad outings shouldn’t make us think he is done, a few good ones shouldn’t make us think he is the next coming. He also faced a weak hitting team. That being said, his velocity was still up compared to before the All Star Break. He started averaging around 92 in the first inning, but then quickly averaged 94 most of the game, getting up to 96 a few times and 95 many times. That is good, but I would still hope that he would be consistent around 95-96…but better. As I mentioned in my last blog I wanted to see more curves and they did throw more and they were very effective. Thrown for strikes and producing outs the curve makes the fastball look better and gives the batter another speed and plane to be worried about.

His control was better as he threw more strikes but 3 walks and a HBP in 7 innings isn’t great. Overall, we have to remember that he has not had many minor league games started and in all of his starts in the majors he has a total of 168 IP. His ERA during that time is 3.42 with a 9-3 record.

I questioned sending him out there for the 8th inning especially because I have my own theory about him needing more rest to keep his velocity (I know this is hard check the validity)

Coke did a great job in bailing out Joba (and Girardi) and deserved a huge pat on the back.

Saturday:

Not sure the validity of adding Ransom to the lineup instead of Matsui on the same day you have Molina in for Posada, but this game was mostly lost in the 7th inning. The weak hitting A’s had been doing very little all day. Pettitte’s control was good and his ball had some movement. But right Texiera and Arod couldn’t get Gardner in from 3rd base with 1 out; Pettitte came out and immediately allowed a ripped double down the line to start the inning off. With a 1 run lead, you have to keep the go ahead run off the bases. After going 3-0 to Garciaparra, Pettitte came back and threw 2 strikes only 2 walk the go ahead run to 1st base. Up came Jack Cust. I could see letting Pettitte go against the lefty. The AB was a rough battle that Cust kept missing some good pitches to hit, but Andy kept throwing strikes (as he needed to). After the 6 pitches to Nomar and after needing 9 pitches to get Cust to fly out to CF on a pitch right down the middle, it was pretty clear to everyone that Andy did a really good job and it was time to turn it over to the bullpen. When Girardi went out to the mound it was time to stand up and give Andy an ovation for a job well done. I have no idea what Girardi was thinking, but after throwing 15 pitches to the last 2 batters alone in the 7th inning; he left Andy in the game with 1st and 2nd and one out??? After allowing a bullet single up the middle to tie the game, Girardi should have realized the mistake he made, but instead let Pettitte allow one more single (a bunt) before turning the game over to Aceves. Aceves came in with the bases loaded and 1 out with the score tied. With no room to put anyone on, Ace went to work and got a popup and things looked good. Then Ace had an 0-2 count on the next batter. The pitch called was a fastball upstairs. The pitch was on the top of the strike zone but their backup catcher was able to bloop a single over SS for a huge single. A couple points… Ace was throwing slowly for him. He didn’t break 90 in his pitches and usually is at 92. This might have been the difference in not being able to get the fastball by him? I also wonder with the bases juiced he wanted to throw more strikes and stay away from a ball in the dirt? I don’t know, but they got a big hit. Ace then allowed another huge hit and clearly was off his game with little pop in his fastball. I can’t blame Girardi for staying with Ace because he has been so good, but in hindsight (usually all my comments are not hindsight but I was watching the game fast) I thought Bruney would have been a good choice because Ace was not throwing hard and Pettitte is not a hard thrower; Bruney would have been a good change of speed. Again, I can’t blame Girardi for that, but after Ace led up a game ending double, Girardi created the mess by clearly leaving Pettitte in for 2 extra batters.

The positive is how tough this team is. After allowing 6 runs in the 7th inning (to be down by 5), the Yankees rallied to have 1st and 2nd with nobody out in the 9th inning down 6-4. Unfortunately Posada hit a hard grounder right at the 2nd base for an easy DP. Then Jeter flew out to end the game!

One other point, I usually don’t pull a Michael Kay, but in the 8th inning, I got out of my seat because I was sure Cano tied the game on well hit ball to RF. I still am not sure what happened on that swing because I thought it was gone (you too?)

Tough loss, but a poor job by Girardi and I guess we won't be calling Aceves the Genius Maker because he couldn’t bail out Girardi.

Good run…let’s start another one.

 
cobalt Id love to see your thoughts on the Santana for Hughes, Cabrera, & Kennedy non-trade now.
No different than before. Utterly ridiculous that we didn't make that deal because we didn't want to get rid of Kennedy. Did something change all of a sudden that I'm not aware of?

Hughes has been absolute $ of late, though. Great role for him so far.
Hughes has been dominant, Santana seems to be on the decline. And if they signed Santana they wouldnt have signed one of CC or Teixeira.
:goodposting: Santana is 11-8 on an awful Mets team and sporting a 3.12 ERA, which is his lifetime number (and an ERA+ better than any current Yankee starter). He's absolutely fine and is exactly what the Yanks need...another dominant starter. I have no faith that the current starting Yankee group as a whole can be consistent enough to win in the playoffs.

Besides, I thought you conceded some pages ago that it was, ultimately, pretty stupid of the Yanks to not pull the trigger when they did. Are you flip-flopping back, now?

 
cobalt_27 said:
jobarules said:
cobalt_27 said:
cobalt Id love to see your thoughts on the Santana for Hughes, Cabrera, & Kennedy non-trade now.
No different than before. Utterly ridiculous that we didn't make that deal because we didn't want to get rid of Kennedy. Did something change all of a sudden that I'm not aware of?

Hughes has been absolute $ of late, though. Great role for him so far.
Hughes has been dominant, Santana seems to be on the decline. And if they signed Santana they wouldnt have signed one of CC or Teixeira.
:unsure: Santana is 11-8 on an awful Mets team and sporting a 3.12 ERA, which is his lifetime number (and an ERA+ better than any current Yankee starter). He's absolutely fine and is exactly what the Yanks need...another dominant starter. I have no faith that the current starting Yankee group as a whole can be consistent enough to win in the playoffs.
:goodposting:
 
cobalt_27 said:
jobarules said:
cobalt_27 said:
cobalt Id love to see your thoughts on the Santana for Hughes, Cabrera, & Kennedy non-trade now.
No different than before. Utterly ridiculous that we didn't make that deal because we didn't want to get rid of Kennedy. Did something change all of a sudden that I'm not aware of?

Hughes has been absolute $ of late, though. Great role for him so far.
Hughes has been dominant, Santana seems to be on the decline. And if they signed Santana they wouldnt have signed one of CC or Teixeira.
:confused: Santana is 11-8 on an awful Mets team and sporting a 3.12 ERA, which is his lifetime number (and an ERA+ better than any current Yankee starter). He's absolutely fine and is exactly what the Yanks need...another dominant starter. I have no faith that the current starting Yankee group as a whole can be consistent enough to win in the playoffs.

Besides, I thought you conceded some pages ago that it was, ultimately, pretty stupid of the Yanks to not pull the trigger when they did. Are you flip-flopping back, now?
1. Hes doing it in the NL. His WHIP is way up. Right now its his highest ERA since 2007 and then its his highest since 2001. Im not saying he sucks but it appears he is on a bit of a decline.2. Im not flip flopping. Im still undecided. I just wanted to hear what you thought as I still think its too early to determine. 2008 goes to the Santana side, 2009 is goin to the Hughes side.

 
cobalt_27 said:
jobarules said:
cobalt_27 said:
cobalt Id love to see your thoughts on the Santana for Hughes, Cabrera, & Kennedy non-trade now.
No different than before. Utterly ridiculous that we didn't make that deal because we didn't want to get rid of Kennedy. Did something change all of a sudden that I'm not aware of?

Hughes has been absolute $ of late, though. Great role for him so far.
Hughes has been dominant, Santana seems to be on the decline. And if they signed Santana they wouldnt have signed one of CC or Teixeira.
:thumbup: Santana is 11-8 on an awful Mets team and sporting a 3.12 ERA, which is his lifetime number (and an ERA+ better than any current Yankee starter). He's absolutely fine and is exactly what the Yanks need...another dominant starter. I have no faith that the current starting Yankee group as a whole can be consistent enough to win in the playoffs.

Besides, I thought you conceded some pages ago that it was, ultimately, pretty stupid of the Yanks to not pull the trigger when they did. Are you flip-flopping back, now?
1. Hes doing it in the NL. His WHIP is way up. Right now its his highest ERA since 2007 and then its his highest since 2001. Im not saying he sucks but it appears he is on a bit of a decline.2. Im not flip flopping. Im still undecided. I just wanted to hear what you thought as I still think its too early to determine. 2008 goes to the Santana side, 2009 is goin to the Hughes side.
Well, he's been ridiculously good in June and July in this limited (but important) role. I am very surprised and pleased by this development and hope it continues. That said, I'd still prefer Santana contributing his production over 120 innings compared to what Hughes has provided the last 2 months in 24 innings.It really shouldn't even be a question, imo.

 
Guys, let's circle the wagons here. No sense crying over spilled milk. The team is in first. They look good. They look like they could go deep in the playoffs. Let's just sit back and enjoy it.

 
cobalt Id love to see your thoughts on the Santana for Hughes, Cabrera, & Kennedy non-trade now.
No different than before. Utterly ridiculous that we didn't make that deal because we didn't want to get rid of Kennedy. Did something change all of a sudden that I'm not aware of?

Hughes has been absolute $ of late, though. Great role for him so far.
Hughes has been dominant, Santana seems to be on the decline. And if they signed Santana they wouldnt have signed one of CC or Teixeira.
:wall: Santana is 11-8 on an awful Mets team and sporting a 3.12 ERA, which is his lifetime number (and an ERA+ better than any current Yankee starter). He's absolutely fine and is exactly what the Yanks need...another dominant starter. I have no faith that the current starting Yankee group as a whole can be consistent enough to win in the playoffs.

Besides, I thought you conceded some pages ago that it was, ultimately, pretty stupid of the Yanks to not pull the trigger when they did. Are you flip-flopping back, now?
I know this was for Joba, but that is roughly a solid 3.5 ERA in the AL. I was good with making the trade, but I had a caveat because everyone said that Hughes threw 95 and all I saw was 92. I said if he really does throw 95 then I would be cautioned.Right now, I would have to say it still probably should have been done, but Hughes looks good and Melky has played and progressed as well as we could have hoped. Overall I don't think it was bad now, but that is hindsight and at the time I would have pulled the trigger.

Keep in mind, if we had Santana we most likely would not have one of the 3 big signings this year...

 
Written before the game last night...I just never sent it

I had a few people say that Pettitte was pitching well and they wouldn’t have blamed Girardi for leaving him in there…

Well I respectfully disagree strongly. He had pitched well, but after allowing 2 baserunners when he was getting tired, it was time to take him out. But, with a lefty up, Girardi stuck with Pettitte (which I agreed with). However, after a 9 pitch AB which was preceded by a 6 pitch walk, it was clearly time to come out. Two hits later before coming out was a bad mistake.

Now, take Sunday’s game. Hughes was doing a good job, but he allowed 2 baserunners and his pitch count was getting up there. Girardi smartly took Hughes out. He brought Bruney in, which was a reasonable move. After Bruney blew away Mark Ellis (a righty), Patterson (a lefty) was up. Girardi then went to Rivera. Now, in this case with the game on the line, I don’t have a huge problem going to Rivera as the 9th may never have a tough spot. But, why not just bring in Rivera with 1 out in the 8th then so that you have Bruney in case you need him? I don’t understand this bizarre infatuation Girardi has with 1 1/3 innings and Rivera can’t pitch more than that? I think the difference between pitching in two different innings is the most taxing issue followed by pitch count. The amount of outs is really not the issue as far as I am concerned. I guess I could understand if you had a specialist that you wanted to get one additional out and the matchup was great, but Bruney has been getting hit by righties this year and has been excellent against lefties. Yes, it worked (read the subject line to find out why), but what if Bruney allowed a single and the score was tied? What if Rivera got the last out in the 8th but it took 9 pitches like Pettitte did the previous night? My feeling is that if you want to bring in Rivera regardless of the outcome in the 8th inning then bring him in with one out and watch the pitch count. Either that or let Bruney close out the 8th inning. What if the Yanks scored 5 runs in the bottom of the 8th? Then you don’t need Rivera in the 9th (either way).

That being said Rivera was awesome. Ball moving like a wiffle ball yet he paints the corners. BTW, he threw 13 pitches to get 4 outs.

We had a Cody Ransom sighting yesterday. His very productive day was getting 2 doubles. This boosted his OPS all the way up to a very weak .615. But, at least he was productive for one of the few times this year.

Jeter had an odd day as he was the goat on a failed DP that he was slow in turning two and the guy was just safe. The inning continued and Coke allowed the 2 run homer after the failed DP. Then Jeter was a goat as he K’d with 2nd and 3rd and 1 out. Then Jeter came through with a single with 2nd and 3rd and one out and he was the hero. Then he got picked off. Finally, in the 7th Jeter was at the plate with 1st and 2nd with 2 outs and grounded out (not a goat but he could have helped the team out a lot with a hit there.)

Mitre was not sharp as he simply could not throw his breaking ball that had excellent movement for a strike. That made him a sinker and changeup pitcher and that won’t get it done for him.

Every Yankee had a hit yesterday!

Boston and TB lost and all is good again. Time to take 2 of 3 from TB!!!

 
Last edited by a moderator:
David Robertson has some pretty filthy stuff.
Well, he has a great curveball, but does not have good control of it. He also has a fastball with decent velocity, but it is straight as an arrow and his control is not great with it.If he can get his control down he will be an effective setup guy, but you could say that about a lot of pitchers. His curve does have excellent movement.
 
Ok, so what could they offer for Washburn, and how many years will they have him?

It'd be nice to get more than a half season rental. There's little chance Petitte comes back next year, so someone like Washburn would fit in nice with CC, AJ, Joba and Hughes.

 
Last night’s game was simply a disaster. We have our ace on the mound and they have a good pitcher who has been getting shelled; the looks of winning the series were in our favor. Instead the bats snooze, CC is wild and the defense was atrocious. This is one we just forget and move on.

At least Papelbon allowed 3 runs in the 9th and Oakland beat teh Red Sox in extra innings...almost makes it worth it.

BTW, on Monday night the announcers were praising Jeter about how much better he was at going to his left and on and on. I think Jeter has played as well as he has in many years, but their praise is unfounded. Jeter still has terrible range to his left and average at best range to his right and the reason is he simply gets terrible jumps on balls. Take any play up the middle and slow motion the view from behind home plate, Jeter does not move until the ball is past the pitcher. Conversely, Cano already has crossed over with his first step. I have watched 20 balls where the camera angle allows the correct view and it is consistent EVERY time.

The play they were praising was made because Jeter was shaded heavily up the middle; that is why he got there.

Again, Jeter may still have terrible range, but he is making the plays he gets to and I have no issue with the way he has played defense this year. I still don’t think he is good defensively, but he is playing as well as he possibly can.

I may not be posting for a week or 2...Hope everyone is well,

Peace

 
Last night's game was simply a disaster. We have our ace on the mound and they have a good pitcher who has been getting shelled; the looks of winning the series were in our favor. Instead the bats snooze, CC is wild and the defense was atrocious. This is one we just forget and move on.At least Papelbon allowed 3 runs in the 9th and Oakland beat teh Red Sox in extra innings...almost makes it worth it.BTW, on Monday night the announcers were praising Jeter about how much better he was at going to his left and on and on. I think Jeter has played as well as he has in many years, but their praise is unfounded. Jeter still has terrible range to his left and average at best range to his right and the reason is he simply gets terrible jumps on balls. Take any play up the middle and slow motion the view from behind home plate, Jeter does not move until the ball is past the pitcher. Conversely, Cano already has crossed over with his first step. I have watched 20 balls where the camera angle allows the correct view and it is consistent EVERY time. The play they were praising was made because Jeter was shaded heavily up the middle; that is why he got there.Again, Jeter may still have terrible range, but he is making the plays he gets to and I have no issue with the way he has played defense this year. I still don't think he is good defensively, but he is playing as well as he possibly can.I may not be posting for a week or 2...Hope everyone is well,Peace
We can both revel in Papeldouche blowing a save.For some reason, Kazmir has always given the Yankees fits. He was 5-4 with a 2.45 coming into tonight's start and Jeter was 4 for 31 lifetime against him, A-Rod 2 for 21 against him. Frankly, I don't get it. Meanwhile, Shields is now 1-7 with a 6.00 ERA career against the Yankees yet I would take Shields over Kazmir 8 days a week.
 
Anyone know why the Yanks are so hesitant to part with Austin Jackson? I know he's a huge prospect and they're trying to avoid depleting their farm system, but they could have really used either Washburn or Cliff Lee this season. Now it seems their AL competitors got better and they did squat.

The Tigers get Washburn.

The White Sox get Peavy.

The Red Sox got Martinez.

Is Jackson THAT valuable that they couldn't have packaged him in a trade for Cliff Lee?

What's their plans for this kid? Are they aiming to replace Damon next year to field a young, super speedy outfield (Gardner, Caberra and Jackson)?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Jackson for Washburn wouldve been a horrible trade for the Yankees. The Tigers didnt give up that much for Washburn. If they couldve gotten Lee for Jackson Im sure they wouldve done it.

 
Anyone know why the Yanks are so hesitant to part with Austin Jackson? I know he's a huge prospect and they're trying to avoid depleting their farm system, but they could have really used either Washburn or Cliff Lee this season. Now it seems their AL competitors got better and they did squat. The Tigers get Washburn.The White Sox get Peavy.The Red Sox got Martinez. Is Jackson THAT valuable that they couldn't have packaged him in a trade for Cliff Lee? What's their plans for this kid? Are they aiming to replace Damon next year to field a young, super speedy outfield (Gardner, Caberra and Jackson)?
The short answer is that they think he's the CFer of the future.
 
Ugggh... Two games with Toronto with horrible pitching matchups..

Why couldn't they trade Halladay to the National league.

Hoping to take 1 heading into the Boston series.

 
BTW, I killed Girardi at every turn earlier in the thread.

If I can criticize him when the team is playing poorly, I have to praise him when the team is playing well. Fair is fair.

:wub:

 
BTW, I killed Girardi at every turn earlier in the thread.If I can criticize him when the team is playing poorly, I have to praise him when the team is playing well. Fair is fair. :wub:
Sure, but he did make one puzzling move: Why did he only play Hughes for 1 out? It looks brilliant now because Hughes is now available for tomorrow's (today's) game. But at the time I thought it was a little short sighted. We were lucky we got the good Bruney tonight, and not his doofus evil twin with the erectile dysfunction.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top