It's February... they're dropping like flies.Missing a ton of weigh-ins for the week.
We are now past the point that is generally accepted as the resolution end point 2/6 more or less Super Bowl Monday.It's February... they're dropping like flies.
It'll be interesting to see who pays the charity money.It's February... they're dropping like flies.
We get itWe are now past the point that is generally accepted as the resolution end point 2/6 more or less Super Bowl Monday.
Half should be back at the start point by the end of the contest and 90%-100% some 6 to 12 months later. It's just simple biology.
so you're saying next year's contest is safe?We are now past the point that is generally accepted as the resolution end point 2/6 more or less Super Bowl Monday.
Half should be back at the start point by the end of the contest and 90%-100% some 6 to 12 months later. It's just simple biology.
It's simply IALALTE science*. Not really complicated.We get it
I was more commenting on his repeating postsIt's simply IALALTE science*. Not really complicated.
*I am lazy and like to eat.
That is called sweatJust went for a (slow) 2.75 mile run (hammy hurts for the last 6 months) and weighed myself. Down another 2.5lbs since last weigh in!
I wasnt really sweating that much but I do agree it was mostly due to that.That is called sweat
Congrats. That may be the break through you were looking for.Just went for a (slow) 2.75 mile run (hammy hurts for the last 6 months) and weighed myself. Down another 2.5lbs since last weigh in!
It appears it takes about 2 years to establish a new and firm set point for endocrine and hormonal factors like serotonin/leptin and others.@culdeus - is there a point in time that someone can move from the 90% to the 10%? Is there some type of physiological change given enough time?
I'm still not sure I even understand the numbers, so maybe start there? I know you've said this a few times (as Gator so eloquently told us) but I don't recall seeing any science behind it.
In addition to the $100 for charity we should have said something like everyone not in the top-5 has to use a topless selfie of themselves as their avatar for the rest of the year.I sense a weakening ITT. Maybe some more AAA selfies will get things going again?
Says the guy who hasn't weighed himself for two weeks and the last time he weighed in he went UP 1.2 lbs.Summer is coming. My wife looks fantastic. I look like a Volkswagen she could hide behind if we take fire.
Let's go do this.
Thanks man. 7 straight days working out hopefully was the trick to boost my metabolism. Cheat dinner coming on SaturdayCongrats. That may be the break through you were looking for.
So there's no such thing as discipline and self control?We are now past the point that is generally accepted as the resolution end point 2/6 more or less Super Bowl Monday.
Half should be back at the start point by the end of the contest and 90%-100% some 6 to 12 months later. It's just simple biology.
Great ideaIn addition to the $100 for charity we should have said something like everyone not in the top-5 has to use a topless selfie of themselves as their avatar for the rest of the year.
Discipline and self-control are finite resources. If you're relying on them to keep you healthy for the rest of your life, you're almost certain to fail.Charlie Harper said:So there's no such thing as discipline and self control?
Are you really say weight loss is genetic?
Why should the rest of the FFA be punished?AAABatteries said:In addition to the $100 for charity we should have said something like everyone not in the top-5 has to use a topless selfie of themselves as their avatar for the rest of the year.
There is some genetic expression to fat and muscle gain and loss. There are also environmental factors. Your environment can overrun your genetics.Charlie Harper said:So there's no such thing as discipline and self control?
Are you really say weight loss is genetic?
Why should the rest of the FFA be punished?
I believe this as well. It's extremely difficult to fight against your set points. And even the non-thermo based factors do have some foundation in testing. Not a ton, I'd say, but still the effects were measureable.There is some genetic expression to fat and muscle gain and loss. There are also environmental factors. Your environment can overrun your genetics.
There's enough evidence out there, both anecdotally and scientifically to say that the body finds a certain set point. That point is not nearly as fluid going down as going up. So a person that perhaps was 275 and now is 195 will have a set point to 275, and if in a calorie surplus will store fat more easily to get back to the same set point.
There seemingly are some factors that can help reset this, but they involve far too many variables for modern science to control long term. When they do figure this out I expect that:
- You can do cardio (or nothing) to cut, but you must do resistance training to maintain until you get your set point. This really isn't negotiable. Brah.
(Probably because this puts serotonin in balance better than cardio for a <setpoint individual)
[*]You can cut with whatever macros you want, but eating sugar below your set point will blow you up faster than thermo would suggest possible.
(Probably because it helps carry fat storage hormones over the blood brain barrier)
[*]Fasting, or at least carb fasting, every so often below set point is perhaps mandatory.
Who the #### knows why, it just seems to work. Seems maybe to affect leptin imbalance in <setpoint people. Dubious of this, but whatever.
Maybe it could be considered a warning of a sort where any future entrants into such a contest would know the ramifications for not taking it seriously. Kind of like sticking the heads of your enemies on poles on the borders of your land. Enter here and you may lose either your head or your dignity.Why should the rest of the FFA be punished?
Copy and paste error - it's fixed!Thanks,
BTW, I mentioned it a while back, but there is an error in the Biggest Weight Loss section in the formulas for 4th and 5th place.
If I win I'm just going to make Otis give his $100 to the Conservative Victory Fund. That's worse punishment.AAABatteries said:In addition to the $100 for charity we should have said something like everyone not in the top-5 has to use a topless selfie of themselves as their avatar for the rest of the year.
Gotcha. I agree with all of that. Pretty much watch what you eat and lift weights. The initial comment sounded as if genetics/biology is all that matters.There is some genetic expression to fat and muscle gain and loss. There are also environmental factors. Your environment can overrun your genetics.
There's enough evidence out there, both anecdotally and scientifically to say that the body finds a certain set point. That point is not nearly as fluid going down as going up. So a person that perhaps was 275 and now is 195 will have a set point to 275, and if in a calorie surplus will store fat more easily to get back to the same set point.
There seemingly are some factors that can help reset this, but they involve far too many variables for modern science to control long term. When they do figure this out I expect that:
- You can do cardio (or nothing) to cut, but you must do resistance training to maintain until you get your set point. This really isn't negotiable. Brah.
(Probably because this puts serotonin in balance better than cardio for a <setpoint individual)
[*]You can cut with whatever macros you want, but eating sugar below your set point will blow you up faster than thermo would suggest possible.
(Probably because it helps carry fat storage hormones over the blood brain barrier)
[*]Fasting, or at least carb fasting, every so often below set point is perhaps mandatory.
Who the #### knows why, it just seems to work. Seems maybe to affect leptin imbalance in <setpoint people. Dubious of this, but whatever.
I've only lost 5lbs so far this weekThis week has been tough so far - I'm still doing really good but it's been a struggle.
I've only lost 5lbs so far this week![]()
Here's a selfie.
You get used to it after a while.Hit shoulders and biceps today and did my 30 minutes of cardio. I am really hungry today and assume it is due to the heavy workouts yesterday and today. I keep chugging water to try to fill my stomach so I do not eat. The water is not helping with the hunger and is just making me have to pee every hour.
#######it so true.Says the guy who hasn't weighed himself for two weeks and the last time he weighed in he went UP 1.2 lbs.
You better reverse the trend or the wife may start looking for other options, divorce you, and take half your money to be with a younger version of you.
So either start hiding money, or start hiding food right now!
More about this pls.Been a very hectic couple weeks- sorry for my scarcity.
Did someone here recommend the Thin Slim bread products? They've been working really great for me. Not many diets allow mw to eat bagels with cream cheese and bacon and continue weight loss.
I spent 5 days at the Phoenix Open last week in the all you can eat/drink area. I've been pretty clean this week, but I've been afraid to come back into this thread, let alone step on a scale...#######it so true.
Been living in a hotel for two weeks. Home this weekend. Will post a damage report then.
Don't be a #### and post your weigh-in.I spent 5 days at the Phoenix Open last week in the all you can eat/drink area. I've been pretty clean this week, but I've been afraid to come back into this thread, let alone step on a scale...
If you are doing low carb, these things are a godsend.More about this pls.