What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Patriots being investigated after Colts game (9 Viewers)

Percent of NFL teams actively trying to steal play sheets?

  • 0%

    Votes: 90 33.0%
  • 25%

    Votes: 91 33.3%
  • 50%

    Votes: 19 7.0%
  • 75%

    Votes: 16 5.9%
  • 100%

    Votes: 57 20.9%

  • Total voters
    273
I'm beginning to think the Patriots are up to something
Welcome to the legacy bonfire.
Might as well throw the Colts into the mix too. Piping in artificial crowd noise, purposely cranking the heat up in the RCA dome, and let's not forget intentionally losing so they could draft Luck. You can't argue another team is cheating when your own team has done it themselves.
You're embarrassing yourself, quit it.
The only person who's embarrassing themselves is you and every other single salty hater in this thread. The NFL hasn't even confirmed that 11 out of 12 balls were underinflated, yet for some reason you're believing Mortenson..who's been wrong in the past. Talk about embarrassing!
ok, you're the one rooting for a cheating organization and the perception is nationwide. The Patriots will forever be tarnished in the yes of the public (minus the Northeast) and again, this is forever.
You mean the Patriots will forever be tarnished in the eyes of a select few haters on a fantasy football forum, Jets/Colts/Ravens fans, and the few "salty haters" in the NFL media such as Brunnel and Bettis..and they're all basing these cheating claims off Mortensons word, lol.
Seriously? I don't even think your fellow Pats Fans would agree with this. Patriots cheating and tarnished legacy is pretty much an Internet meme at this point. Every article you can find just about mentions some variant of "past cheating" , "bending the rules", etc.

And it's not just a few NFL media members, it's a whole laundry list of all kinds of media/members. I've seen articles in every kind of media, not just niche football fan stuff.

And of course, it's not just based on Mort's word. You're kind of deluded.

 
I'm calling cover-up
Nooooo ####, really?!! :lol;

We all knew this was coming from the moment you first posted in the thread... Absent some fantasyland suspension / picks package that was never, ever going to be handed down.
The NFL could have came out today with a live camera feed that was with the footballs the entire day and he would still would have said cover up.

 
The other possibilities are the Pats have only done it a short time or the refs aren't very competent.
Or they only do it for cold games when it's needed.
Or, the refs literally never check because its a literal non-issue.Literally.
If this were true, you'd think the NFL would come out and defend a mega star instead of letting him flop around in the wind against a media that has decided to take a stand against ball deflation.
And put the blame on the refs? Yeah right. The general public will forget/forgive a megastar for things like this, but if the public found out the refs might not be doing 110% of their job... that's bad. Not to mention the reaction speed for the NFL on any sort of PR nonsense is glacier-like.

 
all I'm gonna say is if I still lived in new england I'd trademark salty haters and market some kind of potato snack

:moneybag: :moneybag: :moneybag:

 
If they planned to inspect the balls at halftime, why didn't they inspect them at least thoroughly pregame? They could not have been alerted. The NFL would have made sure NE would NOT have tampered. Or at least they should have.

The Colts suspected it during the regular season and supposedly alerted officials before the game, and the league didn't notify NE? that is just dumb by the league. Way to go risk management.

Has it ever been discussed the concept of the balls coming out to the cold and then going back in? Where were they tested and at what temp? Does the up and down temp throw out scientific analysis? Like psi?

As far as we are being told the Indy balls measured within the threshold of psi. Could they be conceivably originally maxed out or even over maxed and now at bare minimum? Perhaps they went thru the same transformation but Luck likes his footballs like Rogers?

This sucks for Pats fans any way we slice it, My guess is there is no conclusive evidence by the NFL and they now will be strict with the testing.

Blah, whatever, I know its reaching. Either way the whole thing has ruined or at least cut down the fun for the Pat's fans. Mission accomplished.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Lol @ Brady claiming be didn't notice the balls were underinflated after playing with them for 2 quarters, yet D'Qwell Jackson noticed immediately after picking him off. These guys

are terrible liars.
http://m.espn.go.com/nfl/story?storyId=12213533
"I'm a linebacker, I'm a defensive guy," Jackson said. "If anybody recognized anything it definitely wouldn't come from me."
He called the fallout "comical."
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The other possibilities are the Pats have only done it a short time or the refs aren't very competent.
Or they only do it for cold games when it's needed.
Or, the refs literally never check because its a literal non-issue.Literally.
If this were true, you'd think the NFL would come out and defend a mega star instead of letting him flop around in the wind against a media that has decided to take a stand against ball deflation.
And put the blame on the refs? Yeah right. The general public will forget/forgive a megastar for things like this, but if the public found out the refs might not be doing 110% of their job... that's bad. Not to mention the reaction speed for the NFL on any sort of PR nonsense is glacier-like.
No chance the NFL throws the refs under the bus. Someone big at the Patriots is taking the fall for this. I'm sure the refs "know" things that the NFL doesn't want made public.

 
The other possibilities are the Pats have only done it a short time or the refs aren't very competent.
Or they only do it for cold games when it's needed.
Or, the refs literally never check because its a literal non-issue.Literally.
If this were true, you'd think the NFL would come out and defend a mega star instead of letting him flop around in the wind against a media that has decided to take a stand against ball deflation.
This is why you're having such difficulty here. You totally miss the point. The media isn't taking a stand against "ball deflation", they are taking a stand against cheating in sports. Everyone (well, almost everyone) wants a level playing field, even with the minutiae, at the margins of the rules, particularly at this level. Why is this so difficult to understand?

 
The other possibilities are the Pats have only done it a short time or the refs aren't very competent.
Or they only do it for cold games when it's needed.
Or, the refs literally never check because its a literal non-issue.Literally.
If this were true, you'd think the NFL would come out and defend a mega star instead of letting him flop around in the wind against a media that has decided to take a stand against ball deflation.
Ive been saying it for a few days now, I don't think they are gonna find anything condemning. They are taking the investigation as seriously as possible because of how much it blew up overnight and they don't want it to look like they are white washing the issue during a two week period where there will be no actual news.

 
Lol @ Brady claiming be didn't notice the balls were underinflated after playing with them for 2 quarters, yet D'Qwell Jackson noticed immediately after picking him off. These guys

are terrible liars.
http://m.espn.go.com/nfl/story?storyId=12213533
"I'm a linebacker, I'm a defensive guy," Jackson said. "If anybody recognized anything it definitely wouldn't come from me."
He called the fallout "comical."
lets not sweep this tid bit under the rug...the media had this guy being the whistleblower when in fact he never even noticed the ball feeling deflated in the first place ...this is HUGE

 
I see it's already been posted, but let's keep it going to give all of the "Salty Haters" a chance to come up with some new arguments.


Colts ILB D'Qwell Jackson says he didn't notice anything unusual about the ball he intercepted in Sunday's AFC Championship Game.
Jackson was rumored to be the reason the investigation started, but says that's not the case. "I definitely wouldn't be able to tell if one ball had less pressure than another," Jackson said. "It wouldn't have changed the outcome of the game. They outplayed us. ... I don't feel slighted at all personally." If only the rest of America shared Jackson's desire to move on.
 
Lol @ Brady claiming be didn't notice the balls were underinflated after playing with them for 2 quarters, yet D'Qwell Jackson noticed immediately after picking him off. These guys

are terrible liars.
http://m.espn.go.com/nfl/story?storyId=12213533
"I'm a linebacker, I'm a defensive guy," Jackson said. "If anybody recognized anything it definitely wouldn't come from me."
He called the fallout "comical."
lets not sweep this tid bit under the rug...the media had this guy being the whistleblower when in fact he never even noticed the ball feeling deflated in the first place ...this is HUGE
We've known this for days, when Kravitz originally made the claim from an 'unknown source' he also claimed that it was brought to their attention when D'qwell noticed it. D'qwell refuted pretty much immediately, I believe he even said so on Kravitz's show.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I see it's already been posted, but let's keep it going to give all of the "Salty Haters" a chance to come up with some new arguments.


Colts ILB D'Qwell Jackson says he didn't notice anything unusual about the ball he intercepted in Sunday's AFC Championship Game.
Jackson was rumored to be the reason the investigation started, but says that's not the case. "I definitely wouldn't be able to tell if one ball had less pressure than another," Jackson said. "It wouldn't have changed the outcome of the game. They outplayed us. ... I don't feel slighted at all personally." If only the rest of America shared Jackson's desire to move on.
it boils down to credibility and mis-information...both of which the media is on the wrong end of right now

 
So what do we even know for sure right now? We know the league has spoken to Belichick about this (and not Brady). Anything else? Is Mortinson's report all that this is going on?

 
Lol @ Brady claiming be didn't notice the balls were underinflated after playing with them for 2 quarters, yet D'Qwell Jackson noticed immediately after picking him off. These guys

are terrible liars.
http://m.espn.go.com/nfl/story?storyId=12213533
"I'm a linebacker, I'm a defensive guy," Jackson said. "If anybody recognized anything it definitely wouldn't come from me."
He called the fallout "comical."
lets not sweep this tid bit under the rug...the media had this guy being the whistleblower when in fact he never even noticed the ball feeling deflated in the first place ...this is HUGE
What's huge?

The pattern of cheating has been long established. Only a fool or fanatic could not see that.

And while some of us have a chance to throw a little bait onto the steaming pile of ugly truth and honesty here, the harsh reality is that much as I dislike the Steelers far more than the Pats, I still respect them (although the sideline thing was bs).

So please don't hide behind it's hating because of success. It's hating tainted success and with it, that much doubt and loss of faith in a sport we love.

 
Lol @ Brady claiming be didn't notice the balls were underinflated after playing with them for 2 quarters, yet D'Qwell Jackson noticed immediately after picking him off. These guys

are terrible liars.
http://m.espn.go.com/nfl/story?storyId=12213533
"I'm a linebacker, I'm a defensive guy," Jackson said. "If anybody recognized anything it definitely wouldn't come from me."
He called the fallout "comical."
lets not sweep this tid bit under the rug...the media had this guy being the whistleblower when in fact he never even noticed the ball feeling deflated in the first place ...this is HUGE
We've known this for days, when Kravitz originally made the claim from an 'unknown source' also claimed that it was brought to their attention when D'qwell noticed it. D'qwell refuted pretty much immediately, I believe he even said so on Kravitz's show.
who`s WE ? You have a mouse in your pocket? this is the first time its been brought up ...unless you can prove otherwise

 
I'm beginning to think the Patriots are up to something
Welcome to the legacy bonfire.
Might as well throw the Colts into the mix too. Piping in artificial crowd noise, purposely cranking the heat up in the RCA dome, and let's not forget intentionally losing so they could draft Luck. You can't argue another team is cheating when your own team has done it themselves.
You're embarrassing yourself, quit it.
The only person who's embarrassing themselves is you and every other single salty hater in this thread. The NFL hasn't even confirmed that 11 out of 12 balls were underinflated, yet for some reason you're believing Mortenson..who's been wrong in the past. Talk about embarrassing!
ok, you're the one rooting for a cheating organization and the perception is nationwide. The Patriots will forever be tarnished in the yes of the public (minus the Northeast) and again, this is forever.
You mean the Patriots will forever be tarnished in the eyes of a select few haters on a fantasy football forum, Jets/Colts/Ravens fans, and the few "salty haters" in the NFL media such as Brunnel and Bettis..and they're all basing these cheating claims off Mortensons word, lol.
And of course, it's not just based on Mort's word. You're kind of deluded.
Really huh? So where's all the other proof then?

 
Lol @ Brady claiming be didn't notice the balls were underinflated after playing with them for 2 quarters, yet D'Qwell Jackson noticed immediately after picking him off. These guys

are terrible liars.
http://m.espn.go.com/nfl/story?storyId=12213533
Yeah that should shut everybody up. Another example of something we assumed was a "fact of the case" that turns out to be untrue.

For those that don't read links, DQwell said he never noticed the difference in air pressure in the ball he intercepted.

 
What instrument did they originally use to determine the balls were at 12.5 psi?

What instrument did they use to determine the balls were at 10psi?

What is the accuracy of both of the instruments? if you are familiar with gauges, the error is more than you might think.

At what temperature did they use to measure the psi on the ball?

How much can psi change throughout the course of a day, including a football game?

These things could all easily lead to more than a net change in psi than what occurred in the Pats/Colts game.

 
Lol @ Brady claiming be didn't notice the balls were underinflated after playing with them for 2 quarters, yet D'Qwell Jackson noticed immediately after picking him off. These guys

are terrible liars.
http://m.espn.go.com/nfl/story?storyId=12213533
"I'm a linebacker, I'm a defensive guy," Jackson said. "If anybody recognized anything it definitely wouldn't come from me."
He called the fallout "comical."
lets not sweep this tid bit under the rug...the media had this guy being the whistleblower when in fact he never even noticed the ball feeling deflated in the first place ...this is HUGE
We've known this for days, when Kravitz originally made the claim from an 'unknown source' he also claimed that it was brought to their attention when D'qwell noticed it. D'qwell refuted pretty much immediately, I believe he even said so on Kravitz's show.
I don't recall seeing this once in this thread. If I'm wrong, fine. But people have been running with the "DQwell noticed it but brady and the refs didnt" line all day long.

 
I see it's already been posted, but let's keep it going to give all of the "Salty Haters" a chance to come up with some new arguments.

Colts ILB D'Qwell Jackson says he didn't notice anything unusual about the ball he intercepted in Sunday's AFC Championship Game.

Jackson was rumored to be the reason the investigation started, but says that's not the case. "I definitely wouldn't be able to tell if one ball had less pressure than another," Jackson said. "It wouldn't have changed the outcome of the game. They outplayed us. ... I don't feel slighted at all personally." If only the rest of America shared Jackson's desire to move on.
it boils down to credibility and mis-information...both of which the media is on the wrong end of right now
1. The Patriots and "credibility" are long lost. Regardless where you think the team is in the Pantheon of great franchises.

2. Deflated balls is NOT the reason the Pats won. That is hardly disputable in fact. They destroyed the Colts. Which makes it that much more infuriating that they may have (probably did in historical context) cheated. Goes back to my Nixon scenario.

 
I'm calling cover-up
Nooooo ####, really?!! :lol;

We all knew this was coming from the moment you first posted in the thread... Absent some fantasyland suspension / picks package that was never, ever going to be handed down.
The NFL could have came out today with a live camera feed that was with the footballs the entire day and he would still would have said cover up.
Again, not really. You guys are comical in your desperate circling of the wagons. There's reasonable precedent to expect "cover-up" based on the league response to Spy-Gate. Media was almost unanimous in complaining about the lack of transparency in that case.

Then add in their handling of the Ray Rice thing and the supposed "independent" investigation (lead by a former FBI director who apparently was the lead lawyer for the law firm that negotiated the league's last TV contract) and I'd say it's completely reasonable to expect a "cover-up" to some degree at least. They will do anything to protect the brand, it's just a question of what they judge their best response to be based on cost-benefit, which I guess will have only incidental relationship to the truth.

 
What instrument did they originally use to determine the balls were at 12.5 psi?

What instrument did they use to determine the balls were at 10psi?

What is the accuracy of both of the instruments? if you are familiar with gauges, the error is more than you might think.

At what temperature did they use to measure the psi on the ball?

How much can psi change throughout the course of a day, including a football game?

These things could all easily lead to more than a net change in psi than what occurred in the Pats/Colts game.
The NFL has some of these answers and still hasn't given us a timeline, which is quite unbelievable. There are only four or five facts that need to be known, and they all could have been established Monday.

 
We've known this for days, when Kravitz originally made the claim from an 'unknown source' also claimed that it was brought to their attention when D'qwell noticed it. D'qwell refuted pretty much immediately, I believe he even said so on Kravitz's show.
who`s WE ? You have a mouse in your pocket? this is the first time its been brought up ...unless you can prove otherwise
From page 29 of this thread, I only posted it cause I had heard from like 20 different places that he denied the rumor that he brought it to anyones attention.

So, D'Qwell Jackson said that he didn't report anything to anyone and noticed no difference. Harbaww said he has no idea what people are talking about in regards to balls. Justin Tucker has said he noticed absolutely nothing about the K-balls.

So, seriously, who the #### is the source of these rumors?
 
I'm calling cover-up
Nooooo ####, really?!! :lol;We all knew this was coming from the moment you first posted in the thread... Absent some fantasyland suspension / picks package that was never, ever going to be handed down.
The NFL could have came out today with a live camera feed that was with the footballs the entire day and he would still would have said cover up.
Again, not really. You guys are comical in your desperate circling of the wagons. There's reasonable precedent to expect "cover-up" based on the league response to Spy-Gate. Media was almost unanimous in complaining about the lack of transparency in that case.Then add in their handling of the Ray Rice thing and the supposed "independent" investigation (lead by a former FBI director who apparently was the lead lawyer for the law firm that negotiated the league's last TV contract) and I'd say it's completely reasonable to expect a "cover-up" to some degree at least. They will do anything to protect the brand, it's just a question of what they judge their best response to be based on cost-benefit, which I guess will have only incidental relationship to the truth.
If they wanted to protect their brand, they could have easily killed the story Monday.

 
2. Deflated balls is NOT the reason the Pats won. That is hardly disputable in fact. They destroyed the Colts. Which makes it that much more infuriating that they may have (probably did in historical context) cheated. Goes back to my Nixon scenario.
Right, but the question then is did they do it in other games too. They beat the Ravens by 4 the week before. What if they did it in that game? There are rumors flying around that both the Colts and Ravens had noticed it prior to the AFC Championship game. Not sure those are fact yet, but if they become as much then that's a pretty big deal. Who knows how far back it goes.

 
I see it's already been posted, but let's keep it going to give all of the "Salty Haters" a chance to come up with some new arguments.

Colts ILB D'Qwell Jackson says he didn't notice anything unusual about the ball he intercepted in Sunday's AFC Championship Game.

Jackson was rumored to be the reason the investigation started, but says that's not the case. "I definitely wouldn't be able to tell if one ball had less pressure than another," Jackson said. "It wouldn't have changed the outcome of the game. They outplayed us. ... I don't feel slighted at all personally." If only the rest of America shared Jackson's desire to move on.
it boils down to credibility and mis-information...both of which the media is on the wrong end of right now
1. The Patriots and "credibility" are long lost. Regardless where you think the team is in the Pantheon of great franchises.

2. Deflated balls is NOT the reason the Pats won. That is hardly disputable in fact. They destroyed the Colts. Which makes it that much more infuriating that they may have (probably did in historical context) cheated. Goes back to my Nixon scenario.
well it seems to me that the only people making a bigger deal out of this is the haters ...the actual players on the colts team dont have any issues with this whole stupid deflategate crap and they should be the only ones who should

 
I'm calling cover-up
Nooooo ####, really?!! :lol;

We all knew this was coming from the moment you first posted in the thread... Absent some fantasyland suspension / picks package that was never, ever going to be handed down.
The NFL could have came out today with a live camera feed that was with the footballs the entire day and he would still would have said cover up.
Again, not really. You guys are comical in your desperate circling of the wagons. There's reasonable precedent to expect "cover-up" based on the league response to Spy-Gate. Media was almost unanimous in complaining about the lack of transparency in that case.

Then add in their handling of the Ray Rice thing and the supposed "independent" investigation (lead by a former FBI director who apparently was the lead lawyer for the law firm that negotiated the league's last TV contract) and I'd say it's completely reasonable to expect a "cover-up" to some degree at least. They will do anything to protect the brand, it's just a question of what they judge their best response to be based on cost-benefit, which I guess will have only incidental relationship to the truth.
Except right now there's nothing to cover up. :shrug:

 
We've known this for days, when Kravitz originally made the claim from an 'unknown source' also claimed that it was brought to their attention when D'qwell noticed it. D'qwell refuted pretty much immediately, I believe he even said so on Kravitz's show.
who`s WE ? You have a mouse in your pocket? this is the first time its been brought up ...unless you can prove otherwise
From page 29 of this thread, I only posted it cause I had heard from like 20 different places that he denied the rumor that he brought it to anyones attention.

So, D'Qwell Jackson said that he didn't report anything to anyone and noticed no difference. Harbaww said he has no idea what people are talking about in regards to balls. Justin Tucker has said he noticed absolutely nothing about the K-balls.

So, seriously, who the #### is the source of these rumors?
well you`re the only one to mention it...seems it got swept away by all the crazy cheaters talk

 
We've known this for days, when Kravitz originally made the claim from an 'unknown source' also claimed that it was brought to their attention when D'qwell noticed it. D'qwell refuted pretty much immediately, I believe he even said so on Kravitz's show.
who`s WE ? You have a mouse in your pocket? this is the first time its been brought up ...unless you can prove otherwise
From page 29 of this thread, I only posted it cause I had heard from like 20 different places that he denied the rumor that he brought it to anyones attention.

So, D'Qwell Jackson said that he didn't report anything to anyone and noticed no difference. Harbaww said he has no idea what people are talking about in regards to balls. Justin Tucker has said he noticed absolutely nothing about the K-balls.

So, seriously, who the #### is the source of these rumors?
well you`re the only one to mention it...seems it got swept away by all the crazy cheaters talk
Yeah thats what happens when reports from unnamed sources are touted as facts.

 
Lol @ Brady claiming be didn't notice the balls were underinflated after playing with them for 2 quarters, yet D'Qwell Jackson noticed immediately after picking him off. These guys

are terrible liars.
http://m.espn.go.com/nfl/story?storyId=12213533
"I'm a linebacker, I'm a defensive guy," Jackson said. "If anybody recognized anything it definitely wouldn't come from me."
He called the fallout "comical."
lets not sweep this tid bit under the rug...the media had this guy being the whistleblower when in fact he never even noticed the ball feeling deflated in the first place ...this is HUGE
What's huge?

The pattern of cheating has been long established. Only a fool or fanatic could not see that.

And while some of us have a chance to throw a little bait onto the steaming pile of ugly truth and honesty here, the harsh reality is that much as I dislike the Steelers far more than the Pats, I still respect them (although the sideline thing was bs).

So please don't hide behind it's hating because of success. It's hating tainted success and with it, that much doubt and loss of faith in a sport we love.
you mean that thing where tomlin tried to tackle a guy on the field?

what's wrong with that?

not like the football was 10% underinflated

 
I see it's already been posted, but let's keep it going to give all of the "Salty Haters" a chance to come up with some new arguments.

Colts ILB D'Qwell Jackson says he didn't notice anything unusual about the ball he intercepted in Sunday's AFC Championship Game.

Jackson was rumored to be the reason the investigation started, but says that's not the case. "I definitely wouldn't be able to tell if one ball had less pressure than another," Jackson said. "It wouldn't have changed the outcome of the game. They outplayed us. ... I don't feel slighted at all personally." If only the rest of America shared Jackson's desire to move on.
it boils down to credibility and mis-information...both of which the media is on the wrong end of right now
1. The Patriots and "credibility" are long lost. Regardless where you think the team is in the Pantheon of great franchises.2. Deflated balls is NOT the reason the Pats won. That is hardly disputable in fact. They destroyed the Colts. Which makes it that much more infuriating that they may have (probably did in historical context) cheated. Goes back to my Nixon scenario.
well it seems to me that the only people making a bigger deal out of this is the haters ...the actual players on the colts team dont have any issues with this whole stupid deflategate crap and they should be the only ones who should
Just about any other team and this isn't a big deal. it's an issue and kinda bs but hey, #### happen.

A repeated history of organisational level, coordinated cheating?

Pats have forever lost any benefit of a doubt and, unfortunately, their success, great as it is, will always be looked at with the *

 
2. Deflated balls is NOT the reason the Pats won. That is hardly disputable in fact. They destroyed the Colts. Which makes it that much more infuriating that they may have (probably did in historical context) cheated. Goes back to my Nixon scenario.
Right, but the question then is did they do it in other games too. They beat the Ravens by 4 the week before. What if they did it in that game? There are rumors flying around that both the Colts and Ravens had noticed it prior to the AFC Championship game. Not sure those are fact yet, but if they become as much then that's a pretty big deal. Who knows how far back it goes.
noticed it but never said anything, thereby letting the pats keep this tremendous advantage which led to a 4 point win

ok

 
The pattern of cheating has been long established. Only a fool or fanatic could not see that.
I don't want to rehash this whole ridiculous thread, but what pattern are you talking about? A pattern would require at least 2 and generally 3 incidents. What "cheating" episodes are you referring to except Spygate (which was really rule-breaking more than cheating)?

 
The hard-on that the media has for this story is both hilarious and appalling.

I mean, I guess they are probably making a lot of money right now... maybe we should think critically about these stories that they are running?

Nah, #### it. CHEATERS

:no:

 
People should wait for the facts and the investigation. 2.5 psi isn't ####. The NFL is so outdated on so many levels I wouldn't be surprised if they were using a psi gauge from an Autozone. You guys are complaining about air pressure in a ball and we measure first downs with sticks and chains and an old man who looks drunk trying to walk the ball down the field in a straight line. Really?

 
I see it's already been posted, but let's keep it going to give all of the "Salty Haters" a chance to come up with some new arguments.


Colts ILB D'Qwell Jackson says he didn't notice anything unusual about the ball he intercepted in Sunday's AFC Championship Game.
Jackson was rumored to be the reason the investigation started, but says that's not the case. "I definitely wouldn't be able to tell if one ball had less pressure than another," Jackson said. "It wouldn't have changed the outcome of the game. They outplayed us. ... I don't feel slighted at all personally." If only the rest of America shared Jackson's desire to move on.
it boils down to credibility and mis-information...both of which the media is on the wrong end of right now
It doesn't matter what Jackson said, the balls were deflated, 11 out of 12 of them. Nothing he said changes that and the question here is how did 11 out 12 of them get deflated?

 
People should wait for the facts and the investigation. 2.5 psi isn't ####. The NFL is so outdated on so many levels I wouldn't be surprised if they were using a psi gauge from an Autozone. You guys are complaining about air pressure in a ball and we measure first downs with sticks and chains and an old man who looks drunk trying to walk the ball down the field in a straight line. Really?
I've always wondered how they KNOW the first down markers are exactly ten yards. It seems like such guesswork, and is even funnier when they go to "instant replay".

 
I see it's already been posted, but let's keep it going to give all of the "Salty Haters" a chance to come up with some new arguments.


Colts ILB D'Qwell Jackson says he didn't notice anything unusual about the ball he intercepted in Sunday's AFC Championship Game.
Jackson was rumored to be the reason the investigation started, but says that's not the case. "I definitely wouldn't be able to tell if one ball had less pressure than another," Jackson said. "It wouldn't have changed the outcome of the game. They outplayed us. ... I don't feel slighted at all personally." If only the rest of America shared Jackson's desire to move on.
it boils down to credibility and mis-information...both of which the media is on the wrong end of right now
It doesn't matter what Jackson said, the balls were deflated, 11 out of 12 of them. Nothing he said changes that and the question here is how did 11 out 12 of them get deflated?
Wasnt it estblished yesterday that Jackson wasnt the main source of this? Please people, try to keep up.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top