i'm sitting rivers and starting big ben against cleveland.I dont think he's reached "unsittable status" yet... that being said, anyone sitting him against the Bears this week and if so for who?
By a PowerBall ticket, too. Good luck!I'm starting Rex vs. SD over Rivers vs. Chicago. That's right, I said Rex. Let the jokes begin...I'll be back Monday to take it like a man, or make sure you all know I was right.
Rivers and Mcnabb aren't in the same class of fantasy qb's. Why would you be playing the matchups with those two? If you have Mcnabb, you start him every week over Rivers all the time.Starting McNabb over Rivers. And I will do so next week as well.Week 1Phil @ Green BaySan Diego vs ChicagoWeek 2Phil vs WashSan Diego vs New EnglandObviously, this isn't to say that Rivers isn't worth starting. I just like my match-ups better with McNabb these first two weeks. After that, Rivers sees far better match-ups and I will probably be starting him 4-5 weeks in a row.
I personally had Rivers ranked 2 spots ahead of Mcnabb during my drafts this year. I most certainly think they are close enough to play matchups with.Rivers and Mcnabb aren't in the same class of fantasy qb's. Why would you be playing the matchups with those two? If you have Mcnabb, you start him every week over Rivers all the time.Starting McNabb over Rivers. And I will do so next week as well.
Week 1
Phil @ Green Bay
San Diego vs Chicago
Week 2
Phil vs Wash
San Diego vs New England
Obviously, this isn't to say that Rivers isn't worth starting. I just like my match-ups better with McNabb these first two weeks. After that, Rivers sees far better match-ups and I will probably be starting him 4-5 weeks in a row.
I was aware of this, but what can you do really? In certain drafts you almost have to pick him if he drops to you.I figured the LT factor (attention he draws + redzone opportunities) would offset the difficult schedule at least somewhat.Philip Rivers has a TERRIBLE schedule..... I tried to tell everyone....I hope you have other options - seriously.Good luck.
It may not be as obvious as you think. Check out Rivers vs McNabb in the experts rankings.... then compare those rankings to QB cheetsheet for week #1. Very interesting imo. Not saying I agree with it, I just found it interesting. So then I thought "Well, maybe Dodds just loves Rivers and/or hates McNabb so I look at his season projections on both. Still don't get it.Can you make heads or tales of it MT???? What's your best guess to explain the difference?In general, I'll be starting him in leagues where he's my QB1 and sitting him in leagues where he's my QB2. I'll start McNabb or Manning over him, for example, but I'll start Rivers over Jeff Garcia. I guess that's kind of obvious, but those are examples from my own teams. I don't have any close calls involving Rivers.
I've got the same two QB's but I've got PR in my lineup. Ben hasn't had much success against Cleveland in the past so I figure it's a wash but I like River's chances better.i'm sitting rivers and starting big ben against cleveland.I dont think he's reached "unsittable status" yet... that being said, anyone sitting him against the Bears this week and if so for who?
Chargers havent been held under 20 at home in 3 years, just something to think about.Peyton - Rivers
Campbell - Rivers
Kitna - Rivers
Big Ben - Rivers
I like Rivers this year, despite a tough schedule. Without Marty's conservative offense, and LT being the focus of opposing D's, Rivers should have pretty good year, in now his second full season. However, I see a low scoring game in SD this week, and my only close call was Kitna vs. Rivers, but as much hype as Oakland's pass D gets, they are not nearly as good as the Bears.
Sidenote: Chargers/Bears under 44 is a gimmie this week, Chargers win 16-10.
Out of curiosity, what scoring system does your league use?I personally had Rivers ranked 2 spots ahead of Mcnabb during my drafts this year. I most certainly think they are close enough to play matchups with.Rivers and Mcnabb aren't in the same class of fantasy qb's. Why would you be playing the matchups with those two? If you have Mcnabb, you start him every week over Rivers all the time.Starting McNabb over Rivers. And I will do so next week as well.
Week 1
Phil @ Green Bay
San Diego vs Chicago
Week 2
Phil vs Wash
San Diego vs New England
Obviously, this isn't to say that Rivers isn't worth starting. I just like my match-ups better with McNabb these first two weeks. After that, Rivers sees far better match-ups and I will probably be starting him 4-5 weeks in a row.
Regardless of love for one player and/or hate for another, those rankings don't match the reality of what's happened on the field during Rivers's short career. I'm not going to say that he can't be better, only that I wouldn't bet on it until it happens at least once(say, for a year).It may not be as obvious as you think. Check out Rivers vs McNabb in the experts rankings.... then compare those rankings to QB cheetsheet for week #1. Very interesting imo. Not saying I agree with it, I just found it interesting. So then I thought "Well, maybe Dodds just loves Rivers and/or hates McNabb so I look at his season projections on both. Still don't get it.Can you make heads or tales of it MT???? What's your best guess to explain the difference?In general, I'll be starting him in leagues where he's my QB1 and sitting him in leagues where he's my QB2. I'll start McNabb or Manning over him, for example, but I'll start Rivers over Jeff Garcia. I guess that's kind of obvious, but those are examples from my own teams. I don't have any close calls involving Rivers.
Are you still spouting this stuff?Philip Rivers has a TERRIBLE schedule..... I tried to tell everyone....I hope you have other options - seriously.Good luck.
Different systems, different leagues. After looking back, it appears i had Rivers only one spot ahead of Mcnabb, i moved Big Ben ahead of Rivers towards the end. For the record, i had Mcnabb ranked 8.Out of curiosity, what scoring system does your league use?I personally had Rivers ranked 2 spots ahead of Mcnabb during my drafts this year. I most certainly think they are close enough to play matchups with.Rivers and Mcnabb aren't in the same class of fantasy qb's. Why would you be playing the matchups with those two? If you have Mcnabb, you start him every week over Rivers all the time.Starting McNabb over Rivers. And I will do so next week as well.
Week 1
Phil @ Green Bay
San Diego vs Chicago
Week 2
Phil vs Wash
San Diego vs New England
Obviously, this isn't to say that Rivers isn't worth starting. I just like my match-ups better with McNabb these first two weeks. After that, Rivers sees far better match-ups and I will probably be starting him 4-5 weeks in a row.
While i didnt know this info specifically, i still stick by my prediction. I do have them scoring four times, but i think the Bears play good enough bend dont break Defense to keep the score close. The Grossman factor scares me a bit in my prediction, he could easily give the Chargers 21 points himself, but i dont see any way the Bears score more than 10, so the under 44 is a LOCK!!!!Chargers havent been held under 20 at home in 3 years, just something to think about.Peyton - Rivers
Campbell - Rivers
Kitna - Rivers
Big Ben - Rivers
I like Rivers this year, despite a tough schedule. Without Marty's conservative offense, and LT being the focus of opposing D's, Rivers should have pretty good year, in now his second full season. However, I see a low scoring game in SD this week, and my only close call was Kitna vs. Rivers, but as much hype as Oakland's pass D gets, they are not nearly as good as the Bears.
Sidenote: Chargers/Bears under 44 is a gimmie this week, Chargers win 16-10.
Interesting.Different systems, different leagues. After looking back, it appears i had Rivers only one spot ahead of Mcnabb, i moved Big Ben ahead of Rivers towards the end. For the record, i had Mcnabb ranked 8.Out of curiosity, what scoring system does your league use?I personally had Rivers ranked 2 spots ahead of Mcnabb during my drafts this year. I most certainly think they are close enough to play matchups with.Rivers and Mcnabb aren't in the same class of fantasy qb's. Why would you be playing the matchups with those two? If you have Mcnabb, you start him every week over Rivers all the time.Starting McNabb over Rivers. And I will do so next week as well.
Week 1
Phil @ Green Bay
San Diego vs Chicago
Week 2
Phil vs Wash
San Diego vs New England
Obviously, this isn't to say that Rivers isn't worth starting. I just like my match-ups better with McNabb these first two weeks. After that, Rivers sees far better match-ups and I will probably be starting him 4-5 weeks in a row.
FWIW, Rivers is projected by me as well to have the hardest schedule this year.http://subscribers.footballguys.com/2007/07stuart_1qbbc.phpAre you still spouting this stuff?Philip Rivers has a TERRIBLE schedule..... I tried to tell everyone....
I hope you have other options - seriously.
Good luck.Rivers had the 10th hardest QB schedule last year. See Chase's rearview QB article for details. Then check out Clayton Gray's SOS, which shows Rivers' schedule as marginally (2.3%) easier this season.
C'mon, you're just throwing softballs. I know you have better stuff. I mean, you aren't ranking him as QB21 just based on this, right?![]()
Meanwhile, I predict Rivers will have a good performance this week.
JP Losman?FWIW, Rivers is projected by me as well to have the hardest schedule this year.http://subscribers.footballguys.com/2007/07stuart_1qbbc.phpAre you still spouting this stuff?Philip Rivers has a TERRIBLE schedule..... I tried to tell everyone....
I hope you have other options - seriously.
Good luck.Rivers had the 10th hardest QB schedule last year. See Chase's rearview QB article for details. Then check out Clayton Gray's SOS, which shows Rivers' schedule as marginally (2.3%) easier this season.
C'mon, you're just throwing softballs. I know you have better stuff. I mean, you aren't ranking him as QB21 just based on this, right?![]()
Meanwhile, I predict Rivers will have a good performance this week.
And it's not really close. He's easily got the hardest schedule. The toughest six teams for QBs to face (according to my projections) are Jacksonville, Oakland, New England, Chicago, Denver and Baltimore. Rivers faces those teams EIGHT times this year. That's ridiculously tough. I expect Rivers to be average at best in most of those games.
Ditto for me. I'm really thinking that Big Ben has a chance at a very big year this year and I might wind up starting him more than I intended to on draft day.i'm sitting rivers and starting big ben against cleveland.
Starting Rivers against the Bears with confidence. Expecting ~ 230 yards and 2 TDs (Gates and VJax).
Did the same thing .. but got Matt Hasselbeck instead ov er Leinart.I used my top picks to build depth, and drafted both Rivers and Leinart later in the draft. If you go down the schedule, you can tenatively find a great matchup for each almost every week. This is my pre-season plan for Weeks 1-16...obviously performance, and how opposing teams do in reality can/will alter it as the season progresses. -Leinart vs. San Francisco-Leinart vs. Seattle-Rivers vs. Green Bay -Rivers vs. Kansas City-Leinart vs. St. Louis-Rivers vs. Oakland-Leinart vs. Washington-Rivers vs. Houston-Rivers vs. Minnesota-Leinart vs. Detroit (Rivers plays Indy, so both are good matchups)-Leinart vs. Cincinnati-Leinart vs. San Francisco-Leinart vs. Cleveland (Rivers plays Kansas City, so both are good)-Rivers vs. Tennessee-Rivers vs. Detroit (Leinart plays New Orleans, so both are good)-Leinart vs. AtlantaPretty sweet matchups each week, save maybe one or two.
I had McNabb ranked 2 spots higher (at QB6) than Rivers, but think that is statistically close enough to play the match-ups. Especially if McNabb isn't as mobile in the first few games or all season.I personally had Rivers ranked 2 spots ahead of Mcnabb during my drafts this year. I most certainly think they are close enough to play matchups with.Rivers and Mcnabb aren't in the same class of fantasy qb's. Why would you be playing the matchups with those two? If you have Mcnabb, you start him every week over Rivers all the time.Starting McNabb over Rivers. And I will do so next week as well.
Week 1
Phil @ Green Bay
San Diego vs Chicago
Week 2
Phil vs Wash
San Diego vs New England
Obviously, this isn't to say that Rivers isn't worth starting. I just like my match-ups better with McNabb these first two weeks. After that, Rivers sees far better match-ups and I will probably be starting him 4-5 weeks in a row.
I've got both as well and I'm going with Leinart. I just think it's a better matchup, but you never know......I also have Leinart and Rivers, but I'm starting Rivers. Though by not much. Are you really Starting Leinart week 1?
This is interesting, but I don't think it's cut and dry that it's a negative for Rivers. The last thing his owners want is blow-out after blow-out in which all they see is Rivers handing off to LT and Turner throughout the 2nd half.Last year Rivers had 273 passing attempts in the first half compared with 219 in the 2nd half. That's probably not that unusual, but more interestingly, when the Chargers were in front, he threw just 8 TDs (from 217 passes, 4 ints) whereas when they were behind he threw 10 TDs from just 158 attempts with only 2 ints.FWIW, Rivers is projected by me as well to have the hardest schedule this year.http://subscribers.footballguys.com/2007/07stuart_1qbbc.phpAre you still spouting this stuff?Philip Rivers has a TERRIBLE schedule..... I tried to tell everyone....
I hope you have other options - seriously.
Good luck.Rivers had the 10th hardest QB schedule last year. See Chase's rearview QB article for details. Then check out Clayton Gray's SOS, which shows Rivers' schedule as marginally (2.3%) easier this season.
C'mon, you're just throwing softballs. I know you have better stuff. I mean, you aren't ranking him as QB21 just based on this, right?![]()
Meanwhile, I predict Rivers will have a good performance this week.
And it's not really close. He's easily got the hardest schedule. The toughest six teams for QBs to face (according to my projections) are Jacksonville, Oakland, New England, Chicago, Denver and Baltimore. Rivers faces those teams EIGHT times this year. That's ridiculously tough. I expect Rivers to be average at best in most of those games.
I'm going with Rivers over Cutler as well.I'm starting him over Cutler and Losman.
I also have Schaub as my other option. While I like his chances vs KC, he has never started a game for the Texans. I just can't do it in Week 1 w/o seeing him in a meaningful game first.I had thought of him as unsittable, but now I'm wondering. My other option is Schaub against the shoddy KC D.
Great, one more fantasy headache.......![]()
The only way it doesn't work out is if Leinart just flat out takes some steps backwards in his development this season. Because, on paper, it's hard to ignore that matchup with the 49ers, considering the weapons he has. Especially with Rivers vs. Chicago, which is just way too tough to get a handle on, especially Week 1.Dodge said:Did a little research on stats and have switched. Starting Leinart over Rivers.
If it's a league where you get negative points for fumbles and interceptions, then it's a no-brainer. Eli is atrocious.I think I'll be starting Rivers over Eli.