What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Phillip Rivers Owners (1 Viewer)

Gbagzz

Footballguy
I dont think he's reached "unsittable status" yet... that being said, anyone sitting him against the Bears this week and if so for who?

 
In general, I'll be starting him in leagues where he's my QB1 and sitting him in leagues where he's my QB2. I'll start McNabb or Manning over him, for example, but I'll start Rivers over Jeff Garcia. I guess that's kind of obvious, but those are examples from my own teams. I don't have any close calls involving Rivers.

 
I'd sit him if you've got a decent QB with a good matchup. Bears are rough, especially if you're not getting lots of garbage points against them (I doubt SD will be losing by 3 TDs in the 4th quarter).

 
I'm starting Rex vs. SD over Rivers vs. Chicago. That's right, I said Rex. Let the jokes begin...I'll be back Monday to take it like a man, or make sure you all know I was right.

 
Starting McNabb over Rivers. And I will do so next week as well.

Week 1

Phil @ Green Bay

San Diego vs Chicago

Week 2

Phil vs Wash

San Diego vs New England

Obviously, this isn't to say that Rivers isn't worth starting. I just like my match-ups better with McNabb these first two weeks. After that, Rivers sees far better match-ups and I will probably be starting him 4-5 weeks in a row.

 
Philip Rivers has a TERRIBLE schedule..... I tried to tell everyone....

I hope you have other options - seriously.

Good luck.

 
I have benched Rivers in the 2 leagues I'm playing. I am starting VY in place of him in both leagues.

I 'waited' on QB in my 2 $ leagues, I don't think this tandem will hurt me, yet week 1..... :shrug:

 
Starting Leinart in place of Rivers this week...although I do think the Chargers could utterly destroy the Bears this week. Something to the tune of Chargers 31, Bears 13. Will it be LT running em in, or Rivers throwing for 2-3 TD's? I am letting Leinart take the guess work out of it.

 
Starting McNabb over Rivers. And I will do so next week as well.Week 1Phil @ Green BaySan Diego vs ChicagoWeek 2Phil vs WashSan Diego vs New EnglandObviously, this isn't to say that Rivers isn't worth starting. I just like my match-ups better with McNabb these first two weeks. After that, Rivers sees far better match-ups and I will probably be starting him 4-5 weeks in a row.
Rivers and Mcnabb aren't in the same class of fantasy qb's. Why would you be playing the matchups with those two? If you have Mcnabb, you start him every week over Rivers all the time.
 
I am starting him, but I have Harrington as my backup in that league. If I had McNabb or Big Ben I would sit him. On the other hand, I don't put too much stock in how defenses did last year, which is why I don't worry about SOS until three or four weeks have been played THIS year; then I look at strength of schedule.

 
Peyton - Rivers

Campbell - Rivers

Kitna - Rivers

Big Ben - Rivers

I like Rivers this year, despite a tough schedule. Without Marty's conservative offense, and LT being the focus of opposing D's, Rivers should have pretty good year, in now his second full season. However, I see a low scoring game in SD this week, and my only close call was Kitna vs. Rivers, but as much hype as Oakland's pass D gets, they are not nearly as good as the Bears.

Sidenote: Chargers/Bears under 44 is a gimmie this week, Chargers win 16-10.

 
Starting McNabb over Rivers. And I will do so next week as well.

Week 1

Phil @ Green Bay

San Diego vs Chicago

Week 2

Phil vs Wash

San Diego vs New England

Obviously, this isn't to say that Rivers isn't worth starting. I just like my match-ups better with McNabb these first two weeks. After that, Rivers sees far better match-ups and I will probably be starting him 4-5 weeks in a row.
Rivers and Mcnabb aren't in the same class of fantasy qb's. Why would you be playing the matchups with those two? If you have Mcnabb, you start him every week over Rivers all the time.
I personally had Rivers ranked 2 spots ahead of Mcnabb during my drafts this year. I most certainly think they are close enough to play matchups with.
 
Philip Rivers has a TERRIBLE schedule..... I tried to tell everyone....I hope you have other options - seriously.Good luck.
I was aware of this, but what can you do really? In certain drafts you almost have to pick him if he drops to you.I figured the LT factor (attention he draws + redzone opportunities) would offset the difficult schedule at least somewhat.
 
In general, I'll be starting him in leagues where he's my QB1 and sitting him in leagues where he's my QB2. I'll start McNabb or Manning over him, for example, but I'll start Rivers over Jeff Garcia. I guess that's kind of obvious, but those are examples from my own teams. I don't have any close calls involving Rivers.
It may not be as obvious as you think. Check out Rivers vs McNabb in the experts rankings.... then compare those rankings to QB cheetsheet for week #1. Very interesting imo. Not saying I agree with it, I just found it interesting. So then I thought "Well, maybe Dodds just loves Rivers and/or hates McNabb so I look at his season projections on both. Still don't get it.Can you make heads or tales of it MT???? What's your best guess to explain the difference?
 
I dont think he's reached "unsittable status" yet... that being said, anyone sitting him against the Bears this week and if so for who?
i'm sitting rivers and starting big ben against cleveland.
I've got the same two QB's but I've got PR in my lineup. Ben hasn't had much success against Cleveland in the past so I figure it's a wash but I like River's chances better.
 
Peyton - Rivers

Campbell - Rivers

Kitna - Rivers

Big Ben - Rivers

I like Rivers this year, despite a tough schedule. Without Marty's conservative offense, and LT being the focus of opposing D's, Rivers should have pretty good year, in now his second full season. However, I see a low scoring game in SD this week, and my only close call was Kitna vs. Rivers, but as much hype as Oakland's pass D gets, they are not nearly as good as the Bears.

Sidenote: Chargers/Bears under 44 is a gimmie this week, Chargers win 16-10.
Chargers havent been held under 20 at home in 3 years, just something to think about.
 
Starting McNabb over Rivers. And I will do so next week as well.

Week 1

Phil @ Green Bay

San Diego vs Chicago

Week 2

Phil vs Wash

San Diego vs New England

Obviously, this isn't to say that Rivers isn't worth starting. I just like my match-ups better with McNabb these first two weeks. After that, Rivers sees far better match-ups and I will probably be starting him 4-5 weeks in a row.
Rivers and Mcnabb aren't in the same class of fantasy qb's. Why would you be playing the matchups with those two? If you have Mcnabb, you start him every week over Rivers all the time.
I personally had Rivers ranked 2 spots ahead of Mcnabb during my drafts this year. I most certainly think they are close enough to play matchups with.
Out of curiosity, what scoring system does your league use?
 
In general, I'll be starting him in leagues where he's my QB1 and sitting him in leagues where he's my QB2. I'll start McNabb or Manning over him, for example, but I'll start Rivers over Jeff Garcia. I guess that's kind of obvious, but those are examples from my own teams. I don't have any close calls involving Rivers.
It may not be as obvious as you think. Check out Rivers vs McNabb in the experts rankings.... then compare those rankings to QB cheetsheet for week #1. Very interesting imo. Not saying I agree with it, I just found it interesting. So then I thought "Well, maybe Dodds just loves Rivers and/or hates McNabb so I look at his season projections on both. Still don't get it.Can you make heads or tales of it MT???? What's your best guess to explain the difference?
Regardless of love for one player and/or hate for another, those rankings don't match the reality of what's happened on the field during Rivers's short career. I'm not going to say that he can't be better, only that I wouldn't bet on it until it happens at least once(say, for a year).
 
Philip Rivers has a TERRIBLE schedule..... I tried to tell everyone....I hope you have other options - seriously.Good luck.
Are you still spouting this stuff? :thumbup:Rivers had the 10th hardest QB schedule last year. See Chase's rearview QB article for details. Then check out Clayton Gray's SOS, which shows Rivers' schedule as marginally (2.3%) easier this season.C'mon, you're just throwing softballs. I know you have better stuff. I mean, you aren't ranking him as QB21 just based on this, right? :lmao:Meanwhile, I predict Rivers will have a good performance this week.
 
Starting McNabb over Rivers. And I will do so next week as well.

Week 1

Phil @ Green Bay

San Diego vs Chicago

Week 2

Phil vs Wash

San Diego vs New England

Obviously, this isn't to say that Rivers isn't worth starting. I just like my match-ups better with McNabb these first two weeks. After that, Rivers sees far better match-ups and I will probably be starting him 4-5 weeks in a row.
Rivers and Mcnabb aren't in the same class of fantasy qb's. Why would you be playing the matchups with those two? If you have Mcnabb, you start him every week over Rivers all the time.
I personally had Rivers ranked 2 spots ahead of Mcnabb during my drafts this year. I most certainly think they are close enough to play matchups with.
Out of curiosity, what scoring system does your league use?
Different systems, different leagues. After looking back, it appears i had Rivers only one spot ahead of Mcnabb, i moved Big Ben ahead of Rivers towards the end. For the record, i had Mcnabb ranked 8.
 
Peyton - Rivers

Campbell - Rivers

Kitna - Rivers

Big Ben - Rivers

I like Rivers this year, despite a tough schedule. Without Marty's conservative offense, and LT being the focus of opposing D's, Rivers should have pretty good year, in now his second full season. However, I see a low scoring game in SD this week, and my only close call was Kitna vs. Rivers, but as much hype as Oakland's pass D gets, they are not nearly as good as the Bears.

Sidenote: Chargers/Bears under 44 is a gimmie this week, Chargers win 16-10.
Chargers havent been held under 20 at home in 3 years, just something to think about.
While i didnt know this info specifically, i still stick by my prediction. I do have them scoring four times, but i think the Bears play good enough bend dont break Defense to keep the score close. The Grossman factor scares me a bit in my prediction, he could easily give the Chargers 21 points himself, but i dont see any way the Bears score more than 10, so the under 44 is a LOCK!!!!
 
Starting McNabb over Rivers. And I will do so next week as well.

Week 1

Phil @ Green Bay

San Diego vs Chicago

Week 2

Phil vs Wash

San Diego vs New England

Obviously, this isn't to say that Rivers isn't worth starting. I just like my match-ups better with McNabb these first two weeks. After that, Rivers sees far better match-ups and I will probably be starting him 4-5 weeks in a row.
Rivers and Mcnabb aren't in the same class of fantasy qb's. Why would you be playing the matchups with those two? If you have Mcnabb, you start him every week over Rivers all the time.
I personally had Rivers ranked 2 spots ahead of Mcnabb during my drafts this year. I most certainly think they are close enough to play matchups with.
Out of curiosity, what scoring system does your league use?
Different systems, different leagues. After looking back, it appears i had Rivers only one spot ahead of Mcnabb, i moved Big Ben ahead of Rivers towards the end. For the record, i had Mcnabb ranked 8.
Interesting.
 
Philip Rivers has a TERRIBLE schedule..... I tried to tell everyone....

I hope you have other options - seriously.

Good luck.
Are you still spouting this stuff? :thumbup: Rivers had the 10th hardest QB schedule last year. See Chase's rearview QB article for details. Then check out Clayton Gray's SOS, which shows Rivers' schedule as marginally (2.3%) easier this season.

C'mon, you're just throwing softballs. I know you have better stuff. I mean, you aren't ranking him as QB21 just based on this, right? :lmao:

Meanwhile, I predict Rivers will have a good performance this week.
FWIW, Rivers is projected by me as well to have the hardest schedule this year.http://subscribers.footballguys.com/2007/07stuart_1qbbc.php

And it's not really close. He's easily got the hardest schedule. The toughest six teams for QBs to face (according to my projections) are Jacksonville, Oakland, New England, Chicago, Denver and Baltimore. Rivers faces those teams EIGHT times this year. That's ridiculously tough. I expect Rivers to be average at best in most of those games.

 
Philip Rivers has a TERRIBLE schedule..... I tried to tell everyone....

I hope you have other options - seriously.

Good luck.
Are you still spouting this stuff? :thumbup: Rivers had the 10th hardest QB schedule last year. See Chase's rearview QB article for details. Then check out Clayton Gray's SOS, which shows Rivers' schedule as marginally (2.3%) easier this season.

C'mon, you're just throwing softballs. I know you have better stuff. I mean, you aren't ranking him as QB21 just based on this, right? :lmao:

Meanwhile, I predict Rivers will have a good performance this week.
FWIW, Rivers is projected by me as well to have the hardest schedule this year.http://subscribers.footballguys.com/2007/07stuart_1qbbc.php

And it's not really close. He's easily got the hardest schedule. The toughest six teams for QBs to face (according to my projections) are Jacksonville, Oakland, New England, Chicago, Denver and Baltimore. Rivers faces those teams EIGHT times this year. That's ridiculously tough. I expect Rivers to be average at best in most of those games.
JP Losman?
 
I had thought of him as unsittable, but now I'm wondering. My other option is Schaub against the shoddy KC D.

Great, one more fantasy headache....... :moneybag:

 
Watching NFLTA last night during 4 downs they asked who will be the MVP this year and Jamie Dukes responded...Phillip Rivers!!!

I'm not going that far but I won't be sitting him anytime soon. I might even start him during his bye, mostly because my backup is Gross-man.

Chicago D is tuff, but Rivers has the 2 best safety valves in the league: Gates+LT2.

Start Him!

 
I used my top picks to build depth, and drafted both Rivers and Leinart later in the draft. If you go down the schedule, you can tenatively find a great matchup for each almost every week.

This is my pre-season plan for Weeks 1-16...obviously performance, and how opposing teams do in reality can/will alter it as the season progresses.

-Leinart vs. San Francisco

-Leinart vs. Seattle

-Rivers vs. Green Bay

-Rivers vs. Kansas City

-Leinart vs. St. Louis

-Rivers vs. Oakland

-Leinart vs. Washington

-Rivers vs. Houston

-Rivers vs. Minnesota

-Leinart vs. Detroit (Rivers plays Indy, so both are good matchups)

-Leinart vs. Cincinnati

-Leinart vs. San Francisco

-Leinart vs. Cleveland (Rivers plays Kansas City, so both are good)

-Rivers vs. Tennessee

-Rivers vs. Detroit (Leinart plays New Orleans, so both are good)

-Leinart vs. Atlanta

Pretty sweet matchups each week, save maybe one or two.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I used my top picks to build depth, and drafted both Rivers and Leinart later in the draft. If you go down the schedule, you can tenatively find a great matchup for each almost every week. This is my pre-season plan for Weeks 1-16...obviously performance, and how opposing teams do in reality can/will alter it as the season progresses. -Leinart vs. San Francisco-Leinart vs. Seattle-Rivers vs. Green Bay -Rivers vs. Kansas City-Leinart vs. St. Louis-Rivers vs. Oakland-Leinart vs. Washington-Rivers vs. Houston-Rivers vs. Minnesota-Leinart vs. Detroit (Rivers plays Indy, so both are good matchups)-Leinart vs. Cincinnati-Leinart vs. San Francisco-Leinart vs. Cleveland (Rivers plays Kansas City, so both are good)-Rivers vs. Tennessee-Rivers vs. Detroit (Leinart plays New Orleans, so both are good)-Leinart vs. AtlantaPretty sweet matchups each week, save maybe one or two.
Did the same thing .. but got Matt Hasselbeck instead ov er Leinart.
 
I also have Leinart and Rivers, but I'm starting Rivers. Though by not much. Are you really Starting Leinart week 1?

 
Starting McNabb over Rivers. And I will do so next week as well.

Week 1

Phil @ Green Bay

San Diego vs Chicago

Week 2

Phil vs Wash

San Diego vs New England

Obviously, this isn't to say that Rivers isn't worth starting. I just like my match-ups better with McNabb these first two weeks. After that, Rivers sees far better match-ups and I will probably be starting him 4-5 weeks in a row.
Rivers and Mcnabb aren't in the same class of fantasy qb's. Why would you be playing the matchups with those two? If you have Mcnabb, you start him every week over Rivers all the time.
I personally had Rivers ranked 2 spots ahead of Mcnabb during my drafts this year. I most certainly think they are close enough to play matchups with.
I had McNabb ranked 2 spots higher (at QB6) than Rivers, but think that is statistically close enough to play the match-ups. Especially if McNabb isn't as mobile in the first few games or all season.
 
Philip Rivers has a TERRIBLE schedule..... I tried to tell everyone....

I hope you have other options - seriously.

Good luck.
Are you still spouting this stuff? ;) Rivers had the 10th hardest QB schedule last year. See Chase's rearview QB article for details. Then check out Clayton Gray's SOS, which shows Rivers' schedule as marginally (2.3%) easier this season.

C'mon, you're just throwing softballs. I know you have better stuff. I mean, you aren't ranking him as QB21 just based on this, right? :crazy:

Meanwhile, I predict Rivers will have a good performance this week.
FWIW, Rivers is projected by me as well to have the hardest schedule this year.http://subscribers.footballguys.com/2007/07stuart_1qbbc.php

And it's not really close. He's easily got the hardest schedule. The toughest six teams for QBs to face (according to my projections) are Jacksonville, Oakland, New England, Chicago, Denver and Baltimore. Rivers faces those teams EIGHT times this year. That's ridiculously tough. I expect Rivers to be average at best in most of those games.
This is interesting, but I don't think it's cut and dry that it's a negative for Rivers. The last thing his owners want is blow-out after blow-out in which all they see is Rivers handing off to LT and Turner throughout the 2nd half.Last year Rivers had 273 passing attempts in the first half compared with 219 in the 2nd half. That's probably not that unusual, but more interestingly, when the Chargers were in front, he threw just 8 TDs (from 217 passes, 4 ints) whereas when they were behind he threw 10 TDs from just 158 attempts with only 2 ints.

I think San Diego's offense is good enough and varied enough that they will be able to move the ball on good defenses and I think Rivers might actually have some of his better fantasy days against some of the Ds you mention, especially as several of them are renowned against the run.

 
I had thought of him as unsittable, but now I'm wondering. My other option is Schaub against the shoddy KC D.

Great, one more fantasy headache....... :blackdot:
I also have Schaub as my other option. While I like his chances vs KC, he has never started a game for the Texans. I just can't do it in Week 1 w/o seeing him in a meaningful game first.

I'm sticking w/ Rivers, expecting the Bears to focus 90% on LT2, and leave passing lanes wide open. I don't see a lot of passing yards, but 2 TDs is what I expect

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think Rivers is a start every week kind of QB. Unless you were able to draft him as Brees, Bulger or Palmer's backup or someone of that quality, which isnt likely, then Id think Rivers would be the QB1 on most fantasy teams he's on this year. He's leading a top 5 O...tough to bench a Q on such a good offense regardless of the matchup. San Diego is at home against a quality opponent and Rivers will be looking to shine. Dont outthink yourself. If youve got Rivers, give him the nod.

 
We're a start 2 QB league, so going w/ both Rivers and Vince this week. :blackdot: The only other option is Losman, but who knows how he'll end up this week. There are just too many weapons on the SD offense to consider sitting him week 1 when everyone's healthy, no matter how :tfp: the bears D looks.

 
Dodge said:
Did a little research on stats and have switched. Starting Leinart over Rivers.
The only way it doesn't work out is if Leinart just flat out takes some steps backwards in his development this season. Because, on paper, it's hard to ignore that matchup with the 49ers, considering the weapons he has. Especially with Rivers vs. Chicago, which is just way too tough to get a handle on, especially Week 1.
 
In my league, we use a superflex spot where the flex can be a QB. Rivers is my QB1 and Big Ben is my QB2. I have decided to sit Rivers and go with a 3 RB trio of Westbrook, Henry & Jordan. So basically I was deciding between Lamont Jordan and Rivers this week. The Bears D is what decided for me to try the 3 RB approach and play Big Ben against Cleveland. Part of my thinking happened this way because I also have the Bears D. While it may be stupid, I don't like to root for my guys while they are playing against my starting defense. Some times it cannot be helped but this time I opted for other options. So to keep in line with the other responses, I chose Big Ben over Rivers for this week (even though normally I'll be playing them both).

 
I think I'll be starting Rivers over Eli.

Edit to add some thoughts:

Sure Bears are a tough matchup, but Chargers are no slouches. At home, plenty of weapons, good offensive line... I think he'll have a solid game.

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top