The Gator
Footballguy
Pretty cool lineup of the planets and moon this week
Interestingly, there are a couple of black holes that are "estimated" to have masses larger than TON 618 and larger than the theoretical limit described in this article. Obviously, this poses a problem. Either those estimations are unreliable or there is another way massive black holes could form which is not accounted for by the current models.How big is the biggest black hole?
![]()
What's the biggest black hole in the universe?
What's the biggest black hole in the universe, and is there a limit to how big black holes can get?www.livescience.com
"...if the black hole was placed in the center of the solar system, by the time you reached Pluto, you would be less than 5% of the way from the center of the black hole to its edge."
That's a big Twinkie.
That’s crazy.Something else pretty amazing to contemplate...as massive as these black holes may be, their event horizons are so huge that the average density of the black hole is very small. Using the data presented in the article for TON618 of 40 billion solar masses and a radius of 1000 astronomical units calculates to an average density of about 0.0056 kg/m^3. For comparison, the density of air is about 1.3 kg/m^3 at standard temperature and pressure. So, the density of this supermassive black hole is about 200 times less than air!!
Scrubbed. But was highly expected as they are being cautious. At least 48 hour wait.SpaceX Starship launch this morning.
More links here.
EDIT: sounds like it isn't going to happen today.
Light is massless.Question about gravitational lensing...
The idea is that massive objects bend space-time and then light follows that path.
But light has mass, doesn't it? If so, wouldn't that be "attracted" to the massive body?
So is the lensing effect because light is following the bend or because it's being bent itself?
Ah, I'd forgotten that. Good thing it doesn't since things gain mass as they approach the speed of light IIRC.Light is massless.Question about gravitational lensing...
The idea is that massive objects bend space-time and then light follows that path.
But light has mass, doesn't it? If so, wouldn't that be "attracted" to the massive body?
So is the lensing effect because light is following the bend or because it's being bent itself?
Yes, but it depends on the reference frame of the observer. In short, as observed from an inertial reference frame, moving faster => greater energy => greater relativistic rest mass. E=mc^2 establishes energy and rest mass to be equivalent. Light, on the other hand, can never be at rest (always measured at a constant speed regardless of reference frame) and thus has no energy associated with a rest mass. Thus it has no rest mass. All of the energy of a photon can be attributed to it's momentum.Ah, I'd forgotten that. Good thing it doesn't since things gain mass as they approach the speed of light IIRC.
This stuff always gives me the feels for mankind, just so amazing.
JWST making people rewrite books. I love it.With recent observations from James Webb of mature galaxies in the early universe that shouldn't exist, researchers have been prompted to re-think aspects of our standard cosmological model. A researcher from the University of Ottawa, Rajendra Gupta, has invoked ideas originally conceived by Paul Dirac (who developed a relativistic wave equation consistent with both quantum mechanics and special theory of relativity) regarding the evolution of coupling constants blended with redshift effects which points to a claimed age of 26.7 billion years compared to the currently accepted value of 13.7 billion years.
![]()
Reinventing cosmology: New research puts age of universe at 26.7 -- not 13.7 -- billion years
Our universe could be twice as old as current estimates, according to a new study that challenges the dominant cosmological model and sheds new light on the so-called 'impossible early galaxy problem.'www.sciencedaily.com
If they want to look back at the first galaxies, which direction do you look?
Maybe I'm incorrect, but we don't know where the origin was.
Yeah, these are a pretty fascinating concept. And in another cool twist, their namesake is actually inspired by the Grateful Dead song.Yall read about these theoretical "dark stars" where the energy is generated from dark matter "WIMPs" collisions / annihilations instead of proton fusion?
The theory is that some of the "galaxies" we see that are hella far away are really just a single puffy dark star with significant dark matter. Also that these dark stars might be the origin of the supermassive black holes we find at the center of galaxies.
read about them?- I saw one first hand as a kid.Yall read about these theoretical "dark stars" where the energy is generated from dark matter "WIMPs" collisions / annihilations instead of proton fusion?
The theory is that some of the "galaxies" we see that are hella far away are really just a single puffy dark star with significant dark matter. Also that these dark stars might be the origin of the supermassive black holes we find at the center of galaxies.
Not sure why that would need to be an "either/or" decision. There is room for both.Recently released poll shows Americans think nasa should focus more on potential asteroid impacts rather than returning humans to the moon. Your thoughts?
There is, of course. Though the department does have a budget, not unlimited funds. How should those funds be used?Not sure why that would need to be an "either/or" decision. There is room for both.Recently released poll shows Americans think nasa should focus more on potential asteroid impacts rather than returning humans to the moon. Your thoughts?
What really bakes my noodle is the thought that there is no center to the expanding universe.If they want to look back at the first galaxies, which direction do you look?
Maybe I'm incorrect, but we don't know where the origin was.
Every direction leads back to the origin point. Remember TV static? The random black and white dots and noise that would bombard you if you didn't tune into a station? Which came at your antenna from every direction? That was the light from the Big Bang just getting to your house... right... now!
Also, every point in space is the origin point. That is, the Andromeda Galaxy? Alpha Centauri? The top of the Eiffel Tower? The atom at the tip of your... finger? All of those are the exact location of the center of the Universe and the origin point of the Big Bang.
Both. Some of our most impactful day to day use items are results of the space race. We all benefit from the technological advancements. NASA is woefully underfundedThere is, of course. Though the department does have a budget, not unlimited funds. How should those funds be used?Not sure why that would need to be an "either/or" decision. There is room for both.Recently released poll shows Americans think nasa should focus more on potential asteroid impacts rather than returning humans to the moon. Your thoughts?
Finding life on Europa or Enceladus.There is, of course. Though the department does have a budget, not unlimited funds. How should those funds be used?Not sure why that would need to be an "either/or" decision. There is room for both.Recently released poll shows Americans think nasa should focus more on potential asteroid impacts rather than returning humans to the moon. Your thoughts?
I’m lucky this time. I get 3 mins of totality from by back porchFinding life on Europa or Enceladus.There is, of course. Though the department does have a budget, not unlimited funds. How should those funds be used?Not sure why that would need to be an "either/or" decision. There is room for both.Recently released poll shows Americans think nasa should focus more on potential asteroid impacts rather than returning humans to the moon. Your thoughts?
-----
In other related news I have hotel reservations in Jonesboro, AR to get ready for April 9th next year. The last one was awesome and this is realistically the last chance in my life to see another.
What do you have planned? Might it be a small gathering to share stories about why you missed the eclipse the day before?Finding life on Europa or Enceladus.There is, of course. Though the department does have a budget, not unlimited funds. How should those funds be used?Not sure why that would need to be an "either/or" decision. There is room for both.Recently released poll shows Americans think nasa should focus more on potential asteroid impacts rather than returning humans to the moon. Your thoughts?
-----
In other related news I have hotel reservations in Jonesboro, AR to get ready for April 9th next year. The last one was awesome and this is realistically the last chance in my life to see another.
Typo. We have reservations for Sunday night to catch it on Monday. This is a bonus - last time it went over Clemson stadium and ended up being the best sky in the country to see it. My whole family got to sit there and watch the whole thing. It was absolutely amazing.What do you have planned? Might it be a small gathering to share stories about why you missed the eclipse the day before?Finding life on Europa or Enceladus.There is, of course. Though the department does have a budget, not unlimited funds. How should those funds be used?Not sure why that would need to be an "either/or" decision. There is room for both.Recently released poll shows Americans think nasa should focus more on potential asteroid impacts rather than returning humans to the moon. Your thoughts?
-----
In other related news I have hotel reservations in Jonesboro, AR to get ready for April 9th next year. The last one was awesome and this is realistically the last chance in my life to see another.

So SpaceX just notified me that my Starlink receiver is finally available. I signed up like 2 years ago... now my wife says that Elon is such a **** that we're not going to get it.![]()

Oh it's an emotional response for sure. She knows it, obviously I know it, but there's not much I can do about it. Not worth fighting about since our internet is working sufficiently. But its slow and expensive. I hate Comcast so much that I refuse to pay them money, also an emotional response. We use a local ISP called Port Networks (https://portnetworks.net/ ). The connection is a point to point microwace link from my roof to a tall building on Baltimore's inner harbor. The service and professionalism is exceptional. But the bandwidth is low for the cost.So SpaceX just notified me that my Starlink receiver is finally available. I signed up like 2 years ago... now my wife says that Elon is such a **** that we're not going to get it.![]()
Seems like an emotional decision. I’m sure the guy running your internet currently is a peach of a person.
![]()
thequantuminsider.com
This is a gamechanger if it pans out![]()
Researchers Claim They Developed a Room-Temperature Superconductor
A team of South Korean researchers report on a room-temperature superconductor in the pre-print server ArXiv.thequantuminsider.com
agree, although it’s been claimed before.This is a gamechanger if it pans out![]()
Researchers Claim They Developed a Room-Temperature Superconductor
A team of South Korean researchers report on a room-temperature superconductor in the pre-print server ArXiv.thequantuminsider.com
Yes, definitely exciting, but best to stay on the reserved side for now. Other avenues to room temperature superconductors have been proposed/claimed in the past that haven't yet panned out. By all accounts, the claimed method here of producing the LK-99 is pretty straightforward and there should be some results in a very short time to substantiate the claims. One of the authors of the paper is quoted as saying the academic papers on LK-99 were not finished and that the papers were uploaded to arXiv without the permission of one of the originally credited authors who had left the research institute 4 months prior. That raises the eyebrow a little bit. Furthermore, if this proves to be a legit phenomenon, we are a long way from it changing the world. How practical is this LK-99 material to work for doing useful things with once it is synthesized? We will certainly find out, if indeed, the superconducting claims about it are valid. The products of the synthesis process of the LK-99 are Pb9Cu(PO4)6O + S(g). It is the lead based compound that is the superconducting part. I am sure the other product, the sulfur gas, is a pleasant odor... At least the synthesis process seems rather straightforward, so as stated previously we should know more soon.Anybody else following this superconductor thing? I only know enough physics to have like an 8th-grade understanding of the issue here, but it sounds big, and it's exciting to watch a scientific breakthrough like this potentially occur in real time.
I think someone whipped up a batch of that in the Wendy's restroom off I-95 outside Richmond, VA. At least it smelled that way when I went through 2 days ago...the synthesis process of the LK-99 are Pb9Cu(PO4)6O + S(g).
Cool to see. Keep up the good work, LLNL.
This is the classic problem with fusion...Cool to see. Keep up the good work, LLNL.
Then there's this: "During December's experiment, the lab used 192 ultra-powerful lasers to deliver 2.05 megajoules of energy to a tiny capsule smaller than a pea containing isotopes of hydrogen. It produced 3.15 megajoules of fusion energy output.
While the result was a net energy gain, 300 megajoules of energy was needed from the electrical grid to power the lasers."
So uh, not really close to break even yet, eh?