What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Pick One Starter for the Next 3 years (1 Viewer)

One pitcher, all things considered, for the next 3 years

  • Cliff Lee

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Ubaldo Jimenez

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Roy Halladay

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Stephen Strasburg

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • David Price

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Justin Verlander

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Francisco Liriano

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Tim Lincecum

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Zach Grienke

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Josh Johnson

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Tommy Hanson

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Clayton Kershaw

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Adam Wainwright

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0

Smack Tripper

Footballguy
Really a pretty amazing time for pitching, and while I'm leaving a bunch of guys off the list. I actually had started with the first 4 listed in the poll, and then as I thought about it, each guy seemed like he belonged.

I think above all, I go with Lee. Lefthanded strikeout guy with amazing control. Long term I guess you have to go Straz, but I think I also really like Hanson's horse potential.

 
What are we picking? The guy who is going to get the most runs or the lowest ERA? I like Justin Verlander out of this list, but I am not sure what we are picking for.

 
term I guess you have to go Straz, but I think I also really like Hanson's horse potential.
S2 (s squared for noobs) down?If I need one starter for one big game today based on what we are seeing this season, Lee.

Based on who has had the best career to date, I'd go with Halladay - guy has been with phenomenal, top 3-top 5 pitcher every season for a good 8-9 years.

Most potential to be a lights out HoFer? Still Halladay. Strasburg compares favorably with some all-time greats after five starts: Bob Feller, Juan Marachal, Luis Tiant. If he keeps it up he moves into Fernando V or The Bird territory. He looks amazing, but come on, its a little over one month. Durability and achievement have to count for something.

The poll is for the next three years...e.g., what that says to me is who will be at the zenith of their career. Who will be peaking and having the best three year stretch of all the pitchers listed?

The answer is Justin Verlander.

 
I'll take Jimenez - his stuff doesn't rely on that wicked curve ball that Strasburg throws. That pitch is just calling out elbow problems down the road.

Jimenez stuff is a split seam fastball - more like Mariano and look how long he's been throwing.

 
I'd take Verlander. We know he can put up 200 innings a year and get stronger as the months go by.

We do not yet know that about Strassburg, but if he can match V's durability, he can be better. But until I know that, I'll ride V for 3 yrs.

 
I'll take Jimenez - his stuff doesn't rely on that wicked curve ball that Strasburg throws. That pitch is just calling out elbow problems down the road.Jimenez stuff is a split seam fastball - more like Mariano and look how long he's been throwing.
excellent analysis. Durability is huge when you're projecting three years.
 
The poll is for the next three years...e.g., what that says to me is who will be at the zenith of their career. Who will be peaking and having the best three year stretch of all the pitchers listed?The answer is Justin Verlander.
:popcorn: Id take Halladay over Verlander but my reasoning is the same as yours...Strasburg shouldnt be running away with this like he is since he wont be at his best yet 3 years from now, most likely
 
I picked Lincecum. Hard to argue with 793K in 702IP and a .219 BAA.

But at 5'11" and 170, he seems like an injury waiting to happen. Dude is a freak, though.

 
I've already bought my #6 Strasburg Yankees jersey btw.
:goodposting: They're gonna retire that number soon, no way they give it to this kid.

Yanks are gonna have 1-10 retired in 10 years time. First team to lock up the first 10. They're also going to retire the same number twice, again. They're the only team AFAIK with 1 double-retired number, now they're gonna have 2.

 
Barring an injury like Prior's Stras will go down as one of the best pitchers of all-time. With Harper coming aboard next season or the seson after and Zimmerman the Nationals will have a good young core round them. If he played for a team that had decent offensive power, he'd be undefeated as a starter in the bigs.

 
Lincecum. Clay Buchholz not even on the list?!
Nor Lester, or Hughes, or Carpenter either.
Lester was the closest to making it of all these listed, also could have put Sabathia, Gallardo, Felix and a few others. But I figured, realistically, all of the guys listed are tier above all the guys that didn't make it. Lester is the closest to that next tier though.
Liriano is not above Felix, Sabathia, Lester, Carpenter, or Gallardo.
 
Lincecum. Clay Buchholz not even on the list?!
Nor Lester, or Hughes, or Carpenter either.
Lester was the closest to making it of all these listed, also could have put Sabathia, Gallardo, Felix and a few others. But I figured, realistically, all of the guys listed are tier above all the guys that didn't make it. Lester is the closest to that next tier though.
Liriano is not above Felix, Sabathia, Lester, Carpenter, or Gallardo.
It wasn't a who's the best right now list. Felix is a debate, but his early workload concerns me, and I'll take Lirano's lefthandness over him.Sabathia is another workload guy who I love to watch pitch, but don't think he's a valid 3 year choice.Lester is close but not there, for my money.Carpenter has too many injury issues to be seriously considered for three years down the line with these guys.Gallardo is close but has been too inconsistent thus far.
 
Holy crap is Strasburg gonna disappoint some people.

I went Lincecum but Verlander, Jimenez and Felix are all pretty damn good. Josh Johnson very underrated, he might end up being better than any of them over a three year period.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
No clue how Felix doesn't make this list. Guy's absolutely dominant. Playing in Seattle doesn't get him the attention he deserves i guess.

I also don't get the Justin Verlander love. I'm guessing it's because there's a lot of Detroit Tiger faithful on these boards.

 
I also don't get the Justin Verlander love. I'm guessing it's because there's a lot of Detroit Tiger faithful on these boards.
According to a survey of major league players conducted by Sports Illustrated, Verlander, 27, was named the No. 1 fastball pitcher by 30 percent of the 339 players who participated in the survey. His average fastball velocity is second in the league this year at 95.8 mph, according to fangraphs.com.
Jonathan Broxton was second with 11% of the vote. If you don't get the love, you don't watch him. He is a top ten pitcher for sure, top five a lot of the time and on any given night he's the best pitcher in baseball.
 
I also don't get the Justin Verlander love. I'm guessing it's because there's a lot of Detroit Tiger faithful on these boards.
According to a survey of major league players conducted by Sports Illustrated, Verlander, 27, was named the No. 1 fastball pitcher by 30 percent of the 339 players who participated in the survey. His average fastball velocity is second in the league this year at 95.8 mph, according to fangraphs.com.
Jonathan Broxton was second with 11% of the vote. If you don't get the love, you don't watch him. He is a top ten pitcher for sure, top five a lot of the time and on any given night he's the best pitcher in baseball.
Sure he has a dominant fastball, but there's more to pitching than that. One major weakness to his game is he basically only uses 3 pitches, whereas most people on these lists are using 4 or 5. Also, i find survey's like that to be pointless and full of confounds; it's impossible to determine anything form a survey by reading just 1 sentence, but that's what ESPN, etc. want us to. What does the "No. 1 Fastball pitcher" even mean? There's just as good of a chance that it means he's the pitcher who relies most on his fastball as it does that he has the best fastball in the league.
 
I also don't get the Justin Verlander love. I'm guessing it's because there's a lot of Detroit Tiger faithful on these boards.
According to a survey of major league players conducted by Sports Illustrated, Verlander, 27, was named the No. 1 fastball pitcher by 30 percent of the 339 players who participated in the survey. His average fastball velocity is second in the league this year at 95.8 mph, according to fangraphs.com.
Jonathan Broxton was second with 11% of the vote. If you don't get the love, you don't watch him. He is a top ten pitcher for sure, top five a lot of the time and on any given night he's the best pitcher in baseball.
Sure he has a dominant fastball, but there's more to pitching than that. One major weakness to his game is he basically only uses 3 pitches, whereas most people on these lists are using 4 or 5. Also, i find survey's like that to be pointless and full of confounds; it's impossible to determine anything form a survey by reading just 1 sentence, but that's what ESPN, etc. want us to. What does the "No. 1 Fastball pitcher" even mean? There's just as good of a chance that it means he's the pitcher who relies most on his fastball as it does that he has the best fastball in the league.
Of course you find the survey pointless, it doesn't support your argument. I'll take the word of 339 surveyed players, they play the game. As for Verlander he has three pitches, two that are among the best in the game. He throws four pitches, the four seam and curve which are dominant (Verlander, Strasberg and Jimenez have the best 4 seamers) and the two seam and the change-up which are good. He's used the change a lot this year, and since his fastball is 98/99 just about every time an 88 mph change-up can be devastating. And most pitchers don't throw 4 or 5 pitches well, only a handful do and I'm not sure any throw five well. Jimenez throws three pitches effectively, the 4 seam, change and curve. Johnson is the same, 4 seam, change, slider. Halliday, Lester, Wainwright and Sabathia all throw 4 pitches well but there aren't many others. Liriano three, Carpenter three and Price three. In fact if you look at scouting material Verlander is one of the few pitchers who they list as having five pitches (slider the 5th) and they list three as being above average (change) to superior. I voted Lincecum in this poll because I think he might be the only guy in the game with three dominant pitches, as most of the rest have 1-2 dominant pitches and then maybe a third and fourth they can effectively employ. I know I'm a Tigers fan and I do love me some Verlander, but it doesn't take homer glasses to realize how good he really is. His only real issue has always been his Rich Harden-like innings that he has once a game, long innings with a walk, lots of long counts and maybe a couple of runs. If you don't take advantage of that one inning though you are gonna have trouble getting to him. He also led the league not only in Ks last year, but in K/9 and his career K/9 numbers are 8.4/9. Only Peavy, Santana and Beckett have better career numbers of active starters to this point and those guys have been three of the best pitchers over the past decade. K/9 is a pretty good ratio in demonstrating dominance, and Verlander's numbers support the players saying he has the league's best fastball. The guy can throw his first pitch at 99 with great movement, and his 120th pitch at 99 with great movement. That isn't just impressive for today's game, it's impressive period. He's the best pitcher the Tigers have had in my lifetime and he has a chance to be the best pitcher in franchise history. He's a superior talent, I think most fans regardless of affiliation would agree with me.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I also don't get the Justin Verlander love. I'm guessing it's because there's a lot of Detroit Tiger faithful on these boards.
According to a survey of major league players conducted by Sports Illustrated, Verlander, 27, was named the No. 1 fastball pitcher by 30 percent of the 339 players who participated in the survey. His average fastball velocity is second in the league this year at 95.8 mph, according to fangraphs.com.
Jonathan Broxton was second with 11% of the vote. If you don't get the love, you don't watch him. He is a top ten pitcher for sure, top five a lot of the time and on any given night he's the best pitcher in baseball.
Sure he has a dominant fastball, but there's more to pitching than that. One major weakness to his game is he basically only uses 3 pitches, whereas most people on these lists are using 4 or 5. Also, i find survey's like that to be pointless and full of confounds; it's impossible to determine anything form a survey by reading just 1 sentence, but that's what ESPN, etc. want us to. What does the "No. 1 Fastball pitcher" even mean? There's just as good of a chance that it means he's the pitcher who relies most on his fastball as it does that he has the best fastball in the league.
Of course you find the survey pointless, it doesn't support your argument. I'll take the word of 339 surveyed players, they play the game. As for Verlander he has three pitches, two that are among the best in the game. He throws four pitches, the four seam and curve which are dominant (Verlander, Strasberg and Jimenez have the best 4 seamers) and the two seam and the change-up which are good. He's used the change a lot this year, and since his fastball is 98/99 just about every time an 88 mph change-up can be devastating. And most pitchers don't throw 4 or 5 pitches well, only a handful do and I'm not sure any throw five well. Jimenez throws three pitches effectively, the 4 seam, change and curve. Johnson is the same, 4 seam, change, slider. Halliday, Lester, Wainwright and Sabathia all throw 4 pitches well but there aren't many others. Liriano three, Carpenter three and Price three. In fact if you look at scouting material Verlander is one of the few pitchers who they list as having five pitches (slider the 5th) and they list three as being above average (change) to superior. I voted Lincecum in this poll because I think he might be the only guy in the game with three dominant pitches, as most of the rest have 1-2 dominant pitches and then maybe a third and fourth they can effectively employ. I know I'm a Tigers fan and I do love me some Verlander, but it doesn't take homer glasses to realize how good he really is. His only real issue has always been his Rich Harden-like innings that he has once a game, long innings with a walk, lots of long counts and maybe a couple of runs. If you don't take advantage of that one inning though you are gonna have trouble getting to him. He also led the league not only in Ks last year, but in K/9 and his career K/9 numbers are 8.4/9. Only Peavy, Santana and Beckett have better career numbers of active starters to this point and those guys have been three of the best pitchers over the past decade. K/9 is a pretty good ratio in demonstrating dominance, and Verlander's numbers support the players saying he has the league's best fastball. The guy can throw his first pitch at 99 with great movement, and his 120th pitch at 99 with great movement. That isn't just impressive for today's game, it's impressive period. He's the best pitcher the Tigers have had in my lifetime and he has a chance to be the best pitcher in franchise history. He's a superior talent, I think most fans regardless of affiliation would agree with me.
The White Sox own this bum to the tune of a 5-9 record and a 4.87 ERA. Any pitcher with those kind of stats against the White Sox has to suck.
 
The White Sox own this bum to the tune of a 5-9 record and a 4.87 ERA. Any pitcher with those kind of stats against the White Sox has to suck.
2009 v Sux: 3-0 1.40 ERA .97 WHIP 2CG2007 was a tough year for him vs the Sux, I think I remember every game.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top