Editorial from local paper:
GOP endorsed fetal tissue research long before Planned Parenthood smear
Congressional Republicans are pondering a shutdown of the government over the funding of Planned Parenthood, because through their opaque political prism, they only see the health care provider as a full-time abortion mill that sells fetal parts to the highest bidder.
None of that is true, but Planned Parenthood has been smeared in a video sting operation by an anti-abortion group called the Center for Medical Progress, which conveniently omits the importance of fetal tissue in medical research.
This issue has always pitted right-to-life advocates against
researchers who believe that the use of the tissue shows extraordinary promise in the treatment of juvenile diabetes, Parkinson's disease and leukemia.
Actually, fetal tissue is currently being used in more than 150 different medical research projects. Currently, it is used to study connectivity in the brain at Yale; the pathogenesis of neonatal lupus at the NYU School of Medicine; the study of endocrine cell development at the Cincinnati's Children's Hospital Medical Center; vision restoration at Cal-Irvine; neurodevelopmental disorders at Stanford; and scores of other worthy projects that can be found at the National Institutes for Health website.
But a group of ideologues want to close the spigot, because they saw a heavily-edited video that suggested fetuses were sold by Planned Parenthood for surreptitious purposes – a claim widely discredited.
The American people aren't as gullible, and they understand how and why Planned Parenthood sends fetal tissue only to medical researchers, and that under federal law it can be reimbursed only for the cost of obtaining, transferring, and maintaining the tissue.
Indeed, the imagery of a fetus in one video makes this a volatile subject, as a video of any surgical procedure involving a cadaver would be disturbing. It has been this way for decades.
But there have been two federal committees who examined the issue from a legal, ethical, and scientific standpoint, and both concluded that the research was not only medically invaluable, but ethically acceptable.
The most recent was the Human Fetal Tissue Transplantation Research advisory committee, which convened at the NIH in December of 1988 on the order of President Reagan, who had placed a moratorium on its funding.
That panel was chaired by a federal judge named Arlin Adams, a pro-life Republican, and it voted 18-3 to approve of the research – as long as the use of the tissue did not encourage women to have abortions they might not otherwise undertake.
In other words, the woman can be asked to give her consent to donate the remains only after she has decided to have an abortion.
"Using human fetal tissue does not signify approval of abortion," the panel said, just as "organ transplantation from homicide and accident victims does not mean that society approves of homicide or encourages accidents."
It would take four more years for funding to be restored in the NIH Revitalization Act. John McCain, one of the 30 GOP votes in 85-12 Senate landslide, famously wrote, "My abhorrence for the practice of abortion is unquestionable. Yet my abhorrence for these diseases and the suffering they cause is just as strong."
The funding has held ever since, and Americans understand the value of the research, and they aren't oblivious to the source of the tissue: One poll says 61 percent oppose defunding Planned Parenthood; another poll says 9 percent want the GOP to shut down the government over the issue.
Neither is likely to happen. But that doesn't mean Congress is opposed to having budget negotiations and election cycles driven by slander.