What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Player Spotlight: LaDainian Tomlinson (1 Viewer)

Could LT have a larger workload despite his increase in injuries, a franchised Sproles, and his age? Absolutely
He's not going to have a larger workload if he has an increase in injuries.The most likely scenario, IMO, is that he'll have a larger workload than last year due to a decrease in injuries.

Tomlinson is really not much of a team player in the sense of being willing to step aside just because a teammate is playing better. Tomlinson wants the ball, and as long as he's healthy, I'm not sure Norv has the guts to tell him no, even if Sproles would be more effective.
Read in the context of the other things in that list, I meant given his RECENT increase in injuries. In other words, the injuries that he's suffered in the last couple years. Put another way, despite the fact he's seemed to "breakdown" and not be available in the playoffs, would SD want to lighten his load during the year to keep him fresh OR is he going to still get a larger workload than last year despite his recent past.
LT wants the ball and this is Norv Turner.I tried to dredge up a very thourough discussion on pizza faces use of RBs over his career. Emmit Gore and LT. But that thread has been purged I think. Anyhow Norv feeds his main RB. Especialy when that guy is LT.

More recent talk on the subject: http://forums.footballguys.com/forum/index...;hl=norv+turner

Rotoworld - Mar. 24 - 6:26 pm et

SD plans to increase Tomlinson's workload

Chargers coach Norv Turner plans to give LaDainian Tomlinson more carries this season, despite Darren Sproles' 2008 emergence.

"(Tomlinson) had 290 carries last season," Turner said. "I'd expect him to be in the 320s. He can handle it, and he'll be prepared to handle it. When it fits, we're going to use Darren. (But) I believe he can be a 1,500-yard rusher and a guy who catches 50 balls." It sounds like Turner plans to use a one-back system, which would cost Sproles most of his stand-alone value.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
BusterTBronco said:
BusterTBronco said:
Lots of people here drinking the LT2 Kool-Aid.

The Chargers have a dynamite RB in Sproles

I think it's crazy that people are still projecting LT2 to be one of the top 2 or 3 backs in fantasy football this year.
The bolded statement is much more crazy than people projecting LT to be a top 2 or 3 back.
You're right. The Chargers put the franchise tag on Sproles for no reason other than to throw money away. Those 328 all-purpose yards he had versus the Colts in the playoffs last year were a mirage. Sproles ain't nuttin.
I actually believe that the Chargers thought they could trade Sproles in the offseason and found out too late that there were no takers. They screwed up. You don't pay a kick returner six million dollars a year. One game against the Colts' run defense by a guy Sproles' size does not a career make, I'll take the guy who's been doing it against every defense for eight years.As to LT, it seems as if too many people are stuck in the "old ways" of predicting RB decline at age 30. This isn't the 1980s anymore. These guys take much better care of themselves and are in much better shape... and I'd have to argue that LT is at the top of that list. As to drafting LT, who would you take in front of him? Anyone other than Peterson and maybe Portis would be absolutely crazy, in my opinion. Everyone else has serious question marks for an early first round pick and you need to make that pick count. LT's floor, barring injury, is much higher than anyone else's.

 
To me, the bottom-line is this.Could LT finish in the top 5 again? AbsolutelyCould LT defy history and be one of the few HOF RB's to post top #'s at his age? AbsolutelyCould LT have a larger workload despite his increase in injuries, a franchised Sproles, and his age? AbsolutelyWould I bet any $ on the above happening? Absolutely not.Part of LT's value in the past wasn't his ceiling but also his ridiculously high floor. I don't think the ceiling has changed all that much but that floor sure has. Thus, he carries a seriously increased risk that he hasn't really had his entire career. This is why I'm not bullish on him this year. It's not that I don't think he can do it, it's just that I wouldn't want to be counting on it because I think there's just as good a chance he disappoints. Thus, given a comparable RB with similar ceiling and floor, I'll take the younger guy. Of course there will be a breaking point where his upside/downside outweighs other options, but the mid 1st round in a redraft isn't that spot, IMO. LT is going to be a guy who either wins or loses a lot of leagues for people this year.
I'd be curious to know which RBs you'd take ahead of him, which you feel are pretty much interchangeable with him, as well as which first round guys carry lower risk.
In a redraft league, these are the guys I'd select ahead of LT and feel more comfortable with:APMJDDeAngeloTurnerMossCalvinFitzgeraldAJBreesBradyForteChris JohnsonSJaxThe last 3 are awfully close for me, particularly with the risk SJax carries as well, but I'd still gamble with him personally. This isn't a definitive order just as I thought of them.
 
The one thing that I did notice with LT last season that tells me a RB is aging is that many times when he tried to make a quick move he tripped up and stumbled and fell without being hit. The same thing hapened to Emmitt later in his career. The mind is still as quick but the body is not responding.

 
The one thing that I did notice with LT last season that tells me a RB is aging is that many times when he tried to make a quick move he tripped up and stumbled and fell without being hit. The same thing hapened to Emmitt later in his career. The mind is still as quick but the body is not responding.
that's what happens when you hurt your big toe and you try to push off it....
 
I look at LT and Manning in the same light. Both probably will not earn back their investment costs/draft position, but you are reasonably assured at getting most of your return back. Both of these guys will probably get you a 90-95% ROI, and that's still very good.
This is basically what it breaks down to, sort of, but I think Tomlinson is more likely to exceed that ROI than Manning is. Unless you're taking him with a top 5 pick, he's got an excellent chance to be "worth" what you spent on him as long as he can play 14-15 games. Is anyone here REALLY stating they think LT should be drafted top 5? Not that they think he will produce as a top 5, but that he should be drafted there? If that's the case, then that's the disconnect for me. Do I think he could crack the top 5 again? Yeah. Do I think he will? Unlikely. Do I expect him to finish much lower than 7th or 8th? Gun to my head: No, not really. Would I likely have to draft him any earlier than 7th or 8th in a lot of leagues if I wanted him? Probably a no again.I'm not saying I wouldn't be holding my breath every week with him, at least early on, but I think he's got at least one more year of being a viable RB1, just not one I would pay a top 5 price tag for.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I look at LT and Manning in the same light. Both probably will not earn back their investment costs/draft position, but you are reasonably assured at getting most of your return back. Both of these guys will probably get you a 90-95% ROI, and that's still very good.
This is basically what it breaks down to, sort of, but I think Tomlinson is more likely to exceed that ROI than Manning is. Unless you're taking him with a top 5 pick, he's got an excellent chance to be "worth" what you spent on him as long as he can play 14-15 games. Is anyone here REALLY stating they think LT should be drafted top 5? Not that they think he will produce as a top 5, but that he should be drafted there? If that's the case, then that's the disconnect for me. Do I think he could crack the top 5 again? Yeah. Do I think he will? Unlikely. Do I expect him to finish much lower than 7th or 8th? Gun to my head: No, not really. Would I likely have to draft him any earlier than 7th or 8th in a lot of leagues if I wanted him? Probably a no again.I'm not saying I wouldn't be holding my breath every week with him, at least early on, but I think he's got at least one more year of being a viable RB1, just not one I would pay a top 5 price tag for.
That's the crux of the biscuit right there. SOMEONE is going to take LT top five is most every league. Should you be that person? I say no.
 
I look at LT and Manning in the same light. Both probably will not earn back their investment costs/draft position, but you are reasonably assured at getting most of your return back. Both of these guys will probably get you a 90-95% ROI, and that's still very good.
This is basically what it breaks down to, sort of, but I think Tomlinson is more likely to exceed that ROI than Manning is. Unless you're taking him with a top 5 pick, he's got an excellent chance to be "worth" what you spent on him as long as he can play 14-15 games. Is anyone here REALLY stating they think LT should be drafted top 5? Not that they think he will produce as a top 5, but that he should be drafted there? If that's the case, then that's the disconnect for me. Do I think he could crack the top 5 again? Yeah. Do I think he will? Unlikely. Do I expect him to finish much lower than 7th or 8th? Gun to my head: No, not really. Would I likely have to draft him any earlier than 7th or 8th in a lot of leagues if I wanted him? Probably a no again.I'm not saying I wouldn't be holding my breath every week with him, at least early on, but I think he's got at least one more year of being a viable RB1, just not one I would pay a top 5 price tag for.
That's the crux of the biscuit right there. SOMEONE is going to take LT top five is most every league. Should you be that person? I say no.
Every league is different . . .but LT has an ADP of RB10 and 12th overall at the moment.
 
I look at LT and Manning in the same light. Both probably will not earn back their investment costs/draft position, but you are reasonably assured at getting most of your return back. Both of these guys will probably get you a 90-95% ROI, and that's still very good.
This is basically what it breaks down to, sort of, but I think Tomlinson is more likely to exceed that ROI than Manning is. Unless you're taking him with a top 5 pick, he's got an excellent chance to be "worth" what you spent on him as long as he can play 14-15 games. Is anyone here REALLY stating they think LT should be drafted top 5? Not that they think he will produce as a top 5, but that he should be drafted there? If that's the case, then that's the disconnect for me. Do I think he could crack the top 5 again? Yeah. Do I think he will? Unlikely. Do I expect him to finish much lower than 7th or 8th? Gun to my head: No, not really. Would I likely have to draft him any earlier than 7th or 8th in a lot of leagues if I wanted him? Probably a no again.I'm not saying I wouldn't be holding my breath every week with him, at least early on, but I think he's got at least one more year of being a viable RB1, just not one I would pay a top 5 price tag for.
That's the crux of the biscuit right there. SOMEONE is going to take LT top five is most every league. Should you be that person? I say no.
Every league is different . . .but LT has an ADP of RB10 and 12th overall at the moment.
That may be the case right now, but 5 out of 13 staffers with overall rankings up have LT in the top 5. If over 1/3 of our staff rankings have him in the top 5, then that tells me that there'll be at least one person out of the 3-4-5 picks that will take him in most leagues.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I look at LT and Manning in the same light. Both probably will not earn back their investment costs/draft position, but you are reasonably assured at getting most of your return back. Both of these guys will probably get you a 90-95% ROI, and that's still very good.
This is basically what it breaks down to, sort of, but I think Tomlinson is more likely to exceed that ROI than Manning is. Unless you're taking him with a top 5 pick, he's got an excellent chance to be "worth" what you spent on him as long as he can play 14-15 games. Is anyone here REALLY stating they think LT should be drafted top 5? Not that they think he will produce as a top 5, but that he should be drafted there? If that's the case, then that's the disconnect for me. Do I think he could crack the top 5 again? Yeah. Do I think he will? Unlikely. Do I expect him to finish much lower than 7th or 8th? Gun to my head: No, not really. Would I likely have to draft him any earlier than 7th or 8th in a lot of leagues if I wanted him? Probably a no again.I'm not saying I wouldn't be holding my breath every week with him, at least early on, but I think he's got at least one more year of being a viable RB1, just not one I would pay a top 5 price tag for.
That's the crux of the biscuit right there. SOMEONE is going to take LT top five is most every league. Should you be that person? I say no.
Every league is different . . .but LT has an ADP of RB10 and 12th overall at the moment.
That may be the case right now, but 5 out of 13 staffers with overall rankings up have LT in the top 5. If over 1/3 of our staff rankings have him in the top 5, then that tells me that there'll be at least one person out of the 3-4-5 picks that will take him in most leagues.
:shrug:
 
BusterTBronco said:
Is anyone here REALLY stating they think LT should be drafted top 5?
FBG staff rankings currently have LT2 ranked #3 overall in redraft-ppr. FBG is the only fantasy site I know of where LT2 is ranked this high.http://subscribers.footballguys.com/apps/v...amp;howrecent=7
Well then let me expand your awareness. KFFL also has him ranked as #3 right now as well. http://www.kffl.com/article.php/98074/512

I've been doing my overall assessment of player rankings and my ONLY concern with LT is how high to take Sproles in a ppr redraft league.

Has anyone considered trying to take them both? Where is the "fair value" sweet spot for Sproles?

 
The one thing that I did notice with LT last season that tells me a RB is aging is that many times when he tried to make a quick move he tripped up and stumbled and fell without being hit. The same thing hapened to Emmitt later in his career. The mind is still as quick but the body is not responding.
that's what happens when you hurt your big toe and you try to push off it....
:goodposting:
 
The one thing that I did notice with LT last season that tells me a RB is aging is that many times when he tried to make a quick move he tripped up and stumbled and fell without being hit. The same thing hapened to Emmitt later in his career. The mind is still as quick but the body is not responding.
that's what happens when you hurt your big toe and you try to push off it....
:lmao:
If you think RBs age like fine wine, you are mistaken.
 
The one thing that I did notice with LT last season that tells me a RB is aging is that many times when he tried to make a quick move he tripped up and stumbled and fell without being hit. The same thing hapened to Emmitt later in his career. The mind is still as quick but the body is not responding.
that's what happens when you hurt your big toe and you try to push off it....
:thumbup:
If you think RBs age like fine wine, you are mistaken.
If you think LT was stumbling in cuts last year due to age rather than due to his toe injury, you are mistaken. :lmao:
 
That's the crux of the biscuit right there. SOMEONE is going to take LT top five is most every league. Should you be that person? I say no.
That may be the case right now, but 5 out of 13 staffers with overall rankings up have LT in the top 5. If over 1/3 of our staff rankings have him in the top 5, then that tells me that there'll be at least one person out of the 3-4-5 picks that will take him in most leagues.
I understand feeling that way totally. I absolutely wouldn't want to burn a pick on him, as of today, before pick 7-ish. Perhaps those 5 staffers with him top 5 are just wrong? :(However, and I know these are merely mocks, but in any mock I have watched/particiapted in over the past couple/three weeks at several different sites(FFCalc, etc.) he just isn't being taken that high(top 5) in probably 90-95% of them. He's ADPing right around 7-9.If he shows healthy in TC, and remains that way through the PS, I could see him sneaking back upwards in later drafts. If that's what happens, I won't be buying if I happen to be sitting inside the top 5.If I'm picking 8-10 and he falls that far, I'd have a really tough time passing on him. Playing those AFC West defenses twice each should be "good for what ails ya'."
 
Could LT have a larger workload despite his increase in injuries, a franchised Sproles, and his age? Absolutely
He's not going to have a larger workload if he has an increase in injuries.The most likely scenario, IMO, is that he'll have a larger workload than last year due to a decrease in injuries.Tomlinson is really not much of a team player in the sense of being willing to step aside just because a teammate is playing better. Tomlinson wants the ball, and as long as he's healthy, I'm not sure Norv has the guts to tell him no, even if Sproles would be more effective.
Read in the context of the other things in that list, I meant given his RECENT increase in injuries. In other words, the injuries that he's suffered in the last couple years. Put another way, despite the fact he's seemed to "breakdown" and not be available in the playoffs, would SD want to lighten his load during the year to keep him fresh OR is he going to still get a larger workload than last year despite his recent past.
I don't think his past injuries will affect his future playing time. I think he'll get his customary workload as long as he's healthy. He's healthy right now. We'll see how long that lasts, but I don't really see a reason to consider him injury-prone. He's struggled through nagging injuries in 2004, 2005, and 2008. He was limited in the playoffs in 2007 and 2008. Aside from that, in his eight seasons in the league, he's never missed a game due to injury.
 
Isn't it all relative, though? Yes, a 30-year old RB carries risk, but to those who say it's crazy to draft LT as a top 5 RB, name me four RBs other than AP who have less risk.

MJD? Are you kidding? His ADP reminds me of how excited people got about MB3 when Julius Jones left. Get ready for a let down.

Steven Jackson? Always underperforms his draft slot and is always dinged up. Now his offense is in complete shambles.

Michael Turner, Matt Forte, Steve Slaton, Chris Johnson, DeAngelo Williams? I've been burned by many 1-year wonders in the past. None of these guys are "safe" as top 5 picks (though Turner is close).

Frank Gore? Maybe the safest individual player in this group, but surrounding cast makes him a risk.

Heck, if you go by the theory that you can't win a championship in the first round but you can lose it, then the "safest" RBs are probably AP, LT, and Portis.

 
Ladanian Tomlinson has been one the most consistent RBs over the past decade. The two most significant questions for him are is his body failing him and is the Chargers offense going more to the pass?Chargers 08 - 478 pass attempts 4009 yds 8.4 ypa 34 TDs 392 rushes 1584 yds 13 TDs 4.0 ypc Chargers 07 - 470 pass attempts 3158 yds 6.9 ypa 21 TDs 440 rushes 1987 yds 18 TDs 4.5 ypcChargers 06 - 462 pass attempts 3392 yds 7.4 ypa 22 TDs 461 rushes 2482 yds 31 TDs 5.3 ypcChargers 05 - 522 pass attempts 3691 yds 7.2 ypa 24 TDs 434 rushes 1994 yds 21 TDs 4.6 ypcThe stats seem to indicate a marked increase in passing efficiency in 08 as well as a marked decrease in rushing efficiency. A review of the Chargers defenses performance revealed another major change in 08. They ranked 10th overall in 05, 10th overall in 06, 14th overall in 07, and 25th overall in 08. Perhaps the failure of the defense led to the decreased numeber of offensive plays and forced the Chargers to pass more often as a percentage of their offensive plays.I am not an offensive line guru, but I would be interested in others opinion there as the yard per carry stat really fell off in 08. Now a look at LT's stats:05 339 carries 1462 yds 4.3 ypc 18 TDs 51 catches 370 yards and 2 TDs FBG RB #306 348 carries 1815 yds 5.2 ypc 28 TDs 56 catches 508 yards and 3 TDs FBG RB #107 315 carries 1474 yds 4.7 ypc 15 TDs 60 catches 475 yards and 3 TDs FBG RB #108 292 carries 1110 yds 3.8 ypc 11 TDs 52 catches 426 yards and 1 TD FBG RB #7Similar marked decrease, so was it all LT and his injuries? Or was the O-Line play much worse in 08? Will LT again play like his old self or has his body begun to fail him? I think that the injuries were the significant difference in these stats and LT is in for a bounce back season along with the Chargers defense.Tomlinson 320 carries 1344 yds 4.2 ypc 50 catches 420 yds and 16 total TDs
You hit on two important points with the defense and O-line. The loss of Merriman led to almost no pass rush and their defense couldn't get off the field last year. Hopefully with his return it will enable Phillips to get free and Merriman can return to form and get some pass rush because they sorely missed it last year. As JWB mentioned above with his post regarding the reduced number of plays I think it largely has to do with the defense not getting off the field. The Chargers were 5th in '06 in TOP, 16th in '07 and 24th in '08. If their defense improves which it should with Merriman coming back, it will result in a better TOP, more plays and more rush attempts. Also, with respect to the line they were pretty terrible. As Hostile mentioned earlier in the thread McNeill was hurt, Hardwick was hurt (two pro bowlers) and Goff was horrible (and replaced this offseason). They've made some changes on the line and are healthy now so there's reason to think that the line will improve.With respect to their passing increase I think it was done out of necessity. With the defense playing poorly, the O-line playing poorly and LT banged up for the majority of the year the Chargers needed to lean on their passing game in order to win games. Norv has always been a coach that has leaned on the running game and I don't expect that will change if the other aspects of the Chargers return to "normal"...(i.e. defense bounces back, line bounces back and LT is healthy).
These points, IMO, are the best arguments for LT. When you take into account the entire team picture I think there is more reason to think LT will be fine this year than not. I have him in a 2-keeper league and, after reading this, will most likely keep him again (options are LT, Portis, D Williams and Jacobs). LT got injured early in the season last year and disappointed many because of expectations and ADP (I took him #1 overall in a redraft league last year). I think you will see him going in the bottom half of the first round in most drafts. At that placement he is a good bargain and about as safe as they come. No one works harder than LT in the off-season and I think that will extend his career longer than most. As a long-time LT owner, he deserves the benefit of the doubt after his first disappointing season due to injury. If he finished #7RB last season, that's still not a bust for a first round selection.
 
Isn't it all relative, though? Yes, a 30-year old RB carries risk, but to those who say it's crazy to draft LT as a top 5 RB, name me four RBs other than AP who have less risk.MJD? Are you kidding? His ADP reminds me of how excited people got about MB3 when Julius Jones left. Get ready for a let down.Steven Jackson? Always underperforms his draft slot and is always dinged up. Now his offense is in complete shambles.Michael Turner, Matt Forte, Steve Slaton, Chris Johnson, DeAngelo Williams? I've been burned by many 1-year wonders in the past. None of these guys are "safe" as top 5 picks (though Turner is close).Frank Gore? Maybe the safest individual player in this group, but surrounding cast makes him a risk.Heck, if you go by the theory that you can't win a championship in the first round but you can lose it, then the "safest" RBs are probably AP, LT, and Portis.
this makes sense to me. LT is not the flavor of the week anymore. if he's healthy i can see him easily being a top 5 FF back this yr.my gut tells me his ADP will creep up to top 5 as the season nears, otherwise i'd love to have a late pick and pair him with a top WR.
 
For those that don't realize it or fully comphrehend it, Tomlinson has been a workhorse over his career. He's had a ton of touches. Here are ALL the year end rankings for any RB that has suited up on Opening Day and entered the season with 3,000+ career touches . . .Emmitt: 5, 20, 25, 26, 63, 22Payton: 4, 5, 28Martin: 4, 29Bettis: 26, 18, 36Allen: 24, 15, 23Faulk: 30, 53Sanders: 10Edge: 52Thomas: 40, 88, 69Dickerson: 33, 104Harris: 104Watters: 60LT has 3,157 touches to date. Only 3 guys made it into the Top 5. I'm not dissing on Tomlinson, but one has to wonder how long he can continue to take the pounding that an NFL running back is asked to endure.
LT is as good if not better than 2 of those 3 guys.
 
LT has jumped Turner for the #4 spot in PPR according to mockdraftcentral with an ADP of 5.58 vs Turner's 5.91. That's based on 344 PPR drafts last week. 3 weeks ago his ADP was 6.21 vs Turner's 4.61 so LT is FLYING back up people's lists.

In standard performance leagues, he is sitting at #5/6 in a virtual lock with Steven Jackson behind Turner at 4. Kind of funny though that Sjax is #8 in PPR.. you'd think he'd be more valued in PPR.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
LT has jumped Turner for the #4 spot in PPR according to mockdraftcentral with an ADP of 5.58 vs Turner's 5.91. That's based on 344 PPR drafts last week. 3 weeks ago his ADP was 6.21 vs Turner's 4.61 so LT is FLYING back up people's lists.In standard performance leagues, he is sitting at #5/6 in a virtual lock with Steven Jackson behind Turner at 4. Kind of funny though that Sjax is #8 in PPR.. you'd think he'd be more valued in PPR.
this makes perfect sense to me. There were several reasons besides age that caused him to drop, questions about his health, speed/quickness, how he and Sproles will be used and the state of the line. With respect to all of those questions they have all been favorable to LT so far. Reports out of camp are that LT is on a mission and is one of if not the most impressive players so far. He looks completely healthy and has that burst and cutting ability back. Sproles primary role is kicking/punt returns and LT is taking nearly all the 1st string snaps. The big key to the o-line, Marcus McNeill, looks like a different player after offseason neck surgery.It looks like those that drafted/traded early may have gotten some real nice value for LT but the gap is closing quickly.A couple comments from yesterday's TC:Tomlinson looked fast, had all of his explosive moves, and caught the ball well. I couldn't help but think to myself that LT looks as dangerous as ever once he gets into the open field.LT lining up in the wildcat...Philip Rivers lined up wide right. Vincent Jackson went in motion, LaDainian Tomlinson took the shotgun snap and ran through the line. So began a period of the Chargers working on the Wildcat, or the Frog, as they call it. As he did in the spring, when they first worked on the formation, Norv Turner said the period was mostly for his defense to see the Wildcat. He doesn't think his side needs it. While he likes the opportunities it creates for Tomlinson and Legedue Naanee, he doesn't like the fact that it renders Rivers all but a spectator and makes Antonio Gates a tackle. I bet they use it at least a handful of times during the season to get a first down, or somewhere inside the 30. Tomlinson did not hand off at all. He threw one pass to a wide-open Jackson. Naanee also threw to Jackson. They ran a reverse out of the formation as well.Tomlinson then makes a case for himself, saying he now feels just as spry as he did in 2006 when was named MVP. "I do, I really do," he says. "I've been thinking about some of the (recent) training camps that I've been through, and this is the first time in a while that there's not any soreness. "I'm injury-free. This is the same way I felt at camp (in '06)."
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I don't think it would suprise anyone that LT finishes the year a top 5-7 back in a PPR format. But there are a plethera of options to pick ahead of him this season.

I will let others draft the big name. If however LT is finding his way down to me in the late second to mid third round....heavy consideration must be given for him to put together one last big year.

Based of course on a full 16 games and LT having no real injury issues this season.

325 carries

1375 yards

13 TD's

45 receptions

274 yards

3 TD's

 
I don't think it would suprise anyone that LT finishes the year a top 5-7 back in a PPR format. But there are a plethera of options to pick ahead of him this season.

I will let others draft the big name. If however LT is finding his way down to me in the late second to mid third round....heavy consideration must be given for him to put together one last big year.

Based of course on a full 16 games and LT having no real injury issues this season.

325 carries

1375 yards

13 TD's

45 receptions

274 yards

3 TD's
:eek: :eek:
 
I don't think it would suprise anyone that LT finishes the year a top 5-7 back in a PPR format. But there are a plethera of options to pick ahead of him this season.I will let others draft the big name. If however LT is finding his way down to me in the late second to mid third round....heavy consideration must be given for him to put together one last big year.Based of course on a full 16 games and LT having no real injury issues this season.325 carries1375 yards13 TD's45 receptions274 yards3 TD's
If those were LT's stats he would need to be taken as the first overall draft pick.LT's stats will look like this if he can stay healthy.295 Carries1200 Yards13 TD's40 Rec1 TDWith that being said, I am selecting him 3rd overall pick in a 12 team big $ PPR league. I plan to grab sproles if he falls to me in the 7th round!
 
I don't think it would suprise anyone that LT finishes the year a top 5-7 back in a PPR format. But there are a plethera of options to pick ahead of him this season.I will let others draft the big name. If however LT is finding his way down to me in the late second to mid third round....heavy consideration must be given for him to put together one last big year.Based of course on a full 16 games and LT having no real injury issues this season.325 carries1375 yards13 TD's45 receptions274 yards3 TD's
LOL at the notion that LT could fall to the late second round, much less the third round. And at projecting these stats but saying that you wouldn't take him unless he did drop that far. :goodposting:
 
I don't think it would suprise anyone that LT finishes the year a top 5-7 back in a PPR format. But there are a plethera of options to pick ahead of him this season.I will let others draft the big name. If however LT is finding his way down to me in the late second to mid third round....heavy consideration must be given for him to put together one last big year.Based of course on a full 16 games and LT having no real injury issues this season.325 carries1375 yards13 TD's45 receptions274 yards3 TD's
If you are hoping to get him late 2nd or mid 3rd it's safe to say he won't be on any of your teams.If you feel that those are going to be his numbers why wouldn't you draft him mid-1st?ETA...JWB beat me to it...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I don't think it would suprise anyone that LT finishes the year a top 5-7 back in a PPR format. But there are a plethera of options to pick ahead of him this season.

I will let others draft the big name. If however LT is finding his way down to me in the late second to mid third round....heavy consideration must be given for him to put together one last big year.

Based of course on a full 16 games and LT having no real injury issues this season.

325 carries

1375 yards

13 TD's

45 receptions

274 yards

3 TD's
;) :eek:
I don't expect him to fall out of the first round...I really don't....but I would not take him this year in the first or early second...too many other options at WR and RB then to risk it on a guy who really has had a hard time staying healthy. He just looked real slow last season. And I understand he had a bad wheel. But he has shown clear signs of breaking down unlike Westbrook who was very quick and able to cut when playing last season. LT looked like a shadow of himself...yet still finished top 10. I don't see that this season if he breaks down again.Again I would rather land him as my RB2 with his downside risk then take a shot as my RB1 with the chance he finally performs below his ADP. If that makes any sense.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I don't think it would suprise anyone that LT finishes the year a top 5-7 back in a PPR format. But there are a plethera of options to pick ahead of him this season.

I will let others draft the big name. If however LT is finding his way down to me in the late second to mid third round....heavy consideration must be given for him to put together one last big year.

Based of course on a full 16 games and LT having no real injury issues this season.

325 carries

1375 yards

13 TD's

45 receptions

274 yards

3 TD's
Projecting those numbers you wouldn't draft LT in the late 1st, early 2nd round if he fell? When was the last time LT missed a game due to injury?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I don't think it would suprise anyone that LT finishes the year a top 5-7 back in a PPR format. But there are a plethera of options to pick ahead of him this season.

I will let others draft the big name. If however LT is finding his way down to me in the late second to mid third round....heavy consideration must be given for him to put together one last big year.

Based of course on a full 16 games and LT having no real injury issues this season.

325 carries

1375 yards

13 TD's

45 receptions

274 yards

3 TD's
;) :lol:
I don't expect him to fall out of the first round...I really don't....but I would not take him this year in the first or early second...too many other options at WR and RB then to risk it on a guy who really has had a hard time staying healthy. ]He just looked real slow last season. And I understand he had a bad wheel. But he has shown clear signs of breaking down unlike Westbrook who was very quick and able to cut when playing last season. LT looked like a shadow of himself...yet still finished top 10. I don't see that this season if he breaks down again.Again I would rather land him as my RB2 with his downside risk then take a shot as my RB1 with the chance he finally performs below his ADP. If that makes any sense.
Most, if not all of what you are saying, makes little sense. Thanks for trying though.
 
I have my dynasty cap on.....I guess that happens when you don't pay redrafts anymore.

Sorry for the confusion.

 
I look at LT and Manning in the same light. Both probably will not earn back their investment costs/draft position, but you are reasonably assured at getting most of your return back. Both of these guys will probably get you a 90-95% ROI, and that's still very good.
This is basically what it breaks down to, sort of, but I think Tomlinson is more likely to exceed that ROI than Manning is. Unless you're taking him with a top 5 pick, he's got an excellent chance to be "worth" what you spent on him as long as he can play 14-15 games. Is anyone here REALLY stating they think LT should be drafted top 5? Not that they think he will produce as a top 5, but that he should be drafted there? If that's the case, then that's the disconnect for me. Do I think he could crack the top 5 again? Yeah. Do I think he will? Unlikely. Do I expect him to finish much lower than 7th or 8th? Gun to my head: No, not really. Would I likely have to draft him any earlier than 7th or 8th in a lot of leagues if I wanted him? Probably a no again.I'm not saying I wouldn't be holding my breath every week with him, at least early on, but I think he's got at least one more year of being a viable RB1, just not one I would pay a top 5 price tag for.
That's the crux of the biscuit right there. SOMEONE is going to take LT top five is most every league. Should you be that person? I say no.
Every league is different . . .but LT has an ADP of RB10 and 12th overall at the moment.
That may be the case right now, but 5 out of 13 staffers with overall rankings up have LT in the top 5. If over 1/3 of our staff rankings have him in the top 5, then that tells me that there'll be at least one person out of the 3-4-5 picks that will take him in most leagues.
On the decline or not, LT scored the same amount of points as Turner in my PPR league last year. And somehow no one blinks as eye if Turner goes in the Top 5 :goodposting:
 
hmm.. i would say the majority of the posts are bearish on tomlinsons prospects this year, and that he doesn't present good value (ADP ~1.07).

most of projections are around last year or slightly worse, say 1400-1500 total yards and 12 TDs. i am in line with this and currently have him at 1150 rushing 40 catches for 300 yards and 12 TDs.

i feel that's a safe floor for him in 09... so i have a couple questions:

1) if you agree with that being his floor, don't you think that is a safe pick at 1.07? what 6 players do you have above him with a higher floor (especially at RB)?

2) if you disagree, what do you have being his floor?

 
hmm.. i would say the majority of the posts are bearish on tomlinsons prospects this year, and that he doesn't present good value (ADP ~1.07).most of projections are around last year or slightly worse, say 1400-1500 total yards and 12 TDs. i am in line with this and currently have him at 1150 rushing 40 catches for 300 yards and 12 TDs.i feel that's a safe floor for him in 09... so i have a couple questions:1) if you agree with that being his floor, don't you think that is a safe pick at 1.07? what 6 players do you have above him with a higher floor (especially at RB)?2) if you disagree, what do you have being his floor?
I guess the real fear about drafting LT is he pulls a "Alexander" and just hits the brick wall big time. It does happen that way for RB's. That is the inherent risk of drafting "high mileage" backs. So the floor to me could be as bad as:265 carries975 yards7 TD's31 receptions158 yards0 TD's And in redrafts I agree of course he will go in the first round. Again I will let someone else take him there. Too many options to take the risk that the great LT will hit the wall. I hope he doesen't. I want to see him break the rushing record...he is a legendary player.If I were in the 12th hole and he fell there....he may be worth the risk to form a sick one, two punch.So to bring my orignal projection based on 16 games of a healthy LT and now this floor. My true point is he has a chance to be really good....and really bad based on his current ADP. I think LT is a big ??? this season. Your either going to be really happy and pissed off he was your first pick. I don't think this year presents an in-between for LT.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I guess the real fear about drafting LT is he pulls a "Alexander" and just hits the brick wall big time. It does happen that way for RB's. That is the inherent risk of drafting "high mileage" backs. ..So to bring my orignal projection based on 16 games of a healthy LT and now this floor. My true point is he has a chance to be really good....and really bad based on his current ADP. I think LT is a big ??? this season. Your either going to be really happy and pissed off he was your first pick. I don't think this year presents an in-between for LT.
point taken.. i get the whole age+touches RB decline theory and definitely believe LT is on the downside of his career.i guess where we disagree is in the probability of what will happen this coming season. i'm much more comfortable predicting an "inbetween" season than either a disaster or a fantastic season. i have both of those scenarios as pretty big outliers.what's the key for him hitting either of the extremes in your view? is it all the risk of injury? granted he looked slower last season, he still didn't look like he had completely lost his mojo like shaun did in 06.
 
I've seen several people suggest that LT could hit the wall and fall totally flat on his face and either miss a lot of time, lose his job, see a lot less carries, or otherwise be a big disappointment.

Let's look at the 20 or so guys that come remotely close to being in this discussion, as these guys were both high mileage backs and a cut above many other backs for a long time.

Emmitt Smith

350+ touches/1500+ yfs/ 13 TD at 30

300 touches/almost 1300 yfs/9 TD at 31

275 touches/1100 yfs/only 3 TD at 32

Dallas did not have much offense by the end of the Smith era, so his TD took a major hit. He wasn't the back he was in his prime, but I would not say he went from All Pro to NFL backup/scrub.

Did he "hit the wall" at 30? No.

Walter Payton

425 touches/2000 yfs/11 TD at 30

375 touches/2000 yfs/11 TD at 31

350 touches/1700 yfs/11 TD at 32

Did he "hit the wall" at 30? No.

Barry Sanders

380 touches/1750 yfs/4 TD at 30 then retired

Did he "hit the wall" at 30? No.

Curtis Martin

375 touches/1550 yfs/2 TD at 30

410 touches/1900 yfs/14 TD at 31

250ish touches/850 yfs/5 TD at 32

Did he "hit the wall" at 30? No.

Jerome Bettis

200ish touches/700 yfs/9 TD at 30

250 touches/900 yfs/ 7 TD at 31

250 touches/1000 yfs/13 TD at 32

Did he "hit the wall" at 30? No, in that he was already a part time short yardage back.

Eric Dickerson

180 touches/750 yfs/4 TD at 30

200 touches/800 yfs/3 TD at 31

200 touches/800 yfs/3 TD at 32

Did he "hit the wall" at 30? Yes to the extent that he went from workhorse to part-time back with very little production.

Tony Dorsett

350 touches/1600 yfs/7 TD at 30

350 touches/1750 yfs/10 TD at 31

200 touches/1000 yfs/6 TD at 32

Did he "hit the wall" at 30? No.

Marshall Faulk

250 touches/1100 yfs/11 TD at 30

250 touches/1100 yfs/4 TD at 31

100 touches/600 yfs/1 TD at 32

Did he "hit the wall" at 30? Maybe. He had a degenerative knee problem, so his falloff was somewhat expected.

Marcus Allen

200ish touches/850 yfs/13 TD at 30

75 touches/400 yfs/2 TD at 31

100 touches/550 yfs/ TD at 32

Did he "hit the wall" at 30? Given that he had 5 more seasons in the Top 25 AFTER age 32, no.

Edgerrin James

Almost 150 touches/600 yfs/3 TD at 30

Did he "hit the wall" at 30? Probably, but who knows given how putrid the ARI running game has been.

Franco Harris

Almost 200 touches/1000 yfs/6 TD at 30

275 touches/1250 yfs/9 TD at 31

175 touches/850 yfs/2 TD at 32 (9 game strike season)

Did he "hit the wall" at 30? Not really. Just not quite as effective as in his prime.

Thurman Thomas

300 touches/1300 yfs/8 TD at 30

175 touches/850 yfs/1 TD at 31

125 touches/600 yfs/3 TD at 32

Did he "hit the wall" at 30? Maybe. His season at 30 wasn't bad, but he wasn't ever the same as he was in his prime or even close to it.

John Riggins

Around 300 touches/1300 yfs/12 TD at 30

DNP at 31 – contract dispute

200 touches/600 yfs/3 TD at 32 (9 game strike season)

Did he "hit the wall" at 30? No. Had 2 Top 10 seasons beyond at 32.

Fred Taylor

250 touches/1350 yfs/6 TD at 30

225 touches/1250 yfs/5 TD at 31

150 touches/650 yfs/1 TD at 32

Did he "hit the wall" at 30? No. Had 2 solid seasons at 30 and 31 in a part time role.

Corey Dillon

350 touches/1750 yfs/13 TD at 30

225 touches/800 yfs/13 TD at 31

200 touches/950 yfs/13 TD at 32

Did he "hit the wall" at 30? No.

O.J. Simpson

150ish touches/700 yfs/0 TD at 30

175 touches/750 yfs/3 TD at 31

125 touches/500 yfs/3 TD

Did he "hit the wall" at 30? Yes.

Warrick Dunn

300 touches/1600 yfs/4 TD at 30

300 touches/1300 yfs/5 TD at 31

250 touches/950 yfs/2 TD at 32

Did he "hit the wall" at 30? No.

Ricky Watters

350 touches/1600 ys/7 TD at 30

Almost 350 touches/1850 yfs/9 TD at 31

75 touches/400 yfs/1 TD at 32 (then injured in Week 5)

Tiki Barber

400 touches/almost 2400 yfs/11 TD at 30

375 touches/2100 yfs/5 TD at 32 (then retired)

Did he "hit the wall" at 30? No.

Eddie George

325 touches/1200 yfs/5 TD at 30

125 touches/500 yfs/4 TD at 31

Did he "hit the wall" at 30? Pretty much yes.

Ottis Anderson

30 - injured

31 - Non-starter

350 touches/1300 yfs/14 TD at 32

Did he "hit the wall" at 30? Not really applicable.

Those are all the guys in the league that rushed for 10,000 yards (except for Jim Brown who retired before he was 30 and Jamal Lewis who hasn’t yet played as a 30 year old).

LT should be compared to guys in this group. I see Dickerson, Simpson, Edge, and George as the guys that pretty much ran out of gas. Thomas is a maybe and Faulk was known to have a long-standing injury.

That’s still a decent success rate for all the others. I count 13 that were successful (with a couple that were ok but not ground breaking).

 
Here's my dilemma. I want to take LT. I REALLY want to take him. I just don't know if I want to take a gamble on my first round pick. Do you think there is even a gamble involved or am I just worrying too much?

 
definitely good stuff from David.. the only way i see the falling off a cliff scenario happening is an unforeseen injury

 
David Yudkin said:
I've seen several people suggest that LT could hit the wall and fall totally flat on his face and either miss a lot of time, lose his job, see a lot less carries, or otherwise be a big disappointment.Let's look at the 20 or so guys that come remotely close to being in this discussion, as these guys were both high mileage backs and a cut above many other backs for a long time.
honestly some of your conclusions are IMO wrong........case by case IMO as follows:
Emmitt Smith350+ touches/1500+ yfs/ 13 TD at 30300 touches/almost 1300 yfs/9 TD at 31275 touches/1100 yfs/only 3 TD at 32Dallas did not have much offense by the end of the Smith era, so his TD took a major hit. He wasn't the back he was in his prime, but I would not say he went from All Pro to NFL backup/scrub.Did he "hit the wall" at 30? No.
debatable. he went from 1300/9 to 1100/3. maybe not "hitting the wall" but the massive TD drop was significant.
Walter Payton425 touches/2000 yfs/11 TD at 30375 touches/2000 yfs/11 TD at 31350 touches/1700 yfs/11 TD at 32Did he "hit the wall" at 30? No.
true.
Barry Sanders380 touches/1750 yfs/4 TD at 30 then retiredDid he "hit the wall" at 30? No.
try "N/A" (although I"d bet the house he would not have)
Curtis Martin375 touches/1550 yfs/2 TD at 30410 touches/1900 yfs/14 TD at 31250ish touches/850 yfs/5 TD at 32Did he "hit the wall" at 30? No.
true, although I don't think this is a discussion of an EXACT age necessarily, the point being that at ABOUT this age, even the best of RBs quickly fade.
 
(CONT'D)

Jerome Bettis200ish touches/700 yfs/9 TD at 30250 touches/900 yfs/ 7 TD at 31250 touches/1000 yfs/13 TD at 32Did he "hit the wall" at 30? No, in that he was already a part time short yardage back.
true.
Eric Dickerson180 touches/750 yfs/4 TD at 30200 touches/800 yfs/3 TD at 31200 touches/800 yfs/3 TD at 32Did he "hit the wall" at 30? Yes to the extent that he went from workhorse to part-time back with very little production.
in other words: yes. :cool:
Tony Dorsett350 touches/1600 yfs/7 TD at 30350 touches/1750 yfs/10 TD at 31200 touches/1000 yfs/6 TD at 32Did he "hit the wall" at 30? No.
:mellow: going from 1600/1700 yds to 1000 and TDs nearly halved isn't hitting the wall? yes.
Marshall Faulk250 touches/1100 yfs/11 TD at 30250 touches/1100 yfs/4 TD at 31100 touches/600 yfs/1 TD at 32Did he "hit the wall" at 30? Maybe.
clearly yes.
Marcus Allen200ish touches/850 yfs/13 TD at 3075 touches/400 yfs/2 TD at 31100 touches/550 yfs/ TD at 32Did he "hit the wall" at 30? Given that he had 5 more seasons in the Top 25 AFTER age 32, no.
true, but Allen's production dropped off significantly after his first few years (long before he hit 30) so this is basically N/A.
 
Edgerrin JamesAlmost 150 touches/600 yfs/3 TD at 30Did he "hit the wall" at 30? Probably, but who knows given how putrid the ARI running game has been.
sorry but weak excuse. he had less than the previous year's total so a resounding "yes."
Franco HarrisAlmost 200 touches/1000 yfs/6 TD at 30275 touches/1250 yfs/9 TD at 31175 touches/850 yfs/2 TD at 32 (9 game strike season)Did he "hit the wall" at 30? Not really. Just not quite as effective as in his prime.
going from 1250/9 to 850/2 isn't hitting the wall? yeah right!
Thurman Thomas300 touches/1300 yfs/8 TD at 30175 touches/850 yfs/1 TD at 31125 touches/600 yfs/3 TD at 32Did he "hit the wall" at 30? Maybe. His season at 30 wasn't bad, but he wasn't ever the same as he was in his prime or even close to it.
basically he faded significantly well before 30 so I'd call this N/A.
John RigginsAround 300 touches/1300 yfs/12 TD at 30DNP at 31 – contract dispute200 touches/600 yfs/3 TD at 32 (9 game strike season)Did he "hit the wall" at 30? No. Had 2 Top 10 seasons beyond at 32.
yep in fact very good seasons
Fred Taylor250 touches/1350 yfs/6 TD at 30225 touches/1250 yfs/5 TD at 31150 touches/650 yfs/1 TD at 32Did he "hit the wall" at 30? No. Had 2 solid seasons at 30 and 31 in a part time role.
right he waited a year or 2 more to hit the wall, basically.
 
Corey Dillon350 touches/1750 yfs/13 TD at 30225 touches/800 yfs/13 TD at 31200 touches/950 yfs/13 TD at 32Did he "hit the wall" at 30? No.O.J. Simpson150ish touches/700 yfs/0 TD at 30175 touches/750 yfs/3 TD at 31125 touches/500 yfs/3 TDDid he "hit the wall" at 30? Yes.Warrick Dunn300 touches/1600 yfs/4 TD at 30300 touches/1300 yfs/5 TD at 31250 touches/950 yfs/2 TD at 32Did he "hit the wall" at 30? No.Ricky Watters350 touches/1600 ys/7 TD at 30Almost 350 touches/1850 yfs/9 TD at 3175 touches/400 yfs/1 TD at 32 (then injured in Week 5)Tiki Barber400 touches/almost 2400 yfs/11 TD at 30375 touches/2100 yfs/5 TD at 32 (then retired)Did he "hit the wall" at 30? No. Eddie George 325 touches/1200 yfs/5 TD at 30125 touches/500 yfs/4 TD at 31Did he "hit the wall" at 30? Pretty much yes.Ottis Anderson 30 - injured31 - Non-starter350 touches/1300 yfs/14 TD at 32Did he "hit the wall" at 30? Not really applicable.
agree on all these
That’s still a decent success rate for all the others. I count 13 that were successful (with a couple that were ok but not ground breaking).
I count about 50% who hit the wall right at/about 30 (some a bit later, some a bit sooner). I wouldn't call that a decent rate.......All that said though, I lean to drafting LT if he's there for a reasonable price.
 
Brutha... I think you were misunderstanding the take-away from his post. The point was age 30 (relevant here as LT is 30), in several of your comments you are referring to the age 32 stat drop offs.

 
brutha, I think you may have misread or misinterpreted David's post. He was asking for each of those RBs if they hit the wall at age 30. He posted their seasons at age 30, 31, and 32. Much of what you cited in your responses was focused on the age 32 seasons. LT is 30, not 32. This thread is focused on this 2009 season, not the 2010 and 2011 seasons.

 
For those that don't realize it or fully comphrehend it, Tomlinson has been a workhorse over his career. He's had a ton of touches. Here are ALL the year end rankings for any RB that has suited up on Opening Day and entered the season with 3,000+ career touches . . .

Emmitt: 5, 20, 25, 26, 63, 22

Payton: 4, 5, 28

Martin: 4, 29

Bettis: 26, 18, 36

Allen: 24, 15, 23

Faulk: 30, 53

Sanders: 10

Edge: 52

Thomas: 40, 88, 69

Dickerson: 33, 104

Harris: 104

Watters: 60

LT has 3,157 touches to date. Only 3 guys made it into the Top 5.

I'm not dissing on Tomlinson, but one has to wonder how long he can continue to take the pounding that an NFL running back is asked to endure.
LT is as good if not better than 2 of those 3 guys.
Some of those guys (bolded) had major knee injuries well before their 3,000 carries. LT has not, so projecting him to respond the way they did isn't apples to apples.Some of those RBs were bruisers (Bettis, Harris) and LT isn't, he takes far fewer hits.

So you're left with, as closer comparisons -

Emmitt

Martin

Payton

Sanders

Dickerson

Only 2 of those failed to make the top-5 after 3,000 carries.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top