BobbyLayne
Footballguy
Who you got?
Last edited by a moderator:
It’s KamalaWhy is there no option for "None"?
If you wanted a list of "Most Terrible Choices Ever", that might be your list.
Don't even know why Kamela is on that list to begin with.
To destroy Pence in a debate. But yea, better to pick someone who will help in a swing state.Why is there no option for "None"?
If you wanted a list of "Most Terrible Choices Ever", that might be your list.
Don't even know why Kamela is on that list to begin with.
I went with Klobachar as well even though she won't help win a state. I think Minnesota will go Bidens way no matter who his VP is. I just think she has the most experience on many issues.Kal El said:Went with Klobuchar, but I'm fine with whoever gives him the best chance to win.
Did you catch the WAPO article? She's the new hotness.3 Stacey Abrams posts? Has to be Trump supporters. She makes Sarah Palin look overqualified for the job.
She really doesn't. Educational background, experience in the Georgia General Assembly...ability to speak coherently. She makes Palin look like...well, what most people think about Sarah Palin.3 Stacey Abrams posts? Has to be Trump supporters. She makes Sarah Palin look overqualified for the job.
I read it...not sure the conclusions you are making are quite accurate. They were discussing her command of the crowd and eyes and stage. Do you think that article was about appearance and not presence?Did you catch the WAPO article? She's the new hotness.
Beto 2.0 for the democrat party. How about winning a statewide election first3 Stacey Abrams posts? Has to be Trump supporters. She makes Sarah Palin look overqualified for the job.
I dont think it was about her appearance at all. They compared dems excitement over her to that of Bill Clinton and the Obamas. That is upper elite tier. If she isnt the VP pick, the dems have failed.I read it...not sure the conclusions you are making are quite accurate. They were discussing her command of the crowd and eyes and stage. Do you think that article was about appearance and not presence?
And the hotness comment? Also other comments ive read when people discussed that article...? Seems several have talked more about her appearance.I dont think it was about her appearance at all. They compared dems excitement over her to that of Bill Clinton and the Obamas. That is upper elite tier. If she isnt the VP pick, the dems have failed.
Okay, so one of her 3 votes has been unmasked.And the hotness comment? Also other comments ive read when people discussed that article...? Seems several have talked more about her appearance.
I think she has a presence to her and seems to do well when speaking to such crowds that seem to be fired up. With a candidate like Biden who people aren't that excited about...seems a VP that has excitement behind them would be a good pick. You don't get that from Klobuchar.
New hotness means something that is up and coming. Doesnt necessarily mean looks are involved. If you want to talk about her appearance, go for it.And the hotness comment? Also other comments ive read when people discussed that article...? Seems several have talked more about her appearance.
I think she has a presence to her and seems to do well when speaking to such crowds that seem to be fired up. With a candidate like Biden who people aren't that excited about...seems a VP that has excitement behind them would be a good pick. You don't get that from Klobuchar.
Nope...haven't actually voted in the poll. Try commenting on what I said...not the poster.Okay, so one of her 3 votes has been unmasked.
Her appearance is pretty irrelevant to me.New hotness means something that is up and coming. Doesnt necessarily mean looks are involved. If you want to talk about her appearance, go for it.
Then why do you keep asking about it?Her appearance is pretty irrelevant to me.
I don't believe I keep doing much of anything...I asked based on the comments made here and in another thread where talk of hotness and supermodel were brought up...as if the article was about people thinking it was about appearance. I pointed out it was not about that.Then why do you keep asking about it?
So you say something worthy of getting you a time-out.Then why do you keep asking about it?
This is the best decision.The Trump strategy in the campaign is already clear. They are going to attack Biden as too old. Having a young VP actually accentuates this. He needs to pick somebody that people would be very comfortable with as president. The best choice is Klobuchar.
Stop...seriously. This is just a complete bogus accusation.So you say something worthy of getting you a time-out.
Georgia General Assembly vs. Alaska Governor?She really doesn't. Educational background, experience in the Georgia General Assembly...ability to speak coherently. She makes Palin look like...well, what most people think about Sarah Palin.
I think if people want to hit on Trump's weight being unhealthy, they need to do the same for Abrams.I don't believe I keep doing much of anything...I asked based on the comments made here and in another thread where talk of hotness and supermodel were brought up...as if the article was about people thinking it was about appearance. I pointed out it was not about that.
Trump is in his 70s. Abrams is 46. It’s not a big concern. In fact I think the fact that she openly struggles with weight issues will be a plus for her with millions of women who can identify. And Trump won’t be able to resist a sexist comment about her, which will only further strengthen her support- he’s already made racist comments about her in 2018.I think if people want to hit on Trump's weight being unhealthy, they need to do the same for Abrams.
With Biden already a health concern adding Abrams doesn't seem like the Dems best option.
Abrams is also African American which means she's a higher risk already for heart issues. Obesity just increases her risk.Trump is in his 70s. Abrams is 46. It’s not a big concern. In fact I think the fact that she openly struggles with weight issues will be a plus for her with millions of women who can identify. And Trump won’t be able to resist a sexist comment about her, which will only further strengthen her support- he’s already made racist comments about her in 2018.
Doesnt take a great orator to beat Palin. Also...Trump supporters making claims if someone’s qualifications is odd. This thread, like then democratic voters wanting change...I find taking the advice of people who think Trump is a good President to be a bad idea for the Democratic party.Georgia General Assembly vs. Alaska Governor?
I don’t see Abrams as some great orator Sorry
There is a decent chance the VP may have to take over so Amy is a great choice based on her past experience. Amy would be able to step in and run things. Warren would be second, again because I want experience this time around.3 Stacey Abrams posts? Has to be Trump supporters. She makes Sarah Palin look overqualified for the job.
Biden should not have committed to anyone or any gender. What if he committed to Mayor Pete to energize the gay vote?I’m happy with any of them, but give me Stacey since she helps win Georgia and energizes the black vote.
We have had non-boring for 3 years. How is that working out? Boring sounds pretty good right now.Biden and Klobuchar is such a boring ticket.
I went with Abrams
I agree. We all have to look at what’s best for America given Biden’s age and mental decline. If God forbid Biden wins the election, hands down the answer is Amy given those options.There is a decent chance the VP may have to take over so Amy is a great choice based on her past experience. Amy would be able to step in and run things. Warren would be second, again because I want experience this time around.
Abrams health issues along with never running bigger government is a no, Harris butted heads with Biden already so he won`t pick her, Whitmer has only been a Governor for 2 years and from all I read Michigan is in turmoil and she probably won`t be re-elected there.