Harper sits? Im sure he'll be in nickel and dime, but base?If it takes Vaccaro a year to start on that defense something went terribly wrong.
Harper is no slouch.If it takes Vaccaro a year to start on that defense something went terribly wrong.
Harper sits (and comes in on passing situations) or is cut.Harper sits? Im sure he'll be in nickel and dime, but base?If it takes Vaccaro a year to start on that defense something went terribly wrong.
He's got Patterson listed as an "Elite WR 1"Patterson ahead of Austin will generate some conversation.
Thanks Bloom
And Ponder proving he has the capability to be a consistent NFL caliber QB.He's got Patterson listed as an "Elite WR 1"Patterson ahead of Austin will generate some conversation.
Thanks Bloom
Even as a Vikings fan I think that's pretty bold for a rookie WR. Even Julio Jones wasn't an Elite WR his first year, although he showed signs that he had become one at the end of the season.
Keeping my fingers crossed Bloom is right, and I think it will all depend on the guidance of Greg Jennings.
thats his upside. he also has a high risk factorHe's got Patterson listed as an "Elite WR 1"Patterson ahead of Austin will generate some conversation.
Thanks Bloom
Even as a Vikings fan I think that's pretty bold for a rookie WR. Even Julio Jones wasn't an Elite WR his first year, although he showed signs that he had become one at the end of the season.
Keeping my fingers crossed Bloom is right, and I think it will all depend on the guidance of Greg Jennings.
Yes, and I jumped the gun without realizing it was long-term dynasty values.Those rankings are prefaced with "The potential to be..." I believe.
because just like w Hillman, the longer it takes to get on the field, the more likely someone will usurp your shot for a big roleHarper sits (and comes in on passing situations) or is cut.Harper sits? Im sure he'll be in nickel and dime, but base?If it takes Vaccaro a year to start on that defense something went terribly wrong.
Edit: And why do we (not just you Sig, lots do this) care if Fox plays Ball this year when we're considering these guys for dynasty purposes?
The next guy would break the Fox mold? Why wouldn't the rule be true for him too?because just like w Hillman, the longer it takes to get on the field, the more likely someone will usurp your shot for a big roleHarper sits (and comes in on passing situations) or is cut.Harper sits? Im sure he'll be in nickel and dime, but base?If it takes Vaccaro a year to start on that defense something went terribly wrong.
Edit: And why do we (not just you Sig, lots do this) care if Fox plays Ball this year when we're considering these guys for dynasty purposes?
agree IDP class looks a lot better for FF than it did pre-draftIDP owners have to be pretty happy where most of these guys ended up.
Ansah and Jordan as DEs in 4-3, Brown and Jones went to spectacular situations, Bostic and Alonso as well to a lesser extent, and as an Oakland homer, it's tough to imagine Moore not being a compiler on a bad defense. Burris is penciled in as the WLB, but Moore is a lot more athletic. he may be a 3 down LB early in the season.
With this is mind, #17 (offensively) seems awfully high for Michael. With Turbin and Lynch each having 3 years left on their contracts, it's hard to see him being relevant in the next 3 years without injury.because just like w Hillman, the longer it takes to get on the field, the more likely someone will usurp your shot for a big role
Strictly based on upside. Michael looked like the best natural runner on film in this class, and the Seahawks obviously agreed.With this is mind, #17 (offensively) seems awfully high for Michael. With Turbin and Lynch each having 3 years left on their contracts, it's hard to see him being relevant in the next 3 years without injury.because just like w Hillman, the longer it takes to get on the field, the more likely someone will usurp your shot for a big role
the spread isn't as big as the numbers indicate. I have allen and hunter close in talent.I'm having trouble understanding why these two players are so spread out considering their upside/risk factors:
8. Keenan Allen WR SD 9 Floyd and Alexander shouldn t be hard to overtake High WR2 315. Justin Hunter WR TEN 15 flashes of greatness but inconsistent much like guy he s trying to displace Low WR1 4Seems like they should be much tighter in ranking. Risk factors are similar and if Hunter can be a WR1 that seems worth the slightly higher risk, no?
Personally I think the two are close but haven't done enough research for my own rankings yet.
Elite WR 1 as his UPSIDE. He's not saying he's an Elite WR 1 RIGHT NOW.He's got Patterson listed as an "Elite WR 1"Patterson ahead of Austin will generate some conversation.
Thanks Bloom
Even as a Vikings fan I think that's pretty bold for a rookie WR. Even Julio Jones wasn't an Elite WR his first year, although he showed signs that he had become one at the end of the season.
Keeping my fingers crossed Bloom is right, and I think it will all depend on the guidance of Greg Jennings.
5where is your top tier cutoff?
6. Fanklin6where is your top tier cutoff?
So why the big drop off in ratings? Allen as a mid-1st and Hunter an early-mid 2nd. Is this due to competition/QB play?the spread isn't as big as the numbers indicate. I have allen and hunter close in talent.I'm having trouble understanding why these two players are so spread out considering their upside/risk factors:
8. Keenan Allen WR SD 9 Floyd and Alexander shouldn t be hard to overtake High WR2 315. Justin Hunter WR TEN 15 flashes of greatness but inconsistent much like guy he s trying to displace Low WR1 4Seems like they should be much tighter in ranking. Risk factors are similar and if Hunter can be a WR1 that seems worth the slightly higher risk, no?
Personally I think the two are close but haven't done enough research for my own rankings yet.
sorry that was a mistake because of my header row throwing off numbers. its 5Fullback Fro said:6. FanklinSigmund Bloom said:6fruity pebbles said:where is your top tier cutoff?
-----tier cutoff-----
7. Lacy
Seems weird
QB play and lack of trust in locker is a small part of it. honestly its probably more that the 8-15 players are tightly packedExaltedOne said:So why the big drop off in ratings? Allen as a mid-1st and Hunter an early-mid 2nd. Is this due to competition/QB play?Sigmund Bloom said:the spread isn't as big as the numbers indicate. I have allen and hunter close in talent.ExaltedOne said:I'm having trouble understanding why these two players are so spread out considering their upside/risk factors:
8. Keenan Allen WR SD 9 Floyd and Alexander shouldn t be hard to overtake High WR2 315. Justin Hunter WR TEN 15 flashes of greatness but inconsistent much like guy he s trying to displace Low WR1 4Seems like they should be much tighter in ranking. Risk factors are similar and if Hunter can be a WR1 that seems worth the slightly higher risk, no?
Personally I think the two are close but haven't done enough research for my own rankings yet.
I don't discount his talent, just his situation. He'll turn 26 during the last year of Lynch's and Turbin's contracts. Prior to that, this looks at best like a RBBC for Michael. Is it worth waiting 3 years for pssobly 3 years of starter potential?Sigmund Bloom said:Sigmund Bloom, on 29 Apr 2013 - 15:34, said:
Strictly based on upside. Michael looked like the best natural runner on film in this class, and the Seahawks obviously agreed.Hoosier16 said:Hoosier16, on 29 Apr 2013 - 15:21, said:
With this is mind, #17 (offensively) seems awfully high for Michael. With Turbin and Lynch each having 3 years left on their contracts, it's hard to see him being relevant in the next 3 years without injury.Sigmund Bloom said:Sigmund Bloom, on 29 Apr 2013 - 14:38, said:because just like w Hillman, the longer it takes to get on the field, the more likely someone will usurp your shot for a big role
That assumption is that Lynch sees the end of that deal. Lynch will have a 9 million dollar cap number in 2015.I don't discount his talent, just his situation. He'll turn 26 during the last year of Lynch's and Turbin's contracts. Prior to that, this looks at best like a RBBC for Michael. Is it worth waiting 3 years for pssobly 3 years of starter potential?Sigmund Bloom said:Sigmund Bloom, on 29 Apr 2013 - 15:34, said:
Strictly based on upside. Michael looked like the best natural runner on film in this class, and the Seahawks obviously agreed.Hoosier16 said:Hoosier16, on 29 Apr 2013 - 15:21, said:
With this is mind, #17 (offensively) seems awfully high for Michael. With Turbin and Lynch each having 3 years left on their contracts, it's hard to see him being relevant in the next 3 years without injury.Sigmund Bloom said:Sigmund Bloom, on 29 Apr 2013 - 14:38, said:because just like w Hillman, the longer it takes to get on the field, the more likely someone will usurp your shot for a big role
I've read this (bolded) a couple of times and I wonder where that is coming from. I can really only think of one really blatant drop (against the 49ers) and one that was tipped up by him on a slightly errant pass and ended up being intercepted (oddly enough, in the 2nd game against SF). Those are two of his 23 targets last year, a year in which he had 19 catches. So in other words I think the worst case scenario for him would be 3 drops (the 1st SF game and the two I can't remember), and most likely one or both of those ones I can't remember weren't drops.My concern with Michael is his lack of maturity. Curious if he will be able to maintain focus with potentially limited playing time?Can anyone else envision Turbin moving to a FB/HB role? He dropped a lot of passes last year but get him in the flat and he will flatten some DBs.
I think it is a pretty big gap between Rivers and Locker + whoever they go with after Locker loses the job.QB play and lack of trust in locker is a small part of it. honestly its probably more that the 8-15 players are tightly packedExaltedOne said:So why the big drop off in ratings? Allen as a mid-1st and Hunter an early-mid 2nd. Is this due to competition/QB play?Sigmund Bloom said:the spread isn't as big as the numbers indicate. I have allen and hunter close in talent.ExaltedOne said:I'm having trouble understanding why these two players are so spread out considering their upside/risk factors:
8. Keenan Allen WR SD 9 Floyd and Alexander shouldn t be hard to overtake High WR2 315. Justin Hunter WR TEN 15 flashes of greatness but inconsistent much like guy he s trying to displace Low WR1 4Seems like they should be much tighter in ranking. Risk factors are similar and if Hunter can be a WR1 that seems worth the slightly higher risk, no?
Personally I think the two are close but haven't done enough research for my own rankings yet.
22. Josh Boyce WR NE 32 Like his game better than Dobson. Faster and more consistent.
Sounds pretty consistent to me and now has Brady?Marshall WR Aaron Dobson was credited with a drop percentage of zero on 92 targets, according to STATS Inc.
boyce has an extra gear than dobson does not. whatever the timed speeds are, that shows up on film. Dobson might not have had any drops, but he is not a natural hands catcher all of the time and he will fight the ball sometimes.Nice work as usual Bloom.
One thing I disagree with you about it this
22. Josh Boyce WR NE 32 Like his game better than Dobson. Faster and more consistent.Sounds pretty consistent to me and now has Brady?>Marshall WR Aaron Dobson was credited with a drop percentage of zero on 92 targets, according to STATS Inc.
Meanwhile Boyce will have to fight Amendola and others for targets in the slot role, I think Dobson is in a better situation for opportunity than Boyce and is more consistent than you give him credit for. Boyce despite being smaller is not much faster than Dobson is either. Boyce was 4.38 in the 40 while Dobson was 4.44 at his pro day, knock that number down a bit and Dobson is still plenty fast for his size that I would not say Boyce is that much faster than Dobson is.
If Boyce earned Welkers targets I could see your point of view but he wont, by the time he might be able to earn that role in the offense Brady will be on his last legs or retired most likely, which makes it hard to say if that slot role will have the same value it has in recent seasons.
He might play that role well, but they drafted Ware for it.My concern with Michael is his lack of maturity. Curious if he will be able to maintain focus with potentially limited playing time?Can anyone else envision Turbin moving to a FB/HB role? He dropped a lot of passes last year but get him in the flat and he will flatten some DBs.
Pete Carrol is all about competition.. Michael, if he stays focused, will be battling for carries.. Plus Lynch's running style doesnt lead to long career and is 27 already.. and Turbin's style is much like lynch's..He might play that role well, but they drafted Ware for it.My concern with Michael is his lack of maturity. Curious if he will be able to maintain focus with potentially limited playing time?Can anyone else envision Turbin moving to a FB/HB role? He dropped a lot of passes last year but get him in the flat and he will flatten some DBs.
right. terrific skills for PPR tooRB scarcity/good situation for Bernard?