What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Pre-Game Thread - Baltimore Ravens at New England Patriots (1 Viewer)

The funny thing is that with three obvious bad calls that should have been overturned (punt muff recovery, Flacco run, McGahee conversion) if the Ravens had challenged all three and won all three as they should have, they would be unable to challenge the next bad call. That is how bad the refs are. Unreal.
Also wrong. If you get all your challenges right, you continue to get an extra one.
 
I agree with the announcers. They need to code the ball to when it breaks the plane. I have no idea how they don't overturn that call. It was clearly over the plane directly from the side.
All of this outdated silliness of using chains, etc needs to go. Put some radio transmitters in the ball and you can put the ball exactly where it is after every spot.
I agree completely. This is a multi billion dollar sport. They should use technology, and not leave the game in the hands of 70 year old part time side judges.
 
I agree with the announcers. They need to code the ball to when it breaks the plane. I have no idea how they don't overturn that call. It was clearly over the plane directly from the side.
All of this outdated silliness of using chains, etc needs to go. Put some radio transmitters in the ball and you can put the ball exactly where it is after every spot.
RFID chips will require triangulation to accurately determine position. Given the range (width of field) and other challenges, the technology doesn't exist for this application. Constant "on" RFID has a max range of a few meters.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The funny thing is that with three obvious bad calls that should have been overturned (punt muff recovery, Flacco run, McGahee conversion) if the Ravens had challenged all three and won all three as they should have, they would be unable to challenge the next bad call. That is how bad the refs are. Unreal.
This is part of the fix, I presume. The refs know even if they get their calls overturned, it's eventually going to be a no lose situation for the Patriots.
 
The funny thing is that with three obvious bad calls that should have been overturned (punt muff recovery, Flacco run, McGahee conversion) if the Ravens had challenged all three and won all three as they should have, they would be unable to challenge the next bad call. That is how bad the refs are. Unreal.
Also wrong. If you get all your challenges right, you continue to get an extra one.
Don't you only get a max of one extra challenge?
 
I agree with the announcers. They need to code the ball to when it breaks the plane. I have no idea how they don't overturn that call. It was clearly over the plane directly from the side.
All of this outdated silliness of using chains, etc needs to go. Put some radio transmitters in the ball and you can put the ball exactly where it is after every spot.
RFID chips will require triangulation to accurately determine position. Given the range (width of field) and other challenges, the technology doesn't exist for this application.
You sure it doesn't? I'm pretty sure it does.
 
I agree with the announcers. They need to code the ball to when it breaks the plane. I have no idea how they don't overturn that call. It was clearly over the plane directly from the side.
All of this outdated silliness of using chains, etc needs to go. Put some radio transmitters in the ball and you can put the ball exactly where it is after every spot.
RFID chips will require triangulation to accurately determine position. Given the range (width of field) and other challenges, the technology doesn't exist for this application.
They have dog collars that shock if it crosses over a wire buried under the ground.I don't see why they can't put a tiny chip on both tips of the ball, bury some wire on the plane of the goaline and use the same idea, only with some sort of signal in the booth rather than a shock.
 
I agree with the announcers. They need to code the ball to when it breaks the plane. I have no idea how they don't overturn that call. It was clearly over the plane directly from the side.
All of this outdated silliness of using chains, etc needs to go. Put some radio transmitters in the ball and you can put the ball exactly where it is after every spot.
RFID chips will require triangulation to accurately determine position. Given the range (width of field) and other challenges, the technology doesn't exist for this application.
You sure it doesn't? I'm pretty sure it does.
A better and cheaper idea would be for the refs to stop sucking
 
Time to sit the starters, Bill. No need in leaving your players in in a game in which you are clearly going to lose.

:shrug: :bag:

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I agree with the announcers. They need to code the ball to when it breaks the plane. I have no idea how they don't overturn that call. It was clearly over the plane directly from the side.
All of this outdated silliness of using chains, etc needs to go. Put some radio transmitters in the ball and you can put the ball exactly where it is after every spot.
RFID chips will require triangulation to accurately determine position. Given the range (width of field) and other challenges, the technology doesn't exist for this application.
You sure it doesn't? I'm pretty sure it does.
Triggered "on" RFID has a longer range than constant "on" (the latter being needed for this application). Constant on has a max range of a few meters. That and source triangulation is not as accurate as you guys would like to think. Even given adequate range, it would likely be no more accurate than existing setup. Now... if they ran wire under the goalline that could possibly work.
 
I agree with the announcers. They need to code the ball to when it breaks the plane. I have no idea how they don't overturn that call. It was clearly over the plane directly from the side.
All of this outdated silliness of using chains, etc needs to go. Put some radio transmitters in the ball and you can put the ball exactly where it is after every spot.
RFID chips will require triangulation to accurately determine position. Given the range (width of field) and other challenges, the technology doesn't exist for this application.
They have dog collars that shock if it crosses over a wire buried under the ground.I don't see why they can't put a tiny chip on both tips of the ball, bury some wire on the plane of the goaline and use the same idea, only with some sort of signal in the booth rather than a shock.
Or just shock the ball carrier when he crosses the plane. :shrug:
 
I agree with the announcers. They need to code the ball to when it breaks the plane. I have no idea how they don't overturn that call. It was clearly over the plane directly from the side.
All of this outdated silliness of using chains, etc needs to go. Put some radio transmitters in the ball and you can put the ball exactly where it is after every spot.
RFID chips will require triangulation to accurately determine position. Given the range (width of field) and other challenges, the technology doesn't exist for this application.
You sure it doesn't? I'm pretty sure it does.
I'm not worried about every spot, just between the two goal line posts. Put a sensor on each side, and when the ball breaks the plane, a nice light goes off. Ever watch hockey? Same deal.
 
I agree with the announcers. They need to code the ball to when it breaks the plane. I have no idea how they don't overturn that call. It was clearly over the plane directly from the side.
All of this outdated silliness of using chains, etc needs to go. Put some radio transmitters in the ball and you can put the ball exactly where it is after every spot.
RFID chips will require triangulation to accurately determine position. Given the range (width of field) and other challenges, the technology doesn't exist for this application.
You sure it doesn't? I'm pretty sure it does.
A better and cheaper idea would be for the refs to stop sucking
Exactly. Instant replay has made them worse.
 
The funny thing is that with three obvious bad calls that should have been overturned (punt muff recovery, Flacco run, McGahee conversion) if the Ravens had challenged all three and won all three as they should have, they would be unable to challenge the next bad call. That is how bad the refs are. Unreal.
Also wrong. If you get all your challenges right, you continue to get an extra one.
Don't you only get a max of one extra challenge?
You can keep challenging if you have not lost on a challenge, as long as you have a timeout, and it's not in the last 2 minutes.
 
Feeling good about the Cards in the late game as all the ESPN crew picked both the Pats and Packers.

 
The final collapse of the so-called Patriots dynasty is complete after being embarrased @home in the first round of the playoffs. Between the cheating scandal and Bellichick not winning anything without Weis, it's time that the "genius" label be stripped from him.

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top