pantherclub
Footballguy
Panther d is legit to 5 this year
why?You could make an argument for anyone. No other RB has the cosistently elite track record that Peterson has. And yes, people still play standard.I personally wouldn't take Rice over Peterson #1 overall in standard. I could see an argument for Mccoy, Richardson, Lynch, Martin, Charles, Spiller and Morris though.Do people still play standard these days?What about non PPR?Pretty much every back in the first round has a valid argument for #1 overall. I was taking Rice over Peterson (2 weeks ago) before I started taking Mccoy over Peterson (1 week ago.) I think Rice is the safest back in the first round - mostly because of how consistent he is in the PPR format.yeah like rice should easily be in the talk for 1 overall. I can see him finishing way above adp because of his catchesLets stop quoting Keno numbers and get back to something interesting.
That's not what I'm talking about.... but I didn't realize Smith agreed with me. I may have to change my mind now.Stop the presses. Stephen a smith is on your side? Holy ####.
I'm not sure that's helping your argument. espn's analysis is teh suck these days.Funny, ESPN radio disagrees.
Why play PPR? How is that better?why?You could make an argument for anyone. No other RB has the cosistently elite track record that Peterson has. And yes, people still play standard.I personally wouldn't take Rice over Peterson #1 overall in standard. I could see an argument for Mccoy, Richardson, Lynch, Martin, Charles, Spiller and Morris though.Do people still play standard these days?What about non PPR?Pretty much every back in the first round has a valid argument for #1 overall. I was taking Rice over Peterson (2 weeks ago) before I started taking Mccoy over Peterson (1 week ago.) I think Rice is the safest back in the first round - mostly because of how consistent he is in the PPR format.yeah like rice should easily be in the talk for 1 overall. I can see him finishing way above adp because of his catchesLets stop quoting Keno numbers and get back to something interesting.
Don't worry...How in the holy hell could they overturn that. ?
because you get credit for yardsWhy play PPR? How is that better?why?You could make an argument for anyone. No other RB has the cosistently elite track record that Peterson has. And yes, people still play standard.I personally wouldn't take Rice over Peterson #1 overall in standard. I could see an argument for Mccoy, Richardson, Lynch, Martin, Charles, Spiller and Morris though.Do people still play standard these days?What about non PPR?Pretty much every back in the first round has a valid argument for #1 overall. I was taking Rice over Peterson (2 weeks ago) before I started taking Mccoy over Peterson (1 week ago.) I think Rice is the safest back in the first round - mostly because of how consistent he is in the PPR format.yeah like rice should easily be in the talk for 1 overall. I can see him finishing way above adp because of his catchesLets stop quoting Keno numbers and get back to something interesting.
I'm about done with this sport. It's simply awful and approaching unwatchable.How in the holy hell could they overturn that. ?
I'm agreeing with you lol.You could make an argument for anyone. No other RB has the cosistently elite track record that Peterson has. And yes, people still play standard.I personally wouldn't take Rice over Peterson #1 overall in standard. I could see an argument for Mccoy, Richardson, Lynch, Martin, Charles, Spiller and Morris though.Do people still play standard these days?What about non PPR?Pretty much every back in the first round has a valid argument for #1 overall. I was taking Rice over Peterson (2 weeks ago) before I started taking Mccoy over Peterson (1 week ago.) I think Rice is the safest back in the first round - mostly because of how consistent he is in the PPR format.yeah like rice should easily be in the talk for 1 overall. I can see him finishing way above adp because of his catchesLets stop quoting Keno numbers and get back to something interesting.
You know not everyone is watching that game right?How in the holy hell could they overturn that. ?
You'll have to unpack this for me.because you get credit for yardsWhy play PPR? How is that better?why?You could make an argument for anyone. No other RB has the cosistently elite track record that Peterson has. And yes, people still play standard.I personally wouldn't take Rice over Peterson #1 overall in standard. I could see an argument for Mccoy, Richardson, Lynch, Martin, Charles, Spiller and Morris though.Do people still play standard these days?What about non PPR?Pretty much every back in the first round has a valid argument for #1 overall. I was taking Rice over Peterson (2 weeks ago) before I started taking Mccoy over Peterson (1 week ago.) I think Rice is the safest back in the first round - mostly because of how consistent he is in the PPR format.yeah like rice should easily be in the talk for 1 overall. I can see him finishing way above adp because of his catchesLets stop quoting Keno numbers and get back to something interesting.
kuechly wrap up the receiver and they called helmet to helmet after the intYou know not everyone is watching that game right?How in the holy hell could they overturn that. ?
More info would be cool.
Not what I meant, and going into further detail would be a FBG message board no-no so I'll just log off for the nightI'm not sure that's helping your argument. espn's analysis is teh suck these days.Funny, ESPN radio disagrees.
Agree.You know not everyone is watching that game right?How in the holy hell could they overturn that. ?
More info would be cool.
It's early but Peirce looks mehThe odd thing is that Rice doesn't have any catches but Pierce has 2.
Couldn't tell you, he looked okay last week and the way their defense looked week 1 and 2, youd think he would get a bump.Why has Stafford dropped several spots in staff projections in the last week?
I really hope all you jackasses #### soon and talk preseason football!!Awww, even more internet bravado.i think he spouted off without any knowledge and now is trying to backtrack to avoid looking like a fool. Too late.Do you play in a dumb format where receiving yards are somehow worth less than rushing yards?nirad3 said:Im a ####.![]()
I was obviously talking about his rushing stats you festering clam.![]()
No backtracking necessary, just reiteration of facts I already stated... in plainer English for you that got caught up in grade school.
Contribution noted.I really hope all you jackasses #### soon and talk preseason football!!
He's dropping to the 8th QB or so in mocks I'm doing....that appears to be the sweet spot I'm targeting.Couldn't tell you, he looked okay last week and the way their defense looked week 1 and 2, youd think he would get a bump.Why has Stafford dropped several spots in staff projections in the last week?
They look okay today though.
Yeah, ive seen him going as late as the 8th round in redrafts, I won't pass on him in the 7th.He's dropping to the 8th QB or so in mocks I'm doing....that appears to be the sweet spot I'm targeting.Couldn't tell you, he looked okay last week and the way their defense looked week 1 and 2, youd think he would get a bump.Why has Stafford dropped several spots in staff projections in the last week?
They look okay today though.
I'm already going to reach for him. Don't want to attract the guppies.Okay, I've seen enough Reggie Bush in the preseason. I'd hate to see an injury here.
Carolina's best offense has been to keep their defense on the field.My pregame observation is that Carolina needs to end up with Marqise Lee, Sammy Watkins or Donte Moncrief in next years draft.
)He hasn't even been taking snaps...it's looking like this.It doesn't matter who is playing besides him, he's a home run threat and nothing else. People here like to fight for some reason why he's not, but they're wrong. He's great in best ball formats, terrible on your fantasy roster. He will scored 2 TD's in one game then the following week catch 1 pass for 5 yards. AVOID!tsmith still will not be targeted a lot even though boldin is not in town.....?
Broyles has looked good when targetted.Some observations from Pats/Lions game
6. The Lions have nothing at WR out there. If Calvin misses time it's going to be ugly on offense in the reg season. Patrick Edwards and Burleson started tonight and didn't impress at all IMO
I must have missed him out there. I guess Sudfeld and Vereen were benched too which makes sense since I didn't notice them at all after their fumblesBroyles has looked good when targetted.Expect his value to rise as the season goes on and defenses start cracking down on Bush and Megatron.Some observations from Pats/Lions game
6. The Lions have nothing at WR out there. If Calvin misses time it's going to be ugly on offense in the reg season. Patrick Edwards and Burleson started tonight and didn't impress at all IMO
70 year olds with pen/paper and dial up doI personally wouldn't take Rice over Peterson #1 overall in standard. I could see an argument for Mccoy, Richardson, Lynch, Martin, Charles, Spiller and Morris though.Do people still play standard these days?What about non PPR?Pretty much every back in the first round has a valid argument for #1 overall. I was taking Rice over Peterson (2 weeks ago) before I started taking Mccoy over Peterson (1 week ago.) I think Rice is the safest back in the first round - mostly because of how consistent he is in the PPR format.yeah like rice should easily be in the talk for 1 overall. I can see him finishing way above adp because of his catchesLets stop quoting Keno numbers and get back to something interesting.
all he hadI think Jon Gruden just complimented a guy as giving every ounce of what they have just as the guy jogged to finish the play.
I play in a couple non-PPR leagues... sometimes it's fun to have a little variety in your life my friend.70 year olds with pen/paper and dial up doI personally wouldn't take Rice over Peterson #1 overall in standard. I could see an argument for Mccoy, Richardson, Lynch, Martin, Charles, Spiller and Morris though.Do people still play standard these days?What about non PPR?Pretty much every back in the first round has a valid argument for #1 overall. I was taking Rice over Peterson (2 weeks ago) before I started taking Mccoy over Peterson (1 week ago.) I think Rice is the safest back in the first round - mostly because of how consistent he is in the PPR format.yeah like rice should easily be in the talk for 1 overall. I can see him finishing way above adp because of his catchesLets stop quoting Keno numbers and get back to something interesting.