brady2moss
Footballguy
BB says they are "not working out any QBs from what people may have heard." "Cassel is the man and they are focusing on the jets this week"
Last edited by a moderator:
That sounds like Bill.BB says they are "not working out any QBs from what people may have heard." "Cassel is the man and the are focusing on the jets this week"
Can't get to the press conference here, is it official?If so, is it safe to drop Brady in redraft?BB says they are "not working out any QBs from what people may have heard." "Cassel is the man and the are focusing on the jets this week"
Confirmed...yes.Can't get to the press conference here, is it official?If so, is it safe to drop Brady in redraft?BB says they are "not working out any QBs from what people may have heard." "Cassel is the man and the are focusing on the jets this week"
Was Cassel available?Damnit.. I just spent 1 of 14 yearly waiver wire moves on Chris Simms..![]()
Hate seeing anyone get hurt... but at least now we'll know if Brady is really good, or if it's just NE's system.BB says they are "not working out any QBs from what people may have heard." "Cassel is the man and they are focusing on the jets this week"
People need to take what the Pats say at face value. They said they HADN'T brought anyone in. They didn't say they WOULDN'T bring anyone in. There is no way they go very long with Cassel and O'Connell as their QBs.The wheels are in motion behind the scenes on this one. They are having a war room session on what to do and who may or may not be available, what it would cost them, and if that fits their plan.For now, they are saying they are reasy to roll with Cassel. They will probably get someone else to be a veteran backup to learn the play book just in case something happens to Cassel.But if the Pats are 1-3 when they face SD, someone else will be the QB.They don't even want to bring in another backup?
I don't even know why I am even asking this, but did Brady's perfromance from 2001-2006 not show you anything? Or was the system overshadowing his (IMO) so-so supporting cast on offense in all those years?Hate seeing anyone get hurt... but at least now we'll know if Brady is really good, or if it's just NE's system.BB says they are "not working out any QBs from what people may have heard." "Cassel is the man and they are focusing on the jets this week"
Well... I guess based on my statement, you should know I think the system had more to do with anything than Brady.I don't even know why I am even asking this, but did Brady's perfromance from 2001-2006 not show you anything? Or was the system overshadowing his (IMO) so-so supporting cast on offense in all those years?Hate seeing anyone get hurt... but at least now we'll know if Brady is really good, or if it's just NE's system.BB says they are "not working out any QBs from what people may have heard." "Cassel is the man and they are focusing on the jets this week"
Really?Rea Re......Really?Well... I guess based on my statement, you should know I think the system had more to do with anything than Brady.I don't even know why I am even asking this, but did Brady's perfromance from 2001-2006 not show you anything? Or was the system overshadowing his (IMO) so-so supporting cast on offense in all those years?Hate seeing anyone get hurt... but at least now we'll know if Brady is really good, or if it's just NE's system.BB says they are "not working out any QBs from what people may have heard." "Cassel is the man and they are focusing on the jets this week"Reminds me of Troy Aikman.
I knew I shouldn't have asked, but since I did . . .Who did Brady have on offense besides himself? One year he had Dillon. That's about it. Did he have a HOF RB? Nope.Did he have a HOF WR? Nope.Did he have perennial Pro Bowl linemen? Nope.Did he have a Pro Bowl TE? Nyet.How many Pro Bowl players (other than Brady) were on the Pro Bowl in all those years? Troy Brown was selceted as a kick returner. And Matt Light was an injury replacement to an injury replacement in 2006. That's it.The Cowboys had several Pro Bowl lineman (Netwon, Stepnoski, Tuinei, Donaldson, Allen, Williams), many of which went to multiple Pro Bowls. Emmitt, Irvin, Novacek, and Moose Johnson all went to multiple Pro Bowls.Aikman may have been a system QB, but the Pats have had average talent on offense until last year when Brady showed what he could do with a better pool of players on offense.Well... I guess based on my statement, you should know I think the system had more to do with anything than Brady.I don't even know why I am even asking this, but did Brady's perfromance from 2001-2006 not show you anything? Or was the system overshadowing his (IMO) so-so supporting cast on offense in all those years?Hate seeing anyone get hurt... but at least now we'll know if Brady is really good, or if it's just NE's system.BB says they are "not working out any QBs from what people may have heard." "Cassel is the man and they are focusing on the jets this week"Reminds me of Troy Aikman.
I knew I shouldn't have asked, but since I did . . .Who did Brady have on offense besides himself? One year he had Dillon. That's about it. Did he have a HOF RB? Nope.Did he have a HOF WR? Nope.Did he have perennial Pro Bowl linemen? Nope.Did he have a Pro Bowl TE? Nyet.How many Pro Bowl players (other than Brady) were on the Pro Bowl in all those years? Troy Brown was selceted as a kick returner. And Matt Light was an injury replacement to an injury replacement in 2006. That's it.The Cowboys had several Pro Bowl lineman (Netwon, Stepnoski, Tuinei, Donaldson, Allen, Williams), many of which went to multiple Pro Bowls. Emmitt, Irvin, Novacek, and Moose Johnson all went to multiple Pro Bowls.Aikman may have been a system QB, but the Pats have had average talent on offense until last year when Brady showed what he could do with a better pool of players on offense.Well... I guess based on my statement, you should know I think the system had more to do with anything than Brady.I don't even know why I am even asking this, but did Brady's perfromance from 2001-2006 not show you anything? Or was the system overshadowing his (IMO) so-so supporting cast on offense in all those years?Hate seeing anyone get hurt... but at least now we'll know if Brady is really good, or if it's just NE's system.BB says they are "not working out any QBs from what people may have heard." "Cassel is the man and they are focusing on the jets this week"Reminds me of Troy Aikman.
IMHO the Cowboys offensive system actually held Aikman back.Well... I guess based on my statement, you should know I think the system had more to do with anything than Brady.I don't even know why I am even asking this, but did Brady's perfromance from 2001-2006 not show you anything? Or was the system overshadowing his (IMO) so-so supporting cast on offense in all those years?Hate seeing anyone get hurt... but at least now we'll know if Brady is really good, or if it's just NE's system.BB says they are "not working out any QBs from what people may have heard." "Cassel is the man and they are focusing on the jets this week"Reminds me of Troy Aikman.
Actually, I lied. Damien Woody was a Pro Bowl center one season.The fact remains, their players (IMO) on offense were not record breakers or put up anything but average numbers for years until last year when Brady had gotten upgrades at the OL and WR.I knew I shouldn't have asked, but since I did . . .Who did Brady have on offense besides himself? One year he had Dillon. That's about it. Did he have a HOF RB? Nope.Did he have a HOF WR? Nope.Did he have perennial Pro Bowl linemen? Nope.Did he have a Pro Bowl TE? Nyet.How many Pro Bowl players (other than Brady) were on the Pro Bowl in all those years? Troy Brown was selceted as a kick returner. And Matt Light was an injury replacement to an injury replacement in 2006. That's it.The Cowboys had several Pro Bowl lineman (Netwon, Stepnoski, Tuinei, Donaldson, Allen, Williams), many of which went to multiple Pro Bowls. Emmitt, Irvin, Novacek, and Moose Johnson all went to multiple Pro Bowls.Aikman may have been a system QB, but the Pats have had average talent on offense until last year when Brady showed what he could do with a better pool of players on offense.Well... I guess based on my statement, you should know I think the system had more to do with anything than Brady.I don't even know why I am even asking this, but did Brady's perfromance from 2001-2006 not show you anything? Or was the system overshadowing his (IMO) so-so supporting cast on offense in all those years?Hate seeing anyone get hurt... but at least now we'll know if Brady is really good, or if it's just NE's system.BB says they are "not working out any QBs from what people may have heard." "Cassel is the man and they are focusing on the jets this week"Reminds me of Troy Aikman.
I guess we'll see. I tihnk the PAtriots players didn't get enough credit for how good they were to be honest. But that's a Belichick thing, no one should stand out. The Cowboys were totally different... they tried to be as flashy as possible. Brady has had an excellent OL, good WRs. Sure maybe they didn't have Michael Irvin (but heck, Irvin wouldn't be good in today's rules anyway)...
I am speechless at your posts here.....speechless.System QB's? Those are 2 HOF's your talking about. You need to be super accurate and smart to be a great QB...Brady and Aikman fit both those things. These system arguments are a joke.I knew I shouldn't have asked, but since I did . . .Who did Brady have on offense besides himself? One year he had Dillon.Well... I guess based on my statement, you should know I think the system had more to do with anything than Brady.I don't even know why I am even asking this, but did Brady's perfromance from 2001-2006 not show you anything? Or was the system overshadowing his (IMO) so-so supporting cast on offense in all those years?Hate seeing anyone get hurt... but at least now we'll know if Brady is really good, or if it's just NE's system.BB says they are "not working out any QBs from what people may have heard." "Cassel is the man and they are focusing on the jets this week"Reminds me of Troy Aikman.
That's about it. Did he have a HOF RB? Nope.
Did he have a HOF WR? Nope.
Did he have perennial Pro Bowl linemen? Nope.
Did he have a Pro Bowl TE? Nyet.
How many Pro Bowl players (other than Brady) were on the Pro Bowl in all those years? Troy Brown was selceted as a kick returner. And Matt Light was an injury replacement to an injury replacement in 2006. That's it.
The Cowboys had several Pro Bowl lineman (Netwon, Stepnoski, Tuinei, Donaldson, Allen, Williams), many of which went to multiple Pro Bowls. Emmitt, Irvin, Novacek, and Moose Johnson all went to multiple Pro Bowls.
Aikman may have been a system QB, but the Pats have had average talent on offense until last year when Brady showed what he could do with a better pool of players on offense.I guess we'll see. I tihnk the PAtriots players didn't get enough credit for how good they were to be honest. But that's a Belichick thing, no one should stand out. The Cowboys were totally different... they tried to be as flashy as possible. Brady has had an excellent OL, good WRs. Sure maybe they didn't have Michael Irvin (but heck, Irvin wouldn't be good in today's rules anyway)...
Boldin and TO don't push off like Irvin did... they are physical in their RAC. Completely different. I don't believe Irvin caught a TD without pushing off... ok that's exaggeration. Still, WRs are no longer allowed to push off the way Irvin did.As for HOF QBs... so is Terry Bradshaw. Be on a good team and you're in the HOF at QB. Aikman was NOT a great QB - put it this way, Dilfer was better. I tihnk Brady is slightly better than them, but he's not a Favre, Marino, Elway, Kelly, Manning, etc.I am speechless at your posts here.....speechless.System QB's? Those are 2 HOF's your talking about. You need to be super accurate and smart to be a great QB...Brady and Aikman fit both those things. These system arguments are a joke.I knew I shouldn't have asked, but since I did . . .Who did Brady have on offense besides himself? One year he had Dillon.Well... I guess based on my statement, you should know I think the system had more to do with anything than Brady.I don't even know why I am even asking this, but did Brady's perfromance from 2001-2006 not show you anything? Or was the system overshadowing his (IMO) so-so supporting cast on offense in all those years?Hate seeing anyone get hurt... but at least now we'll know if Brady is really good, or if it's just NE's system.BB says they are "not working out any QBs from what people may have heard." "Cassel is the man and they are focusing on the jets this week"Reminds me of Troy Aikman.
That's about it. Did he have a HOF RB? Nope.
Did he have a HOF WR? Nope.
Did he have perennial Pro Bowl linemen? Nope.
Did he have a Pro Bowl TE? Nyet.
How many Pro Bowl players (other than Brady) were on the Pro Bowl in all those years? Troy Brown was selceted as a kick returner. And Matt Light was an injury replacement to an injury replacement in 2006. That's it.
The Cowboys had several Pro Bowl lineman (Netwon, Stepnoski, Tuinei, Donaldson, Allen, Williams), many of which went to multiple Pro Bowls. Emmitt, Irvin, Novacek, and Moose Johnson all went to multiple Pro Bowls.
Aikman may have been a system QB, but the Pats have had average talent on offense until last year when Brady showed what he could do with a better pool of players on offense.I guess we'll see. I tihnk the PAtriots players didn't get enough credit for how good they were to be honest. But that's a Belichick thing, no one should stand out. The Cowboys were totally different... they tried to be as flashy as possible. Brady has had an excellent OL, good WRs. Sure maybe they didn't have Michael Irvin (but heck, Irvin wouldn't be good in today's rules anyway)...
Michael Irvin is one of the all time great physical WR's and guy's like Boldin, and T.O. can thank Irvin for giving them a blueprint of how to be physical, run great routes and be PLAYMAKERS.
Wow just speechless.
![]()
This would have been NFL Gold. Could have gone either way though since it is so late. Even Favre would have needed a couple of weeks to get the system down.Just think if Favre hadn't unretired....You think the Pats would have made a call to Green Bay? That could have been REALLY interesting.
Wow. Just wow.Aikman was NOT a great QB - put it this way, Dilfer was better. I tihnk Brady is slightly better than them
Ok...Aikman I would not mention in the same breath as Favre, Marino, Elway, Manning, Kelly and Montana....but Brady I would without question. The guy worked with really average talent IMO and won 3 Super Bowls with them. Great teams no doubt and New England has been the model of team play. But I think Brady would be great on any team and elevate the level of play of anyone around him. I think he has that skill set. Strong arm, accurate and a great pocket presence.as far as the Pat's for the remainder of the year....I have to believe they are going to make a move for another QB.Boldin and TO don't push off like Irvin did... they are physical in their RAC. Completely different. I don't believe Irvin caught a TD without pushing off... ok that's exaggeration. Still, WRs are no longer allowed to push off the way Irvin did.As for HOF QBs... so is Terry Bradshaw. Be on a good team and you're in the HOF at QB. Aikman was NOT a great QB - put it this way, Dilfer was better. I tihnk Brady is slightly better than them, but he's not a Favre, Marino, Elway, Kelly, Manning, etc.I am speechless at your posts here.....speechless.System QB's? Those are 2 HOF's your talking about. You need to be super accurate and smart to be a great QB...Brady and Aikman fit both those things. These system arguments are a joke.I knew I shouldn't have asked, but since I did . . .Who did Brady have on offense besides himself? One year he had Dillon.Well... I guess based on my statement, you should know I think the system had more to do with anything than Brady.I don't even know why I am even asking this, but did Brady's perfromance from 2001-2006 not show you anything? Or was the system overshadowing his (IMO) so-so supporting cast on offense in all those years?Hate seeing anyone get hurt... but at least now we'll know if Brady is really good, or if it's just NE's system.BB says they are "not working out any QBs from what people may have heard." "Cassel is the man and they are focusing on the jets this week"Reminds me of Troy Aikman.
That's about it. Did he have a HOF RB? Nope.
Did he have a HOF WR? Nope.
Did he have perennial Pro Bowl linemen? Nope.
Did he have a Pro Bowl TE? Nyet.
How many Pro Bowl players (other than Brady) were on the Pro Bowl in all those years? Troy Brown was selceted as a kick returner. And Matt Light was an injury replacement to an injury replacement in 2006. That's it.
The Cowboys had several Pro Bowl lineman (Netwon, Stepnoski, Tuinei, Donaldson, Allen, Williams), many of which went to multiple Pro Bowls. Emmitt, Irvin, Novacek, and Moose Johnson all went to multiple Pro Bowls.
Aikman may have been a system QB, but the Pats have had average talent on offense until last year when Brady showed what he could do with a better pool of players on offense.I guess we'll see. I tihnk the PAtriots players didn't get enough credit for how good they were to be honest. But that's a Belichick thing, no one should stand out. The Cowboys were totally different... they tried to be as flashy as possible. Brady has had an excellent OL, good WRs. Sure maybe they didn't have Michael Irvin (but heck, Irvin wouldn't be good in today's rules anyway)...
Michael Irvin is one of the all time great physical WR's and guy's like Boldin, and T.O. can thank Irvin for giving them a blueprint of how to be physical, run great routes and be PLAYMAKERS.
Wow just speechless.
![]()
credibility going down the toilet with every post.Wow. Just wow.Aikman was NOT a great QB - put it this way, Dilfer was better. I tihnk Brady is slightly better than them
no other WR was allowed to push off when Irvin played either.America's TEam got special treatmentBoldin and TO don't push off like Irvin did... they are physical in their RAC. Completely different. I don't believe Irvin caught a TD without pushing off... ok that's exaggeration. Still, WRs are no longer allowed to push off the way Irvin did.As for HOF QBs... so is Terry Bradshaw. Be on a good team and you're in the HOF at QB. Aikman was NOT a great QB - put it this way, Dilfer was better. I tihnk Brady is slightly better than them, but he's not a Favre, Marino, Elway, Kelly, Manning, etc.I am speechless at your posts here.....speechless.System QB's? Those are 2 HOF's your talking about. You need to be super accurate and smart to be a great QB...Brady and Aikman fit both those things. These system arguments are a joke.I knew I shouldn't have asked, but since I did . . .Who did Brady have on offense besides himself? One year he had Dillon.Well... I guess based on my statement, you should know I think the system had more to do with anything than Brady.I don't even know why I am even asking this, but did Brady's perfromance from 2001-2006 not show you anything? Or was the system overshadowing his (IMO) so-so supporting cast on offense in all those years?Hate seeing anyone get hurt... but at least now we'll know if Brady is really good, or if it's just NE's system.BB says they are "not working out any QBs from what people may have heard." "Cassel is the man and they are focusing on the jets this week"Reminds me of Troy Aikman.
That's about it. Did he have a HOF RB? Nope.
Did he have a HOF WR? Nope.
Did he have perennial Pro Bowl linemen? Nope.
Did he have a Pro Bowl TE? Nyet.
How many Pro Bowl players (other than Brady) were on the Pro Bowl in all those years? Troy Brown was selceted as a kick returner. And Matt Light was an injury replacement to an injury replacement in 2006. That's it.
The Cowboys had several Pro Bowl lineman (Netwon, Stepnoski, Tuinei, Donaldson, Allen, Williams), many of which went to multiple Pro Bowls. Emmitt, Irvin, Novacek, and Moose Johnson all went to multiple Pro Bowls.
Aikman may have been a system QB, but the Pats have had average talent on offense until last year when Brady showed what he could do with a better pool of players on offense.I guess we'll see. I tihnk the PAtriots players didn't get enough credit for how good they were to be honest. But that's a Belichick thing, no one should stand out. The Cowboys were totally different... they tried to be as flashy as possible. Brady has had an excellent OL, good WRs. Sure maybe they didn't have Michael Irvin (but heck, Irvin wouldn't be good in today's rules anyway)...
Michael Irvin is one of the all time great physical WR's and guy's like Boldin, and T.O. can thank Irvin for giving them a blueprint of how to be physical, run great routes and be PLAYMAKERS.
Wow just speechless.
![]()
Well, good thing I wasn't worried about my credibility in your eyes :(credibility going down the toilet with every post.Wow. Just wow.Aikman was NOT a great QB - put it this way, Dilfer was better. I tihnk Brady is slightly better than them
There could be something to your theory if it is a system of cheating to which you refer.Brady had a special ability to quickly process the stolen info he was fed thru his head set. Not everyone could have exploited that info like he could.Cassell is well versed in those same techniques which may be why the Pats are not running out get an outsider to play QB. Forget the video taping, the Pats cheating goes far beyond that entry level stuff to include electronic eavesdropping and use of multiple aduio frequencies- none of which was investigated, let alone stopped, by Goodell.Well... I guess based on my statement, you should know I think the system had more to do with anything than Brady. :( Reminds me of Troy Aikman.I don't even know why I am even asking this, but did Brady's perfromance from 2001-2006 not show you anything? Or was the system overshadowing his (IMO) so-so supporting cast on offense in all those years?Hate seeing anyone get hurt... but at least now we'll know if Brady is really good, or if it's just NE's system.BB says they are "not working out any QBs from what people may have heard." "Cassel is the man and they are focusing on the jets this week"
No, he had just been taken.Was Cassel available?Damnit.. I just spent 1 of 14 yearly waiver wire moves on Chris Simms..![]()
No, he won that round (if you look at it as reporters attempting to incite a sports figure into blowing up, which I do).For those who take enjoyment in watching reporters squirm due to lack of information, which I do, he was at his best.I'm curious, did Belichick get testy at all during the presser or was he his usual cheerful self?