What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

QB Baker Mayfield, TB (1 Viewer)

that’s bull####.  
 

name a single Browns poster on this board who stated he was HOF 6 months ago. 
Obviously he was exaggerating but there were some Browns fans that were certainly aboard the Baker Mayfield wagon only a few months ago.   

I am not saying that I blame them for supporting Mayfield back then but they really turned once Watson was signed.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
... there were some Browns fans that were certainly aboard the Baker Mayfield wagon only a few months ago.  

... they really turned once Watson was signed.
And that is different from 'some' Steeler fans who on-board with Rudolph or Trubisky or who would turn the second a much better QB option comes aboard? 

Could that have anything to do with limited options? 

 
And that is different from 'some' Steeler fans who on-board with Rudolph or Trubisky or who would turn the second a much better QB option comes aboard? 

Could that have anything to do with limited options? 


Who are these crazy people you speak of? 

I don't recall anyone saying Rudolph was the answer.  At best Steelers fans were saying they prefer going with Rudolph for 2022 and drafting a QB in 2023 rather than reaching for a QB in this year's draft or going after one of the high-priced veteran QBs.  Even then we were resigned that 2022 with Rudolph was going to be a lost season.

As far as Trubisky goes I think at best we Steelers fans view him as a bridge until we do acquire a franchise QB.

We don't have an illusions that either one are going to be great so it won't be turning when we eventually get a better option.

I do recall at a few Browns fans that were clearly in Mayfield's corner a few months ago and are now trashing him, that's all I am saying.

 
I don't think I understand what you mean by this.
I guess I see AB and Stefanski as stand up guys (though Haslam not so much).  They say what they mean straight out.  If something must be left unsaid, that's what they do.  They're not going to engage in "leaked" backstabbing. 

 
Obviously he was exaggerating but there were some Browns fans that were certainly aboard the Baker Mayfield wagon only a few months ago.   

I am not saying that I blame them for supporting Mayfield back then but they really turned once Watson was signed.
If you are saying that there is a specific poster (or more) who fits the description, a name would help.  Most times, I have found that it isn't "the same people", but rather a different voice that is now atop the soapbox.  You hear a different message because that's what the climate warrants.  Personally, I think Baker remains talented enough to run an offense.  Further, I agree with much he has said since the season ended.  Watson's on-field talent is superior, IMO, but that doesn't create a need to bash Baker.

 
Who are these crazy people you speak of? 

I don't recall anyone saying Rudolph was the answer.  At best Steelers fans were saying they prefer going with Rudolph for 2022 and drafting a QB in 2023 rather than reaching for a QB in this year's draft or going after one of the high-priced veteran QBs.  Even then we were resigned that 2022 with Rudolph was going to be a lost season.

As far as Trubisky goes I think at best we Steelers fans view him as a bridge until we do acquire a franchise QB.

We don't have an illusions that either one are going to be great so it won't be turning when we eventually get a better option.

I do recall at a few Browns fans that were clearly in Mayfield's corner a few months ago and are now trashing him, that's all I am saying.
I'm confused about Trubisky.  Can you help?  Aren't the other guys good enough to bridge the situation?  Why sign MT for that purpose?  Are they hopeful of catching lightning in a bottle, but reluctant to say so?  If that's the case, will they still spend a #1 on a QB?

 
I'm confused about Trubisky.  Can you help?  Aren't the other guys good enough to bridge the situation?  Why sign MT for that purpose?  Are they hopeful of catching lightning in a bottle, but reluctant to say so?  If that's the case, will they still spend a #1 on a QB?
I’m also wondering about that. Mitch might be better than the others, but it’s marginal. And if he’s truly a “bridge guy”, aren’t they just hurting their own draft by potentially winning more games? 

As such, I believe that like ATL with MM, PIT is hoping that a change of scenery will help Mitch, & they’ll get a bargain on a multi-year solution with Trubisky.

In both situations, if they’re wrong, it helps their draft stock for a 2023 QB-rich draft. But if they’re right, they can spend those picks on other areas of need.

Just a theory. 

 
I'm confused about Trubisky.  Can you help?  Aren't the other guys good enough to bridge the situation?  Why sign MT for that purpose?  Are they hopeful of catching lightning in a bottle, but reluctant to say so?  If that's the case, will they still spend a #1 on a QB?


I can only tell you my perspective.   Technically anyone could be a bridge for hopefully the next franchise QB but I think that going with Rudolph and Haskins would likely be a lost year. Trubisky was brought in as the likely starter and hopefully be an upgrade enough to compete.  It would be nice to catch lightning in a bottle with Trubisky (or Rudolph or Haskins for that matter) but that is likely asking too much.

I think there is a good chance the Steelers could spend a #1 or #2 on a QB in 2022.  I personally would rather they wait on QB until 2023 and concentrate on filling holes on either line, safety, and WR this year but if the guy they like is there at #20 or #52 then I am fine with it.   

What I am most worried about is spending draft capital next year in order to move up in this draft.

 
I guess I see AB and Stefanski as stand up guys (though Haslam not so much).  They say what they mean straight out.  If something must be left unsaid, that's what they do.  They're not going to engage in "leaked" backstabbing. 
Haslam is a part of organization though, frankly the biggest part. I guess after trading for Watson, integrity isn't a word I would use to describe the Browns right now. That's their trade off, they have a better QB, but they aren't getting the benefit of the doubt on any moral/integrity issues. 

 
Obviously he was exaggerating but there were some Browns fans that were certainly aboard the Baker Mayfield wagon only a few months ago.   

I am not saying that I blame them for supporting Mayfield back then but they really turned once Watson was signed.
fair enough.  
 

Mayfield still has enough talent to win a decent amount of games wherever he ends up. 

 
At this point the Seahawks can literally get paid to take him.

If they even see him as an upgrade to Geno Smith. From Carroll’s recent comments, they may not. 
 

Where will he end up? Pitt could use him
Division rival trades are exceedingly rare. I would be shocked. Unless the Browns think Mayfield is so toxic that he’d actively hurt the Steelers, I just can’t see that happening. And with no leverage, it would be a mighty tough pill to swallow to have to pay say, half the salary of a division rival’s starting QB. 

there’s just no way. Not unless they release him & He signs with PIT independently. 

 
I still think Carolina is an option. Don't think they are married to a QB at #6, and Mayfield is a major upgrade from Darnold. 

The reason why QB may not be the pick at #6, is simply that Matt Rhule likely doesn't get retained if the Panthers aren't a playoff contender this season. They'd be better to deal for Baker, and take BPA (hopefully a LT) at #6.

I think they are just waiting for the compensation to come down.

 
I still think Carolina is an option. Don't think they are married to a QB at #6, and Mayfield is a major upgrade from Darnold. 

The reason why QB may not be the pick at #6, is simply that Matt Rhule likely doesn't get retained if the Panthers aren't a playoff contender this season. They'd be better to deal for Baker, and take BPA (hopefully a LT) at #6.

I think they are just waiting for the compensation to come down.
You think CAR is a playoff team with Mayfield?

I have my doubts. For one, TB wins the  division, leaving Wildcard as their path to the playoffs. For another, that team has a whole lot of holes.

If this is truly a “playoffs or fired” scenario as you suggest, Baker Mayfield coming off of his worst year might not be the safest pony to bet on. 

And as an aside, they also know JimmyG will be available sometime after June, when he proves his shoulder surgery was successful.

 
You think CAR is a playoff team with Mayfield?

I have my doubts. For one, TB wins the  division, leaving Wildcard as their path to the playoffs. For another, that team has a whole lot of holes.

If this is truly a “playoffs or fired” scenario as you suggest, Baker Mayfield coming off of his worst year might not be the safest pony to bet on. 

And as an aside, they also know JimmyG will be available sometime after June, when he proves his shoulder surgery was successful.
I wouldn't say they are a playoff team for sure with Mayfield, but it would certainly bring them closer. The NFC is really open after the top few teams, I could see a scenario where the Panthers make the playoffs with a QB upgrade, and if CMC stays healthy. The Panthers started 3-0 last year, and while 2 wins were over NYJ and Hou, they also easily beat NO. 

Mayfield>Jimmy G, he's a better player, and offers a higher ceiling, and will almost certainly be cheaper (both compensation and salary wise) I will agree Jimmy G was better in 2021 (in the easiest possible situation for a QB) but again, Mayfield deserves a pass for playing through injury all year, on a lesser team. Its silly to suggest Mayfield's 2021 is his new normal.  

On a side note, with all the talk of whether Lance is truly ready or not, I'm kinda buying SF keeping Jimmy G, so comparing the 2 may be meaningless anyway. 

 
I wouldn't say they are a playoff team for sure with Mayfield, but it would certainly bring them closer. The NFC is really open after the top few teams, I could see a scenario where the Panthers make the playoffs with a QB upgrade, and if CMC stays healthy. The Panthers started 3-0 last year, and while 2 wins were over NYJ and Hou, they also easily beat NO. 

Mayfield>Jimmy G, he's a better player, and offers a higher ceiling, and will almost certainly be cheaper (both compensation and salary wise) I will agree Jimmy G was better in 2021 (in the easiest possible situation for a QB) but again, Mayfield deserves a pass for playing through injury all year, on a lesser team. Its silly to suggest Mayfield's 2021 is his new normal.  
He's also significantly less professional than JimmyG, which seems important. 

On a side note, with all the talk of whether Lance is truly ready or not, I'm kinda buying SF keeping Jimmy G, so comparing the 2 may be meaningless anyway. 
100% of the Lance talk is media generated. They created this narrative. They run with it. And now they're using the premise they created as the story. The team has consistently said they're happy with Lance's development.  Moreover, JimmyG's press conference sure sounded like a dude who was done with the 49ers, so I very much doubt he stays regardless. 

Maybe Mayfield goes to the Niners to back up Lance. :o  

 
Hot Sauce Guy said:
At this point the Seahawks can literally get paid to take him.

If they even see him as an upgrade to Geno Smith. From Carroll’s recent comments, they may not. 
 

Division rival trades are exceedingly rare. I would be shocked. Unless the Browns think Mayfield is so toxic that he’d actively hurt the Steelers, I just can’t see that happening. And with no leverage, it would be a mighty tough pill to swallow to have to pay say, half the salary of a division rival’s starting QB. 

there’s just no way. Not unless they release him & He signs with PIT independently. 
They clearly don't view him as their QB so get something while you can. He's also clearly not happy. I know I would not be happy if I were in his shoes

 
He's also significantly less professional than JimmyG, which seems important. 

100% of the Lance talk is media generated. They created this narrative. They run with it. And now they're using the premise they created as the story. The team has consistently said they're happy with Lance's development.  Moreover, JimmyG's press conference sure sounded like a dude who was done with the 49ers, so I very much doubt he stays regardless. 

Maybe Mayfield goes to the Niners to back up Lance. :o  
Did the media draft Lance in the 1st, though?

 
Did the media draft Lance in the 1st, though?
No,  but that’s a silly argument. the media is responsible for the “Lance isn’t ready” narrative.

At this point the 49ers have consistently said they’re happy with Lance’s development.

And JimmyG’s presser seemed like a “thanks for the laughs, I’m out” kinda thing.

The media has consistently claimed Lance isn’t ready based on the 49ers making the playoffs last year, and open speculation about moving the QB who got them there.

funny how none of them bother to mention how utterly terrible Jimmy was in the playoffs while spinning that narrative, so…. :shrug:   

 
They clearly don't view him as their QB so get something while you can. He's also clearly not happy. I know I would not be happy if I were in his shoes
He was going to be the starting QB of the Browns until he & his agent started tweeting. 

I doubt we see an in-division deal regardless. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
He's also significantly less professional than JimmyG, which seems important.
Has he done unprofessional stuff throughout his career, or are you just referring to his tweet when Cleveland went after Watson. I can't say that I follow Cleveland very closely, but I had never had a negative impression of him. 

I know he was a little cocky coming out of college, but I don't think that's a terrible thing.

 
Has he done unprofessional stuff throughout his career, or are you just referring to his tweet when Cleveland went after Watson. I can't say that I follow Cleveland very closely, but I had never had a negative impression of him. 

I know he was a little cocky coming out of college, but I don't think that's a terrible thing.
There’s been rumors that he’s been immature for years.

The whole, tweeting his way off the Browns thing seems to have validated some of the stuff that’s been out there. 

It’s less about being brash and more about being impulsive. 

 
There’s been rumors that he’s been immature for years.

The whole, tweeting his way off the Browns thing seems to have validated some of the stuff that’s been out there. 

It’s less about being brash and more about being impulsive. 
Ah, ok. Like I said, I haven't followed them that closely. I'm probably basing my thoughts too much on his commercials. 😂

 
It's the offseason and we really don't have anything to talk about but there is no reason to do anything with Baker right now. Just sit back and wait for the injuries to happen, we all know there will be at least 2-4 starting QB's that will go down in pre-season or even in the regular season. Tell Baker to sit home, we'll call you when we are booking the plane tickets.

 
There’s been rumors that he’s been immature for years.

The whole, tweeting his way off the Browns thing seems to have validated some of the stuff that’s been out there. 

It’s less about being brash and more about being impulsive. 
The things he said after the season ended were accurate, IMO.  He said that expecting a 5th round rookie to block TJ Watt without help wasn't likely to succeed.  He also said some of the stuff written by beat writers was "click bait".  True, also!  You can say that he should be mature enough to keep those things to himself, but like I keep telling people, adulthood starts at 30.

 
The things he said after the season ended were accurate, IMO.  He said that expecting a 5th round rookie to block TJ Watt without help wasn't likely to succeed.  He also said some of the stuff written by beat writers was "click bait".  True, also!  You can say that he should be mature enough to keep those things to himself, but like I keep telling people, adulthood starts at 30.
It’s more the goodbye Cleveland tweet thanking the fans, followed shortly by his agent’s letter citing Mayfield and the team having “irreconcilable differences” - all after CLE had publicly stated they were out on Watson.

look at all the QB movement. Baker was the *only* dude to not handle it like a pro. Literally the only one, and at that point he hadn’t even been replaced.  Matt Ryan, Russell Wilson, hell even Geno Smith didn’t say anything when the Seahawks insisted that Lock be part of the package coming back to them.

But there’s Baker, like the jealous girl at the bar who swore that other girl was checking (Watson) out, and threw a drink in (the browns) face, rather than quietly waiting to chat in private.

some may disagree (but Joe Thomas agrees) - I’m 100% convinced that just prior to that point the Browns were still planning to go into 2022 with Mayfield as their QB. They took a swing and a miss at Watson, and Baker wanted to be Ms Right, he didn’t want to be Ms Right now, so he threw a very public hissy fit.

And he’s unemployed as a result. It was completely unprofessional, and if I’m a GM, I want little to do with him. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
“Cleveland is expected to cover part of Mayfield's $18 million salary, according to Rapoport, who compared the situation to last year's Teddy Bridgewater trade, with the Panthers paying $7 million of Bridgewater’s salary for a late-round pick. The Browns, who's asking price has been a second-round pick, want to avoid covering Mayfield's salary, but teams have balked at that. The Seahawks remain the favorites to trade for Mayfield, with the Titans and Bucs emerging as potential landing spots.”

Titans and Bucs would both be interesting.

Clearly on the Bucs he’s Brady insurance, and possible passing of the torch (No Fire/accuracy jokes, please).

Titans - that one could get weird with a poor Tennehill performance.

I still think it’s Seattle.’

 
So it seems rather than basically taking Baker for free and accepting his salary, a team will pay us in draft capital to take on some of the salary.

Not sure which I prefer, to be able to give Baker away for no compensation, or to be on the hook for say maybe 9 million of the salary and get a 3rd rounder.

A 2nd, sure, I would be happy if they got a 2nd and ate half the salary.  A 3rd??   Meh.  I can live with it

 
“Cleveland is expected to cover part of Mayfield's $18 million salary, according to Rapoport, who compared the situation to last year's Teddy Bridgewater trade, with the Panthers paying $7 million of Bridgewater’s salary for a late-round pick. The Browns, who's asking price has been a second-round pick, want to avoid covering Mayfield's salary, but teams have balked at that. The Seahawks remain the favorites to trade for Mayfield, with the Titans and Bucs emerging as potential landing spots.”

Titans and Bucs would both be interesting.

Clearly on the Bucs he’s Brady insurance, and possible passing of the torch (No Fire/accuracy jokes, please).

Titans - that one could get weird with a poor Tennehill performance.

I still think it’s Seattle.’
TB is interesting. Bruce Arians was a Mayfield fan, and was said to be very interested in him if Brady had stayed retired. 

Seattle certainly needs him (or someone) the most. I'd agree they are the favorites. 

I don't think Tannehill is in any danger of being benched, even if they were to get Mayfield, but I do think he's potentially on the bubble for 2023, when his salary balloons up to almost 40 million.

 
Seahawks do have 2 2nd round picks this year and 2 next year
Based on recent comments, I’m not sure Carroll sees Mayfield as that much of an upgrade to Geno Smith that it’s worth a 2nd. I could see them paying a 3rd. 

Part of that is that there’s very little competition for Mayfield. The market for super soft in a hurry. If it were still the heyday of (checks notes) last week, I could see the 2nd. For now the Seahawks are gonna set the market for what Mayfield is worth. Unless the Bucs or Titans are legitimately interested of course. 

 
If the Browns had tried to trade Baker right before FA opened I would think they could got a 2nd round pick.  Now zero chance.  At this point I think the Browns are going to eat money and get next to nothing for him because teams know they have to get rid of him with Watson there.

 
Speaking on Wednesday, Baker Mayfield said that he has "no clue" where he is going to play in 2022.

Mayfield was appearing on the Ya Never Know podcast and his answer came as he summed up the highs and lows of his time with the Browns. Mayfield was asked if he felt disrespected and although stating that it was a matter of opinion, he admitted that he did. After playing through a variety of injuries in 2021, it's understandable that Mayfield feels done wrong by an organization that gave a massive guaranteed contract to Deshaun Watson without a trade partner for their incumbent quarterback. At the same time, Mayfield played poorly last season, ranking 21st in EPA per play, behind Carson Wentz and barely ahead of Daniel Jones. The Seahawks remain the most likely landing spots for Mayfield, with the Panthers an outside possibility if they don't select a quarterback in the draft. 

SOURCE: Field Yates on Twitter

Apr 13, 2022, 10:51 AM ET

 
Based on recent comments, I’m not sure Carroll sees Mayfield as that much of an upgrade to Geno Smith that it’s worth a 2nd. I could see them paying a 3rd. 

Part of that is that there’s very little competition for Mayfield. The market for super soft in a hurry. If it were still the heyday of (checks notes) last week, I could see the 2nd. For now the Seahawks are gonna set the market for what Mayfield is worth. Unless the Bucs or Titans are legitimately interested of course. 
Geno Smith isn’t even on the Seattle roster - and Pete Carroll says a lot of stuff most people know isn’t true. Geno Smith is horrible and starting him would only be optimal if they decided to tank the season.

 
I wonder, sal cap withstanding, if he could end up in Tampa.  It'd make a a beautiful transition plan.
I don’t really see it. They spent a 2nd round pick on Trask. They re-signed Gabbert. Mayfield is a free agent after the season. If Tom retires after 2022 they can just pursue Baker then if they want him. 

 
I don’t really see it. They spent a 2nd round pick on Trask. They re-signed Gabbert. Mayfield is a free agent after the season. If Tom retires after 2022 they can just pursue Baker then if they want him. 
I agree with doubtful but I also disagree that they can pursue him after the season if they want. People’s opinion of Mayfield aside, if/when he gets traded, I would imagine a new contract is also signed.

 
I agree with doubtful but I also disagree that they can pursue him after the season if they want. People’s opinion of Mayfield aside, if/when he gets traded, I would imagine a new contract is also signed.
What type of contract extension do the Bucs sign Mayfield to right now if he's an obvious backup in 2022?  If Carolina or Seattle want to sign him to average starter money and extend him more power to them.  2nd contract QB money is kind of wild right now.  If they wanted to trade for him and start him I'd want to see how he does as my starter in 2022 before I did that.  Wouldn't you?

 
What type of contract extension do the Bucs sign Mayfield to right now if he's an obvious backup in 2022?  If Carolina or Seattle want to sign him to average starter money and extend him more power to them.  2nd contract QB money is kind of wild right now.  If they wanted to trade for him and start him I'd want to see how he does as my starter in 2022 before I did that.  Wouldn't you?
 I already agreed TB was not a likely option. The second part is a bit tougher. Why would you trade for a guy you plan to start and if he does well, has the option to walk away at the end of the year? 

 
 I already agreed TB was not a likely option. The second part is a bit tougher. Why would you trade for a guy you plan to start and if he does well, has the option to walk away at the end of the year? 
I also think in these situations IF the player comes in and revives his career he'd want to mutually agree with the organization on an extension.  If he went to the Panthers, played great, and made the playoffs I'd think he'd want to stay there to build on the success.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top