Chaka
Footballguy
I'm not sure I agree and, frankly I am surprised that is your argument. There is an easy, clear, logical argument for choosing Daniels over Caleb based entirely on what we saw on the field. The direction you are taking is weird.Stated like that, of course you take Daniels. More importantly, after what we saw last season on the field, of course you take Daniels and that was the only point you needed to make.You'd take mercurial, moody and all the family baggage over the magnanimous, gregarious, fun-loving Daniels?
On the personality front, the reality is we have no real idea who these guys are behind the scenes.
FWIW 1) Caleb seemed like a good dude on Hard Knocks. & 2) trying to engineer his landing spot is probably really appreciated in the locker room.
Gonna go out on a limb and say that all players would like much more say in where they get to play.
Dude......
If you asked two players in 2023 which organization they'd rather play for, Chicago or Washington, how many are picking the latter? That franchise was an abortion since Joe Gibbs left the 2nd time.
I like Caleb Williams quite a bit but his displayed personality underscores many troubling factors. Factor in his over bearing father and it is an easy decision for me to make on who I prefer to lead my franchise.
To your point there is a big difference between 1) pre and post Dan Snyder and 2) big difference between choosing new ownership in Washington and the same old, same old Bears
But, that wasn't even related to my point. Even though the talk of Caleb's contract asks was overblown, headline driven nonsense. What the NFL fan on the outside may think about the reported asks is nowhere near what the guys in the locker room think about it.
Stuff like ownership percentage, guaranteed contracts or a salary based on percentage of cap rather than fixed numbers are probably very popular among players.
And we don't even know what Caleb's camp asked for but talk about it as if it were fact.