Dobbs owner here in SF dynasty format. What do we make of his dynasty value going forward? Is this a trade high moment, or has he played his way into a starter role somewhere next year?
I think the best-case scenario is he can become like Minshew where a team will never commit to him as their long-term starter but he will be a veteran bridge QB.
I'm kind of feeling like a Minshew situation is probably his worst-case scenario at this point. He's clearly put himself in "top backup QB" territory at the very least.
I guess I am not seeing what you are seeing at all.
What DO YOU see Boston? i would like to know.
Your POV is usually pretty astute
BTW, i've already laid out how I feel in several Dobbs/Vikings threads, I won't come over the top of you
I think Dobbs lands in a decent spot for the rest of the year.
Might not start the 1st week but he will soon and he will have ample weapons to throw the ball to
Is Hock better than Ertz? Is Addison better than the entire AZ WR stable without even JJ on the Vikes to boot?
There's a lot to like here for Minnesota IMHO, feel the same about Dobbs
I pretty much agree with you...smart move by the Vikes to stay relevant although the fact they did not trust their current backup is another story...Dobbs came out of nowhere this year and has played competently...if he can play well for the Vikings I think he can solidify himself as a solid veteran backup like Minshew (my comment above was directed at that being the low-point because besides this year Dobbs has not shown anything) who a team can still win with in the short-term or use as a bridge QB for a youngster but not someone who anyone is going to commit to long-term...with his ability to run he could have some more value to a team that has a QB that plays a similar style so you can keep the same offense if the starter gets hurt...this is a huge opportunity for Dobbs and he proved with Arizona he can get up to speed quickly and if JJ comes back he will definitely have much better weapons.
I got you. I think Minneshew has likely shown more than Dobbs has at this point of their careers. I wasn't really focusing on that comparison.
As far as the Vikings not trusting their current back up QBs, I am not sure this move points to that exactly, but I will say a few things about that.
I have heard that Kirk Cousins does not want serious competition for the starting role at QB for the Vikings. I am not sure if that is true or not, but what they have done with the back up QB position at times seemed to be weighed more towards a back up with experience who can help Cousins break down tape than a player who could actually challenge him for the job.
The Vikings did pick Kellen Mond so this was a bit of a deviation from this, but Mond was a bust and wasted pick.
There was a lot of criticism about Cousins lack of mobility back a few years ago from fans and I think Mike Zimmer may have said something about this that got blown out of proportion by the media and so on. This talk was related to Cousins not improvising enough when plays broke down (which is something I think KOC has worked on with Cousins, challenging him to take more risks with his throws) and mostly about Cousins not being able to escape the pass rush. This of course very much related to the Vikings offensive line not being good at that time so pressure was happening a lot more then, than it does now.
Sorry for the digression but the Vikings offensive line is much better than it was 3 years ago and before that.
This talk about Cousins not wanting to be challenged by a back up QB is from several years ago and I have not heard or read anything like this after the Vikings switched to KOC or the new GM.
Maybe the Mond experiment put that to bed. I am sure part of why Spielman was fired was because of his many failed picks at the QB position.
Last year fairly early after the new coach and GM tòok over the Vikings they traded for Nick Mullens as the solution. He does not seem great to me but he knew KOCs offense and could help Cousins learn it more quickly and he was a better option than Sean Mannion, that's not hard.
The Vikings know better than we do how close Mullens is to recovering from an injured back, a tricky injury. They may not be sure about it either. So it could be insurance for if that recovery does not go well enough and that's all.
Or it could be that even if Mullens recovers fine they do not want to start him many games. I am not sure about that. Mullens still might be the starter once he is ready.
I do think the move tells us that they don't feel comfortable enough for Jaren Hall to take over yet. He is their developmental QB they didn't have last season. They have had months to watch him practice now.
I could be wrong and they really like Hall though, and this move is to improve their back up QB options over Sean Mannion or Colt McCoy or whatever free agent they might bring in.
We will just have to see.
I just got home a bit ago so I have not heard what the coaches or GM may have said about the move yet but I am curious and I will listen to that soon.