What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

QB Justin Fields, NYJ (11 Viewers)

One of the things I would strongly bet on about Glenn is he won't quit on someone til they're off the roster.
I'd bet $ if Fields is benched, he's required to stay late and watch extra film with some coach and work on the side etc.
Fields could certainly be benched, put the work in, and return
 
I think everyone needs to take a little step back and remember that this is all preseason. The doomers are putting every play and every word under a microscope.

When the first real kickoff happens, and the snaps count, maybe we’ll be pleasantly surprised. Gotta keep in mind the perspective that preseason snaps come from a vanilla playbook, often without a full OL of starters or compliment of receivers.

Once the playbook opens up, and the whole offense is on the field, I’m betting we see some more creativity to get the defense on their heels. A couple big runs does wonders for the PA pass game.

As a recent GW investor in a start-up, I’m certainly hoping for some improvement when the games actually count. Honestly trying to not pay that much attention to the preseason, especially this time of the preseason. That goes for teams like the Bengals who look absolutely unstoppable right now.

For better or for worse, none of this is real.
 
I think the most polite way to say it is he's in a slump.
I was at Jets training camp yesterday. I’m hardly a scout, but from the novice eye, he definitely didn’t look sharp
My guess is they don't mind having a bad season and position themselves draft wise for QB of the future.
I don’t think any coach or team brass thinks this way, especially for a franchise that is trying to wipe away all the grime.
A slump is when you are missing your targets, not when you can't read the defense fast enough to make your throw.
He was missing targets on easy drills yesterday.
On the upside, if you’re that inaccurate, you can’t throw interceptions either.

Take that, logic!
:pickle:
 
I think everyone needs to take a little step back and remember that this is all preseason. The doomers are putting every play and every word under a microscope.
It doesn't work this way usually.
If practice and preseason are (usually) poor then results are poor.

We often blow off preseason for some but when the two are combined I think it becomes a reasonable negative view
 
It doesn't work this way usually.
If practice and preseason are (usually) poor then results are poor.

We often blow off preseason for some but when the two are combined I think it becomes a reasonable negative view
I have had the opposite experience in rating players too heavily in preseason, then seeing them go out and ball in the regular season.

Somewhere in the middle is probably where the truth lay.

We don’t see every practice. I’m pretty sure the folks who cover the teams don’t either - just what’s open to the public. And I’ll reiterate, they’re not showing everything in preseason games or in practice.

I’m reasonably sure that in ptactice & preseason they’re not letting Fields improvise with his legs like he’ll do in the regular season, for one example.

There’s probably some truth to the struggles - I’m not freaking out about my 1 GW share nor my 1 BA share. I’ll save the freaking out for after Game 1 if they look like boiled booty out there.
:)
 
It doesn't work this way usually.
If practice and preseason are (usually) poor then results are poor.

We often blow off preseason for some but when the two are combined I think it becomes a reasonable negative view
I have had the opposite experience in rating players too heavily in preseason, then seeing them go out and ball in the regular season.

Somewhere in the middle is probably where the truth lay.

We don’t see every practice. I’m pretty sure the folks who cover the teams don’t either - just what’s open to the public. And I’ll reiterate, they’re not showing everything in preseason games or in practice.

I’m reasonably sure that in ptactice & preseason they’re not letting Fields improvise with his legs like he’ll do in the regular season, for one example.

There’s probably some truth to the struggles - I’m not freaking out about my 1 GW share nor my 1 BA share. I’ll save the freaking out for after Game 1 if they look like boiled booty out there.
:)

I know you’ve always believed in this guy’s ability to be up and down and hit a baseline of mediocrity. I’ve never shared that confidence and now it’s my team he’s swinging wildly on. His ups aren’t worth it. This was not a great Plan A and Dart’s start (on paper) is making Plan A look lacking. I just bypassed G. Wilson for Stefon Diggs in the fourth round of a sixteen team league, so nobody really has much confidence here
 
I have been a Fields Stan since I landed/got stuck with him in our rookie draft. He was a better more accurate college passer than Lamar, Allen, and Hurts, thought if they could elevate their game so could Fields. Fields was extremely accurate in college, it appears processing is the major issue, not sure any coach can unlock that at this stage.

He has bounced from coach/coordinator/team every year or so. I really hope he shows enough to last 2 years with the Jets to see if some form of continuity and experience can finally unlock him.
 
It doesn't work this way usually.
If practice and preseason are (usually) poor then results are poor.

We often blow off preseason for some but when the two are combined I think it becomes a reasonable negative view
I have had the opposite experience in rating players too heavily in preseason, then seeing them go out and ball in the regular season.

Somewhere in the middle is probably where the truth lay.

We don’t see every practice. I’m pretty sure the folks who cover the teams don’t either - just what’s open to the public. And I’ll reiterate, they’re not showing everything in preseason games or in practice.

I’m reasonably sure that in ptactice & preseason they’re not letting Fields improvise with his legs like he’ll do in the regular season, for one example.

There’s probably some truth to the struggles - I’m not freaking out about my 1 GW share nor my 1 BA share. I’ll save the freaking out for after Game 1 if they look like boiled booty out there.
:)

I know you’ve always believed in this guy’s ability to be up and down and hit a baseline of mediocrity. I’ve never shared that confidence and now it’s my team he’s swinging wildly on. His ups aren’t worth it. This was not a great Plan A and Dart’s start (on paper) is making Plan A look lacking. I just bypassed G. Wilson for Stefon Diggs in the fourth round of a sixteen team league, so nobody really has much confidence here
Like I said (or tried to heavily imply) for me it’s more about how well his receivers can do, and to lesser degree, B. Allen.

Honestly couldn’t care less if the Jets go 0-17 (sorry, no offense) so long as GW eats. If Taylor could nibble too I’d be very pleased.

But fields can be abjectly terrible and still provide enough production for his receivers to have FF relevance, and if he’s able to run the ball that should open things up for Hall/Allen.

For Jets fans I do hope he can turn things around. And I think Fields is a good egg, and would like to see a redemption arc. But that has nothing to do with my post above.

That’s just a general sentiment of not looking at the minutia of camp/preseason to draw massive conclusions about the quality of a team. Not entirely discounting it, just some perspective.
 
Whatever your floor is for him, its not enough, this team is a real disaster. New coach, new system,

Fields went QB 19 in my draft last night.
Boomer said every backup has outplayed him.
He was arguing with a caller that there is no logic in cutting Martinez or Cook but they're the Jets so they might do it.
 
I'm seeing some plays tonight that I can't help but wonder if they don't play it for Justin and say "do it like this."

The patience and confidence to "sit" and then run sells it so well
Fields looks a lot better than I remember in those clips.
That's Martinez
He has 4.5 speed.
I was trying to say how the backups run plays and it's orderly and like ohhh that's how it should look.
 
Last edited:
Cimini's (minutes ago) 53 only has Fields and Tyrod.
My guy has barely written or mentioned the backups and ...idk I've thought something off with him all off-season.
He's a great reporter so we'll see. He's certainly watched his share
 
I'm seeing some plays tonight that I can't help but wonder if they don't play it for Justin and say "do it like this."

The patience and confidence to "sit" and then run sells it so well
Fields looks a lot better than I remember in those clips.
That's Martinez
He has 4.5 speed.
I was trying to say how the backups run plays and it's orderly and like ohhh that's how it should look.
I got that. Sarcasm is tricky in type.

I like how decisive Martinez looked on those plays.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bri
I'm seeing some plays tonight that I can't help but wonder if they don't play it for Justin and say "do it like this."

The patience and confidence to "sit" and then run sells it so well
Fields looks a lot better than I remember in those clips.
That's Martinez
He has 4.5 speed.
I was trying to say how the backups run plays and it's orderly and like ohhh that's how it should look.
I got that. Sarcasm is tricky in type.

I like how decisive Martinez looked on those plays.
I think @Bri might be a bot.
He's the only Titans on these boards
 
I'm seeing some plays tonight that I can't help but wonder if they don't play it for Justin and say "do it like this."

The patience and confidence to "sit" and then run sells it so well
Fields looks a lot better than I remember in those clips.
That's Martinez
He has 4.5 speed.
I was trying to say how the backups run plays and it's orderly and like ohhh that's how it should look.
I got that. Sarcasm is tricky in type.

I like how decisive Martinez looked on those plays.
I think @Bri might be a bot.
He's the only Titans on these boards
Oh I know. He’s been around a long time.
 
I'm seeing some plays tonight that I can't help but wonder if they don't play it for Justin and say "do it like this."

The patience and confidence to "sit" and then run sells it so well
Fields looks a lot better than I remember in those clips.
That's Martinez
He has 4.5 speed.
I was trying to say how the backups run plays and it's orderly and like ohhh that's how it should look.
@Instinctive stop doing your laughing emoji at my posts
 
I'm seeing some plays tonight that I can't help but wonder if they don't play it for Justin and say "do it like this."

The patience and confidence to "sit" and then run sells it so well
Fields looks a lot better than I remember in those clips.
That's Martinez
He has 4.5 speed.
I was trying to say how the backups run plays and it's orderly and like ohhh that's how it should look.
@Instinctive stop doing your laughing emoji at my posts
It was funny? I thought it was intentionally funny. Take a chill pill man. Fields look terrible over and over. I've grabbed Martinez in 2 2QB dynasties just because of your posts in here. It was hilarious that someone said Fields looked better and you pointed out thats because it was Martinez. The way you typed it and just linked it implied it would be a Fields clip. The subversion of expectation was funny, and a common comedic technique.

Not everyone is out to get people all the time. Sometimes one can just enjoy a funny moment and try to share that laughter.


ETA: I'm now questioning if this was a joke also and it went over my head and I reacted too seriously. If so, just let me know.
 
Last edited:
Martinez was cut
Cimini expects Cook cut once Taylor shows he's ok in practice. That means he was dead on accurate that they'd go with Fields and a guy that had knee surgery weeks ago.

Martinez was preseason MVP which is something another chat does. They curiously never make the team or never play. I forget.

I think this is a bad move today but the Jets have been pretty sharp with all the DT moves lately. Amidst a few moves I think they beefed their front up nicely.

I don't even tho Rich was so right; I don't think you go into a season with a highly questionable results QB and highly questionable health QB. I bet something is up their sleeve here
 
Fields fed DJ Moore. Doesn’t need a ton of yards passing for GW to get there.

Excited to see Fields get a shot to be himself again. Don’t like how things went in Pittsburgh. Definitely capable of putting up scores that’ll win your FF matches. Great target for teams that wait on drafting QB1.
 
I wouldn't be thrilled if he was my qb1 in a 12 man league. Don't play super flex, but he would be perfect in those leagues as your #2. He is my backup in League Uno behind Mahomes. That's about where I feel comfortable. Honestly, id prolly look to move him if he gets one of those 100 yard rushing games. I've always liked Fields and will definitely cheer for his success. Just from afar. Ha ha
 
Last edited:
Does anyone trust Fields to actually be their QB1 this year?
He’s trendy among industry types but of my.3 home leagues no one took him as a qb1, including in a 16 team league

I’m with the home drafters, I think he’s a case of too much data emphasis vs eyeball test.

I also don’t see how fields keeps the job no matter who the backup is
 
I wouldn't be thrilled if he was my qb1 in a 12 man league. Don't play super flex, but he would be perfect in those leagues as your #2. He is my backup in League Uno begins Mahomes. That's about where I feel comfortable. Honestly, id prolly look to move him if he gets one of those 100 yard rushing games. I've always liked Fields and will definitely cheer for his success. Just from afar. Ha ha
My thoughts as well. Not comfortable with Fields as my QB1 in our 12-team league. But got him as my backup to Jared Goff (who is admittedly a borderline QB1/QB2 as well).

I'm clearly not loaded at QB... but the pairing allows me to play matchups. Now let's hope I get the start/sit decisions right.
 
Does anyone trust Fields to actually be their QB1 this year?
He’s trendy among industry types but of my.3 home leagues no one took him as a qb1, including in a 16 team league

I’m with the home drafters, I think he’s a case of too much data emphasis vs eyeball test.

I also don’t see how fields keeps the job no matter who the backup is
It's really hard to see them pivoting to Tyrod. Really really hard. At least for fantasy, Fields was a QB in ppg in 2022 and 2023. on really bad Bears teams. But I would be extremely nervous with him as my starting QB and would certainly quick a 2nd QB pretty quickly.
 
Stop the laughing emojis at other people's posts.
Then just turn it off. Just so we are all on the same page, I did not and have not used the emoji in a "I'm laughing at you" way. Look at the posts. I genuinely believed the OP, the response, and the final quote were funny. The first post seemed intentionally to be a joke about fields. Chakas reply was definitely funny. And the third post seemed to get the joke and reply in kind.

If somebody says something that is funny, that's what it's for. It was funny. If we're going to have people just assume everyone is a jerk about everything all the time then just turn the feature off. This is ridiculous.

ETA: it's not like there's even any history I'm aware of with @Bri where he or the moderation team should probably think I am being a jerk. I think if we go look at my emoji use I've literally never used it to laugh AT someone - which Joe explicitly asked us not to do. If we are supposed to be excellent to each other, two things should have happened:

1. If Bri has hurt feelings over some perceived emoji slight, Bri should PM me and ask if I've got a problem with him (my response would have been confusion, but I imagine we would have got quickly to the heart of the matter)

2. @FBG Moderator should look at what happened before a pretty strongly worded one liner that, at least to me, implies I am in the wrong somehow.

If I'm that far in the wrong, give me a ban timeout and tell me what was offensive. Otherwise, be better.
 
Last edited:
Stop the laughing emojis at other people's posts.
Then just turn it off. Just so we are all on the same page, I did not and have not used the emoji in a "I'm laughing at you" way. Look at the posts. I genuinely believed the OP, the response, and the final quote were funny. The first post seemed intentionally to be a joke about fields. Chakas reply was definitely funny. And the third post seemed to get the joke and reply in kind.

If somebody says something that is funny, that's what it's for. It was funny. If we're going to have people just assume everyone is a jerk about everything all the time then just turn the feature off. This is ridiculous.

ETA: it's not like there's even any history I'm aware of with @Bri where he or the moderation team should probably think I am being a jerk. I think of we go look at my emoji use I've literally never used it to laugh AT someone - which Joe explicitly asked us not to do. If we are supposed to be excellent to each other, two things should have happened:

1. If Bri has hurt feelings over some perceived emoji slight, Bri should PM me and ask if I've got a problem with him (my response would have been confusion, but I imagine we would have got quickly to the heart of the matter)

2. @FBG Moderator should look at what happened before a pretty strongly worded one liner that, at least to me, implies I am in the wrong somehow.

If I'm that far in the wrong, give me a ban timeout and tell me what was offensive. Otherwise, be better.
Speaking as an impartial observer (with a ton of respect for Bri who consistently provides some of the best information on this board, especially in the IDP forum, I might add)... the emoji usage in this case appeared to be benign and acknowledging something thought to be said in jest. Possibly a misunderstanding in this case, at worst... but appeared to be laughing with the author/post (not at it).

Considering some of the pissing matches I've seen in the Shark Pool in the past, I was equally surprised by the quick moderator warning. Honestly seemed a little touchy and unnecessary in this case. Now if Instinctive had a history of using this sarcastically, etc. and was constantly belittling other guys, I could see it differently. But to his point, if the laughing emoji is THAT threatening (good golly)... maybe just (I honestly can't believe we are suggesting this) remove it?
 
Stop the laughing emojis at other people's posts.
Then just turn it off. Just so we are all on the same page, I did not and have not used the emoji in a "I'm laughing at you" way. Look at the posts. I genuinely believed the OP, the response, and the final quote were funny. The first post seemed intentionally to be a joke about fields. Chakas reply was definitely funny. And the third post seemed to get the joke and reply in kind.

If somebody says something that is funny, that's what it's for. It was funny. If we're going to have people just assume everyone is a jerk about everything all the time then just turn the feature off. This is ridiculous.

ETA: it's not like there's even any history I'm aware of with @Bri where he or the moderation team should probably think I am being a jerk. I think of we go look at my emoji use I've literally never used it to laugh AT someone - which Joe explicitly asked us not to do. If we are supposed to be excellent to each other, two things should have happened:

1. If Bri has hurt feelings over some perceived emoji slight, Bri should PM me and ask if I've got a problem with him (my response would have been confusion, but I imagine we would have got quickly to the heart of the matter)

2. @FBG Moderator should look at what happened before a pretty strongly worded one liner that, at least to me, implies I am in the wrong somehow.

If I'm that far in the wrong, give me a ban timeout and tell me what was offensive. Otherwise, be better.
Speaking as an impartial observer (with a ton of respect for Bri who consistently provides some of the best information on this board, I might add)... the emoji usage in this case appeared to be benign and acknowledging something thought to be said in jest. Possibly a misunderstanding in this case, at worst... but appeared to be laughing with the author/post (not at it).

Considering some of the pissing matches I've seen in the Shark Pool in the past, I was equally surprised by the quick moderator warning. Honestly seemed a little touchy and unnecessary in this case. Now if Instinctive had a history of using this sarcastically, etc. and was constantly belittling other guys, I could see it differently. But to his point, if the laughing emoji is THAT threatening (good golly)... maybe just (I honestly can't believe we are suggesting this) remove it?
Exactly!!! The Titans RB thread is a must follow every single year.
 
Stop the laughing emojis at other people's posts.
Then just turn it off. Just so we are all on the same page, I did not and have not used the emoji in a "I'm laughing at you" way. Look at the posts. I genuinely believed the OP, the response, and the final quote were funny. The first post seemed intentionally to be a joke about fields. Chakas reply was definitely funny. And the third post seemed to get the joke and reply in kind.

If somebody says something that is funny, that's what it's for. It was funny. If we're going to have people just assume everyone is a jerk about everything all the time then just turn the feature off. This is ridiculous.

ETA: it's not like there's even any history I'm aware of with @Bri where he or the moderation team should probably think I am being a jerk. I think of we go look at my emoji use I've literally never used it to laugh AT someone - which Joe explicitly asked us not to do. If we are supposed to be excellent to each other, two things should have happened:

1. If Bri has hurt feelings over some perceived emoji slight, Bri should PM me and ask if I've got a problem with him (my response would have been confusion, but I imagine we would have got quickly to the heart of the matter)

2. @FBG Moderator should look at what happened before a pretty strongly worded one liner that, at least to me, implies I am in the wrong somehow.

If I'm that far in the wrong, give me a ban timeout and tell me what was offensive. Otherwise, be better.
Speaking as an impartial observer (with a ton of respect for Bri who consistently provides some of the best information on this board, I might add)... the emoji usage in this case appeared to be benign and acknowledging something thought to be said in jest. Possibly a misunderstanding in this case, at worst... but appeared to be laughing with the author/post (not at it).

Considering some of the pissing matches I've seen in the Shark Pool in the past, I was equally surprised by the quick moderator warning. Honestly seemed a little touchy and unnecessary in this case. Now if Instinctive had a history of using this sarcastically, etc. and was constantly belittling other guys, I could see it differently. But to his point, if the laughing emoji is THAT threatening (good golly)... maybe just (I honestly can't believe we are suggesting this) remove it?
Exactly!!! The Titans RB thread is a must follow every single year.
I'm biased because of my IDP league... but Bri's Titan's IDP thread is must read every year.
 
Martinez was cut
Cimini expects Cook cut once Taylor shows he's ok in practice. That means he was dead on accurate that they'd go with Fields and a guy that had knee surgery weeks ago.

Martinez was preseason MVP which is something another chat does. They curiously never make the team or never play. I forget.

I think this is a bad move today but the Jets have been pretty sharp with all the DT moves lately. Amidst a few moves I think they beefed their front up nicely.

I don't even tho Rich was so right; I don't think you go into a season with a highly questionable results QB and highly questionable health QB. I bet something is up their sleeve here
I wouldn't complain if the Raiders signed Martinez. They need a backup QB.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Bri
Does anyone trust Fields to actually be their QB1 this year?
He’s trendy among industry types but of my.3 home leagues no one took him as a qb1, including in a 16 team league

I’m with the home drafters, I think he’s a case of too much data emphasis vs eyeball test.

I also don’t see how fields keeps the job no matter who the backup is
It's really hard to see them pivoting to Tyrod. Really really hard. At least for fantasy, Fields was a QB in ppg in 2022 and 2023. on really bad Bears teams. But I would be extremely nervous with him as my starting QB and would certainly quick a 2nd QB pretty quickly.
I agree, and look, I liked the signing and I'm rooting for Fields, I thought he got a bit of a raw deal in Pittsburgh last year and likewise Chicago the year prior.

But man he is a rough watch, the team seems to be with him for now, but lets see what October 1 looks like.

Fields ceiling to me if EVERYTHING broke right is QB6 to QB8 lets say... I do think a Maye or even McCarthy has a higher ceiling
 
Does anyone trust Fields to actually be their QB1 this year?
I grabbed him at 10.12 was planning to pair him with a Caleb, Goff, or maye but decided to grab some depth at 11.01 and grab whoever was left at 12.10. 7 freaking teams took their backup Qb in the 13t

Ended up pairing him with stroud, certainly not ideal.
 
as a ny jest homer, i believe the jest are gonna play it close to the vest this year and roll 3 backs. gonna try to limit the times that fields has to throw, which is captain obvious type analysis. but, this is a 5 or 6 win team that should be behind a lot. so, fields may have to throw 30 times some games. who he targets will be fascinating. wilson is obvious, the rest is a cluster. i think mason taylor steps forward as a 2 option given that wilson will be doubled and fields will be looking short to dump. i expect fields to scramble around a lot. essentially, i don’t know how many times this offensive offense exceeds 20 points.
 
Cook to PS has been said often lately.

Devito cut has Jets fans wanting him and writers finally questioning the reasonable nature of Taylor being healthy week one.

And we come full circle to Martinez and Cook are the only ones that ran the offense well this summer.

It's is really damning about Fields if ya read the backup QB comments.

I would very much think the Jets are interested in trading for another veteran if the right one is there. Hooker familiar but not good enough or not ready discussion has really led to...well ya know, of the right guy is available it silences everything.

Yall gotta have a plan B is you have Fields in FF. The more I read or listen, the shorter the hook seems from offstage
 
Tyler Johnson was starting and doing so well. Such a surprise cut!

Most of all he and Fields seemed to have a broken play type rapport.

This is maybe cruel to Justin OR maybe it's "yeah don't do that?"
Very odd

Both Smiths have fun highlights if you want to take a chance on someone.
 
Cook to PS has been said often lately.

Devito cut has Jets fans wanting him and writers finally questioning the reasonable nature of Taylor being healthy week one.

And we come full circle to Martinez and Cook are the only ones that ran the offense well this summer.

It's is really damning about Fields if ya read the backup QB comments.

I would very much think the Jets are interested in trading for another veteran if the right one is there. Hooker familiar but not good enough or not ready discussion has really led to...well ya know, of the right guy is available it silences everything.

Yall gotta have a plan B is you have Fields in FF. The more I read or listen, the shorter the hook seems from offstage
3rd string QB never matters. No matter the name, nor team. In the NFL, IMO, if you need to utilize your 3rd stringer, your season is already over. The 32 starters already have some fringe types, asking the 65th best league QB to do something is crazy. I say this for a good team. For a team that will be as lousy as the Jest, it makes little difference. I mean, if the Dolphins have to actually use Hack Wilson, their season is over. You can argue the Jest are already using a 3rd stringer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bri
Broke my cardinal sin of drafting one of my jets. But people drafting two qbs in a one qb league doomed me. All I need is for this guy to do what he usually does and zoom.
 
Does anyone trust Fields to actually be their QB1 this year?
Trust? No. Rolling with him until the wheels fall off? Yes.

Are there other options if need be? Yes.
I like pairing him with someone like Goff. I high floor/safe option at QB. Something a bit more than waiver wire fodder or at least my choice of waiver wire fodder before they hit the waiver wire
 
Does anyone trust Fields to actually be their QB1 this year?
Trust? No. Rolling with him until the wheels fall off? Yes.

Are there other options if need be? Yes.
I like pairing him with someone like Goff. I high floor/safe option at QB. Something a bit more than waiver wire fodder or at least my choice of waiver wire fodder before they hit the waiver wire
Yes. In most leagues where I have taken Fields I have him paired with the likes of Stroud, Goff, Stafford before I knew how bad his back was/is, and even folks like Lawrence, Maye, McCarthy, Herbert, Purdy etc are good for me. And in the handful where I only took Fields I know from experience there are decent other options still available and will keep my eyes open. There is of course a world where he balls out (for FF) and good enough for NFL to keep the job and I start him every week. By the time the Jets have a bye in week 9 I *should* have clarity and an actual backup option (or 2) on my roster already.
 
Does anyone trust Fields to actually be their QB1 this year?
Trust? No. Rolling with him until the wheels fall off? Yes.

Are there other options if need be? Yes.
The only reason I don't fully "trust" Fields as my QB1 is because he could be benched at some point if the Jets have a terrible season and he is clearly not their future. Kind of like what happened in Pittsburgh and Chicago - though it's encouraging that he doesn't have a reliable starter behind him (Wilson) and the team doesn't have a blue chip rookie to consider (Caleb).

From a fantasy standpoint, absent the real life risk of his playing time, due to his running ability creating a high/safe floor, I actually trust him a ton to be a viable fantasy QB. It won't look pretty, but if he passes for 150 yards and rushes for 50 per game he's going to be consistently double digits because there will be a TD or two in there per game as well. Just plug your nose and enjoy the stats and hopefully he plays well enough to keep the job.

In superflex I genuinely think he's a league winner as a QB2. In 4 pt passing TD leagues he's probably a lock for top ten production if he plays 17 games and is a steal in the 7th or 8th round. As mentioned above, I really like pairing him with a Goff or a Purdy or a Lawrence or something to ensure a near guaranteed floor.

ETA: To quote The Ringer fantasy guys, having a running QB is like a fantasy football cheat code.
 
Does anyone trust Fields to actually be their QB1 this year?
Trust? No. Rolling with him until the wheels fall off? Yes.

Are there other options if need be? Yes.
I like pairing him with someone like Goff. I high floor/safe option at QB. Something a bit more than waiver wire fodder or at least my choice of waiver wire fodder before they hit the waiver wire
Yes. In most leagues where I have taken Fields I have him paired with the likes of Stroud, Goff, Stafford before I knew how bad his back was/is, and even folks like Lawrence, Maye, McCarthy, Herbert, Purdy etc are good for me. And in the handful where I only took Fields I know from experience there are decent other options still available and will keep my eyes open. There is of course a world where he balls out (for FF) and good enough for NFL to keep the job and I start him every week. By the time the Jets have a bye in week 9 I *should* have clarity and an actual backup option (or 2) on my roster already.
He’s my only qb in a ten team redraft. Once some of these teams decide to get rid of one of their two or even three qbs they drafted, I’ll hopefully be able to decide if Fields is worth keeping/starting.
 
Saw the Niners swooped up Martinez. Never seen the kid play, but based on all the Bri reports, Jets fans gotta be scratching heads over that move. They were probably better off trying to sneak Tyrod onto the PS.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top