What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

QB Kyler Murray, ARZ (4 Viewers)

Good luck digging in on mini-me.

Disagree with most everything in this post.

It should** (hint hint) tell you something when you have to resort to 7 games for your argument.  But we all know how this goes.
I'm not even a huge Murray fan, but I don't know what the most everything you are disagreeing with could even be.

I stated his games played, his record, his passer rating, and that he's improved every year. 

If you disagree with that, well, you disagree with facts then. I didn't state an opinion at any point. Every single thing I said is a thing that happened. 

 
I'm not even a huge Murray fan, but I don't know what the most everything you are disagreeing with could even be.

I stated his games played, his record, his passer rating, and that he's improved every year. 

If you disagree with that, well, you disagree with facts then. I didn't state an opinion at any point. Every single thing I said is a thing that happened. 


Again the stats versus eyeballs thing.  And your opinion comes in with the arbitrary 7 games.. that you chose.

He is Dak Prescott only smaller.  Not a great passer, at all.  If the running game is going he is going.

And when it comes down to him making or breaking it.... it breaks.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
AZ doesn't get to feast on the 2 worst divisions in football again this year (no more JAX, DET, HOU, CHI).

They are going to nosedive imo.

 
My eyeballs tell me he is not going to get up from some of the hits bigger guys get up from. If he continues to defy those odds for another decade (like Wilson) or nearly two (like Brees), then I will have been wrong about him.

 
Again the stats versus eyeballs thing.  And your opinion comes in with the arbitrary 7 games.. that you chose.

He is Dak Prescott only smaller.  Not a great passer, at all.  If the running game is going he is going.

And when it comes down to him making or breaking it.... it breaks.
Dak Prescott is pretty good. Most NFL teams would happily dump their guy for Dak.

If cherry picking 7 games is worth mentioning - I bet Gardner Minshew can be portrayed as a badass too.
Didn't cherry pick 7 games at all. They were the 7 games before he suffered the 1 injury he's suffered in his 3 year career, and also the games he played with Hopkins since they went down in the same game. Its not like I just picked his best 7 games at random or something. Even counting the full season, he still showed steady improvement in basically every way a passer can.

AZ doesn't get to feast on the 2 worst divisions in football again this year (no more JAX, DET, HOU, CHI).

They are going to nosedive imo.
Arizona went 5-2 against teams that made the playoffs last season, including sweeping SF. 

 
I don't understand.  What leverage does Kyler think he has here.  He's on year 4 of his rookie deal.  Is he really going to sit if he doesn't get a deal?  

 
[Pelissero] The #Cardinals have yet to make a contract offer to Pro Bowl QB Kyler Murray, whose agent, Erik Burkhardt, informed the team weeks ago he was pulling his opening proposal off the table, per sources. Other teams are monitoring closely; Arizona insists Murray won’t be traded.

https://twitter.com/TomPelissero/status/1514688176769716237

Four QBs – Aaron Rodgers, Deshaun Watson, Matthew Stafford and Derek Carr – have signed contract extensions worth $40 million or more in the past month as the market continues to go up. Murray is due about $5.5 million in 2022, and it’d be a surprise if he plays on that deal.

https://twitter.com/tompelissero/status/1514688339374493696?s=21&t=_hFUSce3uTXSeq9R7U4heg

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I don't understand.  What leverage does Kyler think he has here.  He's on year 4 of his rookie deal.  Is he really going to sit if he doesn't get a deal?  
We just saw Watson sit out a year and get the best contract a QB has ever been given despite you know what hanging over his head.

His base pay this year is just $5.2M and it's possible they could go after some of his $5.8M in bonus money if he sat out but either way not a ton in the sense it's likely about a  1/4th of his APY on a new deal.

He also would not accrue a season if he held out but I"m sure his team is thinking if he eventually gets traded that's something, like his pay in this year, he can easily get back.

Whether he's willing to do these things or not I don't know, but it's leverage and when it's your QB you are kind of holding the entire season hostage for the franchise if he used it in this manner.

 
I don't understand.  What leverage does Kyler think he has here.  He's on year 4 of his rookie deal.  Is he really going to sit if he doesn't get a deal?  
What leverage?  I dunno, but it probably begins with “good luck” and ends with “starting Colt McCoy this year.”

Now, would he really sit?  No idea.  But I’ll guarantee the Cardinals don’t want to see what happens to their season if he does.  I have to imagine this one gets worked out, despite the fact that Kyler Murray isn’t the guy I’d be real comfortable giving a massive deal to.

 
The only thing worse than having a bad QB is paying a ton of money to a good but not elite QB IMO.
I would disagree with that a little. I think paying a good but not elite QB is fine, you can win a Super Bowl with those guys (the Rams just did) but the issue becomes if you have nothing else around them. If you pay for a good but not great QB, you need to either have a great hit rate on value FAs, or nail some drafts to consistently contend. 

Basically, paying a non-elite QB, makes it so you have to thread a pretty small needle. However, that is still FAR better than the alternative of hoping a rookie QB pans out, and/or finding a diamond in the rough. 

If I were the Cardinals, I'd gladly be looking to extend Murray soon. He's improved every year, and so has their record with him. Its very possible/likely we haven't seen Murray's best yet either.

 
The only thing worse than having a bad QB is paying a ton of money to a good but not elite QB IMO.


What's our metric for elite QB at this point?  Murray's per game stats are right on par with Burrow, Dak, Rodgers, Brady in every stat except pass TDs.  Though a large part of that is because he just runs it in from inside the 10 instead (16 rushing TDs the last two years).

He's a 24 year old that just finished with 101 qb rtg, 70% completion, 8ypa.  This isn't like Joe Flacco or Andy Dalton getting a big contract.

 
What's our metric for elite QB at this point?  Murray's per game stats are right on par with Burrow, Dak, Rodgers, Brady in every stat except pass TDs.  Though a large part of that is because he just runs it in from inside the 10 instead (16 rushing TDs the last two years).

He's a 24 year old that just finished with 101 qb rtg, 70% completion, 8ypa.  This isn't like Joe Flacco or Andy Dalton getting a big contract.
None of the QB’s you mentioned had a game like he did in the playoffs. The Rams exposed him. It was pathetic.

His numbers might be OK. But there is a LOT of talk in AZ on how he isn’t a good leader, doesn’t practice hard, and the players are fed up with his attitude. That’s just not the kind of guy you want to pay  big bucks to regardless of the numbers.

 
I trade him for draft capital if I'm the Cards...apparently they were in discussions with the Colts so Keim is trying.  Cards are the third best team in their own division IMHO.   No sense in being mediocre after being weighted down with a bloated QB contract...their roster isn't strong enough to withstand that.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
None of the QB’s you mentioned had a game like he did in the playoffs. The Rams exposed him. It was pathetic.
It was 1 game, without his best weapon, against the Super Bowl Champs. While nobody played as poorly in a playoff game last season, a lot of big time QBs have had similar caliber games in the playoffs. For example:

Tom Brady (2009 Ravens) Peyton Manning (2002 Jets) (2003 Pats) Ben Roethlisberger in wins somehow (2005 Seahawks) (2010 Jets) Eli Manning (2005 Panthers) (2008 Eagles) Russell Wilson also in a win (2014 Packers) Steve McNair (in maybe the flukiest win in history against 1999 Bills) (2006 Colts) 

Point being, sometimes a QB just sucks for a game, even the all-time greats. There is no real reason to think Murray was "exposed" more accurately, the Cardinals were simply beaten by the better team, a team that didn't have Von Miller when Murray torched them earlier in the season, with DeAndre Hopkins.  That Murray struggled with in matchup 2 with Hopkins and Miller playing. Then was awful without Hopkins and with Miller. 

 
It was 1 game, without his best weapon, against the Super Bowl Champs. While nobody played as poorly in a playoff game last season, a lot of big time QBs have had similar caliber games in the playoffs. For example:

Tom Brady (2009 Ravens) Peyton Manning (2002 Jets) (2003 Pats) Ben Roethlisberger in wins somehow (2005 Seahawks) (2010 Jets) Eli Manning (2005 Panthers) (2008 Eagles) Russell Wilson also in a win (2014 Packers) Steve McNair (in maybe the flukiest win in history against 1999 Bills) (2006 Colts) 

Point being, sometimes a QB just sucks for a game, even the all-time greats. There is no real reason to think Murray was "exposed" more accurately, the Cardinals were simply beaten by the better team, a team that didn't have Von Miller when Murray torched them earlier in the season, with DeAndre Hopkins.  That Murray struggled with in matchup 2 with Hopkins and Miller playing. Then was awful without Hopkins and with Miller. 
I didn’t want to rehash everything that has been said earlier, but he was really bad for the entire second half of the year. The Cards had a few chances to clinch a playoff birth with a win, and they couldn’t get it done. We can agree to disagree, but Murray’s poor play down the stretch, coupled with his poor attitude and finger pointing, is the reason why the Cards are taking a stand here. 
 

As a Cardinals fan, I hope they move on from him.

 
I didn’t want to rehash everything that has been said earlier, but he was really bad for the entire second half of the year. The Cards had a few chances to clinch a playoff birth with a win, and they couldn’t get it done. We can agree to disagree, but Murray’s poor play down the stretch, coupled with his poor attitude and finger pointing, is the reason why the Cards are taking a stand here. 
 

As a Cardinals fan, I hope they move on from him.
There are probably 15+ teams that hope the Cardinals move on from him too. 

 
menobrown said:
We just saw Watson sit out a year and get the best contract a QB has ever been given despite you know what hanging over his head.

His base pay this year is just $5.2M and it's possible they could go after some of his $5.8M in bonus money if he sat out but either way not a ton in the sense it's likely about a  1/4th of his APY on a new deal.

He also would not accrue a season if he held out but I"m sure his team is thinking if he eventually gets traded that's something, like his pay in this year, he can easily get back.

Whether he's willing to do these things or not I don't know, but it's leverage and when it's your QB you are kind of holding the entire season hostage for the franchise if he used it in this manner.
I don't really agree.  I know there have been a bunch of big QB contracts but in my eyes, he doesn't qualify for the big payday yet.  He has not shown that he can stay healthy and he really hasn't won anything yet.  The fact that AZ hasn't even made him a contract offer yet is telling for me.

I think he's overplaying his hand here.  He's on year four of his deal and IMO, he should go out, have a great season and show he's worth a big deal.  I wouldn't feel comfortable opening the vault for him at this point in his career.  If push comes to shove, bring in Baker.  I'd love to see him come in and play well and win.  

 
Great, if the demand is that high should mean more draft capital for the Cards.
Hypothetically, if he's on the market, I would think a 1st and a 2nd is basically the starting point of any offer, with it likely ending up being 2 1sts.

If he's really on the market, any team that is thinking of taking a QB in round 1 this year, should be rethinking that idea, and shooting for Murray instead. Especially contenders like Pittsburgh (and their loads of cap space going forward) or New Orleans (with those 2 mid 1sts) or Philly (same idea as NO) 

I don't think the Cards would be getting a Watson level haul, but then again, all it takes is one team to overpay, like Cleveland did, and Murray doesn't have anywhere near Watson's baggage. Also, if Murray is on the market, I wonder if the Cards would be looking at Mayfield as a replacement (short term at least) as Kingsbury coached him in college.

 
Hypothetically, if he's on the market, I would think a 1st and a 2nd is basically the starting point of any offer, with it likely ending up being 2 1sts.

If he's really on the market, any team that is thinking of taking a QB in round 1 this year, should be rethinking that idea, and shooting for Murray instead. Especially contenders like Pittsburgh (and their loads of cap space going forward) or New Orleans (with those 2 mid 1sts) or Philly (same idea as NO) 

I don't think the Cards would be getting a Watson level haul, but then again, all it takes is one team to overpay, like Cleveland did, and Murray doesn't have anywhere near Watson's baggage. Also, if Murray is on the market, I wonder if the Cards would be looking at Mayfield as a replacement (short term at least) as Kingsbury coached him in college.
I agree 100% with the bolded.  Those teams would get a huge upgrade at QB and would keep them as playoff contenders.  If I'm ARI and shopping him, I would have to get two 1sts and more.  He's very young so he has the long term potential to spend over a decade with a new team.  I think that should have some value and will be one of the reasons other teams like CAR will also want him.  PIT in particular would be a great destination for him IMO, in part because of Tomlin.

Mayfield transferred to Oklahoma after his freshman year and I've heard him and Kingsberry aren't on good terms.  Besides, if Murray's locker room presence is one of the reasons they aren't giving him an offer and may be shopping him, I don't know if they would want to replace him with Mayfield's locker room presence.  I can see them trying for Garoppolo and if SF really doesn't think he can get them a Super Bowl win, they shouldn't have a problem trading him within the division.  Then again, that's probably why nobody is beating down SFs door asking about him.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I agree 100% with the bolded.  Those teams would get a huge upgrade at QB and would keep them as playoff contenders.  If I'm ARI and shopping him, I would have to get two 1sts and more.  He's very young so he has the long term potential to spend over a decade with a new team.  I think that should have some value and will be one of the reasons other teams like CAR will also want him.  PIT in particular would be a great destination for him IMO, in part because of Tomlin.

Mayfield transferred to Oklahoma after his freshman year and I've heard him and Kingsberry aren't on good terms.  Besides, if Murray's locker room presence is one of the reasons they aren't giving him an offer and may be shopping him, I don't know if they would want to replace him with Mayfield's locker room presence.  I can see them trying for Garoppolo and if SF really doesn't think he can get them a Super Bowl win, they shouldn't have a problem trading him within the division.  Then again, that's probably why nobody is beating down SFs door asking about him.
I hadn't heard anything about Kingsbury and Mayfield being on bad terms. Then again, the only thing I ever recall hearing was that when asked about drafting Murray and moving on from Rosen in 2019, Kingsbury implied that if they had ended up with Mayfield in that draft, that they wouldn't have looked at QB as a need. You could probably argue that is as much or more anti-Rosen than pro-Mayfield though. I don't think he ever held Mayfield transferring against him, college QBs transfer all the time, especially ones with NFL talent, hell, Murray transferred away too, and he still took him #1. 

 
I hadn't heard anything about Kingsbury and Mayfield being on bad terms. Then again, the only thing I ever recall hearing was that when asked about drafting Murray and moving on from Rosen in 2019, Kingsbury implied that if they had ended up with Mayfield in that draft, that they wouldn't have looked at QB as a need. You could probably argue that is as much or more anti-Rosen than pro-Mayfield though. I don't think he ever held Mayfield transferring against him, college QBs transfer all the time, especially ones with NFL talent, hell, Murray transferred away too, and he still took him #1. 
I remember where I heard it now.  I don't think it's Kingsberry who has the problem.  In that interview Mayfield did the other day he said that even though he had started 5 games and they were 5-0, they wouldn't give him a scholarship (he was a walk-on at Texas Tech).  Plus, he said they blocked him from transferring so he had to redo his 101 classes at Oklahoma.

 
I trade him for draft capital if I'm the Cards...apparently they were in discussions with the Colts so Keim is trying.  Cards are the third best team in their own division IMHO.   No sense in being mediocre after being weighted down with a bloated QB contract...their roster isn't strong enough to withstand that.
I guess I'm just old enough to remember when the Arizona Cardinals being "mediocre", and losing their best player the second half of the season, and the QB folding down the stretch didn't look like an 11-6 season. Yeah, they definitely looked better the first half of the stretch when they had Hopkins but this franchise doesn't exactly have the history of the Steelers or Packers.

If an 11 win season is "mediocre" how many seasons have they had that were better than mediocre since they moved from St Louis THIRTY FOUR YEARS AGO? For that matter, how many times have they won more than 11 games in history of the franchise going back 100+ years ago?

Not a Cards hater or supporter...... just think it's really odd how Cards fans seem to view last season. I don't know how you could view last season as anything BUT a step in the right direction. But I also find it a complete mystery so many people are saying he hasn't steadily improved(in almost every area) since his rookie season.

 
I guess I'm just old enough to remember when the Arizona Cardinals being "mediocre", and losing their best player the second half of the season, and the QB folding down the stretch didn't look like an 11-6 season. Yeah, they definitely looked better the first half of the stretch when they had Hopkins but this franchise doesn't exactly have the history of the Steelers or Packers.

If an 11 win season is "mediocre" how many seasons have they had that were better than mediocre since they moved from St Louis THIRTY FOUR YEARS AGO? For that matter, how many times have they won more than 11 games in history of the franchise going back 100+ years ago?

Not a Cards hater or supporter...... just think it's really odd how Cards fans seem to view last season. I don't know how you could view last season as anything BUT a step in the right direction. But I also find it a complete mystery so many people are saying he hasn't steadily improved(in almost every area) since his rookie season.


Right, it's interesting because if they'd had the same season as last year in a more spread out fashion people would have been excited about it. But they almost hurt themselves by looking SO good early on that everyone got sky high expectations to the point where 11-6 and a trip to the playoffs despite injury issues for their two best players felt like a letdown rather than one of the best seasons they've had in the last 30 years. 

 
BoltBacker said:
Not a Cards hater or supporter...... just think it's really odd how Cards fans seem to view last season. I don't know how you could view last season as anything BUT a step in the right direction. But I also find it a complete mystery so many people are saying he hasn't steadily improved(in almost every area) since his rookie season.


See the Tweet by Warren Sharp regarding "Highest Paid QBs last 3 years and playoff wins"

If we break the bank on Kyler, it's over.   Kyler considers himself an MVP candidate, many Cards fans do not.  

Trade him, get the draft capital, bring in another veteran QB and draft a QB.

 
See the Tweet by Warren Sharp regarding "Highest Paid QBs last 3 years and playoff wins"

If we break the bank on Kyler, it's over.   Kyler considers himself an MVP candidate, many Cards fans do not.  

Trade him, get the draft capital, bring in another veteran QB and draft a QB.
I'm fine with that. 

But just for the record... unless the new veteran QB and rookie QB(from THIS draft I assume you mean) win 12+ games you are considering it a "mediocre" season. Right?

 
I think Murray is one of those "at the right price" QBs but that isn't likely how this will unfold. He won't accept a "we sort of believe in you" contract.

 
This kid thinks he's an MVP candidate?    :lmao:

I have a feeling whoever pays him what he wants is going to sorely regret it.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I don't think he had a "mediocre" season.   I do think from what I've seen that his style of play and his body can't hold up for an entire season into the playoffs.  Maybe he can prove me wrong, but his play thus far doesn't warrant the payday he thinks he deserves.

 
I think Murray is one of those "at the right price" QBs but that isn't likely how this will unfold. He won't accept a "we sort of believe in you" contract.
Correct, cards fans know this which is why there is a growing sentiment to trade him.

 
 I do think from what I've seen that his style of play and his body can't hold up for an entire season into the playoffs.  Maybe he can prove me wrong, but his play thus far doesn't warrant the payday he thinks he deserves.


Correct, Cards fans also know this.

 
But just for the record... unless the new veteran QB and rookie QB(from THIS draft I assume you mean) win 12+ games you are considering it a "mediocre" season. Right?


no, I'm saying if they break the bank on Kyler this year, The Cards will be mediocre in 2022 and beyond.

unless you have an elite QB, spending the big money on QB does not pay off...there is ample evidence to support this.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I don't think he had a "mediocre" season.   I do think from what I've seen that his style of play and his body can't hold up for an entire season into the playoffs.  Maybe he can prove me wrong, but his play thus far doesn't warrant the payday he thinks he deserves.
This is fair, and I can understand that criticism. For all the regular season fireworks Lamar Jackson has created he is only 1-3 in the playoffs. I'm chalking that up to small sample size but until he proves he can win in the playoffs it's up for debate whether QB's that lean so heavily on their mobility can beat playoff level defenses week after week.

As far as the salary he "deserves" I'd say turning a 5-win team into an 11-win team at the ripe old age of 24 put him at least as high as Carr/Prescott range. I wouldn't be surprised if nearly a dozen teams would gladly pay him as much as either. The interesting bit will be how ARZ values him in a trade. I don't think they want to trade him though because it would make no sense to leak all this "terrible leader" garbage if you are trying to get maximum return in a trade. The only reason you leak that imo is if you are trying to low-ball and KEEP the guy. I wonder why they would want to keep such an awful leader?

 
The problem, for me, is that he isn't a finished product yet.  He's a work in progress.  Kyler wants to be paid as an MVP QB.  And I agree, he can be or may be an elite QB at some point in time.  He's just not there yet.  

I'm sure that at least one NFL Team may be willing to pay him as if he were an elite QB now.  That team needs to be able to live with the consequences if they turn out to be wrong.  Big risk.  Too big IMO.

 
As far as the salary he "deserves" I'd say turning a 5-win team into an 11-win team at the ripe old age of 24
The fact that a 35 year old Colt McCoy went 2-1 as a starter - with those wins coming on the road - tells me that maybe Arizona actually has a good team/good coaching and it's not all Kyler Murray.

This isn't to comment on Murray really, just that wins and losses don't always tell the full story.

 
This is fair, and I can understand that criticism. For all the regular season fireworks Lamar Jackson has created he is only 1-3 in the playoffs. I'm chalking that up to small sample size but until he proves he can win in the playoffs it's up for debate whether QB's that lean so heavily on their mobility can beat playoff level defenses week after week.

As far as the salary he "deserves" I'd say turning a 5-win team into an 11-win team at the ripe old age of 24 put him at least as high as Carr/Prescott range. I wouldn't be surprised if nearly a dozen teams would gladly pay him as much as either. The interesting bit will be how ARZ values him in a trade. I don't think they want to trade him though because it would make no sense to leak all this "terrible leader" garbage if you are trying to get maximum return in a trade. The only reason you leak that imo is if you are trying to low-ball and KEEP the guy. I wonder why they would want to keep such an awful leader?
The team isn’t leaking it. The players are outright saying it. Players are saying that he doesn’t practice hard: that he doesn’t watch tape; that at half time he either calls his girlfriend or puts on headphones; that he needs to mature.

Heck, Colt McCoy said that with one minute left in the Rams playoff game and the team getting killed, Kyler didn’t want to go back in with the other starters ti finish out the game. McCoy said that he begged Kyler to go in - it’s his team and he needs to finish the game. Kyler refused and McCoy went in for the last snaps.

The Team isn’t leaking things, and it’s not  “garbage.” If you followed the Cards as much as some of us in this thread, you would hear this stuff all the time from lots of sources.

 
NFL Network's Ian Rapoport reports Kyler Murray won't attend the Cardinals' offseason program.

Murray not attending the team's offseason workouts while he lobbies for a long-term contract is apparently part of a "deal" the team has known about for weeks, according to Rapoport. Murray, who removed the Cardinals from his social media accounts -- a popular player protest against teams holding out on long-term deals -- has clashed with the organization since the team's dismal postseason loss to the Rams -- a game in which Murray collapsed under pressure from LA's pass rusher. Despite all the acrimony, Murray is likely to sign an extension in the coming months and remain Arizona's franchise player for the foreseeable future. 

SOURCE: Ian Rapoport on Twitter

Apr 19, 2022, 11:35 AM ET

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top