Edgar Bennett seems to be the closest compare, except he was 28 when he was injured. http://www.nj.com/giants/index.ssf/2010/03...andre_brow.html10:24 a.m. UPDATE Longtime MG blog reader Tom E. has checked in via e-mail with Edgar Bennett. Good work as always by Tom. Bennett's run with the Packers ended with a torn Achilles in the '97 preseason. He returned to action with the Bears in '98 and had a decent, but not great, season with 820 total yards.I'm unaware of any running back in NFL history that has come back successfully from a torn Achilles' tendon. Do you know of a success story?
Thanks for providing that link. Looks like Mr. Brown has his work cut out for him.I can't recall one that has recovered well.
Neither can this guy:
http://www.nj.com/giants/index.ssf/2010/03...andre_brow.html
Not real young, but linebacker Jamir Miller tore his at age 28 and never played again. He was coming off a pro bowl season of 99 tackles, 13 sacks and 1 int.Carolina Hustler said:I don't recall a promising RB ever having the same injury. So, I'd be inclined to start comparing other positions outside or RB.I haven't done the research but you'd have to bet there is some president out there.Can you name any other young promising players that had a career ending achilles injury? RB's or otherwise?
Do not ever question the toughness of ANDRE THE GIANT!JohnnyU said:I'm unaware of any running back in NFL history that has come back successfully from a torn Achilles' tendon.
That injury was a killer to Browns fans.Not real young, but linebacker Jamir Miller tore his at age 28 and never played again. He was coming off a pro bowl season of 99 tackles, 13 sacks and 1 int.Carolina Hustler said:I don't recall a promising RB ever having the same injury. So, I'd be inclined to start comparing other positions outside or RB.I haven't done the research but you'd have to bet there is some president out there.Can you name any other young promising players that had a career ending achilles injury? RB's or otherwise?
From the article:Offensively, quarterbacks had a power rating averaging 108 in the 3 seasons prior to their injuries. In the 3 seasons following their return, they averaged a power rating of 62. There was a net decrease in power ratings of 42.6%. Wide receivers, running backs, and tights ends also witnessed an average decrease in their power ratings over 3 years by 88%, 83%, and 78%, espectively. Linebackers experienced the greatest drop in power ratings, followed by cornerbacks, defensive tackles, and defensive ends. The average decrease over 3 years was 95%, 87%, 64%, and 55%, respectively. When evaluating power ratings per game played, offensively, running backs had the most significant drop in power ratings, by 83%. They were followed by wide receivers, tight ends, and quarterbacks, whose power ratings percentage decrease was 77%, 73%, and 50%, respectively (Figure 2). Finally, the percentage decrease in power ratings per game dropped in the same order as power ratings per season for the defensive players.As a Brown Dynasty owner, it doesn't look good...
http://www.biocompare.com/News/NewsStory/3...-Sidelined.html
First, great find on the article.As a Brown Dynasty owner, it doesn't look good...
http://www.biocompare.com/News/NewsStory/3...-Sidelined.html
Yep, that doesn't bode well for Brown.The study found that Achilles tendon ruptures can be career-altering injuries. Nearly 36% of players who sustained this injury never returned to play in the NFL and the ones who were able to return were never able to return to their pre-injury levels of play.
.....probably becasue coming back isn't the same as REALLY COMING BACK.The studies I see are all-time or imply that they're over a lengthy period. Medical advancements can dramatically alter those success rates; the point of the advancements.I have zero knowledge of achilles advancements, I am just leery of the aforementioned time range. No one came back from ACL tears in the 80s.Most importantly, I have not witnessed this extremely negative concern from the Giants- not from those I know, not in reading, radio or conversation. If the meidcal history is a point to consider then similarly should be the lack of (almost) fear displayed by the Giants about this."Rookie's career is already over" would have been a dramatic headline. That didn't happen, gotta wonder why if all the aforementioned studies were true.
The study cited above was written in late 2009, and analyzed only players who ruptured their achilles from 1997 - 2002. Recent study group, not "all time."The studies I see are all-time or imply that they're over a lengthy period. Medical advancements can dramatically alter those success rates; the point of the advancements.I have zero knowledge of achilles advancements, I am just leery of the aforementioned time range. No one came back from ACL tears in the 80s.Most importantly, I have not witnessed this extremely negative concern from the Giants- not from those I know, not in reading, radio or conversation. If the meidcal history is a point to consider then similarly should be the lack of (almost) fear displayed by the Giants about this."Rookie's career is already over" would have been a dramatic headline. That didn't happen, gotta wonder why if all the aforementioned studies were true.
ThanksThat's good it's more current. Still important to note it was 8 years ago.I don't have the time today necessary to research this. Googling, though, it's interesting how much attention Achilles tendons have in the medical community. Pick a term any term and google it, total results is astonishing.In just 5-10 minutes, I've read enough to reaffirm my opinion that Andre could be OK. (note could not the more definitive-will)I can't imagine why anyone in dynasty would hold onto him until now and then drop him. You waited this long, wait to see how he does in camp. It seems like dropping him last summer was the less headache route but if you've got him....gotta wait this out.The study cited above was written in late 2009, and analyzed only players who ruptured their achilles from 1997 - 2002. Recent study group, not "all time."The studies I see are all-time or imply that they're over a lengthy period. Medical advancements can dramatically alter those success rates; the point of the advancements.I have zero knowledge of achilles advancements, I am just leery of the aforementioned time range. No one came back from ACL tears in the 80s.Most importantly, I have not witnessed this extremely negative concern from the Giants- not from those I know, not in reading, radio or conversation. If the meidcal history is a point to consider then similarly should be the lack of (almost) fear displayed by the Giants about this."Rookie's career is already over" would have been a dramatic headline. That didn't happen, gotta wonder why if all the aforementioned studies were true.
Again, being able to come back is one thing, but coming back and being effective is quite another. A running back has to be able to push off with power and from the sounds of it, that just isn't happening with those having this kind of injury. Studies that show percentages for re-ruptures isn't the point. All that's important to me is whether they can return to what they were before the injury. As far as I know no one has ever been able to come back to what they were prior to this type of injury.UWO protocol study shows 3 in 145 re-ruptured achilles.
Previous I can find is nearly 60%.
There's gotta be a significant advancement medically evidenced by those stats
short of an amputation, I don't feel anything is definitively career ending anymore. I did some research on Doc Andrews a few months back, which led me to some other incredible docs and...they're almost magical geniuses.The implied tone that Andre is done is too harsh, too extreme for me to support.Again, being able to come back is one thing, but coming back and being effective is quite another. A running back has to be able to push off with power and from the sounds of it, that just isn't happening with those having this kind of injury. Studies that show percentages for re-ruptures isn't the point. All that's important to me is whether they can return to what they were before the injury. As far as I know no one has ever been able to come back to what they were prior to this type of injury.UWO protocol study shows 3 in 145 re-ruptured achilles.
Previous I can find is nearly 60%.
There's gotta be a significant advancement medically evidenced by those stats
Exactly.IF he recovered 100%, what would it mean? A decent prospect who may/may not be able to hang in the NFL. Never mind his value to FF owners.Again, being able to come back is one thing, but coming back and being effective is quite another. A running back has to be able to push off with power and from the sounds of it, that just isn't happening with those having this kind of injury. Studies that show percentages for re-ruptures isn't the point. All that's important to me is whether they can return to what they were before the injury. As far as I know no one has ever been able to come back to what they were prior to this type of injury.UWO protocol study shows 3 in 145 re-ruptured achilles.
Previous I can find is nearly 60%.
There's gotta be a significant advancement medically evidenced by those stats
I agree. I just posted the article because I found it with a quick Google search and thought it was relevant to the conversation. As a Brown Dynasty owner, I see no reason to drop him now. I'll wait and see what happens in camp and see what kind of reviews he's getting. Then I'll look at my roster and make a decision at that point.I can't imagine why anyone in dynasty would hold onto him until now and then drop him. You waited this long, wait to see how he does in camp. It seems like dropping him last summer was the less headache route but if you've got him....gotta wait this out.
Holding onto him now won't turn a bad decision last year into a good one. If increasing your knowledge about a specific injury makes you think he is less likely to contribute then having already held onto him doesn't change that.ThanksThat's good it's more current. Still important to note it was 8 years ago.I don't have the time today necessary to research this. Googling, though, it's interesting how much attention Achilles tendons have in the medical community. Pick a term any term and google it, total results is astonishing.In just 5-10 minutes, I've read enough to reaffirm my opinion that Andre could be OK. (note could not the more definitive-will)I can't imagine why anyone in dynasty would hold onto him until now and then drop him. You waited this long, wait to see how he does in camp. It seems like dropping him last summer was the less headache route but if you've got him....gotta wait this out.The study cited above was written in late 2009, and analyzed only players who ruptured their achilles from 1997 - 2002. Recent study group, not "all time."The studies I see are all-time or imply that they're over a lengthy period. Medical advancements can dramatically alter those success rates; the point of the advancements.I have zero knowledge of achilles advancements, I am just leery of the aforementioned time range. No one came back from ACL tears in the 80s.Most importantly, I have not witnessed this extremely negative concern from the Giants- not from those I know, not in reading, radio or conversation. If the meidcal history is a point to consider then similarly should be the lack of (almost) fear displayed by the Giants about this."Rookie's career is already over" would have been a dramatic headline. That didn't happen, gotta wonder why if all the aforementioned studies were true.
Well, because there's an upcoming rookie draft in 3 weeks, I'll be dropping three players, and choices have to be made. And I've held him about 2 months, adding him when a previous owner dumped him (he probably saw this study before I did).I can't imagine why anyone in dynasty would hold onto him until now and then drop him. You waited this long, wait to see how he does in camp.
Yes, that's the same study the other article was referring to.Return of Brown to a high degree of efficiency must be guarded. One third of RBs never come back. Those who do have 50% decrease in power rankings. See article:
http://www.uphs.upenn.edu/orthopaedics/ort.../06achilles.pdf
Ok then, anyone in the last 5 years with the same injury as Andre Brown ever come back just as effective as pre-injury? My guess is still a resounding no.To my knowledge no RB has ever came back to put up 1000 total yards after the injuries to both legs Caddy has had.Medicine today is different then 10 years ago...
I probably need to frame this next to my computer for when I am making moves. It's hard to get rid of injured potentialHolding onto him now won't turn a bad decision last year into a good one. If increasing your knowledge about a specific injury makes you think he is less likely to contribute then having already held onto him doesn't change that.
Huh - I thought that tear meant it could be a partial tear, while rupture meant it snapped and rolled up into the calf.They are synonymous.Googling Andre shows "rupture" and others say "tear."Can someone clarify which it is and what the distinction is here?
^ this is why DEN acquired Maroney. I tried snagging Moreno, but no one panicked.(KFFL) The Denver Broncos have released RB Andre Brown, a source told Aaron Wilson, of NationalFootballPost.com.
More likely Brown was released because Maroney was acquired.^ this is why DEN acquired Maroney. I tried snagging Moreno, but no one panicked.(KFFL) The Denver Broncos have released RB Andre Brown, a source told Aaron Wilson, of NationalFootballPost.com.
I'm just guessing here, but Brown is probably far from 100% and was going to be released regardless of which RB they acquired. He was released 'virtually' before the trade and the team probably didn't want to tip their hand. It could be chicken-egg, but I don't think it's about Maroney being a significant contributor as much as the team wanted the best 3rd string RB they could find and Maroney is much cheaper than Lynch.More likely Brown was released because Maroney was acquired.^ this is why DEN acquired Maroney. I tried snagging Moreno, but no one panicked.(KFFL) The Denver Broncos have released RB Andre Brown, a source told Aaron Wilson, of NationalFootballPost.com.
Andre Brown is very confusing. He ran good all preseason, the NY beat writers were saying he was going to be a part of the offense, he is big, fast and punishes defenders and is a good pass catcher. After watching Jacobs on Sunday I really think he has lost whatever made him special. For the Giants and the Broncs not to keep Brown tells me that there is some other factor that nobody knows about.I'm just guessing here, but Brown is probably far from 100% and was going to be released regardless of which RB they acquired. He was released 'virtually' before the trade and the team probably didn't want to tip their hand. It could be chicken-egg, but I don't think it's about Maroney being a significant contributor as much as the team wanted the best 3rd string RB they could find and Maroney is much cheaper than Lynch.More likely Brown was released because Maroney was acquired.^ this is why DEN acquired Maroney. I tried snagging Moreno, but no one panicked.(KFFL) The Denver Broncos have released RB Andre Brown, a source told Aaron Wilson, of NationalFootballPost.com.
Thanks, now I can't cut him.I can't see how he's worse than Dimitri Nance, although now they have to keep Nance a short while.I doubt it would happen, but it would be an amazing landing spot.So does Brown get looked at in Green Bay? He is basically the same runner as Grant probably with a better high end speed and better hands.
(KFFL) The Denver Broncos have released RB Andre Brown, a source told Aaron Wilson, of NationalFootballPost.com.
Brown suffered a turf toe injury in the preseasonAndre Brown is very confusing. He ran good all preseason, the NY beat writers were saying he was going to be a part of the offense, he is big, fast and punishes defenders and is a good pass catcher. After watching Jacobs on Sunday I really think he has lost whatever made him special. For the Giants and the Broncs not to keep Brown tells me that there is some other factor that nobody knows about.I'm just guessing here, but Brown is probably far from 100% and was going to be released regardless of which RB they acquired. He was released 'virtually' before the trade and the team probably didn't want to tip their hand. It could be chicken-egg, but I don't think it's about Maroney being a significant contributor as much as the team wanted the best 3rd string RB they could find and Maroney is much cheaper than Lynch.More likely Brown was released because Maroney was acquired.^ this is why DEN acquired Maroney. I tried snagging Moreno, but no one panicked.(KFFL) The Denver Broncos have released RB Andre Brown, a source told Aaron Wilson, of NationalFootballPost.com.
There is just something in my gut that tells me that before the year is over Andre Brown will be a solid FF producer.Denver placed Andre Brown on the active roster today from their practice squad and waived Lance Ball.
Your gut or your NC State fandom hoping he produces?There is just something in my gut that tells me that before the year is over Andre Brown will be a solid FF producer.Denver placed Andre Brown on the active roster today from their practice squad and waived Lance Ball.
Probably a little of both but I think with his speed, size and hands all he needs is a chance.Your gut or your NC State fandom hoping he produces?There is just something in my gut that tells me that before the year is over Andre Brown will be a solid FF producer.Denver placed Andre Brown on the active roster today from their practice squad and waived Lance Ball.
He was good at NC State, and I think his type of play would translate even better on the NFL level, the only problem is his constant battle with injuries. He did manage to stay healthy for the most part during his senior year at NCSU.Probably a little of both but I think with his speed, size and hands all he needs is a chance.Your gut or your NC State fandom hoping he produces?There is just something in my gut that tells me that before the year is over Andre Brown will be a solid FF producer.Denver placed Andre Brown on the active roster today from their practice squad and waived Lance Ball.
I've got Brown stashed, but thinking about dropping him for Danny Ware. Bradshaw homer, but he does get nicked up a lot. Anybody know if Jacobs has his helmet back yet?Probably a little of both but I think with his speed, size and hands all he needs is a chance.Your gut or your NC State fandom hoping he produces?There is just something in my gut that tells me that before the year is over Andre Brown will be a solid FF producer.Denver placed Andre Brown on the active roster today from their practice squad and waived Lance Ball.