good call/guess here, DA was wildly inaccurate...I'm still sticking with my OPGot to be Fitz
Gotta be Fitzgerald- that week one would have set him so far behind.Of the top 15 most targeted WRs in the NFL through 4 weeks, which WR has the lower catch % (and by a decent margin)?Don't peek.
5 days ago.10 catches on 15 targets for 222/1holy #### TO has a lot of targets. when did that happen and why
Swear I did not peek, and have not read any further in this thread. Is it Larry Fitzgerald? It has to be Larry Fitzgerald.Of the top 15 most targeted WRs in the NFL through 4 weeks, which WR has the lower catch % (and by a decent margin)?Don't peek.
+ 1Another vote for Fitz
+ 1Another vote for Fitz
Some of this is on him and the coaches too. It's so bad there's tons of blame to go around.46% or 41% seem high. I can't recall ever seeing anything like it. Maybe a fairly young Chris Chambers? He had a good week mixed in there I think padding those stats. Wasn't it like 4 of 25 one week or somesuch? I mean...NNTSI looked through all the targets earlier in the week - the answer is Fitz - 46% catch rate - that's what Anderson and a rookie throwing the ball will do to a stud WR....
QFTWhen Anderson throws a pass, it's really difficult to figure out who the real target is.