Ghost Rider
Footballguy
Having seen Arcade Fire live, you have to have a really narrow definition of what rock is to not think they are a rock band. It is more than obvious.
No idea but there sound is rather arena leaning at times. Is there a song that rocks half as hard as Power Out?Arcade Fire is more bombastic and at least from my memory has more grooving, jamming, etc. Louder? I can't explain but AF feels more rock to me than The ShinsI don't see how Arcade Fire is ROCK and The Shins are NOT rock.
Feel like AI needs to get involved here. In no universe would I consider Arcade Fire more rock than The Shins. Both bands are fronted by wispy hipsters. Didn't Arcade Fire require concert goers to dress in period piece costumes?
Winner!! Genre labeling is so awful when you think about it, as are the gatekeepers of genres. Good music is good music.I've never had much use for genres when it comes to music.
I think we all agree, was more a question of The Shins.Having seen Arcade Fire live, you have to have a really narrow definition of what rock is to not think they are a rock band. It is more than obvious.
Yeah for sure, but this is for fun. Nobody is saying don't listen to Jay-Z because he's not rock. Just a thing to debate and have some fun with.Winner!! Genre labeling is so awful when you think about it, as are the gatekeepers of genres. Good music is good music.I've never had much use for genres when it comes to music.
I don't remember much about The Shins (checked them out many years ago, but they fell off my radar pretty quickly), but I think some (the general "some") have it in their heads that if it doesn't rock like AC/DC or Zeppelin, then it ain't rock. Rock has clearly taken a hit in the mainstream thanks to the 90s, but there is still a lot of rock music out there. It's just not out front and center anymore.I think we all agree, was more a question of The Shins.Having seen Arcade Fire live, you have to have a really narrow definition of what rock is to not think they are a rock band. It is more than obvious.
Oh yeah, I get it.Yeah for sure, but this is for fun. Nobody is saying don't listen to Jay-Z because he's not rock. Just a thing to debate and have some fun with.Winner!! Genre labeling is so awful when you think about it, as are the gatekeepers of genres. Good music is good music.I've never had much use for genres when it comes to music.
For sure and I might be too caught up in the context for this thread itself. Rock posted a thread about what's the best pure rock album of the last 20 years. He clearly excluded anything folk rock, indie rock, etc. and said guitar heavy rock. Trip posted this as a kind of spinoff but since he didn't reference that exactly, I should probably let that original context go.I don't remember much about The Shins (checked them out many years ago, but they fell off my radar pretty quickly), but I think some (the general "some") have it in their heads that if it doesn't rock like AC/DC or Zeppelin, then it ain't rock. Rock has clearly taken a hit in the mainstream thanks to the 90s, but there is still a lot of rock music out there. It's just not out front and center anymore.I think we all agree, was more a question of The Shins.Having seen Arcade Fire live, you have to have a really narrow definition of what rock is to not think they are a rock band. It is more than obvious.
I think you are thinking of Jack White.Arcade Fire is more bombastic and at least from my memory has more grooving, jamming, etc. Louder? I can't explain but AF feels more rock to me than The ShinsI don't see how Arcade Fire is ROCK and The Shins are NOT rock.
Feel like AI needs to get involved here. In no universe would I consider Arcade Fire more rock than The Shins. Both bands are fronted by wispy hipsters. Didn't Arcade Fire require concert goers to dress in period piece costumes?
The first three Arcade Fire records are very rockin. Reflektor is a lil different.Arcade Fire is more bombastic and at least from my memory has more grooving, jamming, etc. Louder? I can't explain but AF feels more rock to me than The ShinsI don't see how Arcade Fire is ROCK and The Shins are NOT rock.
Reflektor is where I fell off the train with the band. Not sure if I didn't care for the new direction or I was just tired of the band itself.The first three Arcade Fire records are very rockin. Reflektor is a lil different.Arcade Fire is more bombastic and at least from my memory has more grooving, jamming, etc. Louder? I can't explain but AF feels more rock to me than The ShinsI don't see how Arcade Fire is ROCK and The Shins are NOT rock.
I have A.D.D. and missed all that. I just thought to list the best 5 records of that time. Oops.For sure and I might be too caught up in the context for this thread itself. Rock posted a thread about what's the best pure rock album of the last 20 years. He clearly excluded anything folk rock, indie rock, etc. and said guitar heavy rock. Trip posted this as a kind of spinoff but since he didn't reference that exactly, I should probably let that original context go.I don't remember much about The Shins (checked them out many years ago, but they fell off my radar pretty quickly), but I think some (the general "some") have it in their heads that if it doesn't rock like AC/DC or Zeppelin, then it ain't rock. Rock has clearly taken a hit in the mainstream thanks to the 90s, but there is still a lot of rock music out there. It's just not out front and center anymore.I think we all agree, was more a question of The Shins.Having seen Arcade Fire live, you have to have a really narrow definition of what rock is to not think they are a rock band. It is more than obvious.
I think you are thinking of Jack White.Arcade Fire is more bombastic and at least from my memory has more grooving, jamming, etc. Louder? I can't explain but AF feels more rock to me than The ShinsI don't see how Arcade Fire is ROCK and The Shins are NOT rock.
Feel like AI needs to get involved here. In no universe would I consider Arcade Fire more rock than The Shins. Both bands are fronted by wispy hipsters. Didn't Arcade Fire require concert goers to dress in period piece costumes?
Wasted hours is the least rocking song on that Suburbs record. Ready to Start, Rococo, Half Life's, Month of May, and We Used to Wait are super rockin off the top of my head.The first three Arcade Fire records are very rockin. Reflektor is a lil different.Arcade Fire is more bombastic and at least from my memory has more grooving, jamming, etc. Louder? I can't explain but AF feels more rock to me than The ShinsI don't see how Arcade Fire is ROCK and The Shins are NOT rock.
I know, I am a big fan but they don't come front of mind when I think of "Rock".
The Shins: "Turn a Square vs.
Arcade Fire: "Wasted Hours"
What's more ROCK?
And he looks like a saint compared to the average 70s male rock star. Crazy, ain't it?Reflektor is where I fell off the train with the band. Not sure if I didn't care for the new direction or I was just tired of the band itself.The first three Arcade Fire records are very rockin. Reflektor is a lil different.Arcade Fire is more bombastic and at least from my memory has more grooving, jamming, etc. Louder? I can't explain but AF feels more rock to me than The ShinsI don't see how Arcade Fire is ROCK and The Shins are NOT rock.
Well, and the lead singer is a #Me Too creep. Allegedly.
Titus was a near miss for, great f'n album. Now that is pure rock (and some history)King Gizzard - Nonagon Infinity
Thee Oh Sees - Floating Coffin
Secret Machines - Now Here Is Nowhere
J Roddy Walston & the Business - J Roddy Walston & the Business
Titus Andronicus - The Monitor
My 5 favorite, "is it rock" albums of the last 20 years (off the top of my head so I am certainly missing several albums)
- Local Natives- Hummingbird (2013)
- Vampire Weekend- Modern Vampires of the City (2013)
- The War on Drugs- Lost in the Dream (2014)
- Sturgill Simpson- Metamodern Sounds in Country Music (2014)
- Big Thief- UFOF (2019)
and that is also very much why I lost interest in them.Let's be honest: after a string of intimate shows billed as "fake art band" The Reflektors, we all saw an Arcade Fire arena tour coming. What we didn't, though, is that they would continue to reinforce its dress code of "formal attire or costume". Imagine that: a stadium full of people who look like they fell into that new David Bowie Louis Vuitton advert.
Amazing.
As someone who saw The Reflektors at the Roundhouse last week, however, I can say with a heavy heart that gig-goers do not do fancy dress well. Fans had taken to Twitter to express their outrage at having to wear something other than Converse and skinny jeans and, in retaliation, turned up in painfully terrible attempts at costumes. It led the Fire's Win Butler to tell the audience that he wasn't going to apologise for (loosely) enforcing such a dress code.
So if you want to impress Arcade Fire in the coming year, you'd better try harder. Here's our guide to how to do it best.
Having seen Arcade Fire live, you have to have a really narrow definition of what rock is to not think they are a rock band. It is more than obvious.
and that is also very much why I lost interest in them.Let's be honest: after a string of intimate shows billed as "fake art band" The Reflektors, we all saw an Arcade Fire arena tour coming. What we didn't, though, is that they would continue to reinforce its dress code of "formal attire or costume". Imagine that: a stadium full of people who look like they fell into that new David Bowie Louis Vuitton advert.
Amazing.
As someone who saw The Reflektors at the Roundhouse last week, however, I can say with a heavy heart that gig-goers do not do fancy dress well. Fans had taken to Twitter to express their outrage at having to wear something other than Converse and skinny jeans and, in retaliation, turned up in painfully terrible attempts at costumes. It led the Fire's Win Butler to tell the audience that he wasn't going to apologise for (loosely) enforcing such a dress code.
So if you want to impress Arcade Fire in the coming year, you'd better try harder. Here's our guide to how to do it best.
And he looks like a saint compared to the average 70s male rock star. Crazy, ain't it?Reflektor is where I fell off the train with the band. Not sure if I didn't care for the new direction or I was just tired of the band itself.The first three Arcade Fire records are very rockin. Reflektor is a lil different.Arcade Fire is more bombastic and at least from my memory has more grooving, jamming, etc. Louder? I can't explain but AF feels more rock to me than The ShinsI don't see how Arcade Fire is ROCK and The Shins are NOT rock.
Well, and the lead singer is a #Me Too creep. Allegedly.
Yeah the band and the general following around them became too much. Pompous is exactly the right word.and that is also very much why I lost interest in them.Let's be honest: after a string of intimate shows billed as "fake art band" The Reflektors, we all saw an Arcade Fire arena tour coming. What we didn't, though, is that they would continue to reinforce its dress code of "formal attire or costume". Imagine that: a stadium full of people who look like they fell into that new David Bowie Louis Vuitton advert.
Amazing.
As someone who saw The Reflektors at the Roundhouse last week, however, I can say with a heavy heart that gig-goers do not do fancy dress well. Fans had taken to Twitter to express their outrage at having to wear something other than Converse and skinny jeans and, in retaliation, turned up in painfully terrible attempts at costumes. It led the Fire's Win Butler to tell the audience that he wasn't going to apologise for (loosely) enforcing such a dress code.
So if you want to impress Arcade Fire in the coming year, you'd better try harder. Here's our guide to how to do it best.
It's where I left them too. What a pompous doosh.
Being a pretentious fop doesn't exclude one from being a rock star.Having seen Arcade Fire live, you have to have a really narrow definition of what rock is to not think they are a rock band. It is more than obvious.
Make sure Winn approves of your outfit first. Nothing says ROCK like a dress code.
I am not going to litigate the accusations that have been thrown at Butler, but I am going to go out on a limb and say he isn't the first rock star in his 30s or 40s to use his rock star cred to sleep with 19-year olds. Guys with money do it all the time. Leo D never dates anyone over 25. Al Pacino just had a baby with someone young enough to be his granddaughter. It's what men with power and money do.And he looks like a saint compared to the average 70s male rock star. Crazy, ain't it?Reflektor is where I fell off the train with the band. Not sure if I didn't care for the new direction or I was just tired of the band itself.The first three Arcade Fire records are very rockin. Reflektor is a lil different.Arcade Fire is more bombastic and at least from my memory has more grooving, jamming, etc. Louder? I can't explain but AF feels more rock to me than The ShinsI don't see how Arcade Fire is ROCK and The Shins are NOT rock.
Well, and the lead singer is a #Me Too creep. Allegedly.
Your argument for Winn being gross is that the guys in the 70s were grooser?
Win.Having seen Arcade Fire live, you have to have a really narrow definition of what rock is to not think they are a rock band. It is more than obvious.
Make sure Winn approves of your outfit first. Nothing says ROCK like a dress code.
Still working this band into my repatoire. They are something.King Gizzard - Nonagon Infinity
Thee Oh Sees - Floating Coffin
Secret Machines - Now Here Is Nowhere
J Roddy Walston & the Business - J Roddy Walston & the Business
Titus Andronicus - The Monitor
I was at a Reflektors show in a great costume fwiw. Most people had fun with it. Just sayin.Let's be honest: after a string of intimate shows billed as "fake art band" The Reflektors, we all saw an Arcade Fire arena tour coming. What we didn't, though, is that they would continue to reinforce its dress code of "formal attire or costume". Imagine that: a stadium full of people who look like they fell into that new David Bowie Louis Vuitton advert.
Amazing.
As someone who saw The Reflektors at the Roundhouse last week, however, I can say with a heavy heart that gig-goers do not do fancy dress well. Fans had taken to Twitter to express their outrage at having to wear something other than Converse and skinny jeans and, in retaliation, turned up in painfully terrible attempts at costumes. It led the Fire's Win Butler to tell the audience that he wasn't going to apologise for (loosely) enforcing such a dress code.
So if you want to impress Arcade Fire in the coming year, you'd better try harder. Here's our guide to how to do it best.
Yeah the band and the general following around them became too much. Pompous is exactly the right word.and that is also very much why I lost interest in them.Let's be honest: after a string of intimate shows billed as "fake art band" The Reflektors, we all saw an Arcade Fire arena tour coming. What we didn't, though, is that they would continue to reinforce its dress code of "formal attire or costume". Imagine that: a stadium full of people who look like they fell into that new David Bowie Louis Vuitton advert.
Amazing.
As someone who saw The Reflektors at the Roundhouse last week, however, I can say with a heavy heart that gig-goers do not do fancy dress well. Fans had taken to Twitter to express their outrage at having to wear something other than Converse and skinny jeans and, in retaliation, turned up in painfully terrible attempts at costumes. It led the Fire's Win Butler to tell the audience that he wasn't going to apologise for (loosely) enforcing such a dress code.
So if you want to impress Arcade Fire in the coming year, you'd better try harder. Here's our guide to how to do it best.
It's where I left them too. What a pompous doosh.
That's ridiculous actually. As someone who went to a bunch of AF shows over the years I can say the fans are mostly super geeks. The exact opposite of pompous. If you were at the U2/AF show you would have seen the biggest pompous DB fans in existence. I'm talking to you U2 fan.Yeah the band and the general following around them became too much. Pompous is exactly the right word.and that is also very much why I lost interest in them.Let's be honest: after a string of intimate shows billed as "fake art band" The Reflektors, we all saw an Arcade Fire arena tour coming. What we didn't, though, is that they would continue to reinforce its dress code of "formal attire or costume". Imagine that: a stadium full of people who look like they fell into that new David Bowie Louis Vuitton advert.
Amazing.
As someone who saw The Reflektors at the Roundhouse last week, however, I can say with a heavy heart that gig-goers do not do fancy dress well. Fans had taken to Twitter to express their outrage at having to wear something other than Converse and skinny jeans and, in retaliation, turned up in painfully terrible attempts at costumes. It led the Fire's Win Butler to tell the audience that he wasn't going to apologise for (loosely) enforcing such a dress code.
So if you want to impress Arcade Fire in the coming year, you'd better try harder. Here's our guide to how to do it best.
It's where I left them too. What a pompous doosh.
Nerds and geeks can be pompous. I can’t really comment, haven’t been to a show. It’s just the vibe the band gives off and a very small set of internet nuts.Yeah the band and the general following around them became too much. Pompous is exactly the right word.and that is also very much why I lost interest in them.Let's be honest: after a string of intimate shows billed as "fake art band" The Reflektors, we all saw an Arcade Fire arena tour coming. What we didn't, though, is that they would continue to reinforce its dress code of "formal attire or costume". Imagine that: a stadium full of people who look like they fell into that new David Bowie Louis Vuitton advert.
Amazing.
As someone who saw The Reflektors at the Roundhouse last week, however, I can say with a heavy heart that gig-goers do not do fancy dress well. Fans had taken to Twitter to express their outrage at having to wear something other than Converse and skinny jeans and, in retaliation, turned up in painfully terrible attempts at costumes. It led the Fire's Win Butler to tell the audience that he wasn't going to apologise for (loosely) enforcing such a dress code.
So if you want to impress Arcade Fire in the coming year, you'd better try harder. Here's our guide to how to do it best.
It's where I left them too. What a pompous doosh.That's ridiculous actually. As someone who went to a bunch of AF shows over the years I can say the fans are mostly super geeks. The exact opposite of pompous. If you were at the U2/AF show you would have seen the biggest pompous DB fans in existence. I'm talking to you U2 fan.Yeah the band and the general following around them became too much. Pompous is exactly the right word.and that is also very much why I lost interest in them.Let's be honest: after a string of intimate shows billed as "fake art band" The Reflektors, we all saw an Arcade Fire arena tour coming. What we didn't, though, is that they would continue to reinforce its dress code of "formal attire or costume". Imagine that: a stadium full of people who look like they fell into that new David Bowie Louis Vuitton advert.
Amazing.
As someone who saw The Reflektors at the Roundhouse last week, however, I can say with a heavy heart that gig-goers do not do fancy dress well. Fans had taken to Twitter to express their outrage at having to wear something other than Converse and skinny jeans and, in retaliation, turned up in painfully terrible attempts at costumes. It led the Fire's Win Butler to tell the audience that he wasn't going to apologise for (loosely) enforcing such a dress code.
So if you want to impress Arcade Fire in the coming year, you'd better try harder. Here's our guide to how to do it best.
It's where I left them too. What a pompous doosh.
No idea but there sound is rather arena leaning at times. Is there a song that rocks half as hard as Power Out?Arcade Fire is more bombastic and at least from my memory has more grooving, jamming, etc. Louder? I can't explain but AF feels more rock to me than The ShinsI don't see how Arcade Fire is ROCK and The Shins are NOT rock.
Feel like AI needs to get involved here. In no universe would I consider Arcade Fire more rock than The Shins. Both bands are fronted by wispy hipsters. Didn't Arcade Fire require concert goers to dress in period piece costumes?
Wasn’t “indie” originally “indie rock”?Never thought of them as emo. Indie would be the bucket I tossed both of them inThey were #6 on my 2003 list. Not sure if they would pass muster as rock though.Do The Shins count as rock?![]()
Emo? Same genre as Deathcab, right? Just trying to see the bucket I need to pull from.
Need a @rockarbiter ruling to be sure.
Obviously you just don't like Arcade Fire. Which is fine.No idea but there sound is rather arena leaning at times. Is there a song that rocks half as hard as Power Out?Arcade Fire is more bombastic and at least from my memory has more grooving, jamming, etc. Louder? I can't explain but AF feels more rock to me than The ShinsI don't see how Arcade Fire is ROCK and The Shins are NOT rock.
Feel like AI needs to get involved here. In no universe would I consider Arcade Fire more rock than The Shins. Both bands are fronted by wispy hipsters. Didn't Arcade Fire require concert goers to dress in period piece costumes?
If Power Out is your baseline for ROCK I don't think we will ever agree on a definition. Power Out sounds like a marketing song for Orange Theory Fitness.
Win.Having seen Arcade Fire live, you have to have a really narrow definition of what rock is to not think they are a rock band. It is more than obvious.
Make sure Winn approves of your outfit first. Nothing says ROCK like a dress code.
Obviously you just don't like Arcade Fire. Which is fine.No idea but there sound is rather arena leaning at times. Is there a song that rocks half as hard as Power Out?Arcade Fire is more bombastic and at least from my memory has more grooving, jamming, etc. Louder? I can't explain but AF feels more rock to me than The ShinsI don't see how Arcade Fire is ROCK and The Shins are NOT rock.
Feel like AI needs to get involved here. In no universe would I consider Arcade Fire more rock than The Shins. Both bands are fronted by wispy hipsters. Didn't Arcade Fire require concert goers to dress in period piece costumes?
If Power Out is your baseline for ROCK I don't think we will ever agree on a definition. Power Out sounds like a marketing song for Orange Theory Fitness.
I am not going to litigate the accusations that have been thrown at Butler, but I am going to go out on a limb and say he isn't the first rock star in his 30s or 40s to use his rock star cred to sleep with 19-year olds. Guys with money do it all the time. Leo D never dates anyone over 25. Al Pacino just had a baby with someone young enough to be his granddaughter. It's what men with power and money do.And he looks like a saint compared to the average 70s male rock star. Crazy, ain't it?Reflektor is where I fell off the train with the band. Not sure if I didn't care for the new direction or I was just tired of the band itself.The first three Arcade Fire records are very rockin. Reflektor is a lil different.Arcade Fire is more bombastic and at least from my memory has more grooving, jamming, etc. Louder? I can't explain but AF feels more rock to me than The ShinsI don't see how Arcade Fire is ROCK and The Shins are NOT rock.
Well, and the lead singer is a #Me Too creep. Allegedly.
Your argument for Winn being gross is that the guys in the 70s were grooser?
Edit: I am not saying it it right or justifying it, just pointing out the reality.
They aren't Chuck Berry, Iggy Pop, Pearl Jam quintessential straightforward rock and roll . They certainly have elements of pop, baroque, etc as well. but it's pretty out there to say Arcade Fire aren't a rock band playing mostly rock music. But no point in arguing over this.Obviously you just don't like Arcade Fire. Which is fine.No idea but there sound is rather arena leaning at times. Is there a song that rocks half as hard as Power Out?Arcade Fire is more bombastic and at least from my memory has more grooving, jamming, etc. Louder? I can't explain but AF feels more rock to me than The ShinsI don't see how Arcade Fire is ROCK and The Shins are NOT rock.
Feel like AI needs to get involved here. In no universe would I consider Arcade Fire more rock than The Shins. Both bands are fronted by wispy hipsters. Didn't Arcade Fire require concert goers to dress in period piece costumes?
If Power Out is your baseline for ROCK I don't think we will ever agree on a definition. Power Out sounds like a marketing song for Orange Theory Fitness.
Wrong. I like their music fine. I think Win is a 5 star dooooosch mago, but I like their music. I just don't think they are ROCK.
Reflektor is basically an attempt to recreate Remain in Light. (Sometimes it succeeds, sometimes it doesn't.) But it's not a conventional "rock" record for the same reason Remain in Light isn't.The first three Arcade Fire records are very rockin. Reflektor is a lil different.Arcade Fire is more bombastic and at least from my memory has more grooving, jamming, etc. Louder? I can't explain but AF feels more rock to me than The ShinsI don't see how Arcade Fire is ROCK and The Shins are NOT rock.
I think he left after I started making Elvis Costello jokes.And this is TripitUp's thread, so he can do whatever he wants