Interseptopus
Footballguy
when are people going to wise up? sure, this is rbbc but if anyone has value it's Jones. Ty has ppr appeal but Jones can score from anywhere. Williams can score from the 3.5
30 touches for Packers RBs, split 12/11/7. Lol at a "lions share".24 touches for Packers RBs, split 10/7/7. Full blown RBBC where nobody will get more than about 12 touches until someone gets hurt.
15.2 points per game in ppr.30 touches for Packers RBs, split 12/11/7. Lol at a "lions share".
Damn straight. I don’t care if it is rbbc if he produces like this.15.2 points per game in ppr.
Who cares if he isnt getting a lions share? he is efficient as hell and a legitimate fantasy starter
ETA: Williams got 2.7 fp with one less carry
The entire career of Andre Williams argues that this is not true...Even the worst HC will have to play a guy more who’s been as efficient as Jones.
Disagree strongly with this take. The health of Rodgers' knee is the thing that's dictating the playcalling right now.its only going to get better with Jones..GB is transitioning to a run based offense.Rodgers hasnt been the td throwing machine he used to be for quite some time now. Im actually more interested in Dalton than Rodgers. just a fact hes slipping. and likely to pound it with Jones more and more
I did not watch the entire game, listened to the first quarter on the radio. From what I did watch it seemed random. There wasn't a rotation by series that I noticed. 3 plays of Williams followed by 3 with Jones, and 3 with Ty. At the end of the game, when GB wanted to run the ball, Jones was in. He was banged up briefly on a blitz pick up and left the game. He did come back into the game. That was telling to me- when they wanted to run the ball, Jones was the guy.Q: for those who watched the game... did usage rotate by series or randomly?
even the play usage was virtually the same.... A Jones RB 29 38% J Williams RB 28 37%
Maybe. I'm not excited about having to play Montgomery or Williams though. Jones, very excited.Really I think all 3 of these RBs (including Ty) can have value, it's a very odd situation where 3 RBs could be startable at flex.
Yep!
Comparing him to one of if not the most overrated fantasy assets this offseason isn't how you prove a pointDr. Dan said:Yep!
Dalvin Cook: 110 attempts, 452 yards, 4.1 ypc, 2 TDs
Aaron Jones: 98 attempts, 555 yards, 5.7 ypc, 5 TDs
![]()
![]()
Until the absurd timeshare is actually broken in real life it will be tough for analysts to give him the touches that he should actually be getting in their predictions.Not much love for A. Jones on early sleeper picks and rankings. Surprised. Thought he'd be hyped up a bit with the matchup @DET.
All murky situations. All coin flips. I wouldn’t feel comfortable with any of them on a consistency basis. I would say since he has had the fewest opportunities with the suspension and all he is the biggest unknown so perhaps the overall outlook is higher.Is he already worth a guy like Alex Collins or Kenyan Drake?
he should have a nice game this weekendI have a feeling Jones becomes the main guy and gets to carry the load as the Packers offense starts to pick up. I just traded Cooper for him.
Alex Collins is exactly who I am benching for A. Jones this week.Is he already worth a guy like Alex Collins or Kenyan Drake?
Two words on the Packer Lion history. Matt Flynn. I would take my chances with Jones rather than stacking the box.Looking like Adams Cobb and Allison all may be out against the lions. Does this help or hurt Jones?
anyone think the lions will stack the box knowing the WR core is depleted....?
Looking like Adams Cobb and Allison all may be out against the lions. Does this help or hurt Jones?
anyone think the lions will stack the box knowing the WR core is depleted....?
They still have Rodgers. If they do stack the box, they are still the worst defense in the NFL vs the rungreat pointOne other thought, if all 3 WRs are out, I wouldn't be surprised if they slide Ty back into a WR role, leaving it as a 2 back committee.
He hasn’t practiced as a WR in years so that seems unlikely - he may line up split out-wide a few times but he’s still likely to catch most of his passes out of the backfield.great point
everyone keeps saying this and I dont understand why, especially when McCarthy has come out and says Ty is a RB.One other thought, if all 3 WRs are out, I wouldn't be surprised if they slide Ty back into a WR role, leaving it as a 2 back committee.
Ya, I recall McCarthy saying this a few years back also. I dunno, just seems like a pretty dire situation right now for the WR corp, potential for the starting 3 wideouts to be out. Desperate times call for desperate measures, although you are probably right.everyone keeps saying this and I dont understand why, especially when McCarthy has come out and says Ty is a RB.
I can see them running more routes with him out of the backfield, or motioning to the slot, but he wont be functioning as a wr. he hasn't practiced there or been to wr meetings in 2 years.
He hasn’t practiced as a WR in years so that seems unlikely - he may line up split out-wide a few times but he’s still likely to catch most of his passes out of the backfield.
oh didn't realize thateveryone keeps saying this and I dont understand why, especially when McCarthy has come out and says Ty is a RB.
I can see them running more routes with him out of the backfield, or motioning to the slot, but he wont be functioning as a wr. he hasn't practiced there or been to wr meetings in 2 years.
Fire up J'Mon!Ya, I recall McCarthy saying this a few years back also. I dunno, just seems like a pretty dire situation right now for the WR corp, potential for the starting 3 wideouts to be out. Desperate times call for desperate measures, although you are probably right.
Yesterday 22 touches for Packers RBs, split 9/8/5.24 touches for Packers RBs, split 10/7/7. Full blown RBBC where nobody will get more than about 12 touches until someone gets hurt.
Unbelievable. What a mess. I know I don't know anything about anything and I'm not a coach, but I still think all of these coaches are idiots. You can't tell me that it makes any sense or is best for the team to split touches like that. Anyone who's ever played sports knows how important it is to get a feel for the game and to get into a rhythm.Yesterday 22 touches for Packers RBs, split 9/8/5.
Previous week had 30 touches for Packers RBs, split 12/11/7.
It's only a mess from a FF perspective. On the field the 3 of them have been productive (over 150 total yards in 3 straight games) and they've all stayed healthy which has been a problem for each at times.Unbelievable. What a mess. I know I don't know anything about anything and I'm not a coach, but I still think all of these coaches are idiots. You can't tell me that it makes any sense or is best for the team to split touches like that. Anyone who's ever played sports knows how important it is to get a feel for the game and to get into a rhythm.
My point is that I think they would be more productive if given more reps (except maybe for Williams). This is how they've been able to devalue the position. I don't think decreased performance is worth the health aspect, especially if you think they're all equal. Ride a guy until he gets hurt then move to the next one.It's only a mess from a FF perspective. On the field the 3 of them have been productive (over 150 total yards in 3 straight games) and they've all stayed healthy which has been a problem for each at times.
Jones had the perfect game script last week, and got the same share.Was really hoping for the breakout here. Nope. Game script didn't help.
McCarthy has to win. Gotta think things get hot in GB this week after this loss. Juicy matchup against SF too.
One of the many reasons this is his last year in GB.https://twitter.com/TomSilverstein/status/1049369399197614080
McCarthy on Aaron Jones: Way the game goes and strength of the players on the football. He's dynamic with the ball in his hands. But there's more to the position than just running the football. We have diversity in our attack with three guys. All have excellent attributes
BAH :(