What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

RB Alexander Mattison, MIA (1 Viewer)

It does occur to me that there’s a non-zero chance Ty is the starter next year.

They’ll have to pinch some pennies based on Cousins alleged contract demands, and Ty does know the offense.

MIN has also de-emphasized the run game a bit since moving on from Cook.

I can see a scenario where the Vikes roll the dice with Chandler & spend a later round pick on a backup who could get a shot if Chandler is on a short leash.

Not making a prediction - just saying I could see a chance that Ty remains the starter. It wouldn’t be crazy, given their other needs.

I agree with all of this. Surprise!

I'd still move Chandler if you could get a first for him. In a heartbeat.
 
It does occur to me that there’s a non-zero chance Ty is the starter next year.

They’ll have to pinch some pennies based on Cousins alleged contract demands, and Ty does know the offense.

MIN has also de-emphasized the run game a bit since moving on from Cook.

I can see a scenario where the Vikes roll the dice with Chandler & spend a later round pick on a backup who could get a shot if Chandler is on a short leash.

Not making a prediction - just saying I could see a chance that Ty remains the starter. It wouldn’t be crazy, given their other needs.

I agree with all of this. Surprise!

I'd still move Chandler if you could get a first for him. In a heartbeat.
Oh yeah - I’d probably take a 2nd.
 
It does occur to me that there’s a non-zero chance Ty is the starter next year.

They’ll have to pinch some pennies based on Cousins alleged contract demands, and Ty does know the offense.

MIN has also de-emphasized the run game a bit since moving on from Cook.

I can see a scenario where the Vikes roll the dice with Chandler & spend a later round pick on a backup who could get a shot if Chandler is on a short leash.

Not making a prediction - just saying I could see a chance that Ty remains the starter. It wouldn’t be crazy, given their other needs.

I agree with all of this. Surprise!

I'd still move Chandler if you could get a first for him. In a heartbeat.
Anyone who would do that (trade for Chandler) needs their head examined.
 
I thought that was a foregone conclusion. Man, you have to snicker at those who traded a 1st round rookie pick for him.
To be fair, at the time AM was a dude who performed well in relief of Cook. He wasn’t a known JAG to that point. He was a zero RB darling who everyone drafted hoping for a Cook absence prior to that.

Folks looking to buy on AM saw a dude with little competition for carries in a high powered offense with JJ stretching the field all day, with 264 carries & 56 receiving targets available.

It wasn’t correct logic, but I can squint a little and understand the logic.

That said, I’m glad I was one of the ones selling for a 1st rather than buying. I’d traded Mariota for AM in 2022 to a contending team that needed BYE week coverage in SF, so that worked out great.
 
I'm a little surprised if only because they save basically no money doing it. Like, they could have easily kept him as an RB3 for the money they saved.
Agreed, that part was very surprising.

Turns out they saved a little over $3m by cutting him. He had $2.75m reported as a guarantee that was really an option bonus and he is no longer owed it.
 
He has always done well when he got 18+ carries, the same way many in previous eras would.

They too wouldn't do well with less unless they broke one.
For this reason, they were always done once they were backups

You're advocating giving this slow guy more carries to increase his effectiveness?

That's not the way they're playing football anymore. The analytics-dominated guys in Minnesota certainly aren't going to do that. They're throwing or giving the ball to highly efficient backs. This plodder is neither efficient nor a receiver, so he ain't touching the ball anymore for them.
No just that he played in the wrong era.
He could be done quick as the other sled dogs were
 
I thought that was a foregone conclusion. Man, you have to snicker at those who traded a 1st round rookie pick for him.
To be fair, at the time AM was a dude who performed well in relief of Cook. He wasn’t a known JAG to that point. He was a zero RB darling who everyone drafted hoping for a Cook absence prior to that.

Folks looking to buy on AM saw a dude with little competition for carries in a high powered offense with JJ stretching the field all day, with 264 carries & 56 receiving targets available.

It wasn’t correct logic, but I can squint a little and understand the logic.

That said, I’m glad I was one of the ones selling for a 1st rather than buying. I’d traded Mariota for AM in 2022 to a contending team that needed BYE week coverage in SF, so that worked out great.
Not directed at anyone in particular, but I thought RB's were easily replaceable. Plug and play. No use spending money on them.
 
I thought that was a foregone conclusion. Man, you have to snicker at those who traded a 1st round rookie pick for him.
To be fair, at the time AM was a dude who performed well in relief of Cook. He wasn’t a known JAG to that point. He was a zero RB darling who everyone drafted hoping for a Cook absence prior to that.

Folks looking to buy on AM saw a dude with little competition for carries in a high powered offense with JJ stretching the field all day, with 264 carries & 56 receiving targets available.

It wasn’t correct logic, but I can squint a little and understand the logic.

That said, I’m glad I was one of the ones selling for a 1st rather than buying. I’d traded Mariota for AM in 2022 to a contending team that needed BYE week coverage in SF, so that worked out great.
Not directed at anyone in particular, but I thought RB's were easily replaceable. Plug and play. No use spending money on them.
While that’s somewhat correct, as long as they’re a roster requirement, people will value them.

Also keep in mind, getting a 2025 1st in 2023 is equivalent value to a 2024 2nd. -ish.

Not saying it was a smart buy by my trade partner or anyone who paid up for AM, I’m just saying it’s not as insane as some would have you believe.

We all get feelings about certain players. Mattison had a buzz for a couple years as “next man up” - when it finally happened, some folks got excited. I don’t judge them for it.

Some folks might similarly get excited about Ty Chandler if the Vikes don’t draft an early round RB.
 
Last edited:
Some folks might similarly get excited about Ty Chandler if the Vikes don’t draft an early round RB.
And that’s a mistake. I like Chandler as a prospect more than I ever did Mattison but if you get a chance to cash out on Chandler like people did with Mattison, you have to do it. He was such a late pick or even a waiver wire add. It’s just free money.
 
Some folks might similarly get excited about Ty Chandler if the Vikes don’t draft an early round RB.
And that’s a mistake. I like Chandler as a prospect more than I ever did Mattison but if you get a chance to cash out on Chandler like people did with Mattison, you have to do it. He was such a late pick or even a waiver wire add. It’s just free money.
I’m not arguing against that at all. As a Ty shareholder I’m hoping someone in that league gets smitten enough with him to pay me what I got for AM!

Send me a 2026 1st? Hell, a 2027 1st? Sold!
:lol:
 
They’ll have to pinch some pennies based on Cousins alleged contract demands, and Ty does know the offense.
My understanding is that they're not in the running for Cousins at his asking price. They don't have the luxury of waiting to see what his market is because once the official 1st day of the 2024 season begins, they're absorbing a nearly $30M dead cap hit from him. Not saying they don't resign him, just that if they do, it'll be before FA. In previous drafts they've been linked to moving up & they are again. Reportedly, they've inquired about a trade with New England. They've added Josh McCown to their coaching staff, who was Drake Maye's high school QB coach.

Tough to do both, you neither benefit from cap relief & if you win 9 or 10 games, you're not in a position to recoup the major investment you made to land Maye... Defensively they blitzed like 51.5% of the time, IIRC. Considerably more than the team that was 2nd most & in some other orbit when compared to league avg. Tendencies, no matter what they are or how effective eventually are used against every team. It's back to whether they believe they're in some sort of window & this 35 yr old, with a 1-4 playoff record, is their savior?
 
Has to be great news for Zamir White truthers. You’d much, much rather them sign a trash can like this then bring in some upstart rookie. Not that this prevents them from doing that, but maybe it lessens the odds.

Yeah, I posted in Zamir's thread when this one was official.
 
Warren Sharp
the craziest stat you'll see today

Alexander Mattison had 9 rushes inside the 5 yard line last yr

the result?

-7 yards & 0 TDs

😬

he's the first RB in at least 25 years to have more than 6 attempts inside the 5 but score 0 TDs and actually lose at least 2 yards in total
 
Warren Sharp
the craziest stat you'll see today

Alexander Mattison had 9 rushes inside the 5 yard line last yr

the result?

-7 yards & 0 TDs

😬

he's the first RB in at least 25 years to have more than 6 attempts inside the 5 but score 0 TDs and actually lose at least 2 yards in total
Just saw a tweet with the same thing. But this time with video. Came here to post it. lol

 
Warren Sharp
the craziest stat you'll see today

Alexander Mattison had 9 rushes inside the 5 yard line last yr

the result?

-7 yards & 0 TDs

😬

he's the first RB in at least 25 years to have more than 6 attempts inside the 5 but score 0 TDs and actually lose at least 2 yards in total
Just saw a tweet with the same thing. But this time with video. Came here to post it. lol

It’s not like they were all Top 10 defenses though… TB & SF were good but Atl, Den & Car were bottom feeder Run Def
 
Has to be great news for Zamir White truthers. You’d much, much rather them sign a trash can like this then bring in some upstart rookie. Not that this prevents them from doing that, but maybe it lessens the odds.

Yeah, I posted in Zamir's thread when this one was official.
What happened to this guy? He seemed pretty good when he was backing up Cook. Did his legs just fall off? Was the o-line not as good as it once was or am I just a bad judge of talent?
 
Warren Sharp
the craziest stat you'll see today

Alexander Mattison had 9 rushes inside the 5 yard line last yr

the result?

-7 yards & 0 TDs

😬

he's the first RB in at least 25 years to have more than 6 attempts inside the 5 but score 0 TDs and actually lose at least 2 yards in total
Just saw a tweet with the same thing. But this time with video. Came here to post it. lol

It’s not like they were all Top 10 defenses though… TB & SF were good but Atl, Den & Car were bottom feeder Run Def
Yep. It’s pretty pathetic overall.
 
Seems like Dylan Laube is a good bet to be a Danny Woodhead-type 3rd down back at some point.

Mattison has a career mentor / life coach right there in his locker room. Figure out how Ameer Abdullah has lasted a decade. Embrace the ST role, make another $10M over the next 5 years.

It's difficult to be very excited about the Raiders offense. But I do think the OL is improving. From PFF, which moved them up to 18th in OL rankings this spring:

Kolton Miller has developed into one of the NFL's best left tackles, center Andre James had a breakout 2023 season (ranked 9th among centers in PFF grade) and right tackle Thayer Munford Jr. was promising in his second season on a limited workload. Added IOL Jackson Powers-Johnson in the 2nd round.

Love their DL and I'm rooting for Anthony Pierce, but they're very unsettled at QB. The culture is going in the right direction so it should be a more enjoyable season for LV fans.
 
Has to be great news for Zamir White truthers. You’d much, much rather them sign a trash can like this then bring in some upstart rookie. Not that this prevents them from doing that, but maybe it lessens the odds.

Yeah, I posted in Zamir's thread when this one was official.
What happened to this guy? He seemed pretty good when he was backing up Cook. Did his legs just fall off? Was the o-line not as good as it once was or am I just a bad judge of talent?

Vikings fan here.

I dont think Mattison lost anything to age or anything. He is what he always has been. He is an ok back up RB decent blocker and special teamer but he isnt good enough to start.

The Vikings offensive line in 2023 only made one change at Left Guard where they replaced Ezra Cleveland with Dalton Risner.

Risner is a better pass blocker than Cleveland but not as good in run blocking.

But Mattison was bad before they traded Cleveland to the Jaguars.

Im not sure what you thought Mattison was capable of but the Vikings made him the starter to save money and because he can pass block.

The Vikings this offseason signed Aaron Jones and they want Blake Brandel to start at LG. They are trying to improve their run blocking.
 
I'm in no way an analyst nor do I spend a lot of time reading articles or listening to podcasts about football but I think it's fairly objectable that AM was a decent backup. His y/a dipped after 2001 so maybe the writing was on the wall but I, along with many, thought he'd be a serviceable back last year. I know that real football and fantasy football don't quite align but there is overlap.

Several people in this thread have mentioned that he seemed slow (last year). If he was slower last year (compared to previous years) what would cause that other than age or injury?

and of course, if the o-line wasn't very good at run blocking then it's not quite his fault.

I'm willing to cede to your knowledge as a vikes fan but RB38 last year. whew!
 
He was worse than I expected last season but I didnt expect him to be good.

The Vikings personnel on the offensive line hasnt changed that much under the new coach and GM. They had Brsdbury at center Cleveland at LG and ONeil at RT starting in the years Prior to that as Darrisaw was drafted by previous organizational staff as well. Although he only played his rookie season with the old coaching staff.

In 2022 Dalvin Cook still performed statistically similar with KOC coached Vikings. He had 4.7 ypc compared to his career average of 4.6 but there were some small signs of Cook falling off. The coaches were not happy with his performance, I think they were especially bad at converting 1st downs with the run in short yardage.

In the same season, same team Mattison performed much worse than Cook. So if they were not happy with Cook why did they believe in Mattison?

They didnt they just didnt believe in paying Cook his salary at 28 years old as they had other priorities and it does seem like they timed this right as Cook looked like a shell of himself with the Jets.

Now the opportunity for RBs with the Vikings went down with the new coach compared to previously with Gary Kubiak and then his son. It may be worth noting that I dont think Kubiak JRs offense was as good as his pops although it follows the same concepts. While KOC offense does use outside zone not nearly as much. KOC in 2022 ran the ball 36% of the offensive plays in 2023 they ran the ball 39% but this was due to 60 QB runs compared to 30 being normal for Cousins with the Vikings. Kubiak Sr ran the ball 46% of the time. Kubiak Jr about 40%

So I think Mattison benefitted from the Kubiak scheme (he influenced Stefsnskis offense in 2019 as well) and the higher volume of run plays wearing the defense down where Mattison could thrive against a bit more as the COP RB.

When the defense is worried more about Dalvin Cook because he is a better RB than Mattison, this means when Mattison came in the defense did not have the same priorities to stop him as Cook.

But you make Mattison the starter and this dynamic changes.

Same is true for many back up COP RBs. They often have good efficiency stats on small volume of opportunity but if you increase that opportunity the efficiency goes way down.

Anyhow I think this is the main change is coaching philosophy. The Vikings used to be more of a run first type of offense, for a long time really going back to the years with Adrian Peterson. Their offensive linemen were selected and developed (not well) for their run blocking ability moreso than pass blocking. It showed. Completely different priorities with the new coach.

Ed Ingram the starting RG has not been good. He is going into his 3rd season now when many offensive linemen show improvement from pff grades and so on. But If he doesnt he could lose his job to Risner or someone else.

The Raiders have a better run blocking offensive line than the Vikings have I think. So in that sense its a positive for Mattison I think. He needs blocking.
 
The Coachspeak Index
#Raiders HC Antonio Pierce on Alexander Mattison:

“I thought he did a heck of a job. Every time he went in there, made plays. Really good job, also, in pass protection for us.”

on whether he’ll will ride the hot hand:

“We’ve got to”
 
It's his time! White hurt groin in practice today

Well, he had a chance to shine in Minnesota when he was the number one running back and he failed miserably. In my opinion, he's best as a change of pace back.
 
White is out. He was already going to get more carries. Personally already have one Raider playing so two is too much but he should have a chance for a good game.
 
I saw on the Raiders depth chart Mattison is listed as RB1. White was healthy and played last week, only a couple touches from what I can remember.

Don’t see a ton of upside but if Mattison keeps getting touches at his current level, not a terrible RB3/4.
 
I saw on the Raiders depth chart Mattison is listed as RB1. White was healthy and played last week, only a couple touches from what I can remember.

Don’t see a ton of upside but if Mattison keeps getting touches at his current level, not a terrible RB3/4.
Right! KC a couple times and a bye but other than that, as a bellcow that he is currently, especially in PPR, he’s easy flex RB 3/4.
 
I just noticed he was dropped in my league, which seems odd since anyone with a pulse at running back is on a roster.

But it turns out the guy is desperate for a starting WR this week, and Mattison wasn’t breaking his lineup.

I haven’t watched much Vegas ball, as I don’t own any of them. But Mattison has put up decent enough stats with volume. And trying to figure out if he’s worth a FAAB bid tonight as he clears waivers tomorrow. Two of my starting running backs have week 12 byes, so if anything it may be worth having a starter that week alone.
 
I just noticed he was dropped in my league, which seems odd since anyone with a pulse at running back is on a roster.

But it turns out the guy is desperate for a starting WR this week, and Mattison wasn’t breaking his lineup.

I haven’t watched much Vegas ball, as I don’t own any of them. But Mattison has put up decent enough stats with volume. And trying to figure out if he’s worth a FAAB bid tonight as he clears waivers tomorrow. Two of my starting running backs have week 12 byes, so if anything it may be worth having a starter that week alone.

Josh Dubow

@JoshDubowAP

49 players have 50+ carries so far this season. Here are the bottom 2 in yards/carry

48th. Alexander Mattison 3.19
49th. Zamir White 3.04
#Raiders

1:56 PM · Oct 28, 2024
 
Whats the expectation this week? Will he play?

Averaging 9:5 in half per. Which I will gkadly take with all the byes.
 
Whats the expectation this week? Will he play?

Averaging 9:5 in half per. Which I will gkadly take with all the byes.
According to Paul Gutierrez of ESPN, Las Vegas Raiders running backs Zamir White (quadriceps) has been ruled out, and Alexander Mattison (ankle) has been listed as questionable for Sunday's game against the Tampa Bay Buccaneers. White will now miss his third-straight contest. Mattison has remained a limited participant during this week's practices and could be in line to return following his two-game absence. Over the past two weeks, veteran Ameer Abdullah has operated as the lead back and averaged a modest 33.5 rushing with 25.5 receiving yards per game. However, depth option Sincere McCormick has shown flashes over this stint, as he has posted a solid 5.7 yards per carry. Fantasy managers should continue to monitor Mattison's status over the weekend as he would likely reclaim his lead role if he can suit up on Sunday.--Andy Smith - RotoBaller
Source: Paul Gutierrez
 
Happy to read the above considering I got off waivers earlier this week.

Remaining games: TB, ATL, Jax, NO - if he gets his reps back he might make a significant playoff impact.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top