this is because they have two very good RB's. It would be different if they didn't have Monty & Gibbs. Gibbs with the work horse and Reynolds/Vaki will get some scraps.They like the two back thing, and have been very consistent with it.
this is because they have two very good RB's. It would be different if they didn't have Monty & Gibbs. Gibbs with the work horse and Reynolds/Vaki will get some scraps.They like the two back thing, and have been very consistent with it.
Yeah, well - as you saw yesterday, those sort of games often comes down to who has the ball last, or who plays mistake-free football.Yeah, I’m much more concerned with the 3 defensive hits they took.Lions have already shown what the utilization will look like when Monty is out. No mystery to solve.
Craig Reynolds & Sione Vaki will get some work, but Jah will be a bell cow.
They’re gonna have to win shootouts. Went deep with a terrible D last year.
Right now I’m worried about how to beat Chicago.
Yeah, well - as you saw yesterday, those sort of games often comes down to who has the ball last, or who plays mistake-free football.Yeah, I’m much more concerned with the 3 defensive hits they took.Lions have already shown what the utilization will look like when Monty is out. No mystery to solve.
Craig Reynolds & Sione Vaki will get some work, but Jah will be a bell cow.
They’re gonna have to win shootouts. Went deep with a terrible D last year.
Right now I’m worried about how to beat Chicago.
Certainly a more difficult task in the playoffs when facing competent offenses & stout defenses.
I’m still rooting for your squad. My team’s toast & DET is fun to root for.
Maybe this late in the season yes. Over a entire season, he may not hold up speed wise.I know I'm just a biased/greedy Gibbs owner, but ... I feel like there's a realistic chance that giving Gibbs 70-80% of the RB touches, or whatever is expected now, is an improvement for the team over the near 50-50 split. Gibbs has averaged 33% more yards per carry on the season. That's a pretty big difference. Not trying to hate on the guy, but I really don't get why everyone likes Montgomery so much. He is fine. He is somewhere around average or a bit better among lead backs, I would figure. Gibbs could gain 2.4 ypc the rest of the way, who knows. But I honestly think Gibbs is an improvement over Montgomery on almost any play, other than maybe a 3rd or 4th & short.
Monty pounds away to allow Gibbs to be fresh, and use his speed. imo, Monty is one the best run finishers in the NFL.I know I'm just a biased/greedy Gibbs owner, but ... I feel like there's a realistic chance that giving Gibbs 70-80% of the RB touches, or whatever is expected now, is an improvement for the team over the near 50-50 split. Gibbs has averaged 33% more yards per carry on the season. That's a pretty big difference. Not trying to hate on the guy, but I really don't get why everyone likes Montgomery so much. He is fine. He is somewhere around average or a bit better among lead backs, I would figure. Gibbs could gain 2.4 ypc the rest of the way, who knows. But I honestly think Gibbs is an improvement over Montgomery on almost any play, other than maybe a 3rd or 4th & short.
You mean was?Monty pounds away to allow Gibbs to be fresh, and use his speed. imo, Monty is one the best run finishers in the NFL.I know I'm just a biased/greedy Gibbs owner, but ... I feel like there's a realistic chance that giving Gibbs 70-80% of the RB touches, or whatever is expected now, is an improvement for the team over the near 50-50 split. Gibbs has averaged 33% more yards per carry on the season. That's a pretty big difference. Not trying to hate on the guy, but I really don't get why everyone likes Montgomery so much. He is fine. He is somewhere around average or a bit better among lead backs, I would figure. Gibbs could gain 2.4 ypc the rest of the way, who knows. But I honestly think Gibbs is an improvement over Montgomery on almost any play, other than maybe a 3rd or 4th & short.
… will be, next year, again.You mean was?Monty pounds away to allow Gibbs to be fresh, and use his speed. imo, Monty is one the best run finishers in the NFL.I know I'm just a biased/greedy Gibbs owner, but ... I feel like there's a realistic chance that giving Gibbs 70-80% of the RB touches, or whatever is expected now, is an improvement for the team over the near 50-50 split. Gibbs has averaged 33% more yards per carry on the season. That's a pretty big difference. Not trying to hate on the guy, but I really don't get why everyone likes Montgomery so much. He is fine. He is somewhere around average or a bit better among lead backs, I would figure. Gibbs could gain 2.4 ypc the rest of the way, who knows. But I honestly think Gibbs is an improvement over Montgomery on almost any play, other than maybe a 3rd or 4th & short.
David Montgomery should just keep seeing doctors until one of them tells him he can play.
Go to Dr. Dre if you have to.
Wow, was it a tongue sprain?[Jeremy Reisman]
David Montgomery talked for the first time since his injury.
well, its also a matter of managing the asset that is Gibbs. no need to over play him when you have a starting Calibre RB on the bench who can take 50% of the carries.The Lion's hired Tashard Choice for RB coach. He was Gibb's college coach, so I could see a narrative that Gibbs will get more work. I have to remind myself that this is Dan's offense and he values Monty and the early down running game. So people may sleep on Monty again this year.
Yep - that, and they’re very different players with different skill sets.well, its also a matter of managing the asset that is Gibbs. no need to over play him when you have a starting Calibre RB on the bench who can take 50% of the carries.The Lion's hired Tashard Choice for RB coach. He was Gibb's college coach, so I could see a narrative that Gibbs will get more work. I have to remind myself that this is Dan's offense and he values Monty and the early down running game. So people may sleep on Monty again this year.
its a nice luxury to have.
but come playoff time Gibbs usage should (in theory) go up. At least... thats how I'd manage it. but it may also be somewhat dependant on the opponent.
the nice thing about this is that Gibbs likely has a longer career because his body is taking less of a pounding early in his career.
Yep - that, and they’re very different players with different skill sets.well, its also a matter of managing the asset that is Gibbs. no need to over play him when you have a starting Calibre RB on the bench who can take 50% of the carries.The Lion's hired Tashard Choice for RB coach. He was Gibb's college coach, so I could see a narrative that Gibbs will get more work. I have to remind myself that this is Dan's offense and he values Monty and the early down running game. So people may sleep on Monty again this year.
its a nice luxury to have.
but come playoff time Gibbs usage should (in theory) go up. At least... thats how I'd manage it. but it may also be somewhat dependant on the opponent.
the nice thing about this is that Gibbs likely has a longer career because his body is taking less of a pounding early in his career.
I agree Monty will be underrated again next season - maybe even moreso as the Gibbs ascension narrative builds.
I’m not saying Gibbs isn’t an ascendant talent - he absolutely is. But there’s going to be plenty of work for Monty, including relevant work at the stripe. Not a lot of tush-pushing in DET, and Monty is good at salting games away. Nothing a Monty shareholder likes to see more than a 4th quarter with a 2-score lead.
Yeah, but that’s not all Monty’s value. He’s used to spell Gibbs, he’s an above average receiver who gets more catches than people expect, and he’s extremely useful in short yardage, which includes the stripe.Their schedule this next year looks more difficult and that point differential is going to come down.