What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

RB Joe Mixon, HOU (2 Viewers)

Besides wanting to move up to make sure you get a particular player, teams will also move from the early 2nd to the late 1st (even if it's 2.01 to 1.32) because 1st round contracts come with the 5th year team option while the other rounds do not.

 
I'd put him being available at 33rd pick at 50/50.  Almost all reputable sources seem to think he's a top 15 overall talent in the draft.  If a team has done their research and feels he's safe character wise going forward he could go before the 33rd pick.
I wonder how the professional media guys who stated he'd go undrafted will feel if he goes at the end of rd 1? There were an awful lot of them banging that drum a few months ago. 

 
I wonder how the professional media guys who stated he'd go undrafted will feel if he goes at the end of rd 1? There were an awful lot of them banging that drum a few months ago. 
They will shamelessly migrate to the next outrage without missing a beat.

It's what they do.

 
To play devil's advocate for a minute, do you think it is a wise choice to select Mixon at 2.1 but a poor choice to move up to, say, 1.25 if you think a team picking late in the first has interest?
I think it's wise to sit where they are and if he falls, great, if not, look elsewhere. They really don't need him because they have a gaping hole at QB. Until that get addressed, the last position to address is RB because of it's short shelf life. Now Mixon does have the build of a guy that can play 10 years. So it's not out of the question but it seems like a bad move when he won't help you win games (because you have no QB)

For instance unless the NYJ think that they are going to suck so bad even with Fournette in 2017 AND be in position to draft Sam Darnold, they are simply wasting Fournette's career. By the time they find a QB, Fournette will be used up.

 
Perfect place for him. Small market which protects the NFL's interest going forward, the fan base is like a high school crowd that loves everyone, strongly entrenched GM/HC/QB hierarchy to deflect and withstand criticism. 

 
JetMaxx said:
Perfect place for him. Small market which protects the NFL's interest going forward, the fan base is like a high school crowd that loves everyone, strongly entrenched GM/HC/QB hierarchy to deflect and withstand criticism. 


And immediately after he's picked the local news stations will all be running the clip of him punching that girl - which GB folk don't cotton to much.  Don't see any way that GB and Mixon get connected.

 
I think it's wise to sit where they are and if he falls, great, if not, look elsewhere. They really don't need him because they have a gaping hole at QB. Until that get addressed, the last position to address is RB because of it's short shelf life. Now Mixon does have the build of a guy that can play 10 years. So it's not out of the question but it seems like a bad move when he won't help you win games (because you have no QB)

For instance unless the NYJ think that they are going to suck so bad even with Fournette in 2017 AND be in position to draft Sam Darnold, they are simply wasting Fournette's career. By the time they find a QB, Fournette will be used up.
From the outside looking in we may not think these teams have QBs, but I'm sure they're more optimistic (whether its warranted or not).

I can see the logic of taking what falls to you during a draft, especially given the cost of moving up.  You don't want to constantly reach for a guy.  But, if I think that player is a difference maker, I like the aggressive move to get him, be it the NFL or fantasy.

In the specific case of the Browns and their current roster, I agree they have bigger needs and serviceable backs in house.

 
Bucky Brooks has him going 29th to GB.

Casserly doesn't have him on his draft board. Charley, that's why you don't work for an NFL team anymore. You are stupid.

 
Bucky Brooks has him going 29th to GB.

Casserly doesn't have him on his draft board. Charley, that's why you don't work for an NFL team anymore. You are stupid.
I've seen a lot of talk about Brooks having him to GB.  Is that just because it's enticing for fantasy, or because Brooks is particularly well regarded as a draftnik?  Because I'd never heard of him before this, but now everyone is talking about it like he's everyone's favorite mock drafter.

 
I've seen a lot of talk about Brooks having him to GB.  Is that just because it's enticing for fantasy, or because Brooks is particularly well regarded as a draftnik?  Because I'd never heard of him before this, but now everyone is talking about it like he's everyone's favorite mock drafter.
He's not my one of my favs. He actually has some real head scratchers but he's at least reasonable as far as Mixon. Anyone completely nixing Mixon from their board is a moron or they already have their RB. Like someone on NFL network said, if you are drafting him in the 7th RD, it's not like you will avoid publicity. The round only makes a difference in the $ you shell out for a guy who, if he screws up again, you probably have to cut. He's a risky pick but to not even have him on your board is just flat out stupid.

 
Bucky Brooks has him going 29th to GB.

Casserly doesn't have him on his draft board. Charley, that's why you don't work for an NFL team anymore. You are stupid.
Casserly is media driven. He wants to have people like him and by taking a "stand" he can appeal to those outraged over Mixon and still come across well even when he knows he'll be wrong.

think about it, once Mixon is drafted in the top 2 rounds he can rant about how wrong it was for a team to draft him.  A bunch of people will jump on that bandwagon and agree with him.  

It's a disservice to the community what he is doing, but it gives him a platform to take a stand and look like a good guy.

It's obv totally fake and contrived, but it will work and help him from a media perspective.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I've seen a lot of talk about Brooks having him to GB.  Is that just because it's enticing for fantasy, or because Brooks is particularly well regarded as a draftnik?  Because I'd never heard of him before this, but now everyone is talking about it like he's everyone's favorite mock drafter.
Drafted by the Buffalo Bills in the second round of the 1994 NFL Draft, Bucky Brooks played for five different teams (Buffalo, Jacksonville, Green Bay, Kansas City and Oakland) in five NFL seasons.

After his playing career was over in 1999, Brooks joined the Seattle Seahawks' pro personnel department as a regional college scout. He served in the same capacity for the Carolina Panthers from 2003 to 2007, before joining CNNSI.com as a football analyst.

He joined NFL Media in 2009.

http://www.nflcdn.com/news/author?id=09000d5d80f97bfd

..................

To be fair, he probably hasn't heard of you or me either...

 
I've seen a lot of talk about Brooks having him to GB.  Is that just because it's enticing for fantasy, or because Brooks is particularly well regarded as a draftnik?  Because I'd never heard of him before this, but now everyone is talking about it like he's everyone's favorite mock drafter.
IMO Brooks likes to entice people to click on his mocks. I think a few years ago when Bortles/Bridgewater/Manziel/Carr were all coming out I can still remember a headline that Brooks had NO QB in his first round mock(!) in April. Personally, I think he's guilty of click-baiting in April and while I get a lot out of listening to Daniel Jeremiah I almost never feel like I get anything from listening to Bucky Brooks. I would put absolutely no weight in Brooks going out on a limb on predicting Mixon in the first round. Once the first pick is made during the draft nobody remembers just how wrong these guys are so they may as well be as wildly inaccurate as they want if it drives audience before the draft.

I am bullish on Mixon though. Much more bullish on the talent Mixon has than the accuracy of anything Brooks says.

 
Casserly is media driven. He wants to have people like him and by taking a "stand" he can appeal to those outraged over Mixon and still come across well even when he knows he'll be wrong.

think about it, once Mixon is drafted in the top 2 rounds he can rant about how wrong it was for a team to draft him.  A bunch of people will jump on that bandwagon and agree with him.  

It's a disservice to the community what he is doing, but it gives him a platform to take a stand and look like a good guy.

It's obv totally fake and contrived, but it will work and help him from a media perspective.
I still think he's dumb.

 
They do this every year with a player and I sit back and laugh. Kiper not having Mixon on his draft board earlier is comical.

If Brady were charged with domestic violence does anyone think the Patriots would cut him?

 
 


Oklahoma RB Joe Mixon does not make an appearance in Gil Brandt's top 150 prospects.
There is no mention of why Mixon does not apparently on the list, but we guess it is solely due to the 2014 incident where Mixon punched a female. Brandt is closely connected to the NFL Combine, and Mixon was not invited to the event. Ole Miss' Chad Kelly is also not listed. Brandt's top running back is Leonard Fournette at No. 2 overall.

 
 
Source: NFL.com 
Apr 18 - 9:24 AM




 

 
Profootballtalk's Mike Florio passes along "palpable buzz" that Oklahoma RB Joe Mixon "could linger much longer than expected" in the NFL draft.

Per Florio, "multiple league sources who have investigated the situation believe that Mixon may be waiting beyond round two or three." Another source "suggested" to Florio that "Mixon possibly won't be drafted at all." NFL.com analyst and longtime league insider Gil Brandt recently ranked this year's top-150 draft prospects, and Mixon wasn't included. The draftnik community has seemed convinced Mixon will be drafted early in the second round.
 
 
Profootballtalk's Mike Florio passes along "palpable buzz" that Oklahoma RB Joe Mixon "could linger much longer than expected" in the NFL draft.

Per Florio, "multiple league sources who have investigated the situation believe that Mixon may be waiting beyond round two or three." Another source "suggested" to Florio that "Mixon possibly won't be drafted at all." NFL.com analyst and longtime league insider Gil Brandt recently ranked this year's top-150 draft prospects, and Mixon wasn't included. The draftnik community has seemed convinced Mixon will be drafted early in the second round.
 
I was listening to a week old MTS podcast yesterday where Charles Davis was discussing possibility of Mixon shocking people going in round one and Jeremiah had commented that he felt Tampa was the team to watch but added that he would not be surprised if Mixon went in round one or round 5.

So basically who knows?

Sometimes you hear positive reports that suggest it was a one time incidence and stuff like everyone at OU loves and vouches for him. Then sometimes you hear stuff like Casserly a week or so ago saying something along the lines of it may not be such an isolated incident or there are other character concerns, can't recall exactly but point was he was saying he's hearing there are additional off the field concerns above and beyond the "punch".

Since we don't know this kind of information, we don't know which teams have removed him from their board or lowered him on their board, he's about as big a wild card as I can recall in years but I would be like 10x more shocked if he went undrafted then if he went in round one.

 
I was listening to a week old MTS podcast yesterday where Charles Davis was discussing possibility of Mixon shocking people going in round one and Jeremiah had commented that he felt Tampa was the team to watch but added that he would not be surprised if Mixon went in round one or round 5.

So basically who knows?

Sometimes you hear positive reports that suggest it was a one time incidence and stuff like everyone at OU loves and vouches for him. Then sometimes you hear stuff like Casserly a week or so ago saying something along the lines of it may not be such an isolated incident or there are other character concerns, can't recall exactly but point was he was saying he's hearing there are additional off the field concerns above and beyond the "punch".

Since we don't know this kind of information, we don't know which teams have removed him from their board or lowered him on their board, he's about as big a wild card as I can recall in years but I would be like 10x more shocked if he went undrafted then if he went in round one.
Yeah if there are other things then that is a whole new ball game. A lot of question marks and information that we just don't know. 

I think round 1 is likely based off of one reason: a 5th year option. If he does as well as people feel he could, going round 1 would give his team a 5th year option at an affordable price. Rather than taking him round 2-UDFA where you're stuck paying him his "get rich" contract earlier. Of course, if there are other character concerns this theory goes out the window. 

 
menobrown said:
Sometimes you hear positive reports that suggest it was a one time incidence and stuff like everyone at OU loves and vouches for him. Then sometimes you hear stuff like Casserly a week or so ago saying something along the lines of it may not be such an isolated incident or there are other character concerns, can't recall exactly but point was he was saying he's hearing there are additional off the field concerns above and beyond the "punch".
Maybe none of his teammates went to his birthday party (RED FLAG!).

 
I don't know... color me skeptical. 

It's real easy to come out after the fact and start making claims, especially when a kid is a 5 star athlete and very well might be making some good money some day. 

As the father of two daughters, if some punk threw one of them to the ground and hit them, I'm taking pictures of the injuries and filing a complaint for a police report immediately, which is public record. I'd be raising hell about it until something happened. Since there hasn't been any word of evidence of a police report, I'm calling BS on this story. 

The school may want to protect Mixon. But the police? They have no skin in the game. If there's a complaint filed with evidence of trauma then that's hard to ignore.

A push and a hit could be what we could say Ms. Molitor did to Joe too. 

Yes, with a video showing him hitting a woman and then an alleged complaint that he had done it previously makes it hard to ignore, but the facts just don't seem to add up. This would be public record and we would have heard about it 100 times if this actually happened. There'd likely be picture evidence. 

I agree with Borden though, this guy has 2 strikes... 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I don't know... color me skeptical. 

It's real easy to come out after the fact and start making claims, especially when a kid is a 5 star athlete and very well might be making some good money some day. 
The police were called and the school was involved, these are not just accusations. Mixon can sue this guy for slander if it is not true, then the police report and stuff will come to light. Mixon will not want that. You better believe if a guy is going public right now to slander someone, its probably true. 

I am drooling over Mixons talent and want him badly on my teams, but if he keeps hitting women I will want him in jail. Risk I am worth taking on my fantasy team but not one in real life. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
The police were called and the school was involved, these are not just accusations. Mixon can sue this guy for slander if it is not true, then the police report and stuff will come to light. Mixon will not want that. You better believe if a guy is going public right now to slander someone, its probably true. 
and what would be the father's incentive to come out now? @Dr. Dan implies it's a money grab, but that doesn't make any sense since he went public with the story before the NFL draft so why would Mixon pay him off now?

It's also well past the statue of limitations for any civil action at this point (I'm basing that off of NY's 3 year statue of limitations for a personal injury suit, so perhaps this jurisdiction's is longer but it's doubtful that it hasn't run by now).

 
The police were called and the school was involved, these are not just accusations. Mixon can sue this guy for slander if it is not true, then the police report and stuff will come to light. Mixon will not want that. You better believe if a guy is going public right now to slander someone, its probably true. 

I am drooling over Mixons talent and want him badly on my teams, but if he keeps hitting women I will want him in jail. Risk I am worth taking on my fantasy team but not one in real life. 
Yeah I agree with this. If this is true, which it may be or may not be. Again, I think it's easy to jump to conclusions and believe the first thing your hear. There are two sides to every story and we shouldn't rush to conclusions. I am skeptical, but if it's true then he's another loser that his actions will/could eventually lead to a squandered athletic opportunity. 

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top