Call me Jack because I'm going down with the ship.
Looking good in the preseason and the rest of the RB room is still relatively mediocre.
Rachaad White doesn't get enough credit as an all-around solid 3-down RB. People see his YPC and dismiss him.
If you dig just a little bit, you will see he has had the highest YPC of all TB RB's in each of the last 2 seasons, as crappy as it looks. No TB RB is a threat to Rachaad this year, and his backups will be fighting for scraps.
I actually did a little digging after you prompted me to do such and here's what I found:
2023:
Rachaad White 272 Carries 3.6 YPC
Chase Edmonds 49 Carries 3.6 YPC
Ke'Shawn Vaughn 24 Carries 1.8 YPC
Sean Tucker 15 Carries 1.5 YPC
So for last season, technically Chase Edmonds tied Rachaad White for the highest YPC.
No, they didn't. Rachaad White ran 272 times for 990 yards = 3.64 yards per carry. Chase Edmonds ran 49 times for 176 yards = 3.59 yards per carry. As for Ke'Shawn Vaughn, he's always kind of stunk but I assume his YPC would be higher with more touches as he had a 3.5 YPC the year before.
No, he didn't. The year before, he had 17 carries for 53 yards = 3.1 yards per carry. Sean Tucker had a 1.5 YPC average but it was only on 15 carries and since this is a thread about him, I think it would be silly to try and compare his YPC with White. It's too small of a sample size. Plus, common sense tells us that Tucker isn't a 1.5 YPC guy because well, nobody is a 1.5 YPC guy, lol. Even a bad RB averages at least 3.0 YPC. That looks to be a statistical outlier and a good example of why we throw certain stats away. I'm not saying that Sean Tucker would have a comparable YPC as Rachaad White, what I'm saying is that we know his actual YPC isn't 1.5.
You say we know his actual YPC isn't 1.5, but that makes no sense. In the NFL, he has 15 carries for 23 yards. That comes out to 1.5 yards per carry, so yes, he is, in fact a RB whose YPC is 1.5. He isn't a RB whose YPC is something different.
TLDR: White averaged the same YPC as the RB (Chase Edmonds) with the next highest amount of carries
(WRONG, White's YPC was higher), the other two RB didn't log enough carries individually to be statistically relevant.
And why is that? Because Rachaad White proved to be a solid 3-down RB, so yeah, the team's RB3 and RB4 weren't needed. Also, with their crappy performances in limited opportunities, Vaughn and Tucker proved they weren't needed either. Vaughn moved on to SF this year, and Edmonds/Tucker are still there, but both were leapfrogged by Bucky Irving.
2022:
Leonard Fournette 189 Carries 3.5 YPC
Rachaad White 129 Carries 3.7 YPC
Ke'Shawn Vaughn 17 Carries 3.5 YPC
Giovanni Bernard 8 Carries 3.5 YPC
So definitely, Rachaad White had the highest YPC of this RB group (by 0.2 yards). But it's probably important to note that 2 of the 3 guys he had a high YPC than were no longer in the league the following year (Fournette & Bernard) and Vaughn probably won't be on an active roster this upcoming season.
Wrong again. Fournette played for Buffalo last year. And I wouldn't be surprised to see him in action with another team at some point this year. He's still under 30. I think it would be selling Sean Tucker short to compare him to those guys, his situation is vastly different than a couple of journeyman with one foot out the door.
I'm not comparing Tucker to Fournette and Bernard - I only posted stats from 2 different TB seasons, and both times, White had the HIGHEST yards per carry.
With that said, I do think that Rachaad White has appeal as a non-sexy volume runner, but your statement was a little misleading.
My statements were all facts. Your numbers were flat out wrong. After a little digging, I discovered that that Rachaad White had the highest YPC amongst a couple of guys who were in their final season in 2022
(WRONG) and tied with Chase Edmonds from last year
(once again, WRONG). The reason I think there is potential with Sean Tucker is because:
1.) Sean Tucker was expected to be a 2nd - 4th Round Pick by many people before his heart condition caused him to go undrafted.
So, you're saying he has potential because he has a bad heart?
2.) Runningbacks get hurt, especially ones who see high volume like Rachaad White (he had the 5th most touches in the league at RB last season).
This I agree with. Tucker has a shot at some volume if all the RB's in front of him get hurt.
3.) Sean Tucker hasn't really had opportunity to prove himself. 15 carries is meaningless to me, he might as well have 0.
15 carries wouldn't have been meaningless if he did something with them.
4.) Rachaad White will be a free agent after the 2025 season, this would be around the time you would be grooming his replacement.
First, I only play redraft, so future years are unimportant. But as you said, Rachaad should be the starter for the next 2 seasons. And TB drafted Bucky Irving, who is already listed as the RB2 on the depth chart. He is Rachaad's replacement; not Sean Tucker.
5.) The NFL stands for "not for long".
Especially for undrafted guys with heart conditions who have a lifetime 1.5 YPC.